--- AnyEvent/lib/AnyEvent.pm 2008/04/25 07:47:22 1.74 +++ AnyEvent/lib/AnyEvent.pm 2008/04/25 13:05:17 1.81 @@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ During the first call of any watcher-creation method, the module tries to detect the currently loaded event loop by probing whether one of the following modules is already loaded: L, L, L, -L, L, L, L, L, L, +L, L, L, L, L, L, L. The first one found is used. If none are found, the module tries -to load these modules (excluding Event::Lib, Qt and POE as the pure perl +to load these modules (excluding Tk, Event::Lib, Qt and POE as the pure perl adaptor should always succeed) in the order given. The first one that can be successfully loaded will be used. If, after this, still none could be found, AnyEvent will fall back to a pure-perl event loop, which is not @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ my variables are only visible after the statement in which they are declared. -=head2 IO WATCHERS +=head2 I/O WATCHERS You can create an I/O watcher by calling the C<< AnyEvent->io >> method with the following mandatory key-value pairs as arguments: @@ -361,8 +361,8 @@ AnyEvent::Impl::EV based on EV (an interface to libev, best choice). AnyEvent::Impl::Event based on Event, second best choice. AnyEvent::Impl::Glib based on Glib, third-best choice. - AnyEvent::Impl::Tk based on Tk, very bad choice. AnyEvent::Impl::Perl pure-perl implementation, inefficient but portable. + AnyEvent::Impl::Tk based on Tk, very bad choice. AnyEvent::Impl::Qt based on Qt, cannot be autoprobed (see its docs). AnyEvent::Impl::EventLib based on Event::Lib, leaks memory and worse. AnyEvent::Impl::POE based on POE, not generic enough for full support. @@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ =head1 EXAMPLE PROGRAM -The following program uses an IO watcher to read data from STDIN, a timer +The following program uses an I/O watcher to read data from STDIN, a timer to display a message once per second, and a condition variable to quit the program when the user enters quit: @@ -869,10 +869,15 @@ over the event loops themselves (and to give you an impression of the speed of various event loops), here is a benchmark of various supported event models natively and with anyevent. The benchmark creates a lot of -timers (with a zero timeout) and io watchers (watching STDOUT, a pty, to +timers (with a zero timeout) and I/O watchers (watching STDOUT, a pty, to become writable, which it is), lets them fire exactly once and destroys them again. +Rewriting the benchmark to use many different sockets instead of using +the same filehandle for all I/O watchers results in a much longer runtime +(socket creation is expensive), but qualitatively the same figures, so it +was not used. + =head2 Explanation of the columns I is the number of event watchers created/destroyed. Since @@ -901,38 +906,40 @@ =head2 Results - name watcher bytes create invoke destroy comment - EV/EV 400000 244 0.56 0.46 0.31 EV native interface - EV/Any 100000 610 3.52 0.91 0.75 EV + AnyEvent watchers - CoroEV/Any 100000 610 3.49 0.92 0.75 coroutines + Coro::Signal - Perl/Any 16000 654 4.64 1.22 0.77 pure perl implementation - Event/Event 16000 523 28.05 21.38 0.86 Event native interface - Event/Any 16000 943 34.43 20.48 1.39 Event + AnyEvent watchers - Glib/Any 16000 1357 96.99 12.55 55.51 quadratic behaviour - Tk/Any 2000 1855 27.01 66.61 14.03 SEGV with >> 2000 watchers - POE/Event 2000 6644 108.15 768.19 14.33 via POE::Loop::Event - POE/Select 2000 6343 94.69 807.65 562.69 via POE::Loop::Select + name watchers bytes create invoke destroy comment + EV/EV 400000 244 0.56 0.46 0.31 EV native interface + EV/Any 100000 610 3.52 0.91 0.75 EV + AnyEvent watchers + CoroEV/Any 100000 610 3.49 0.92 0.75 coroutines + Coro::Signal + Perl/Any 100000 513 4.91 0.92 1.15 pure perl implementation + Event/Event 16000 523 28.05 21.38 0.86 Event native interface + Event/Any 16000 943 34.43 20.48 1.39 Event + AnyEvent watchers + Glib/Any 16000 1357 96.99 12.55 55.51 quadratic behaviour + Tk/Any 2000 1855 27.01 66.61 14.03 SEGV with >> 2000 watchers + POE/Event 2000 6644 108.15 768.19 14.33 via POE::Loop::Event + POE/Select 2000 6343 94.69 807.65 562.69 via POE::Loop::Select =head2 Discussion The benchmark does I measure scalability of the event loop very well. For example, a select-based event loop (such as the pure perl one) can never compete with an event loop that uses epoll when the number of -file descriptors grows high. In this benchmark, only a single filehandle -is used (although some of the AnyEvent adaptors dup() its file descriptor -to worka round bugs). +file descriptors grows high. In this benchmark, all events become ready at +the same time, so select/poll-based implementations get an unnatural speed +boost. C is the sole leader regarding speed and memory use, which are both -maximal/minimal, respectively. Even when going through AnyEvent, there is -only one event loop that uses less memory (the C module natively), and -no faster event model, not event C natively. +maximal/minimal, respectively. Even when going through AnyEvent, there are +only two event loops that use slightly less memory (the C module +natively and the pure perl backend), and no faster event models, not even +C natively. The pure perl implementation is hit in a few sweet spots (both the zero timeout and the use of a single fd hit optimisations in the perl -interpreter and the backend itself). Nevertheless tis shows that it -adds very little overhead in itself. Like any select-based backend its -performance becomes really bad with lots of file descriptors, of course, -but this was not subjetc of this benchmark. +interpreter and the backend itself, and all watchers become ready at the +same time). Nevertheless this shows that it adds very little overhead in +itself. Like any select-based backend its performance becomes really bad +with lots of file descriptors (and few of them active), of course, but +this was not subject of this benchmark. The C module has a relatively high setup and callback invocation cost, but overall scores on the third place. @@ -957,7 +964,7 @@ select-based backend or the Event module) shows abysmal performance and memory usage: Watchers use almost 30 times as much memory as EV watchers, and 10 times as much memory as both Event or EV via AnyEvent. Watcher -invocation is almost 700 times slower than with AnyEvent's pure perl +invocation is almost 900 times slower than with AnyEvent's pure perl implementation. The design of the POE adaptor class in AnyEvent can not really account for this, as session creation overhead is small compared to execution of the state machine, which is coded pretty optimally within