… | |
… | |
99 | |
99 | |
100 | =cut |
100 | =cut |
101 | |
101 | |
102 | package JSON::XS; |
102 | package JSON::XS; |
103 | |
103 | |
104 | no warnings; |
104 | use common::sense; |
105 | use strict; |
|
|
106 | |
105 | |
107 | our $VERSION = '2.231'; |
106 | our $VERSION = '2.24'; |
108 | our @ISA = qw(Exporter); |
107 | our @ISA = qw(Exporter); |
109 | |
108 | |
110 | our @EXPORT = qw(encode_json decode_json to_json from_json); |
109 | our @EXPORT = qw(encode_json decode_json to_json from_json); |
111 | |
110 | |
112 | sub to_json($) { |
111 | sub to_json($) { |
… | |
… | |
441 | the same JSON text (given the same overall settings). If it is disabled, |
440 | the same JSON text (given the same overall settings). If it is disabled, |
442 | the same hash might be encoded differently even if contains the same data, |
441 | the same hash might be encoded differently even if contains the same data, |
443 | as key-value pairs have no inherent ordering in Perl. |
442 | as key-value pairs have no inherent ordering in Perl. |
444 | |
443 | |
445 | This setting has no effect when decoding JSON texts. |
444 | This setting has no effect when decoding JSON texts. |
|
|
445 | |
|
|
446 | This setting has currently no effect on tied hashes. |
446 | |
447 | |
447 | =item $json = $json->allow_nonref ([$enable]) |
448 | =item $json = $json->allow_nonref ([$enable]) |
448 | |
449 | |
449 | =item $enabled = $json->get_allow_nonref |
450 | =item $enabled = $json->get_allow_nonref |
450 | |
451 | |
… | |
… | |
1183 | when your channel for JSON transfer is not 8-bit clean or the encoding |
1184 | when your channel for JSON transfer is not 8-bit clean or the encoding |
1184 | might be mangled in between (e.g. in mail), and works because ASCII is a |
1185 | might be mangled in between (e.g. in mail), and works because ASCII is a |
1185 | proper subset of most 8-bit and multibyte encodings in use in the world. |
1186 | proper subset of most 8-bit and multibyte encodings in use in the world. |
1186 | |
1187 | |
1187 | =back |
1188 | =back |
|
|
1189 | |
|
|
1190 | |
|
|
1191 | =head2 JSON and ECMAscript |
|
|
1192 | |
|
|
1193 | JSON syntax is based on how literals are represented in javascript (the |
|
|
1194 | not-standardised predecessor of ECMAscript) which is presumably why it is |
|
|
1195 | called "JavaScript Object Notation". |
|
|
1196 | |
|
|
1197 | However, JSON is not a subset (and also not a superset of course) of |
|
|
1198 | ECMAscript (the standard) or javascript (whatever browsers actually |
|
|
1199 | implement). |
|
|
1200 | |
|
|
1201 | If you want to use javascript's C<eval> function to "parse" JSON, you |
|
|
1202 | might run into parse errors for valid JSON texts, or the resulting data |
|
|
1203 | structure might not be queryable: |
|
|
1204 | |
|
|
1205 | One of the problems is that U+2028 and U+2029 are valid characters inside |
|
|
1206 | JSON strings, but are not allowed in ECMAscript string literals, so the |
|
|
1207 | following Perl fragment will not output something that can be guaranteed |
|
|
1208 | to be parsable by javascript's C<eval>: |
|
|
1209 | |
|
|
1210 | use JSON::XS; |
|
|
1211 | |
|
|
1212 | print encode_json [chr 0x2028]; |
|
|
1213 | |
|
|
1214 | The right fix for this is to use a proper JSON parser in your javascript |
|
|
1215 | programs, and not rely on C<eval> (see for example Douglas Crockford's |
|
|
1216 | F<json2.js> parser). |
|
|
1217 | |
|
|
1218 | If this is not an option, you can, as a stop-gap measure, simply encode to |
|
|
1219 | ASCII-only JSON: |
|
|
1220 | |
|
|
1221 | use JSON::XS; |
|
|
1222 | |
|
|
1223 | print JSON::XS->new->ascii->encode ([chr 0x2028]); |
|
|
1224 | |
|
|
1225 | Note that this will enlarge the resulting JSON text quite a bit if you |
|
|
1226 | have many non-ASCII characters. You might be tempted to run some regexes |
|
|
1227 | to only escape U+2028 and U+2029, e.g.: |
|
|
1228 | |
|
|
1229 | # DO NOT USE THIS! |
|
|
1230 | my $json = JSON::XS->new->utf8->encode ([chr 0x2028]); |
|
|
1231 | $json =~ s/\xe2\x80\xa8/\\u2028/g; # escape U+2028 |
|
|
1232 | $json =~ s/\xe2\x80\xa9/\\u2029/g; # escape U+2029 |
|
|
1233 | print $json; |
|
|
1234 | |
|
|
1235 | Note that I<this is a bad idea>: the above only works for U+2028 and |
|
|
1236 | U+2029 and thus only for fully ECMAscript-compliant parsers. Many existing |
|
|
1237 | javascript implementations, however, have issues with other characters as |
|
|
1238 | well - using C<eval> naively simply I<will> cause problems. |
|
|
1239 | |
|
|
1240 | Another problem is that some javascript implementations reserve |
|
|
1241 | some property names for their own purposes (which probably makes |
|
|
1242 | them non-ECMAscript-compliant). For example, Iceweasel reserves the |
|
|
1243 | C<__proto__> property name for it's own purposes. |
|
|
1244 | |
|
|
1245 | If that is a problem, you could parse try to filter the resulting JSON |
|
|
1246 | output for these property strings, e.g.: |
|
|
1247 | |
|
|
1248 | $json =~ s/"__proto__"\s*:/"__proto__renamed":/g; |
|
|
1249 | |
|
|
1250 | This works because C<__proto__> is not valid outside of strings, so every |
|
|
1251 | occurence of C<"__proto__"\s*:> must be a string used as property name. |
|
|
1252 | |
|
|
1253 | If you know of other incompatibilities, please let me know. |
1188 | |
1254 | |
1189 | |
1255 | |
1190 | =head2 JSON and YAML |
1256 | =head2 JSON and YAML |
1191 | |
1257 | |
1192 | You often hear that JSON is a subset of YAML. This is, however, a mass |
1258 | You often hear that JSON is a subset of YAML. This is, however, a mass |