--- JSON-XS/README 2009/08/08 10:06:02 1.31 +++ JSON-XS/README 2010/03/11 19:31:37 1.35 @@ -58,10 +58,11 @@ * round-trip integrity When you serialise a perl data structure using only data types - supported by JSON, the deserialised data structure is identical on - the Perl level. (e.g. the string "2.0" doesn't suddenly become "2" - just because it looks like a number). There minor *are* exceptions - to this, read the MAPPING section below to learn about those. + supported by JSON and Perl, the deserialised data structure is + identical on the Perl level. (e.g. the string "2.0" doesn't suddenly + become "2" just because it looks like a number). There *are* minor + exceptions to this, read the MAPPING section below to learn about + those. * strict checking of JSON correctness @@ -672,6 +673,11 @@ the scalar context case. Note that in this case, any previously-parsed JSON texts will be lost. + Example: Parse some JSON arrays/objects in a given string and return + them. + + my @objs = JSON::XS->new->incr_parse ("[5][7][1,2]"); + $lvalue_string = $json->incr_text This method returns the currently stored JSON fragment as an lvalue, that is, you can manipulate it. This *only* works when a preceding @@ -896,6 +902,11 @@ ability, but the JSON number will still be re-encoded as a JSON number). + Note that precision is not accuracy - binary floating point values + cannot represent most decimal fractions exactly, and when converting + from and to floating point, JSON::XS only guarantees precision up to + but not including the leats significant bit. + true, false These JSON atoms become "JSON::XS::true" and "JSON::XS::false", respectively. They are overloaded to act almost exactly like the @@ -981,6 +992,13 @@ Tell me if you need this capability (but don't forget to explain why it's needed :). + Note that numerical precision has the same meaning as under Perl (so + binary to decimal conversion follows the same rules as in Perl, + which can differ to other languages). Also, your perl interpreter + might expose extensions to the floating point numbers of your + platform, such as infinities or NaN's - these cannot be represented + in JSON, and it is an error to pass those in. + ENCODING/CODESET FLAG NOTES The interested reader might have seen a number of flags that signify encodings or codesets - "utf8", "latin1" and "ascii". There seems to be @@ -1155,10 +1173,10 @@ This will *usually* generate JSON texts that also parse as valid YAML. Please note that YAML has hardcoded limits on (simple) object key lengths that JSON doesn't have and also has different and incompatible - unicode handling, so you should make sure that your hash keys are - noticeably shorter than the 1024 "stream characters" YAML allows and - that you do not have characters with codepoint values outside the - Unicode BMP (basic multilingual page). YAML also does not allow "\/" + unicode character escape syntax, so you should make sure that your hash + keys are noticeably shorter than the 1024 "stream characters" YAML + allows and that you do not have characters with codepoint values outside + the Unicode BMP (basic multilingual page). YAML also does not allow "\/" sequences in strings (which JSON::XS does not *currently* generate, but other JSON generators might). @@ -1185,6 +1203,12 @@ spreading lies about the real compatibility for many *years* and trying to silence people who point out that it isn't true. + Addendum/2009: the YAML 1.2 spec is still incomaptible with JSON, + even though the incompatibilities have been documented (and are + known to Brian) for many years and the spec makes explicit claims + that YAML is a superset of JSON. It would be so easy to fix, but + apparently, bullying and corrupting userdata is so much easier. + SPEED It seems that JSON::XS is surprisingly fast, as shown in the following tables. They have been generated with the help of the "eg/bench" program @@ -1197,49 +1221,48 @@ {"method": "handleMessage", "params": ["user1", "we were just talking"], "id": null, "array":[1,11,234,-5,1e5,1e7, - true, false]} + 1, 0]} It shows the number of encodes/decodes per second (JSON::XS uses the functional interface, while JSON::XS/2 uses the OO interface with - pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables shrink). - Higher is better: - - module | encode | decode | - -----------|------------|------------| - JSON 1.x | 4990.842 | 4088.813 | - JSON::DWIW | 51653.990 | 71575.154 | - JSON::PC | 65948.176 | 74631.744 | - JSON::PP | 8931.652 | 3817.168 | - JSON::Syck | 24877.248 | 27776.848 | - JSON::XS | 388361.481 | 227951.304 | - JSON::XS/2 | 227951.304 | 218453.333 | - JSON::XS/3 | 338250.323 | 218453.333 | - Storable | 16500.016 | 135300.129 | - -----------+------------+------------+ - - That is, JSON::XS is about five times faster than JSON::DWIW on - encoding, about three times faster on decoding, and over forty times - faster than JSON, even with pretty-printing and key sorting. It also + pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables shrink. + JSON::DWIW/DS uses the deserialise function, while JSON::DWIW::FJ uses + the from_json method). Higher is better: + + module | encode | decode | + --------------|------------|------------| + JSON::DWIW/DS | 86302.551 | 102300.098 | + JSON::DWIW/FJ | 86302.551 | 75983.768 | + JSON::PP | 15827.562 | 6638.658 | + JSON::Syck | 63358.066 | 47662.545 | + JSON::XS | 511500.488 | 511500.488 | + JSON::XS/2 | 291271.111 | 388361.481 | + JSON::XS/3 | 361577.931 | 361577.931 | + Storable | 66788.280 | 265462.278 | + --------------+------------+------------+ + + That is, JSON::XS is almost six times faster than JSON::DWIW on + encoding, about five times faster on decoding, and over thirty to + seventy times faster than JSON's pure perl implementation. It also compares favourably to Storable for small amounts of data. Using a longer test string (roughly 18KB, generated from Yahoo! Locals search API (). - module | encode | decode | - -----------|------------|------------| - JSON 1.x | 55.260 | 34.971 | - JSON::DWIW | 825.228 | 1082.513 | - JSON::PC | 3571.444 | 2394.829 | - JSON::PP | 210.987 | 32.574 | - JSON::Syck | 552.551 | 787.544 | - JSON::XS | 5780.463 | 4854.519 | - JSON::XS/2 | 3869.998 | 4798.975 | - JSON::XS/3 | 5862.880 | 4798.975 | - Storable | 4445.002 | 5235.027 | - -----------+------------+------------+ + module | encode | decode | + --------------|------------|------------| + JSON::DWIW/DS | 1647.927 | 2673.916 | + JSON::DWIW/FJ | 1630.249 | 2596.128 | + JSON::PP | 400.640 | 62.311 | + JSON::Syck | 1481.040 | 1524.869 | + JSON::XS | 20661.596 | 9541.183 | + JSON::XS/2 | 10683.403 | 9416.938 | + JSON::XS/3 | 20661.596 | 9400.054 | + Storable | 19765.806 | 10000.725 | + --------------+------------+------------+ Again, JSON::XS leads by far (except for Storable which non-surprisingly - decodes faster). + decodes a bit faster). On large strings containing lots of high Unicode characters, some modules (such as JSON::PC) seem to decode faster than JSON::XS, but the @@ -1284,11 +1307,11 @@ If you are using JSON::XS to return packets to consumption by JavaScript scripts in a browser you should have a look at - to see whether - you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which really are - browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to deal with it, - as major browser developers care only for features, not about getting - security right). + + to see whether you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which + really are browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to + deal with it, as major browser developers care only for features, not + about getting security right). THREADS This module is *not* guaranteed to be thread safe and there are no plans