[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/Coro/Coro.pm

Comparing Coro/Coro.pm (file contents):
Revision 1.148 by root, Fri Oct 5 20:11:25 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.274 by root, Sat Dec 12 01:30:26 2009 UTC

…		…
1	=head1 NAME	1	=head1 NAME
2		2
3	Coro - coroutine process abstraction	3	Coro - the only real threads in perl
4		4
5	=head1 SYNOPSIS	5	=head1 SYNOPSIS
6		6
7	use Coro;	7	use Coro;
8		8
9	async {	9	async {
10	# some asynchronous thread of execution	10	# some asynchronous thread of execution
		11	print "2\n";
		12	cede; # yield back to main
		13	print "4\n";
11	};	14	};
12		15	print "1\n";
13	# alternatively create an async coroutine like this:	16	cede; # yield to coro
14		17	print "3\n";
15	sub some_func : Coro {	18	cede; # and again
16	# some more async code	19
17	}	20	# use locking
18		21	use Coro::Semaphore;
19	cede;	22	my $lock = new Coro::Semaphore;
		23	my $locked;
		24
		25	$lock->down;
		26	$locked = 1;
		27	$lock->up;
20		28
21	=head1 DESCRIPTION	29	=head1 DESCRIPTION
22		30
23	This module collection manages coroutines. Coroutines are similar	31	For a tutorial-style introduction, please read the L<Coro::Intro>
24	to threads but don't run in parallel at the same time even on SMP	32	manpage. This manpage mainly contains reference information.
25	machines. The specific flavor of coroutine used in this module also
26	guarantees you that it will not switch between coroutines unless
27	necessary, at easily-identified points in your program, so locking and
28	parallel access are rarely an issue, making coroutine programming much
29	safer than threads programming.
30		33
31	(Perl, however, does not natively support real threads but instead does a	34	This module collection manages continuations in general, most often in
32	very slow and memory-intensive emulation of processes using threads. This	35	the form of cooperative threads (also called coros, or simply "coro"
33	is a performance win on Windows machines, and a loss everywhere else).	36	in the documentation). They are similar to kernel threads but don't (in
		37	general) run in parallel at the same time even on SMP machines. The
		38	specific flavor of thread offered by this module also guarantees you that
		39	it will not switch between threads unless necessary, at easily-identified
		40	points in your program, so locking and parallel access are rarely an
		41	issue, making thread programming much safer and easier than using other
		42	thread models.
34		43
		44	Unlike the so-called "Perl threads" (which are not actually real threads
		45	but only the windows process emulation (see section of same name for more
		46	details) ported to unix, and as such act as processes), Coro provides
		47	a full shared address space, which makes communication between threads
		48	very easy. And Coro's threads are fast, too: disabling the Windows
		49	process emulation code in your perl and using Coro can easily result in
		50	a two to four times speed increase for your programs. A parallel matrix
		51	multiplication benchmark runs over 300 times faster on a single core than
		52	perl's pseudo-threads on a quad core using all four cores.
		53
		54	Coro achieves that by supporting multiple running interpreters that share
		55	data, which is especially useful to code pseudo-parallel processes and
		56	for event-based programming, such as multiple HTTP-GET requests running
		57	concurrently. See L<Coro::AnyEvent> to learn more on how to integrate Coro
		58	into an event-based environment.
		59
35	In this module, coroutines are defined as "callchain + lexical variables +	60	In this module, a thread is defined as "callchain + lexical variables +
36	@_ + $_ + $@ + $/ + C stack), that is, a coroutine has its own callchain,	61	some package variables + C stack), that is, a thread has its own callchain,
37	its own set of lexicals and its own set of perls most important global	62	its own set of lexicals and its own set of perls most important global
38	variables.	63	variables (see L<Coro::State> for more configuration and background info).
		64
		65	See also the C<SEE ALSO> section at the end of this document - the Coro
		66	module family is quite large.
39		67
40	=cut	68	=cut
41		69
42	package Coro;	70	package Coro;
43		71
44	use strict;	72	use common::sense;
45	no warnings "uninitialized";	73
		74	use Carp ();
		75
		76	use Guard ();
46		77
47	use Coro::State;	78	use Coro::State;
48		79
49	use base qw(Coro::State Exporter);	80	use base qw(Coro::State Exporter);
50		81
51	our $idle; # idle handler	82	our $idle; # idle handler
52	our $main; # main coroutine	83	our $main; # main coro
53	our $current; # current coroutine	84	our $current; # current coro
54		85
55	our $VERSION = '4.01';	86	our $VERSION = 5.21;
56		87
57	our @EXPORT = qw(async async_pool cede schedule terminate current unblock_sub);	88	our @EXPORT = qw(async async_pool cede schedule terminate current unblock_sub rouse_cb rouse_wait);
58	our %EXPORT_TAGS = (	89	our %EXPORT_TAGS = (
59	prio => [qw(PRIO_MAX PRIO_HIGH PRIO_NORMAL PRIO_LOW PRIO_IDLE PRIO_MIN)],	90	prio => [qw(PRIO_MAX PRIO_HIGH PRIO_NORMAL PRIO_LOW PRIO_IDLE PRIO_MIN)],
60	);	91	);
61	our @EXPORT_OK = (@{$EXPORT_TAGS{prio}}, qw(nready));	92	our @EXPORT_OK = (@{$EXPORT_TAGS{prio}}, qw(nready));
62		93
63	{	94	=head1 GLOBAL VARIABLES
64	my @async;
65	my $init;
66
67	# this way of handling attributes simply is NOT scalable ;()
68	sub import {
69	no strict 'refs';
70
71	Coro->export_to_level (1, @_);
72
73	my $old = *{(caller)[0]."::MODIFY_CODE_ATTRIBUTES"}{CODE};
74	*{(caller)[0]."::MODIFY_CODE_ATTRIBUTES"} = sub {
75	my ($package, $ref) = (shift, shift);
76	my @attrs;
77	for (@_) {
78	if ($_ eq "Coro") {
79	push @async, $ref;
80	unless ($init++) {
81	eval q{
82	sub INIT {
83	&async(pop @async) while @async;
84	}
85	};
86	}
87	} else {
88	push @attrs, $_;
89	}
90	}
91	return $old ? $old->($package, $ref, @attrs) : @attrs;
92	};
93	}
94
95	}
96		95
97	=over 4	96	=over 4
98		97
99	=item $main	98	=item $Coro::main
100		99
101	This coroutine represents the main program.	100	This variable stores the Coro object that represents the main
		101	program. While you cna C<ready> it and do most other things you can do to
		102	coro, it is mainly useful to compare again C<$Coro::current>, to see
		103	whether you are running in the main program or not.
