… | |
… | |
2 | Meta, Features & Commandline Issues |
2 | Meta, Features & Commandline Issues |
3 | My question isn't answered here, can I ask a human? |
3 | My question isn't answered here, can I ask a human? |
4 | Before sending me mail, you could go to IRC: "irc.freenode.net", channel |
4 | Before sending me mail, you could go to IRC: "irc.freenode.net", channel |
5 | "#rxvt-unicode" has some rxvt-unicode enthusiasts that might be |
5 | "#rxvt-unicode" has some rxvt-unicode enthusiasts that might be |
6 | interested in learning about new and exciting problems (but not FAQs :). |
6 | interested in learning about new and exciting problems (but not FAQs :). |
|
|
7 | |
|
|
8 | I use Gentoo, and I have a problem... |
|
|
9 | There are three big problems with Gentoo Linux: first of all, most if |
|
|
10 | not all Gentoo systems are completely broken (missing or mismatched |
|
|
11 | header files, broken compiler etc. are just the tip of the iceberg); |
|
|
12 | secondly, the Gentoo maintainer thinks it is a good idea to add broken |
|
|
13 | patches to the code; and lastly, it should be called Gentoo GNU/Linux. |
|
|
14 | |
|
|
15 | For these reasons, it is impossible to support rxvt-unicode on Gentoo. |
|
|
16 | Problems appearing on Gentoo systems will usually simply be ignored |
|
|
17 | unless they can be reproduced on non-Gentoo systems. |
7 | |
18 | |
8 | Does it support tabs, can I have a tabbed rxvt-unicode? |
19 | Does it support tabs, can I have a tabbed rxvt-unicode? |
9 | Beginning with version 7.3, there is a perl extension that implements a |
20 | Beginning with version 7.3, there is a perl extension that implements a |
10 | simple tabbed terminal. It is installed by default, so any of these |
21 | simple tabbed terminal. It is installed by default, so any of these |
11 | should give you tabs: |
22 | should give you tabs: |
… | |
… | |
823 | cases. You can also create a termcap entry by using terminfo's infocmp |
834 | cases. You can also create a termcap entry by using terminfo's infocmp |
824 | program like this: |
835 | program like this: |
825 | |
836 | |
826 | infocmp -C rxvt-unicode |
837 | infocmp -C rxvt-unicode |
827 | |
838 | |
828 | Or you could use this termcap entry, generated by the command above: |
839 | Or you could use the termcap entry in doc/etc/rxvt-unicode.termcap, |
829 | |
840 | generated by the command above. |
830 | rxvt-unicode|rxvt-unicode terminal (X Window System):\ |
|
|
831 | :am:bw:eo:km:mi:ms:xn:xo:\ |
|
|
832 | :co#80:it#8:li#24:lm#0:\ |
|
|
833 | :AL=\E[%dL:DC=\E[%dP:DL=\E[%dM:DO=\E[%dB:IC=\E[%d@:\ |
|
|
834 | :K1=\EOw:K2=\EOu:K3=\EOy:K4=\EOq:K5=\EOs:LE=\E[%dD:\ |
|
|
835 | :RI=\E[%dC:SF=\E[%dS:SR=\E[%dT:UP=\E[%dA:ae=\E(B:al=\E[L:\ |
|
|
836 | :as=\E(0:bl=^G:cd=\E[J:ce=\E[K:cl=\E[H\E[2J:\ |
|
|
837 | :cm=\E[%i%d;%dH:cr=^M:cs=\E[%i%d;%dr:ct=\E[3g:dc=\E[P:\ |
|
|
838 | :dl=\E[M:do=^J:ec=\E[%dX:ei=\E[4l:ho=\E[H:\ |
|
|
839 | :i1=\E[?47l\E=\E[?1l:ic=\E[@:im=\E[4h:\ |
|
|
840 | :is=\E[r\E[m\E[2J\E[H\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l\E[4l:\ |
|
|
841 | :k1=\E[11~:k2=\E[12~:k3=\E[13~:k4=\E[14~:k5=\E[15~:\ |
|
|
842 | :k6=\E[17~:k7=\E[18~:k8=\E[19~:k9=\E[20~:kD=\E[3~:\ |
|
|
843 | :kI=\E[2~:kN=\E[6~:kP=\E[5~:kb=\177:kd=\EOB:ke=\E[?1l\E>:\ |
|
|
844 | :kh=\E[7~:kl=\EOD:kr=\EOC:ks=\E[?1h\E=:ku=\EOA:le=^H:\ |
|
|
845 | :mb=\E[5m:md=\E[1m:me=\E[m\017:mr=\E[7m:nd=\E[C:rc=\E8:\ |
|
|
846 | :sc=\E7:se=\E[27m:sf=^J:so=\E[7m:sr=\EM:st=\EH:ta=^I:\ |
|
|
847 | :te=\E[r\E[?1049l:ti=\E[?1049h:ue=\E[24m:up=\E[A:\ |
|
|
848 | :us=\E[4m:vb=\E[?5h\E[?5l:ve=\E[?25h:vi=\E[?25l:\ |
|
|
849 | :vs=\E[?25h: |
|
|
850 | |
841 | |
851 | Why does "ls" no longer have coloured output? |
842 | Why does "ls" no longer have coloured output? |
852 | The "ls" in the GNU coreutils unfortunately doesn't use terminfo to |
843 | The "ls" in the GNU coreutils unfortunately doesn't use terminfo to |
853 | decide whether a terminal has colour, but uses its own configuration |
844 | decide whether a terminal has colour, but uses its own configuration |
854 | file. Needless to say, "rxvt-unicode" is not in its default file (among |
845 | file. Needless to say, "rxvt-unicode" is not in its default file (among |
… | |
… | |
1076 | As you might have guessed, FreeBSD does neither define this symbol nor |
1067 | As you might have guessed, FreeBSD does neither define this symbol nor |
1077 | does it support it. Instead, it uses its own internal representation of |
1068 | does it support it. Instead, it uses its own internal representation of |
1078 | wchar_t. This is, of course, completely fine with respect to standards. |
1069 | wchar_t. This is, of course, completely fine with respect to standards. |
1079 | |
1070 | |
1080 | However, that means rxvt-unicode only works in "POSIX", "ISO-8859-1" and |
1071 | However, that means rxvt-unicode only works in "POSIX", "ISO-8859-1" and |
1081 | "UTF-8" locales under FreeBSD (which all use Unicode as wchar_t. |
1072 | "UTF-8" locales under FreeBSD (which all use Unicode as wchar_t). |
1082 | |
1073 | |
1083 | "__STDC_ISO_10646__" is the only sane way to support multi-language apps |
1074 | "__STDC_ISO_10646__" is the only sane way to support multi-language apps |
1084 | in an OS, as using a locale-dependent (and non-standardized) |
1075 | in an OS, as using a locale-dependent (and non-standardized) |
1085 | representation of wchar_t makes it impossible to convert between wchar_t |
1076 | representation of wchar_t makes it impossible to convert between wchar_t |
1086 | (as used by X11 and your applications) and any other encoding without |
1077 | (as used by X11 and your applications) and any other encoding without |