--- JSON-XS/XS.pm 2009/08/09 16:01:39 1.124 +++ JSON-XS/XS.pm 2010/03/17 01:45:43 1.132 @@ -66,10 +66,10 @@ =item * round-trip integrity When you serialise a perl data structure using only data types supported -by JSON, the deserialised data structure is identical on the Perl level. -(e.g. the string "2.0" doesn't suddenly become "2" just because it looks -like a number). There minor I exceptions to this, read the MAPPING -section below to learn about those. +by JSON and Perl, the deserialised data structure is identical on the Perl +level. (e.g. the string "2.0" doesn't suddenly become "2" just because +it looks like a number). There I minor exceptions to this, read the +MAPPING section below to learn about those. =item * strict checking of JSON correctness @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ use common::sense; -our $VERSION = '2.25'; +our $VERSION = '2.29'; our @ISA = qw(Exporter); our @EXPORT = qw(encode_json decode_json to_json from_json); @@ -753,6 +753,11 @@ case. Note that in this case, any previously-parsed JSON texts will be lost. +Example: Parse some JSON arrays/objects in a given string and return +them. + + my @objs = JSON::XS->new->incr_parse ("[5][7][1,2]"); + =item $lvalue_string = $json->incr_text This method returns the currently stored JSON fragment as an lvalue, that @@ -991,6 +996,11 @@ precision (in which case you might lose perfect roundtripping ability, but the JSON number will still be re-encoded as a JSON number). +Note that precision is not accuracy - binary floating point values cannot +represent most decimal fractions exactly, and when converting from and to +floating point, JSON::XS only guarantees precision up to but not including +the leats significant bit. + =item true, false These JSON atoms become C and C, @@ -1087,6 +1097,13 @@ if you need this capability (but don't forget to explain why it's needed :). +Note that numerical precision has the same meaning as under Perl (so +binary to decimal conversion follows the same rules as in Perl, which +can differ to other languages). Also, your perl interpreter might expose +extensions to the floating point numbers of your platform, such as +infinities or NaN's - these cannot be represented in JSON, and it is an +error to pass those in. + =back @@ -1326,49 +1343,48 @@ {"method": "handleMessage", "params": ["user1", "we were just talking"], "id": null, "array":[1,11,234,-5,1e5,1e7, - true, false]} + 1, 0]} It shows the number of encodes/decodes per second (JSON::XS uses the functional interface, while JSON::XS/2 uses the OO interface with pretty-printing and hashkey sorting enabled, JSON::XS/3 enables -shrink). Higher is better: +shrink. JSON::DWIW/DS uses the deserialise function, while JSON::DWIW::FJ +uses the from_json method). Higher is better: - module | encode | decode | - -----------|------------|------------| - JSON 1.x | 4990.842 | 4088.813 | - JSON::DWIW | 51653.990 | 71575.154 | - JSON::PC | 65948.176 | 74631.744 | - JSON::PP | 8931.652 | 3817.168 | - JSON::Syck | 24877.248 | 27776.848 | - JSON::XS | 388361.481 | 227951.304 | - JSON::XS/2 | 227951.304 | 218453.333 | - JSON::XS/3 | 338250.323 | 218453.333 | - Storable | 16500.016 | 135300.129 | - -----------+------------+------------+ - -That is, JSON::XS is about five times faster than JSON::DWIW on encoding, -about three times faster on decoding, and over forty times faster -than JSON, even with pretty-printing and key sorting. It also compares -favourably to Storable for small amounts of data. + module | encode | decode | + --------------|------------|------------| + JSON::DWIW/DS | 86302.551 | 102300.098 | + JSON::DWIW/FJ | 86302.551 | 75983.768 | + JSON::PP | 15827.562 | 6638.658 | + JSON::Syck | 63358.066 | 47662.545 | + JSON::XS | 511500.488 | 511500.488 | + JSON::XS/2 | 291271.111 | 388361.481 | + JSON::XS/3 | 361577.931 | 361577.931 | + Storable | 66788.280 | 265462.278 | + --------------+------------+------------+ + +That is, JSON::XS is almost six times faster than JSON::DWIW on encoding, +about five times faster on decoding, and over thirty to seventy times +faster than JSON's pure perl implementation. It also compares favourably +to Storable for small amounts of data. Using a longer test string (roughly 18KB, generated from Yahoo! Locals search API (L). - module | encode | decode | - -----------|------------|------------| - JSON 1.x | 55.260 | 34.971 | - JSON::DWIW | 825.228 | 1082.513 | - JSON::PC | 3571.444 | 2394.829 | - JSON::PP | 210.987 | 32.574 | - JSON::Syck | 552.551 | 787.544 | - JSON::XS | 5780.463 | 4854.519 | - JSON::XS/2 | 3869.998 | 4798.975 | - JSON::XS/3 | 5862.880 | 4798.975 | - Storable | 4445.002 | 5235.027 | - -----------+------------+------------+ + module | encode | decode | + --------------|------------|------------| + JSON::DWIW/DS | 1647.927 | 2673.916 | + JSON::DWIW/FJ | 1630.249 | 2596.128 | + JSON::PP | 400.640 | 62.311 | + JSON::Syck | 1481.040 | 1524.869 | + JSON::XS | 20661.596 | 9541.183 | + JSON::XS/2 | 10683.403 | 9416.938 | + JSON::XS/3 | 20661.596 | 9400.054 | + Storable | 19765.806 | 10000.725 | + --------------+------------+------------+ Again, JSON::XS leads by far (except for Storable which non-surprisingly -decodes faster). +decodes a bit faster). On large strings containing lots of high Unicode characters, some modules (such as JSON::PC) seem to decode faster than JSON::XS, but the result @@ -1414,11 +1430,11 @@ If you are using JSON::XS to return packets to consumption by JavaScript scripts in a browser you should have a look at -L to see whether -you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which really are browser -design bugs, but it is still you who will have to deal with it, as major -browser developers care only for features, not about getting security -right). +L to +see whether you are vulnerable to some common attack vectors (which really +are browser design bugs, but it is still you who will have to deal with +it, as major browser developers care only for features, not about getting +security right). =head1 THREADS