102		104
103	=cut	105	=cut
104		106
105	$main = new Coro;	107	# $main is now being initialised by Coro::State
106		108
107	=item $current (or as function: current)	109	=item $Coro::current
108		110
109	The current coroutine (the last coroutine switched to). The initial value	111	The Coro object representing the current coro (the last
		112	coro that the Coro scheduler switched to). The initial value is
110	is C<$main> (of course).	113	C<$Coro::main> (of course).
111		114
112	This variable is B<strictly> I<read-only>. It is provided for performance	115	This variable is B<strictly> I<read-only>. You can take copies of the
113	reasons. If performance is not essential you are encouraged to use the	116	value stored in it and use it as any other Coro object, but you must
114	C<Coro::current> function instead.	117	not otherwise modify the variable itself.
115		118
116	=cut	119	=cut
117		120
118	$main->{desc} = "[main::]";
119
120	# maybe some other module used Coro::Specific before...
121	$main->{_specific} = $current->{_specific}
122	if $current;
123
124	_set_current $main;
125
126	sub current() { $current }	121	sub current() { $current } # [DEPRECATED]
127		122
128	=item $idle	123	=item $Coro::idle
129		124
130	A callback that is called whenever the scheduler finds no ready coroutines	125	This variable is mainly useful to integrate Coro into event loops. It is
		126	usually better to rely on L<Coro::AnyEvent> or L<Coro::EV>, as this is
		127	pretty low-level functionality.
		128
		129	This variable stores a Coro object that is put into the ready queue when
		130	there are no other ready threads (without invoking any ready hooks).
		131
131	to run. The default implementation prints "FATAL: deadlock detected" and	132	The default implementation dies with "FATAL: deadlock detected.", followed
132	exits, because the program has no other way to continue.	133	by a thread listing, because the program has no other way to continue.
133		134
134	This hook is overwritten by modules such as C<Coro::Timer> and	135	This hook is overwritten by modules such as C<Coro::EV> and
135	C<Coro::Event> to wait on an external event that hopefully wake up a	136	C<Coro::AnyEvent> to wait on an external event that hopefully wake up a
136	coroutine so the scheduler can run it.	137	coro so the scheduler can run it.
137		138
138	Please note that if your callback recursively invokes perl (e.g. for event	139	See L<Coro::EV> or L<Coro::AnyEvent> for examples of using this technique.
139	handlers), then it must be prepared to be called recursively.
140		140
141	=cut	141	=cut
142		142
143	$idle = sub {	143	$idle = new Coro sub {
144	require Carp;	144	require Coro::Debug;
145	Carp::croak ("FATAL: deadlock detected");	145	die "FATAL: deadlock detected.\n"
		146	. Coro::Debug::ps_listing ();
146	};	147	};
147		148
148	sub _cancel {
149	my ($self) = @_;
150
151	# free coroutine data and mark as destructed
152	$self->_destroy
153	or return;
154
155	# call all destruction callbacks
156	$_->(@{$self->{_status}})
157	for @{(delete $self->{_on_destroy}) \|\| []};
158	}
159
160	# this coroutine is necessary because a coroutine	149	# this coro is necessary because a coro
161	# cannot destroy itself.	150	# cannot destroy itself.
162	my @destroy;	151	our @destroy;
163	my $manager;	152	our $manager;
164		153
165	$manager = new Coro sub {	154	$manager = new Coro sub {
166	while () {	155	while () {
167	(shift @destroy)->_cancel	156	Coro::State::cancel shift @destroy
168	while @destroy;	157	while @destroy;
169		158
170	&schedule;	159	&schedule;
171	}	160	}
172	};	161	};
173	$manager->desc ("[coro manager]");	162	$manager->{desc} = "[coro manager]";
174	$manager->prio (PRIO_MAX);	163	$manager->prio (PRIO_MAX);
175		164
176	# static methods. not really.
177
178	=back	165	=back
179		166
180	=head2 STATIC METHODS	167	=head1 SIMPLE CORO CREATION
181
182	Static methods are actually functions that operate on the current coroutine only.
183		168
184	=over 4	169	=over 4
185		170
186	=item async { ... } [@args...]	171	=item async { ... } [@args...]
187		172
188	Create a new asynchronous coroutine and return it's coroutine object	173	Create a new coro and return its Coro object (usually
189	(usually unused). When the sub returns the new coroutine is automatically	174	unused). The coro will be put into the ready queue, so
		175	it will start running automatically on the next scheduler run.
		176
		177	The first argument is a codeblock/closure that should be executed in the
		178	coro. When it returns argument returns the coro is automatically
190	terminated.	179	terminated.
191		180
		181	The remaining arguments are passed as arguments to the closure.
		182
192	See the C<Coro::State::new> constructor for info about the coroutine	183	See the C<Coro::State::new> constructor for info about the coro
193	environment.	184	environment in which coro are executed.
194		185
195	Calling C<exit> in a coroutine will do the same as calling exit outside	186	Calling C<exit> in a coro will do the same as calling exit outside
196	the coroutine. Likewise, when the coroutine dies, the program will exit,	187	the coro. Likewise, when the coro dies, the program will exit,
197	just as it would in the main program.	188	just as it would in the main program.
198		189
		190	If you do not want that, you can provide a default C<die> handler, or
		191	simply avoid dieing (by use of C<eval>).
		192
199	# create a new coroutine that just prints its arguments	193	Example: Create a new coro that just prints its arguments.
		194
200	async {	195	async {
201	print "@_\n";	196	print "@_\n";
202	} 1,2,3,4;	197	} 1,2,3,4;
203		198
204	=cut
205
206	sub async(&@) {
207	my $coro = new Coro @_;
208	$coro->ready;
209	$coro
210	}
211
212	=item async_pool { ... } [@args...]	199	=item async_pool { ... } [@args...]
213		200
214	Similar to C<async>, but uses a coroutine pool, so you should not call	201	Similar to C<async>, but uses a coro pool, so you should not call
215	terminate or join (although you are allowed to), and you get a coroutine	202	terminate or join on it (although you are allowed to), and you get a
216	that might have executed other code already (which can be good or bad :).	203	coro that might have executed other code already (which can be good
		204	or bad :).
