1 |
=head1 CROSSFIRE+ JEWELER SKILL |
2 |
|
3 |
Last update: L<DATE> |
4 |
|
5 |
Here the system and usage of the B<new> jeweler skill is described. |
6 |
|
7 |
=head2 Where to get it? How to!? What?? |
8 |
|
9 |
You can learn the jeweler by finding a I<scroll of jewelers>. If you |
10 |
want to make rings and amulets you also have to find a I<jewelers workbench>. The best |
11 |
place to find that is in a I<Jewelers Workshop> which can be found in towns (for example in Scorn). |
12 |
|
13 |
=head2 Identifying jewelery |
14 |
|
15 |
The most basic function of the jeweler skill is identifying rings and amulets, the higher |
16 |
your jeweler level is the more and the better you can identify jewelery. |
17 |
|
18 |
You identify jewelery by standing above it or having it in your inventory and entering: |
19 |
|
20 |
use_skill jeweler |
21 |
|
22 |
You will see the information about the identified jewelery and will gain exp for the identified objects. |
23 |
|
24 |
=head2 Generating blank rings and amulets |
25 |
|
26 |
For this you need to find a I<jewelers workbench>. You can generate blank rings |
27 |
and amulets of adornment from B<large gold nuggets>. |
28 |
But you need at least B<10 large gold nuggets> for a ring or an amulet! |
29 |
You can place multiples of 10 nuggets in the bench and such make multiple rings or amulets of adornment at once. |
30 |
|
31 |
So place 10 large gold nuggets in the bench and then enter: |
32 |
|
33 |
use_skill jeweler make ring |
34 |
|
35 |
Or if you want to make a blank amulet of adornment: |
36 |
|
37 |
use_skill jeweler make amulet |
38 |
|
39 |
=head2 Analyzing jewelery |
40 |
|
41 |
If you want to know what your chances are to make a specific rings or amulets place them |
42 |
in the workbench and enter: |
43 |
|
44 |
use_skill jeweler analyze |
45 |
|
46 |
You will get output like this, which gives you a clue whether it's futile or not to try |
47 |
to make this ring at your current level in the jeweler skill: |
48 |
|
49 |
ring (str+1)(dex+2): Projected success rate: Way above your skill |
50 |
ring (resist electricity +22)(con-1): Projected success rate: Way above your skill |
51 |
|
52 |
=head2 Merging rings or amulets |
53 |
|
54 |
You can merge the abilities of two rings or amulets, or even between a ring and an amulet. |
55 |
For example: toss two rings in the workbench, and type: |
56 |
|
57 |
use_skill jeweler merge analyze |
58 |
|
59 |
And you will get a similar output as for C<use_skill jeweler analyze>, which tells you |
60 |
whether you have a chance. If you are confident enter this command to merge the jewelery: |
61 |
|
62 |
use_skill jeweler merge |
63 |
|
64 |
You either get the merged improved ring/amulet or a very bad ring/amulet. |
65 |
|
66 |
=head2 Improving rings and amulets |
67 |
|
68 |
Improving rings is a bit more complicated, but it generally follows this schema: |
69 |
You have to put N base items, which indicate your plan, into the workbench. For example |
70 |
2 potions of strenght indicate that you want to improve a ring from (Str+0) to (Str+1). |
71 |
|
72 |
Then you just execute the jeweler skill to calculate how many additional gems you need to |
73 |
fullfill that plan, just enter: |
74 |
|
75 |
use_skill jeweler |
76 |
|
77 |
You will get an output similar to this (here a ring (str+1)(dex+2) and 2 wisdom potions were |
78 |
placed in the workbench): |
79 |
|
80 |
You want to make a ring (wis+1)(str+1)(dex+2): Projected success rate: Slightly above 50:50 |
81 |
You recognize that you are short of: 200 times gem, 1600 times ruby |
82 |
|
83 |
Next you put 200 diamonds and 1600 rubies in the bench and try your luck with the same command. |
84 |
You either see: |
85 |
|
86 |
You succeed. |
87 |
|
88 |
And have a ring (Str+1)(Dex+2)(Wis+1) in your workbench, or you see: |
89 |
|
90 |
You fail! |
91 |
|
92 |
And have a ring (Str-1)(Dex-2)(Wis-1) in your workbench. |
93 |
|
94 |
If you succeed to make the ring, you will get more experience. The more difficult a ring |
95 |
is, the more experience you get. |
96 |
|
97 |
=head2 AUTHOR |
98 |
|
99 |
Robin Redeker <elmex@ta-sa.org> |
100 |
http://www.ta-sa.org/ |