| … | |
… | |
| 1131 | *destroy* is the time, in microseconds, that it takes to destroy a |
1131 | *destroy* is the time, in microseconds, that it takes to destroy a |
| 1132 | single watcher. |
1132 | single watcher. |
| 1133 | |
1133 | |
| 1134 | Results |
1134 | Results |
| 1135 | name watchers bytes create invoke destroy comment |
1135 | name watchers bytes create invoke destroy comment |
| 1136 | EV/EV 400000 244 0.56 0.46 0.31 EV native interface |
1136 | EV/EV 400000 224 0.47 0.35 0.27 EV native interface |
| 1137 | EV/Any 100000 244 2.50 0.46 0.29 EV + AnyEvent watchers |
1137 | EV/Any 100000 224 2.88 0.34 0.27 EV + AnyEvent watchers |
| 1138 | CoroEV/Any 100000 244 2.49 0.44 0.29 coroutines + Coro::Signal |
1138 | CoroEV/Any 100000 224 2.85 0.35 0.28 coroutines + Coro::Signal |
| 1139 | Perl/Any 100000 513 4.92 0.87 1.12 pure perl implementation |
1139 | Perl/Any 100000 452 4.14 0.75 0.99 pure perl implementation |
| 1140 | Event/Event 16000 516 31.88 31.30 0.85 Event native interface |
1140 | Event/Event 16000 517 32.20 31.80 0.81 Event native interface |
| 1141 | Event/Any 16000 590 35.75 31.42 1.08 Event + AnyEvent watchers |
1141 | Event/Any 16000 590 35.85 31.55 1.06 Event + AnyEvent watchers |
| 1142 | Glib/Any 16000 1357 98.22 12.41 54.00 quadratic behaviour |
1142 | Glib/Any 16000 1357 102.33 12.31 51.00 quadratic behaviour |
| 1143 | Tk/Any 2000 1860 26.97 67.98 14.00 SEGV with >> 2000 watchers |
1143 | Tk/Any 2000 1860 27.20 66.31 14.00 SEGV with >> 2000 watchers |
| 1144 | POE/Event 2000 6644 108.64 736.02 14.73 via POE::Loop::Event |
1144 | POE/Event 2000 6328 109.99 751.67 14.02 via POE::Loop::Event |
| 1145 | POE/Select 2000 6343 94.13 809.12 565.96 via POE::Loop::Select |
1145 | POE/Select 2000 6027 94.54 809.13 579.80 via POE::Loop::Select |
| 1146 | |
1146 | |
| 1147 | Discussion |
1147 | Discussion |
| 1148 | The benchmark does *not* measure scalability of the event loop very |
1148 | The benchmark does *not* measure scalability of the event loop very |
| 1149 | well. For example, a select-based event loop (such as the pure perl one) |
1149 | well. For example, a select-based event loop (such as the pure perl one) |
| 1150 | can never compete with an event loop that uses epoll when the number of |
1150 | can never compete with an event loop that uses epoll when the number of |