217		205
		206	On the plus side, this function is about twice as fast as creating (and
		207	destroying) a completely new coro, so if you need a lot of generic
		208	coros in quick successsion, use C<async_pool>, not C<async>.
		209
218	Also, the block is executed in an C<eval> context and a warning will be	210	The code block is executed in an C<eval> context and a warning will be
219	issued in case of an exception instead of terminating the program, as	211	issued in case of an exception instead of terminating the program, as
220	C<async> does. As the coroutine is being reused, stuff like C<on_destroy>	212	C<async> does. As the coro is being reused, stuff like C<on_destroy>
221	will not work in the expected way, unless you call terminate or cancel,	213	will not work in the expected way, unless you call terminate or cancel,
222	which somehow defeats the purpose of pooling.	214	which somehow defeats the purpose of pooling (but is fine in the
		215	exceptional case).
223		216
224	The priority will be reset to C<0> after each job, tracing will be	217	The priority will be reset to C<0> after each run, tracing will be
225	disabled, the description will be reset and the default output filehandle	218	disabled, the description will be reset and the default output filehandle
226	gets restored, so you can change alkl these. Otherwise the coroutine will	219	gets restored, so you can change all these. Otherwise the coro will
227	be re-used "as-is": most notably if you change other per-coroutine global	220	be re-used "as-is": most notably if you change other per-coro global
228	stuff such as C<$/> you need to revert that change, which is most simply	221	stuff such as C<$/> you I<must needs> revert that change, which is most
229	done by using local as in C< local $/ >.	222	simply done by using local as in: C<< local $/ >>.
230		223
231	The pool size is limited to 8 idle coroutines (this can be adjusted by	224	The idle pool size is limited to C<8> idle coros (this can be
232	changing $Coro::POOL_SIZE), and there can be as many non-idle coros as	225	adjusted by changing $Coro::POOL_SIZE), but there can be as many non-idle
233	required.	226	coros as required.
234		227
235	If you are concerned about pooled coroutines growing a lot because a	228	If you are concerned about pooled coros growing a lot because a
236	single C<async_pool> used a lot of stackspace you can e.g. C<async_pool	229	single C<async_pool> used a lot of stackspace you can e.g. C<async_pool
237	{ terminate }> once per second or so to slowly replenish the pool. In	230	{ terminate }> once per second or so to slowly replenish the pool. In
238	addition to that, when the stacks used by a handler grows larger than 16kb	231	addition to that, when the stacks used by a handler grows larger than 32kb
239	(adjustable with $Coro::POOL_RSS) it will also exit.	232	(adjustable via $Coro::POOL_RSS) it will also be destroyed.
240		233
241	=cut	234	=cut
242		235
243	our $POOL_SIZE = 8;	236	our $POOL_SIZE = 8;
244	our $POOL_RSS = 16 * 1024;	237	our $POOL_RSS = 32 * 1024;
245	our @async_pool;	238	our @async_pool;
246		239
247	sub pool_handler {	240	sub pool_handler {
248	my $cb;
249
250	while () {	241	while () {
251	eval {	242	eval {
252	while () {	243	&{&_pool_handler} while 1;
253	_pool_1 $cb;
254	&$cb;
255	_pool_2 $cb;
256	&schedule;
257	}
258	};	244	};
259		245
260	last if $@ eq "\3terminate\2\n";
261	warn $@ if $@;	246	warn $@ if $@;
262	}	247	}
263	}	248	}
264		249
265	sub async_pool(&@) {	250	=back
266	# this is also inlined into the unlock_scheduler
267	my $coro = (pop @async_pool) \|\| new Coro \&pool_handler;
268		251
269	$coro->{_invoke} = [@_];	252	=head1 STATIC METHODS
270	$coro->ready;
271		253
272	$coro	254	Static methods are actually functions that implicitly operate on the
273	}	255	current coro.
		256
		257	=over 4
274		258
275	=item schedule	259	=item schedule
276		260
277	Calls the scheduler. Please note that the current coroutine will not be put	261	Calls the scheduler. The scheduler will find the next coro that is
		262	to be run from the ready queue and switches to it. The next coro
		263	to be run is simply the one with the highest priority that is longest
		264	in its ready queue. If there is no coro ready, it will call the
		265	C<$Coro::idle> hook.
		266
		267	Please note that the current coro will I<not> be put into the ready
278	into the ready queue, so calling this function usually means you will	268	queue, so calling this function usually means you will never be called
279	never be called again unless something else (e.g. an event handler) calls	269	again unless something else (e.g. an event handler) calls C<< ->ready >>,
280	ready.	270	thus waking you up.
281		271
282	The canonical way to wait on external events is this:	272	This makes C<schedule> I<the> generic method to use to block the current
		273	coro and wait for events: first you remember the current coro in
		274	a variable, then arrange for some callback of yours to call C<< ->ready
		275	>> on that once some event happens, and last you call C<schedule> to put
		276	yourself to sleep. Note that a lot of things can wake your coro up,
		277	so you need to check whether the event indeed happened, e.g. by storing the
		278	status in a variable.
283		279
284	{	280	See B<HOW TO WAIT FOR A CALLBACK>, below, for some ways to wait for callbacks.
285	# remember current coroutine
286	my $current = $Coro::current;
287		281
288	# register a hypothetical event handler	282	=item cede
289	on_event_invoke sub {	283
290	# wake up sleeping coroutine	284	"Cede" to other coros. This function puts the current coro into
291	$current->ready;	285	the ready queue and calls C<schedule>, which has the effect of giving
292	undef $current;	286	up the current "timeslice" to other coros of the same or higher
		287	priority. Once your coro gets its turn again it will automatically be
		288	resumed.
		289
		290	This function is often called C<yield> in other languages.
		291
		292	=item Coro::cede_notself
		293
		294	Works like cede, but is not exported by default and will cede to I<any>
		295	coro, regardless of priority. This is useful sometimes to ensure
		296	progress is made.
		297
		298	=item terminate [arg...]
		299
		300	Terminates the current coro with the given status values (see L<cancel>).
		301
		302	=item Coro::on_enter BLOCK, Coro::on_leave BLOCK
		303
		304	These function install enter and leave winders in the current scope. The
		305	enter block will be executed when on_enter is called and whenever the
		306	current coro is re-entered by the scheduler, while the leave block is
		307	executed whenever the current coro is blocked by the scheduler, and
		308	also when the containing scope is exited (by whatever means, be it exit,
		309	die, last etc.).
