ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Download File
/cvs/cvsroot/Coro/Changes
(Generate patch)

Comparing cvsroot/Coro/Changes (file contents):
Revision 1.526 by root, Thu Oct 1 23:51:33 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 1.532 by root, Fri Dec 25 07:17:11 2009 UTC

6 but very lacking in others (higher level ipc)). 6 but very lacking in others (higher level ipc)).
7TODO: unready_all 7TODO: unready_all
8TODO: myhttpd header parsing 8TODO: myhttpd header parsing
9TODO: channel->maxsize(newsize)? 9TODO: channel->maxsize(newsize)?
10 10
11 - convert Coro::Util into a "perl compatibility wrapper" - the functions
12 are less useful now, but are drop-in replacements for existing
13 functions, listing better alternatives in the documentation. This also
14 fixes a bug in Coro::LWP which naively substituted Socket::inet_aton
15 with Coro::Util::inet_aton.
16 - fix Coro::Util::gethost* functions.
17
185.21 Wed Dec 16 07:19:51 CET 2009
19 - automatically load Coro::AnyEvent when AnyEvent and Coro are used
20 together.
21 - add some examples on how to combine other event loops with Coro in
22 Coro::AnyEvent, and how to run it (and not to block). Seems to be
23 the most common source of confusion.
24 - try to catch people naively blocking in an event callback.
25 - work around the perl filehandle bug issue in conjunction with
26 older common::sense (as indirectly pointed out by ZSystem).
27 - clarify the "not from signal handlers" section.
28
295.2 Sun Oct 4 14:54:24 CEST 2009
11 - Coro::Storable destroyed the prototypes of the functions it wrapped. 30 - Coro::Storable destroyed the prototypes of the functions it wrapped.
31 - export rouse_cb and rouse_wait by default now.
12 - fix various prototype mismatches in Coro::AnyEvent and Coro::Handle. 32 - fix various prototype mismatches in Coro::AnyEvent and Coro::Handle.
33 - new method $state->swap_sv.
13 - added section on "windows process emulation" to the manpage, 34 - added section on "windows process emulation" to the manpage,
14 after a not-so-fruitful (nor-friendly) "discussion" with chip 35 after a not-so-fruitful (nor-friendly) "discussion" with chip
15 salzenberg (discussion implies arguments, but his only arguments 36 salzenberg (discussion implies arguments, but his only arguments
16 were ad-hominems, one wonders why he started it in the first 37 were ad-hominems, one wonders why he started it in the first
17 place). I hope this explains it well enough for him to understand, 38 place). I hope this explains it well enough for him to understand,

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines