--- JSON-XS/README 2009/02/19 01:13:46 1.29 +++ JSON-XS/README 2010/03/11 17:36:09 1.34 @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ # Note that JSON version 2.0 and above will automatically use JSON::XS # if available, at virtually no speed overhead either, so you should # be able to just: - - use JSON; + + use JSON; # and do the same things, except that you have a pure-perl fallback now. @@ -380,6 +380,8 @@ This setting has no effect when decoding JSON texts. + This setting has currently no effect on tied hashes. + $json = $json->allow_nonref ([$enable]) $enabled = $json->get_allow_nonref If $enable is true (or missing), then the "encode" method can @@ -1153,10 +1155,10 @@ This will *usually* generate JSON texts that also parse as valid YAML. Please note that YAML has hardcoded limits on (simple) object key lengths that JSON doesn't have and also has different and incompatible - unicode handling, so you should make sure that your hash keys are - noticeably shorter than the 1024 "stream characters" YAML allows and - that you do not have characters with codepoint values outside the - Unicode BMP (basic multilingual page). YAML also does not allow "\/" + unicode character escape syntax, so you should make sure that your hash + keys are noticeably shorter than the 1024 "stream characters" YAML + allows and that you do not have characters with codepoint values outside + the Unicode BMP (basic multilingual page). YAML also does not allow "\/" sequences in strings (which JSON::XS does not *currently* generate, but other JSON generators might). @@ -1183,6 +1185,12 @@ spreading lies about the real compatibility for many *years* and trying to silence people who point out that it isn't true. + Addendum/2009: the YAML 1.2 spec is still incomaptible with JSON, + even though the incompatibilities have been documented (and are + known to Brian) for many years and the spec makes explicit claims + that YAML is a superset of JSON. It would be so easy to fix, but + apparently, bullying and corrupting userdata is so much easier. + SPEED It seems that JSON::XS is surprisingly fast, as shown in the following tables. They have been generated with the help of the "eg/bench" program @@ -1195,49 +1203,48 @@ {"method": "handleMessage", "params": ["user1", "we were just talking"], "id": null, "array":[1,11,234,-5,1e5,1e7, - true, false]} + 1, 0]} It shows the number of encodes/decodes per second (JSON::XS uses the functional interface, while JSON::XS/2 uses the OO interface with - pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables shrink). - Higher is better: - - module | encode | decode | - -----------|------------|------------| - JSON 1.x | 4990.842 | 4088.813 | - JSON::DWIW | 51653.990 | 71575.154 | - JSON::PC | 65948.176 | 74631.744 | - JSON::PP | 8931.652 | 3817.168 | - JSON::Syck | 24877.248 | 27776.848 | - JSON::XS | 388361.481 | 227951.304 | - JSON::XS/2 | 227951.304 | 218453.333 | - JSON::XS/3 | 338250.323 | 218453.333 | - Storable | 16500.016 | 135300.129 | - -----------+------------+------------+ - - That is, JSON::XS is about five times faster than JSON::DWIW on - encoding, about three times faster on decoding, and over forty times - faster than JSON, even with pretty-printing and key sorting. It also + pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables shrink. + JSON::DWIW/DS uses the deserialise function, while JSON::DWIW::FJ uses + the from_json method). Higher is better: + + module | encode | decode | + --------------|------------|------------| + JSON::DWIW/DS | 86302.551 | 102300.098 | + JSON::DWIW/FJ | 86302.551 | 75983.768 | + JSON::PP | 15827.562 | 6638.658 | + JSON::Syck | 63358.066 | 47662.545 | + JSON::XS | 511500.488 | 511500.488 | + JSON::XS/2 | 291271.111 | 388361.481 | + JSON::XS/3 | 361577.931 | 361577.931 | + Storable | 66788.280 | 265462.278 | + --------------+------------+------------+ + + That is, JSON::XS is almost six times faster than JSON::DWIW on + encoding, about five times faster on decoding, and over thirty to + seventy times faster than JSON's pure perl implementation. It also compares favourably to Storable for small amounts of data. Using a longer test string (roughly 18KB, generated from Yahoo! Locals search API (). - module | encode | decode | - -----------|------------|------------| - JSON 1.x | 55.260 | 34.971 | - JSON::DWIW | 825.228 | 1082.513 | - JSON::PC | 3571.444 | 2394.829 | - JSON::PP | 210.987 | 32.574 | - JSON::Syck | 552.551 | 787.544 | - JSON::XS | 5780.463 | 4854.519 | - JSON::XS/2 | 3869.998 | 4798.975 | - JSON::XS/3 | 5862.880 | 4798.975 | - Storable | 4445.002 | 5235.027 | - -----------+------------+------------+ + module | encode | decode | + --------------|------------|------------| + JSON::DWIW/DS | 1647.927 | 2673.916 | + JSON::DWIW/FJ | 1630.249 | 2596.128 | + JSON::PP | 400.640 | 62.311 | + JSON::Syck | 1481.040 | 1524.869 | + JSON::XS | 20661.596 | 9541.183 | + JSON::XS/2 | 10683.403 | 9416.938 | + JSON::XS/3 | 20661.596 | 9400.054 | + Storable | 19765.806 | 10000.725 | + --------------+------------+------------+ Again, JSON::XS leads by far (except for Storable which non-surprisingly - decodes faster). + decodes a bit faster). On large strings containing lots of high Unicode characters, some modules (such as JSON::PC) seem to decode faster than JSON::XS, but the @@ -1282,11 +1289,11 @@ If you are using JSON::XS to return packets to consumption by JavaScript scripts in a browser you should have a look at - to see whether - you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which really are - browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to deal with it, - as major browser developers care only for features, not about getting - security right). + + to see whether you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which + really are browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to + deal with it, as major browser developers care only for features, not + about getting security right). THREADS This module is *not* guaranteed to be thread safe and there are no plans