		310
		311	I<Neither invoking the scheduler, nor exceptions, are allowed within those
		312	BLOCKs>. That means: do not even think about calling C<die> without an
		313	eval, and do not even think of entering the scheduler in any way.
		314
		315	Since both BLOCKs are tied to the current scope, they will automatically
		316	be removed when the current scope exits.
		317
		318	These functions implement the same concept as C<dynamic-wind> in scheme
		319	does, and are useful when you want to localise some resource to a specific
		320	coro.
		321
		322	They slow down thread switching considerably for coros that use them
		323	(about 40% for a BLOCK with a single assignment, so thread switching is
		324	still reasonably fast if the handlers are fast).
		325
		326	These functions are best understood by an example: The following function
		327	will change the current timezone to "Antarctica/South_Pole", which
		328	requires a call to C<tzset>, but by using C<on_enter> and C<on_leave>,
		329	which remember/change the current timezone and restore the previous
		330	value, respectively, the timezone is only changed for the coro that
		331	installed those handlers.
		332
		333	use POSIX qw(tzset);
		334
		335	async {
		336	my $old_tz; # store outside TZ value here
		337
		338	Coro::on_enter {
		339	$old_tz = $ENV{TZ}; # remember the old value
		340
		341	$ENV{TZ} = "Antarctica/South_Pole";
		342	tzset; # enable new value
293	};	343	};
294		344
295	# call schedule until event occurred.	345	Coro::on_leave {
296	# in case we are woken up for other reasons	346	$ENV{TZ} = $old_tz;
297	# (current still defined), loop.	347	tzset; # restore old value
298	Coro::schedule while $current;	348	};
		349
		350	# at this place, the timezone is Antarctica/South_Pole,
		351	# without disturbing the TZ of any other coro.
299	}	352	};
300		353
301	=item cede	354	This can be used to localise about any resource (locale, uid, current
		355	working directory etc.) to a block, despite the existance of other
		356	coros.
302		357
303	"Cede" to other coroutines. This function puts the current coroutine into the	358	Another interesting example implements time-sliced multitasking using
304	ready queue and calls C<schedule>, which has the effect of giving up the	359	interval timers (this could obviously be optimised, but does the job):
305	current "timeslice" to other coroutines of the same or higher priority.
306		360
307	Returns true if at least one coroutine switch has happened.	361	# "timeslice" the given block
		362	sub timeslice(&) {
		363	use Time::HiRes ();
308		364
309	=item Coro::cede_notself	365	Coro::on_enter {
		366	# on entering the thread, we set an VTALRM handler to cede
		367	$SIG{VTALRM} = sub { cede };
		368	# and then start the interval timer
		369	Time::HiRes::setitimer &Time::HiRes::ITIMER_VIRTUAL, 0.01, 0.01;
		370	};
		371	Coro::on_leave {
		372	# on leaving the thread, we stop the interval timer again
		373	Time::HiRes::setitimer &Time::HiRes::ITIMER_VIRTUAL, 0, 0;
		374	};
310		375
311	Works like cede, but is not exported by default and will cede to any	376	&{+shift};
312	coroutine, regardless of priority, once.	377	}
313		378
314	Returns true if at least one coroutine switch has happened.	379	# use like this:
		380	timeslice {
		381	# The following is an endless loop that would normally
		382	# monopolise the process. Since it runs in a timesliced
		383	# environment, it will regularly cede to other threads.
		384	while () { }
		385	};
315		386
316	=item terminate [arg...]
317
318	Terminates the current coroutine with the given status values (see L<cancel>).
319		387
320	=item killall	388	=item killall
321		389
322	Kills/terminates/cancels all coroutines except the currently running	390	Kills/terminates/cancels all coros except the currently running one.
323	one. This is useful after a fork, either in the child or the parent, as
324	usually only one of them should inherit the running coroutines.
325		391
326	=cut	392	Note that while this will try to free some of the main interpreter
		393	resources if the calling coro isn't the main coro, but one
		394	cannot free all of them, so if a coro that is not the main coro
		395	calls this function, there will be some one-time resource leak.
327		396
328	sub terminate {	397	=cut
329	$current->cancel (@_);
330	}
331		398
332	sub killall {	399	sub killall {
333	for (Coro::State::list) {	400	for (Coro::State::list) {
334	$_->cancel	401	$_->cancel
335	if $_ != $current && UNIVERSAL::isa $_, "Coro";	402	if $_ != $current && UNIVERSAL::isa $_, "Coro";
336	}	403	}
337	}	404	}
338		405
339	=back	406	=back
340		407
341	# dynamic methods
342
343	=head2 COROUTINE METHODS	408	=head1 CORO OBJECT METHODS
344		409
345	These are the methods you can call on coroutine objects.	410	These are the methods you can call on coro objects (or to create
		411	them).
346		412
347	=over 4	413	=over 4
348		414
349	=item new Coro \&sub [, @args...]	415	=item new Coro \&sub [, @args...]
350		416
351	Create a new coroutine and return it. When the sub returns the coroutine	417	Create a new coro and return it. When the sub returns, the coro
352	automatically terminates as if C<terminate> with the returned values were	418	automatically terminates as if C<terminate> with the returned values were
353	called. To make the coroutine run you must first put it into the ready queue	419	called. To make the coro run you must first put it into the ready
354	by calling the ready method.	420	queue by calling the ready method.
355		421
356	See C<async> and C<Coro::State::new> for additional info about the	422	See C<async> and C<Coro::State::new> for additional info about the
357	coroutine environment.	423	coro environment.
358		424
359	=cut	425	=cut
360		426
361	sub _run_coro {	427	sub _coro_run {
362	terminate &{+shift};	428	terminate &{+shift};
363	}	429	}
364		430
365	sub new {
366	my $class = shift;
367
368	$class->SUPER::new (\&_run_coro, @_)
369	}
370
371	=item $success = $coroutine->ready	431	=item $success = $coro->ready
372		432
373	Put the given coroutine into the ready queue (according to it's priority)	433	Put the given coro into the end of its ready queue (there is one
374	and return true. If the coroutine is already in the ready queue, do nothing	434	queue for each priority) and return true. If the coro is already in
375	and return false.	435	the ready queue, do nothing and return false.
376		436
		437	This ensures that the scheduler will resume this coro automatically
		438	once all the coro of higher priority and all coro of the same
		439	priority that were put into the ready queue earlier have been resumed.
