--- AnyEvent/README 2007/11/09 19:37:05 1.12 +++ AnyEvent/README 2008/04/07 19:46:50 1.14 @@ -18,6 +18,48 @@ $w->wait; # enters "main loop" till $condvar gets ->broadcast $w->broadcast; # wake up current and all future wait's +WHY YOU SHOULD USE THIS MODULE (OR NOT) + Glib, POE, IO::Async, Event... CPAN offers event models by the dozen + nowadays. So what is different about AnyEvent? + + Executive Summary: AnyEvent is *compatible*, AnyEvent is *free of + policy* and AnyEvent is *small and efficient*. + + First and foremost, *AnyEvent is not an event model* itself, it only + interfaces to whatever event model the main program happens to use in a + pragmatic way. For event models and certain classes of immortals alike, + the statement "there can only be one" is a bitter reality, and AnyEvent + helps hiding the differences. + + The goal of AnyEvent is to offer module authors the ability to do event + programming (waiting for I/O or timer events) without subscribing to a + religion, a way of living, and most importantly: without forcing your + module users into the same thing by forcing them to use the same event + model you use. + + For modules like POE or IO::Async (which is actually doing all I/O + *synchronously*...), using them in your module is like joining a cult: + After you joined, you are dependent on them and you cannot use anything + else, as it is simply incompatible to everything that isn't itself. + + AnyEvent + POE works fine. AnyEvent + Glib works fine. AnyEvent + Tk + works fine etc. etc. but none of these work together with the rest: POE + + IO::Async? no go. Tk + Event? no go. If your module uses one of those, + every user of your module has to use it, too. If your module uses + AnyEvent, it works transparently with all event models it supports + (including stuff like POE and IO::Async). + + In addition of being free of having to use *the one and only true event + model*, AnyEvent also is free of bloat and policy: with POE or similar + modules, you get an enourmous amount of code and strict rules you have + to follow. AnyEvent, on the other hand, is lean and to the point by only + offering the functionality that is useful, in as thin as a wrapper as + technically possible. + + Of course, if you want lots of policy (this can arguably be somewhat + useful) and you want to force your users to use the one and only event + model, you should *not* use this module. + DESCRIPTION AnyEvent provides an identical interface to multiple event loops. This allows module authors to utilise an event loop without forcing module @@ -67,7 +109,7 @@ "fh" the Perl *filehandle* (not filedescriptor) to watch for events. "poll" must be a string that is either "r" or "w", that creates a - watcher waiting for "r"eadable or "w"ritable events. "cb" teh callback + watcher waiting for "r"eadable or "w"ritable events. "cb" the callback to invoke everytime the filehandle becomes ready. Only one io watcher per "fh" and "poll" combination is allowed (i.e. on @@ -105,7 +147,7 @@ }); # to cancel the timer: - undef $w + undef $w; CONDITION WATCHERS Condition watchers can be created by calling the "AnyEvent->condvar" @@ -114,6 +156,12 @@ A condition watcher watches for a condition - precisely that the "->broadcast" method has been called. + Note that condition watchers recurse into the event loop - if you have + two watchers that call "->wait" in a round-robbin fashion, you lose. + Therefore, condition watchers are good to export to your caller, but you + should avoid making a blocking wait, at least in callbacks, as this + usually asks for trouble. + The watcher has only two methods: $cv->wait @@ -183,7 +231,7 @@ AnyEvent::Impl::CoroEV based on Coro::EV, best choice. AnyEvent::Impl::EV based on EV (an interface to libev, also best choice). - AnyEvent::Impl::Coro based on Coro::Event, second best choice. + AnyEvent::Impl::CoroEvent based on Coro::Event, second best choice. AnyEvent::Impl::Event based on Event, also second best choice :) AnyEvent::Impl::Glib based on Glib, second-best choice. AnyEvent::Impl::Tk based on Tk, very bad choice.