[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/Coro/Coro.pm

Comparing Coro/Coro.pm (file contents):
Revision 1.181 by root, Fri May 9 22:04:37 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 1.206 by root, Thu Oct 30 09:57:00 2008 UTC

   cede; # yield to coroutine
   print "3\n";
   cede; # and again
   # use locking
+  use Coro::Semaphore;
   my $lock = new Coro::Semaphore;
   my $locked;
   $lock->down;
   $locked = 1;
 parallel access are rarely an issue, making coroutine programming much
 safer and easier than threads programming.
 Unlike a normal perl program, however, coroutines allow you to have
 multiple running interpreters that share data, which is especially useful
-to code pseudo-parallel processes, such as multiple HTTP-GET requests
+to code pseudo-parallel processes and for event-based programming, such as
-running concurrently.
+multiple HTTP-GET requests running concurrently. See L<Coro::AnyEvent> to
+learn more.
 Coroutines are also useful because Perl has no support for threads (the so
 called "threads" that perl offers are nothing more than the (bad) process
 emulation coming from the Windows platform: On standard operating systems
 they serve no purpose whatsoever, except by making your programs slow and
 our $idle;    # idle handler
 our $main;    # main coroutine
 our $current; # current coroutine
-our $VERSION = 4.6;
+our $VERSION = 4.802;
 our @EXPORT = qw(async async_pool cede schedule terminate current unblock_sub);
 our %EXPORT_TAGS = (
       prio => [qw(PRIO_MAX PRIO_HIGH PRIO_NORMAL PRIO_LOW PRIO_IDLE PRIO_MIN)],
 );
 =item $Coro::main
 This variable stores the coroutine object that represents the main
 program. While you cna C<ready> it and do most other things you can do to
 coroutines, it is mainly useful to compare again C<$Coro::current>, to see
-wether you are running in the main program or not.
+whether you are running in the main program or not.
 =cut
 $main = new Coro;
 terminate or join on it (although you are allowed to), and you get a
 coroutine that might have executed other code already (which can be good
 or bad :).
 On the plus side, this function is faster than creating (and destroying)
-a completely new coroutine, so if you need a lot of generic coroutines in
+a completly new coroutine, so if you need a lot of generic coroutines in
 quick successsion, use C<async_pool>, not C<async>.
 The code block is executed in an C<eval> context and a warning will be
 issued in case of an exception instead of terminating the program, as
 C<async> does. As the coroutine is being reused, stuff like C<on_destroy>
 The priority will be reset to C<0> after each run, tracing will be
 disabled, the description will be reset and the default output filehandle
 gets restored, so you can change all these. Otherwise the coroutine will
 be re-used "as-is": most notably if you change other per-coroutine global
-stuff such as C<$/> you I<must needs> to revert that change, which is most
+stuff such as C<$/> you I<must needs> revert that change, which is most
-simply done by using local as in: C< local $/ >.
+simply done by using local as in: C<< local $/ >>.
-The pool size is limited to C<8> idle coroutines (this can be adjusted by
+The idle pool size is limited to C<8> idle coroutines (this can be
-changing $Coro::POOL_SIZE), and there can be as many non-idle coros as
+adjusted by changing $Coro::POOL_SIZE), but there can be as many non-idle
-required.
+coros as required.
 If you are concerned about pooled coroutines growing a lot because a
 single C<async_pool> used a lot of stackspace you can e.g. C<async_pool
 { terminate }> once per second or so to slowly replenish the pool. In
 addition to that, when the stacks used by a handler grows larger than 16kb
             _pool_2 $cb;
             &schedule;
          }
       };
+      if ($@) {
-      last if $@ eq "\3async_pool terminate\2\n";
+         last if $@ eq "\3async_pool terminate\2\n";
-      warn $@ if $@;
+         warn $@;
+      }
    }
 }
 sub async_pool(&@) {
    # this is also inlined into the unlock_scheduler
 This makes C<schedule> I<the> generic method to use to block the current
 coroutine and wait for events: first you remember the current coroutine in
 a variable, then arrange for some callback of yours to call C<< ->ready
 >> on that once some event happens, and last you call C<schedule> to put
 yourself to sleep. Note that a lot of things can wake your coroutine up,
-so you need to check wether the event indeed happened, e.g. by storing the
+so you need to check whether the event indeed happened, e.g. by storing the
 status in a variable.
 The canonical way to wait on external events is this:
    {
 Kills/terminates/cancels all coroutines except the currently running
 one. This is useful after a fork, either in the child or the parent, as
 usually only one of them should inherit the running coroutines.
 Note that while this will try to free some of the main programs resources,
-you cnanot free all of them, so if a coroutine that is not the main
+you cannot free all of them, so if a coroutine that is not the main
 program calls this function, there will be some one-time resource leak.
 =cut
 sub terminate {
 once all the coroutines of higher priority and all coroutines of the same
 priority that were put into the ready queue earlier have been resumed.
 =item $is_ready = $coroutine->is_ready
-Return wether the coroutine is currently the ready queue or not,
+Return whether the coroutine is currently the ready queue or not,
 =item $coroutine->cancel (arg...)
 Terminates the given coroutine and makes it return the given arguments as
 status (default: the empty list). Never returns if the coroutine is the
 creating event callbacks that want to block.
 If your handler does not plan to block (e.g. simply sends a message to
 another coroutine, or puts some other coroutine into the ready queue),
 there is no reason to use C<unblock_sub>.
+Note that you also need to use C<unblock_sub> for any other callbacks that
+are indirectly executed by any C-based event loop. For example, when you
+use a module that uses L<AnyEvent> (and you use L<Coro::AnyEvent>) and it
+provides callbacks that are the result of some event callback, then you
+must not block either, or use C<unblock_sub>.
 =cut
 our @unblock_queue;

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing Coro/Coro.pm (file contents): Revision 1.181 by root, Fri May 9 22:04:37 2008 UTC vs. Revision 1.206 by root, Thu Oct 30 09:57:00 2008 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing Coro/Coro.pm (file contents):
Revision 1.181 by root, Fri May 9 22:04:37 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 1.206 by root, Thu Oct 30 09:57:00 2008 UTC