		440
		441	=item $coro->suspend
		442
		443	Suspends the specified coro. A suspended coro works just like any other
		444	coro, except that the scheduler will not select a suspended coro for
		445	execution.
		446
		447	Suspending a coro can be useful when you want to keep the coro from
		448	running, but you don't want to destroy it, or when you want to temporarily
		449	freeze a coro (e.g. for debugging) to resume it later.
		450
		451	A scenario for the former would be to suspend all (other) coros after a
		452	fork and keep them alive, so their destructors aren't called, but new
		453	coros can be created.
		454
		455	=item $coro->resume
		456
		457	If the specified coro was suspended, it will be resumed. Note that when
		458	the coro was in the ready queue when it was suspended, it might have been
		459	unreadied by the scheduler, so an activation might have been lost.
		460
		461	To avoid this, it is best to put a suspended coro into the ready queue
		462	unconditionally, as every synchronisation mechanism must protect itself
		463	against spurious wakeups, and the one in the Coro family certainly do
		464	that.
		465
377	=item $is_ready = $coroutine->is_ready	466	=item $is_ready = $coro->is_ready
378		467
379	Return wether the coroutine is currently the ready queue or not,	468	Returns true iff the Coro object is in the ready queue. Unless the Coro
		469	object gets destroyed, it will eventually be scheduled by the scheduler.
380		470
		471	=item $is_running = $coro->is_running
		472
		473	Returns true iff the Coro object is currently running. Only one Coro object
		474	can ever be in the running state (but it currently is possible to have
		475	multiple running Coro::States).
		476
		477	=item $is_suspended = $coro->is_suspended
		478
		479	Returns true iff this Coro object has been suspended. Suspended Coros will
		480	not ever be scheduled.
		481
381	=item $coroutine->cancel (arg...)	482	=item $coro->cancel (arg...)
382		483
383	Terminates the given coroutine and makes it return the given arguments as	484	Terminates the given Coro and makes it return the given arguments as
384	status (default: the empty list). Never returns if the coroutine is the	485	status (default: the empty list). Never returns if the Coro is the
385	current coroutine.	486	current Coro.
386		487
387	=cut	488	=cut
388		489
389	sub cancel {	490	sub cancel {
390	my $self = shift;	491	my $self = shift;
391	$self->{_status} = [@_];
392		492
393	if ($current == $self) {	493	if ($current == $self) {
394	push @destroy, $self;	494	terminate @_;
395	$manager->ready;
396	&schedule while 1;
397	} else {	495	} else {
398	$self->_cancel;	496	$self->{_status} = [@_];
		497	Coro::State::cancel $self;
399	}	498	}
400	}	499	}
401		500
		501	=item $coro->schedule_to
		502
		503	Puts the current coro to sleep (like C<Coro::schedule>), but instead
		504	of continuing with the next coro from the ready queue, always switch to
		505	the given coro object (regardless of priority etc.). The readyness
		506	state of that coro isn't changed.
		507
		508	This is an advanced method for special cases - I'd love to hear about any
		509	uses for this one.
		510
		511	=item $coro->cede_to
		512
		513	Like C<schedule_to>, but puts the current coro into the ready
		514	queue. This has the effect of temporarily switching to the given
		515	coro, and continuing some time later.
		516
		517	This is an advanced method for special cases - I'd love to hear about any
		518	uses for this one.
		519
		520	=item $coro->throw ([$scalar])
		521
		522	If C<$throw> is specified and defined, it will be thrown as an exception
		523	inside the coro at the next convenient point in time. Otherwise
		524	clears the exception object.
		525
		526	Coro will check for the exception each time a schedule-like-function
		527	returns, i.e. after each C<schedule>, C<cede>, C<< Coro::Semaphore->down
		528	>>, C<< Coro::Handle->readable >> and so on. Most of these functions
		529	detect this case and return early in case an exception is pending.
		530
		531	The exception object will be thrown "as is" with the specified scalar in
		532	C<$@>, i.e. if it is a string, no line number or newline will be appended
		533	(unlike with C<die>).
		534
		535	This can be used as a softer means than C<cancel> to ask a coro to
		536	end itself, although there is no guarantee that the exception will lead to
		537	termination, and if the exception isn't caught it might well end the whole
		538	program.
		539
		540	You might also think of C<throw> as being the moral equivalent of
		541	C<kill>ing a coro with a signal (in this case, a scalar).
		542
402	=item $coroutine->join	543	=item $coro->join
403		544
404	Wait until the coroutine terminates and return any values given to the	545	Wait until the coro terminates and return any values given to the
405	C<terminate> or C<cancel> functions. C<join> can be called concurrently	546	C<terminate> or C<cancel> functions. C<join> can be called concurrently
406	from multiple coroutines.	547	from multiple coro, and all will be resumed and given the status
		548	return once the C<$coro> terminates.
407		549
408	=cut	550	=cut
409		551
410	sub join {	552	sub join {
411	my $self = shift;	553	my $self = shift;
422	}	564	}
423		565
424	wantarray ? @{$self->{_status}} : $self->{_status}[0];	566	wantarray ? @{$self->{_status}} : $self->{_status}[0];
425	}	567	}
426		568
427	=item $coroutine->on_destroy (\&cb)	569	=item $coro->on_destroy (\&cb)
428		570
429	Registers a callback that is called when this coroutine gets destroyed,	571	Registers a callback that is called when this coro gets destroyed,
430	but before it is joined. The callback gets passed the terminate arguments,	572	but before it is joined. The callback gets passed the terminate arguments,
431	if any.	573	if any, and I<must not> die, under any circumstances.
432		574
433	=cut	575	=cut
434		576
435	sub on_destroy {	577	sub on_destroy {
436	my ($self, $cb) = @_;	578	my ($self, $cb) = @_;
437		579
438	push @{ $self->{_on_destroy} }, $cb;	580	push @{ $self->{_on_destroy} }, $cb;
439	}	581	}
440		582
441	=item $oldprio = $coroutine->prio ($newprio)	583	=item $oldprio = $coro->prio ($newprio)
442		584
443	Sets (or gets, if the argument is missing) the priority of the	585	Sets (or gets, if the argument is missing) the priority of the
444	coroutine. Higher priority coroutines get run before lower priority	586	coro. Higher priority coro get run before lower priority
445	coroutines. Priorities are small signed integers (currently -4 .. +3),	587	coro. Priorities are small signed integers (currently -4 .. +3),
446	that you can refer to using PRIO_xxx constants (use the import tag :prio	588	that you can refer to using PRIO_xxx constants (use the import tag :prio
447	to get then):	589	to get then):
448		590
449	PRIO_MAX > PRIO_HIGH > PRIO_NORMAL > PRIO_LOW > PRIO_IDLE > PRIO_MIN	591	PRIO_MAX > PRIO_HIGH > PRIO_NORMAL > PRIO_LOW > PRIO_IDLE > PRIO_MIN
450	3 > 1 > 0 > -1 > -3 > -4	592	3 > 1 > 0 > -1 > -3 > -4
451		593
452	# set priority to HIGH	594	# set priority to HIGH
453	current->prio(PRIO_HIGH);	595	current->prio (PRIO_HIGH);
454		596
455	The idle coroutine ($Coro::idle) always has a lower priority than any	597	The idle coro ($Coro::idle) always has a lower priority than any
456	existing coroutine.	598	existing coro.
457		599
458	Changing the priority of the current coroutine will take effect immediately,	600	Changing the priority of the current coro will take effect immediately,
459	but changing the priority of coroutines in the ready queue (but not	601	but changing the priority of coro in the ready queue (but not
460	running) will only take effect after the next schedule (of that	602	running) will only take effect after the next schedule (of that
461	coroutine). This is a bug that will be fixed in some future version.	603	coro). This is a bug that will be fixed in some future version.
462		604
463	=item $newprio = $coroutine->nice ($change)	605	=item $newprio = $coro->nice ($change)
464		606
465	Similar to C<prio>, but subtract the given value from the priority (i.e.	607	Similar to C<prio>, but subtract the given value from the priority (i.e.
466	higher values mean lower priority, just as in unix).	608	higher values mean lower priority, just as in unix).
467		609
468	=item $olddesc = $coroutine->desc ($newdesc)	610	=item $olddesc = $coro->desc ($newdesc)
469		611
470	Sets (or gets in case the argument is missing) the description for this	612	Sets (or gets in case the argument is missing) the description for this
471	coroutine. This is just a free-form string you can associate with a coroutine.	613	coro. This is just a free-form string you can associate with a
		614	coro.
472		615
473	This method simply sets the C<< $coroutine->{desc} >> member to the given string. You	616	This method simply sets the C<< $coro->{desc} >> member to the given
474	can modify this member directly if you wish.	617	string. You can modify this member directly if you wish.
475		618
476	=cut	619	=cut
477		620
478	sub desc {	621	sub desc {
479	my $old = $_[0]{desc};	622	my $old = $_[0]{desc};
480	$_[0]{desc} = $_[1] if @_ > 1;	623	$_[0]{desc} = $_[1] if @_ > 1;
481	$old;	624	$old;
482	}	625	}
483		626
		627	sub transfer {
		628	require Carp;
		629	Carp::croak ("You must not call ->transfer on Coro objects. Use Coro::State objects or the ->schedule_to method. Caught");
		630	}
		631
484	=back	632	=back
485		633
486	=head2 GLOBAL FUNCTIONS	634	=head1 GLOBAL FUNCTIONS
487		635
488	=over 4	636	=over 4
489		637
490	=item Coro::nready	638	=item Coro::nready
491		639
492	Returns the number of coroutines that are currently in the ready state,	640	Returns the number of coro that are currently in the ready state,
493	i.e. that can be switched to. The value C<0> means that the only runnable	641	i.e. that can be switched to by calling C<schedule> directory or
		642	indirectly. The value C<0> means that the only runnable coro is the
494	coroutine is the currently running one, so C<cede> would have no effect,	643	currently running one, so C<cede> would have no effect, and C<schedule>
495	and C<schedule> would cause a deadlock unless there is an idle handler	644	would cause a deadlock unless there is an idle handler that wakes up some
496	that wakes up some coroutines.	645	coro.
497		646
498	=item my $guard = Coro::guard { ... }	647	=item my $guard = Coro::guard { ... }
499		648
500	This creates and returns a guard object. Nothing happens until the object	649	This function still exists, but is deprecated. Please use the
501	gets destroyed, in which case the codeblock given as argument will be	650	C<Guard::guard> function instead.
502	executed. This is useful to free locks or other resources in case of a
503	runtime error or when the coroutine gets canceled, as in both cases the
504	guard block will be executed. The guard object supports only one method,
505	C<< ->cancel >>, which will keep the codeblock from being executed.
506		651
507	Example: set some flag and clear it again when the coroutine gets canceled
508	or the function returns:
509
510	sub do_something {
511	my $guard = Coro::guard { $busy = 0 };
512	$busy = 1;
513
514	# do something that requires $busy to be true
515	}
516
517	=cut	652	=cut
518		653
519	sub guard(&) {	654	BEGIN { *guard = \&Guard::guard }
520	bless \(my $cb = $_[0]), "Coro::guard"
521	}
522
523	sub Coro::guard::cancel {
524	${$_[0]} = sub { };
525	}
526
527	sub Coro::guard::DESTROY {
528	${$_[0]}->();
529	}
530
531		655
532	=item unblock_sub { ... }	656	=item unblock_sub { ... }
533		657
534	This utility function takes a BLOCK or code reference and "unblocks" it,	658	This utility function takes a BLOCK or code reference and "unblocks" it,
535	returning the new coderef. This means that the new coderef will return	659	returning a new coderef. Unblocking means that calling the new coderef
536	immediately without blocking, returning nothing, while the original code	660	will return immediately without blocking, returning nothing, while the
537	ref will be called (with parameters) from within its own coroutine.	661	original code ref will be called (with parameters) from within another
		662	coro.
538		663
539	The reason this function exists is that many event libraries (such as the	664	The reason this function exists is that many event libraries (such as the
540	venerable L<Event\|Event> module) are not coroutine-safe (a weaker form	665	venerable L<Event\|Event> module) are not thread-safe (a weaker form
541	of thread-safety). This means you must not block within event callbacks,	666	of reentrancy). This means you must not block within event callbacks,
542	otherwise you might suffer from crashes or worse.	667	otherwise you might suffer from crashes or worse. The only event library
		668	currently known that is safe to use without C<unblock_sub> is L<EV>.
		669
		670	Coro will try to catch you when you block in the event loop
		671	("FATAL:$Coro::IDLE blocked itself"), but this is just best effort and
		672	only works when you do not run your own event loop.
