[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/AnyEvent-MP/MP.pm

Comparing AnyEvent-MP/MP.pm (file contents):
Revision 1.98 by root, Fri Oct 2 13:31:15 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 1.99 by root, Fri Oct 2 14:12:16 2009 UTC

 =item * Node IDs are arbitrary strings in AEMP.
 Erlang relies on special naming and DNS to work everywhere in the same
 way. AEMP relies on each node somehow knowing its own address(es) (e.g. by
-configuration or DNS), but will otherwise discover other odes itself.
+configuration or DNS), and possibly the addresses of some seed nodes, but
+will otherwise discover other nodes (and their IDs) itself.
 =item * Erlang has a "remote ports are like local ports" philosophy, AEMP
 uses "local ports are like remote ports".
 The failure modes for local ports are quite different (runtime errors
 so does not need a queue that can overflow). AEMP sends are immediate,
 connection establishment is handled in the background.
 =item * Erlang suffers from silent message loss, AEMP does not.
-Erlang makes few guarantees on messages delivery - messages can get lost
+Erlang implements few guarantees on messages delivery - messages can get
-without any of the processes realising it (i.e. you send messages a, b,
+lost without any of the processes realising it (i.e. you send messages a,
-and c, and the other side only receives messages a and c).
+b, and c, and the other side only receives messages a and c).
 AEMP guarantees correct ordering, and the guarantee that after one message
 is lost, all following ones sent to the same port are lost as well, until
 monitoring raises an error, so there are no silent "holes" in the message
 sequence.

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines