[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/JSON-XS/README

Comparing JSON-XS/README (file contents):
Revision 1.32 by root, Sat Oct 10 01:48:50 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 1.36 by root, Wed Jul 27 15:53:40 2011 UTC

         does so, and even documents what "correct" means.
     *   round-trip integrity
         When you serialise a perl data structure using only data types
-        supported by JSON, the deserialised data structure is identical on
+        supported by JSON and Perl, the deserialised data structure is
-        the Perl level. (e.g. the string "2.0" doesn't suddenly become "2"
+        identical on the Perl level. (e.g. the string "2.0" doesn't suddenly
-        just because it looks like a number). There minor *are* exceptions
+        become "2" just because it looks like a number). There *are* minor
-        to this, read the MAPPING section below to learn about those.
+        exceptions to this, read the MAPPING section below to learn about
+        those.
     *   strict checking of JSON correctness
         There is no guessing, no generating of illegal JSON texts by
         default, and only JSON is accepted as input by default (the latter
     calls).
     JSON::XS will only attempt to parse the JSON text once it is sure it has
     enough text to get a decisive result, using a very simple but truly
     incremental parser. This means that it sometimes won't stop as early as
-    the full parser, for example, it doesn't detect parenthese mismatches.
+    the full parser, for example, it doesn't detect mismatched parentheses.
     The only thing it guarantees is that it starts decoding as soon as a
     syntactically valid JSON text has been seen. This means you need to set
     resource limits (e.g. "max_size") to ensure the parser will stop parsing
     in the presence if syntax errors.
         otherwise. For this to work, there must be no separators between the
         JSON objects or arrays, instead they must be concatenated
         back-to-back. If an error occurs, an exception will be raised as in
         the scalar context case. Note that in this case, any
         previously-parsed JSON texts will be lost.
+        Example: Parse some JSON arrays/objects in a given string and return
+        them.
+           my @objs = JSON::XS->new->incr_parse ("[5][7][1,2]");
     $lvalue_string = $json->incr_text
         This method returns the currently stored JSON fragment as an lvalue,
         that is, you can manipulate it. This *only* works when a preceding
         call to "incr_parse" in *scalar context* successfully returned an
         Numbers containing a fractional or exponential part will always be
         represented as numeric (floating point) values, possibly at a loss
         of precision (in which case you might lose perfect roundtripping
         ability, but the JSON number will still be re-encoded as a JSON
         number).
+        Note that precision is not accuracy - binary floating point values
+        cannot represent most decimal fractions exactly, and when converting
+        from and to floating point, JSON::XS only guarantees precision up to
+        but not including the leats significant bit.
     true, false
         These JSON atoms become "JSON::XS::true" and "JSON::XS::false",
         respectively. They are overloaded to act almost exactly like the
         numbers 1 and 0. You can check whether a scalar is a JSON boolean by
         You can not currently force the type in other, less obscure, ways.
         Tell me if you need this capability (but don't forget to explain why
         it's needed :).
+        Note that numerical precision has the same meaning as under Perl (so
+        binary to decimal conversion follows the same rules as in Perl,
+        which can differ to other languages). Also, your perl interpreter
+        might expose extensions to the floating point numbers of your
+        platform, such as infinities or NaN's - these cannot be represented
+        in JSON, and it is an error to pass those in.
 ENCODING/CODESET FLAG NOTES
     The interested reader might have seen a number of flags that signify
     encodings or codesets - "utf8", "latin1" and "ascii". There seems to be
     some confusion on what these do, so here is a short comparison:
     characters as well - using "eval" naively simply *will* cause problems.
     Another problem is that some javascript implementations reserve some
     property names for their own purposes (which probably makes them
     non-ECMAscript-compliant). For example, Iceweasel reserves the
-    "__proto__" property name for it's own purposes.
+    "__proto__" property name for its own purposes.
     If that is a problem, you could parse try to filter the resulting JSON
     output for these property strings, e.g.:
        $json =~ s/"__proto__"\s*:/"__proto__renamed":/g;
         (which is not that difficult or long) and finally make YAML
         compatible to it, and educating users about the changes, instead of
         spreading lies about the real compatibility for many *years* and
         trying to silence people who point out that it isn't true.
-        Addendum/2009: the YAML 1.2 spec is still incomaptible with JSON,
+        Addendum/2009: the YAML 1.2 spec is still incompatible with JSON,
         even though the incompatibilities have been documented (and are
         known to Brian) for many years and the spec makes explicit claims
         that YAML is a superset of JSON. It would be so easy to fix, but
-        apparently, bullying and corrupting userdata is so much easier.
+        apparently, bullying people and corrupting userdata is so much
+        easier.
   SPEED
     It seems that JSON::XS is surprisingly fast, as shown in the following
     tables. They have been generated with the help of the "eg/bench" program
     in the JSON::XS distribution, to make it easy to compare on your own
     single-line JSON string (also available at
     <http://dist.schmorp.de/misc/json/short.json>).
        {"method": "handleMessage", "params": ["user1",
        "we were just talking"], "id": null, "array":[1,11,234,-5,1e5,1e7,
-       true,  false]}
+       1,  0]}
     It shows the number of encodes/decodes per second (JSON::XS uses the
     functional interface, while JSON::XS/2 uses the OO interface with
-    pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables shrink).
+    pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables shrink.
-    Higher is better:
+    JSON::DWIW/DS uses the deserialise function, while JSON::DWIW::FJ uses
+    the from_json method). Higher is better:
-       module     |     encode |     decode |
+       module        |     encode |     decode |
-       -----------|------------|------------|
+       --------------|------------|------------|
-       JSON 1.x   |   4990.842 |   4088.813 |
+       JSON::DWIW/DS |  86302.551 | 102300.098 |
-       JSON::DWIW |  51653.990 |  71575.154 |
+       JSON::DWIW/FJ |  86302.551 |  75983.768 |
-       JSON::PC   |  65948.176 |  74631.744 |
+       JSON::PP      |  15827.562 |   6638.658 |
-       JSON::PP   |   8931.652 |   3817.168 |
+       JSON::Syck    |  63358.066 |  47662.545 |
-       JSON::Syck |  24877.248 |  27776.848 |
+       JSON::XS      | 511500.488 | 511500.488 |
-       JSON::XS   | 388361.481 | 227951.304 |
+       JSON::XS/2    | 291271.111 | 388361.481 |
-       JSON::XS/2 | 227951.304 | 218453.333 |
+       JSON::XS/3    | 361577.931 | 361577.931 |
-       JSON::XS/3 | 338250.323 | 218453.333 |
+       Storable      |  66788.280 | 265462.278 |
-       Storable   |  16500.016 | 135300.129 |
-       -----------+------------+------------+
+       --------------+------------+------------+
-    That is, JSON::XS is about five times faster than JSON::DWIW on
+    That is, JSON::XS is almost six times faster than JSON::DWIW on
-    encoding, about three times faster on decoding, and over forty times
+    encoding, about five times faster on decoding, and over thirty to
-    faster than JSON, even with pretty-printing and key sorting. It also
+    seventy times faster than JSON's pure perl implementation. It also
     compares favourably to Storable for small amounts of data.
     Using a longer test string (roughly 18KB, generated from Yahoo! Locals
     search API (<http://dist.schmorp.de/misc/json/long.json>).
-       module     |     encode |     decode |
+       module        |     encode |     decode |
-       -----------|------------|------------|
+       --------------|------------|------------|
-       JSON 1.x   |     55.260 |     34.971 |
+       JSON::DWIW/DS |   1647.927 |   2673.916 |
-       JSON::DWIW |    825.228 |   1082.513 |
+       JSON::DWIW/FJ |   1630.249 |   2596.128 |
-       JSON::PC   |   3571.444 |   2394.829 |
-       JSON::PP   |    210.987 |     32.574 |
+       JSON::PP      |    400.640 |     62.311 |
-       JSON::Syck |    552.551 |    787.544 |
+       JSON::Syck    |   1481.040 |   1524.869 |
-       JSON::XS   |   5780.463 |   4854.519 |
+       JSON::XS      |  20661.596 |   9541.183 |
-       JSON::XS/2 |   3869.998 |   4798.975 |
+       JSON::XS/2    |  10683.403 |   9416.938 |
-       JSON::XS/3 |   5862.880 |   4798.975 |
+       JSON::XS/3    |  20661.596 |   9400.054 |
-       Storable   |   4445.002 |   5235.027 |
+       Storable      |  19765.806 |  10000.725 |
-       -----------+------------+------------+
+       --------------+------------+------------+
     Again, JSON::XS leads by far (except for Storable which non-surprisingly
-    decodes faster).
+    decodes a bit faster).
     On large strings containing lots of high Unicode characters, some
     modules (such as JSON::PC) seem to decode faster than JSON::XS, but the
     result will be broken due to missing (or wrong) Unicode handling. Others
     refuse to decode or encode properly, so it was impossible to prepare a
     information you might want to make sure that exceptions thrown by
     JSON::XS will not end up in front of untrusted eyes.
     If you are using JSON::XS to return packets to consumption by JavaScript
     scripts in a browser you should have a look at
-    <http://jpsykes.com/47/practical-csrf-and-json-security> to see whether
+    <http://blog.archive.jpsykes.com/47/practical-csrf-and-json-security/>
-    you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which really are
+    to see whether you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which
-    browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to deal with it,
+    really are browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to
-    as major browser developers care only for features, not about getting
+    deal with it, as major browser developers care only for features, not
-    security right).
+    about getting security right).
 THREADS
     This module is *not* guaranteed to be thread safe and there are no plans
     to change this until Perl gets thread support (as opposed to the
     horribly slow so-called "threads" which are simply slow and bloated

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing JSON-XS/README (file contents): Revision 1.32 by root, Sat Oct 10 01:48:50 2009 UTC vs. Revision 1.36 by root, Wed Jul 27 15:53:40 2011 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing JSON-XS/README (file contents):
Revision 1.32 by root, Sat Oct 10 01:48:50 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 1.36 by root, Wed Jul 27 15:53:40 2011 UTC