543		673
544	This function allows your callbacks to block by executing them in another	674	This function allows your callbacks to block by executing them in another
545	coroutine where it is safe to block. One example where blocking is handy	675	coro where it is safe to block. One example where blocking is handy
546	is when you use the L<Coro::AIO\|Coro::AIO> functions to save results to	676	is when you use the L<Coro::AIO\|Coro::AIO> functions to save results to
547	disk.	677	disk, for example.
548		678
549	In short: simply use C<unblock_sub { ... }> instead of C<sub { ... }> when	679	In short: simply use C<unblock_sub { ... }> instead of C<sub { ... }> when
550	creating event callbacks that want to block.	680	creating event callbacks that want to block.
		681
		682	If your handler does not plan to block (e.g. simply sends a message to
		683	another coro, or puts some other coro into the ready queue), there is
		684	no reason to use C<unblock_sub>.
		685
		686	Note that you also need to use C<unblock_sub> for any other callbacks that
		687	are indirectly executed by any C-based event loop. For example, when you
		688	use a module that uses L<AnyEvent> (and you use L<Coro::AnyEvent>) and it
		689	provides callbacks that are the result of some event callback, then you
		690	must not block either, or use C<unblock_sub>.
551		691
552	=cut	692	=cut
553		693
554	our @unblock_queue;	694	our @unblock_queue;
555		695
…		…
558	# return immediately and can be reused) and because we cannot cede	698	# return immediately and can be reused) and because we cannot cede
559	# inside an event callback.	699	# inside an event callback.
560	our $unblock_scheduler = new Coro sub {	700	our $unblock_scheduler = new Coro sub {
561	while () {	701	while () {
562	while (my $cb = pop @unblock_queue) {	702	while (my $cb = pop @unblock_queue) {
563	# this is an inlined copy of async_pool	703	&async_pool (@$cb);
564	my $coro = (pop @async_pool) \|\| new Coro \&pool_handler;
565		704
566	$coro->{_invoke} = $cb;
567	$coro->ready;
568	cede; # for short-lived callbacks, this reduces pressure on the coro pool	705	# for short-lived callbacks, this reduces pressure on the coro pool
		706	# as the chance is very high that the async_poll coro will be back
		707	# in the idle state when cede returns
		708	cede;
569	}	709	}
570	schedule; # sleep well	710	schedule; # sleep well
571	}	711	}
572	};	712	};
573	$unblock_scheduler->desc ("[unblock_sub scheduler]");	713	$unblock_scheduler->{desc} = "[unblock_sub scheduler]";
574		714
575	sub unblock_sub(&) {	715	sub unblock_sub(&) {
576	my $cb = shift;	716	my $cb = shift;
577		717
578	sub {	718	sub {
579	unshift @unblock_queue, [$cb, @_];	719	unshift @unblock_queue, [$cb, @_];
580	$unblock_scheduler->ready;	720	$unblock_scheduler->ready;
581	}	721	}
582	}	722	}
583		723
		724	=item $cb = rouse_cb
		725
		726	Create and return a "rouse callback". That's a code reference that,
		727	when called, will remember a copy of its arguments and notify the owner
		728	coro of the callback.
		729
		730	See the next function.
		731
		732	=item @args = rouse_wait [$cb]
		733
		734	Wait for the specified rouse callback (or the last one that was created in
		735	this coro).
		736
		737	As soon as the callback is invoked (or when the callback was invoked
		738	before C<rouse_wait>), it will return the arguments originally passed to
		739	the rouse callback. In scalar context, that means you get the I<last>
		740	argument, just as if C<rouse_wait> had a C<return ($a1, $a2, $a3...)>
		741	statement at the end.
		742
		743	See the section B<HOW TO WAIT FOR A CALLBACK> for an actual usage example.
		744
584	=back	745	=back
585		746
586	=cut	747	=cut
587		748
588	1;	749	1;
589		750
		751	=head1 HOW TO WAIT FOR A CALLBACK
		752
		753	It is very common for a coro to wait for some callback to be
		754	called. This occurs naturally when you use coro in an otherwise
		755	event-based program, or when you use event-based libraries.
		756
		757	These typically register a callback for some event, and call that callback
		758	when the event occured. In a coro, however, you typically want to
		759	just wait for the event, simplyifying things.
		760
		761	For example C<< AnyEvent->child >> registers a callback to be called when
		762	a specific child has exited:
		763
		764	my $child_watcher = AnyEvent->child (pid => $pid, cb => sub { ... });
		765
		766	But from within a coro, you often just want to write this:
		767
		768	my $status = wait_for_child $pid;
		769
		770	Coro offers two functions specifically designed to make this easy,
		771	C<Coro::rouse_cb> and C<Coro::rouse_wait>.
		772
		773	The first function, C<rouse_cb>, generates and returns a callback that,
		774	when invoked, will save its arguments and notify the coro that
		775	created the callback.
		776
		777	The second function, C<rouse_wait>, waits for the callback to be called
		778	(by calling C<schedule> to go to sleep) and returns the arguments
		779	originally passed to the callback.
		780
		781	Using these functions, it becomes easy to write the C<wait_for_child>
		782	function mentioned above:
		783
		784	sub wait_for_child($) {
		785	my ($pid) = @_;
		786
		787	my $watcher = AnyEvent->child (pid => $pid, cb => Coro::rouse_cb);
		788
		789	my ($rpid, $rstatus) = Coro::rouse_wait;
		790	$rstatus
		791	}
		792
		793	In the case where C<rouse_cb> and C<rouse_wait> are not flexible enough,
		794	you can roll your own, using C<schedule>:
		795
		796	sub wait_for_child($) {
		797	my ($pid) = @_;
		798
		799	# store the current coro in $current,
		800	# and provide result variables for the closure passed to ->child
		801	my $current = $Coro::current;
		802	my ($done, $rstatus);
		803
		804	# pass a closure to ->child
		805	my $watcher = AnyEvent->child (pid => $pid, cb => sub {
		806	$rstatus = $_[1]; # remember rstatus
		807	$done = 1; # mark $rstatus as valud
		808	});
		809
		810	# wait until the closure has been called
		811	schedule while !$done;
		812
		813	$rstatus
		814	}
		815
		816
590	=head1 BUGS/LIMITATIONS	817	=head1 BUGS/LIMITATIONS
591		818
592	- you must make very sure that no coro is still active on global	819	=over 4
593	destruction. very bad things might happen otherwise (usually segfaults).
594		820
		821	=item fork with pthread backend
		822
		823	When Coro is compiled using the pthread backend (which isn't recommended
		824	but required on many BSDs as their libcs are completely broken), then
		825	coro will not survive a fork. There is no known workaround except to
		826	fix your libc and use a saner backend.
		827
		828	=item perl process emulation ("threads")
		829
595	- this module is not thread-safe. You should only ever use this module	830	This module is not perl-pseudo-thread-safe. You should only ever use this
596	from the same thread (this requirement might be loosened in the future	831	module from the first thread (this requirement might be removed in the
597	to allow per-thread schedulers, but Coro::State does not yet allow	832	future to allow per-thread schedulers, but Coro::State does not yet allow
598	this).	833	this). I recommend disabling thread support and using processes, as having
		834	the windows process emulation enabled under unix roughly halves perl
		835	performance, even when not used.
		836
		837	=item coro switching is not signal safe
		838
		839	You must not switch to another coro from within a signal handler (only
		840	relevant with %SIG - most event libraries provide safe signals), I<unless>
		841	you are sure you are not interrupting a Coro function.
		842
		843	That means you I<MUST NOT> call any function that might "block" the
		844	current coro - C<cede>, C<schedule> C<< Coro::Semaphore->down >> or
		845	anything that calls those. Everything else, including calling C<ready>,
		846	works.
		847
		848	=back
		849
		850
		851	=head1 WINDOWS PROCESS EMULATION
		852
		853	A great many people seem to be confused about ithreads (for example, Chip
		854	Salzenberg called me unintelligent, incapable, stupid and gullible,
		855	while in the same mail making rather confused statements about perl
		856	ithreads (for example, that memory or files would be shared), showing his
		857	lack of understanding of this area - if it is hard to understand for Chip,
		858	it is probably not obvious to everybody).
		859
		860	What follows is an ultra-condensed version of my talk about threads in
		861	scripting languages given onthe perl workshop 2009:
		862
		863	The so-called "ithreads" were originally implemented for two reasons:
		864	first, to (badly) emulate unix processes on native win32 perls, and
		865	secondly, to replace the older, real thread model ("5.005-threads").
		866
		867	It does that by using threads instead of OS processes. The difference
		868	between processes and threads is that threads share memory (and other
		869	state, such as files) between threads within a single process, while
		870	processes do not share anything (at least not semantically). That
		871	means that modifications done by one thread are seen by others, while
		872	modifications by one process are not seen by other processes.
		873
		874	The "ithreads" work exactly like that: when creating a new ithreads
		875	process, all state is copied (memory is copied physically, files and code
		876	is copied logically). Afterwards, it isolates all modifications. On UNIX,
		877	the same behaviour can be achieved by using operating system processes,
		878	except that UNIX typically uses hardware built into the system to do this
		879	efficiently, while the windows process emulation emulates this hardware in
		880	software (rather efficiently, but of course it is still much slower than
		881	dedicated hardware).
		882
		883	As mentioned before, loading code, modifying code, modifying data
		884	structures and so on is only visible in the ithreads process doing the
		885	modification, not in other ithread processes within the same OS process.
		886
		887	This is why "ithreads" do not implement threads for perl at all, only
		888	processes. What makes it so bad is that on non-windows platforms, you can
		889	actually take advantage of custom hardware for this purpose (as evidenced
		890	by the forks module, which gives you the (i-) threads API, just much
		891	faster).
		892
		893	Sharing data is in the i-threads model is done by transfering data
		894	structures between threads using copying semantics, which is very slow -
		895	shared data simply does not exist. Benchmarks using i-threads which are
		896	communication-intensive show extremely bad behaviour with i-threads (in
		897	fact, so bad that Coro, which cannot take direct advantage of multiple
		898	CPUs, is often orders of magnitude faster because it shares data using
		899	real threads, refer to my talk for details).
		900
		901	As summary, i-threads use threads to implement processes, while
		902	the compatible forks module uses processes to emulate, uhm,
		903	processes. I-threads slow down every perl program when enabled, and
		904	outside of windows, serve no (or little) practical purpose, but
		905	disadvantages every single-threaded Perl program.
		906
		907	This is the reason that I try to avoid the name "ithreads", as it is
		908	misleading as it implies that it implements some kind of thread model for
		909	perl, and prefer the name "windows process emulation", which describes the
		910	actual use and behaviour of it much better.
599		911
600	=head1 SEE ALSO	912	=head1 SEE ALSO
601		913
		914	Event-Loop integration: L<Coro::AnyEvent>, L<Coro::EV>, L<Coro::Event>.
		915
		916	Debugging: L<Coro::Debug>.
		917
602	Support/Utility: L<Coro::Specific>, L<Coro::State>, L<Coro::Util>.	918	Support/Utility: L<Coro::Specific>, L<Coro::Util>.
603		919
604	Locking/IPC: L<Coro::Signal>, L<Coro::Channel>, L<Coro::Semaphore>, L<Coro::SemaphoreSet>, L<Coro::RWLock>.	920	Locking and IPC: L<Coro::Signal>, L<Coro::Channel>, L<Coro::Semaphore>,
		921	L<Coro::SemaphoreSet>, L<Coro::RWLock>.
605		922
606	Event/IO: L<Coro::Timer>, L<Coro::Event>, L<Coro::Handle>, L<Coro::Socket>, L<Coro::Select>.	923	I/O and Timers: L<Coro::Timer>, L<Coro::Handle>, L<Coro::Socket>, L<Coro::AIO>.
607		924
608	Embedding: L<Coro:MakeMaker>	925	Compatibility with other modules: L<Coro::LWP> (but see also L<AnyEvent::HTTP> for
		926	a better-working alternative), L<Coro::BDB>, L<Coro::Storable>,
		927	L<Coro::Select>.
		928
		929	XS API: L<Coro::MakeMaker>.
		930
		931	Low level Configuration, Thread Environment, Continuations: L<Coro::State>.
609		932
610	=head1 AUTHOR	933	=head1 AUTHOR
611		934
612	Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>	935	Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>
613	http://home.schmorp.de/	936	http://home.schmorp.de/

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing Coro/Coro.pm (file contents): Revision 1.148 by root, Fri Oct 5 20:11:25 2007 UTC vs. Revision 1.274 by root, Sat Dec 12 01:30:26 2009 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing Coro/Coro.pm (file contents):
Revision 1.148 by root, Fri Oct 5 20:11:25 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.274 by root, Sat Dec 12 01:30:26 2009 UTC