--- libecb/ecb.h 2013/12/04 10:17:49 1.125 +++ libecb/ecb.h 2014/01/09 05:16:12 1.128 @@ -89,13 +89,21 @@ #endif #endif -#define ECB_C (__STDC__+0) /* this assumes that __STDC__ is either empty or a number */ -#define ECB_C99 (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) -#define ECB_C11 (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L) #define ECB_CPP (__cplusplus+0) #define ECB_CPP11 (__cplusplus >= 201103L) #if ECB_CPP + #define ECB_C 0 + #define ECB_STDC_VERSION 0 +#else + #define ECB_C 1 + #define ECB_STDC_VERSION __STDC_VERSION__ +#endif + +#define ECB_C99 (ECB_STDC_VERSION >= 199901L) +#define ECB_C11 (ECB_STDC_VERSION >= 201112L) + +#if ECB_CPP #define ECB_EXTERN_C extern "C" #define ECB_EXTERN_C_BEG ECB_EXTERN_C { #define ECB_EXTERN_C_END } @@ -167,6 +175,8 @@ #if ECB_GCC_VERSION(4,7) /* see comment below (stdatomic.h) about the C11 memory model. */ #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE __atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) + #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_ACQUIRE __atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) + #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_RELEASE __atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_RELEASE) /* The __has_feature syntax from clang is so misdesigned that we cannot use it * without risking compile time errors with other compilers. We *could* @@ -175,10 +185,18 @@ * #elif defined __clang && __has_feature (cxx_atomic) * // see comment below (stdatomic.h) about the C11 memory model. * #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE __c11_atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) + * #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_ACQUIRE __c11_atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) + * #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_RELEASE __c11_atomic_thread_fence (__ATOMIC_RELEASE) */ #elif ECB_GCC_VERSION(4,4) || defined __INTEL_COMPILER || defined __clang__ #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE __sync_synchronize () + #elif _MSC_VER >= 1500 /* VC++ 2008 */ + /* apparently, microsoft broke all the memory barrier stuff in Visual Studio 2008... */ + #pragma intrinsic(_ReadBarrier,_WriteBarrier,_ReadWriteBarrier) + #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE _ReadWriteBarrier (); MemoryBarrier() + #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_ACQUIRE _ReadWriteBarrier (); MemoryBarrier() /* according to msdn, _ReadBarrier is not a load fence */ + #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE_RELEASE _WriteBarrier (); MemoryBarrier() #elif _MSC_VER >= 1400 /* VC++ 2005 */ #pragma intrinsic(_ReadBarrier,_WriteBarrier,_ReadWriteBarrier) #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE _ReadWriteBarrier () @@ -208,6 +226,8 @@ /* for most usages, or gcc and clang have a bug */ /* I *currently* lean towards the latter, and inefficiently implement */ /* all three of ecb's fences as a seq_cst fence */ + /* Update, gcc-4.8 generates mfence for all c++ fences, but nothing */ + /* for all __atomic_thread_fence's except seq_cst */ #define ECB_MEMORY_FENCE atomic_thread_fence (memory_order_seq_cst) #endif #endif @@ -274,6 +294,11 @@ #define ecb_prefetch(addr,rw,locality) __builtin_prefetch (addr, rw, locality) #else #define ecb_attribute(attrlist) + + /* possible C11 impl for integral types + typedef struct ecb_is_constant_struct ecb_is_constant_struct; + #define ecb_is_constant(expr) _Generic ((1 ? (struct ecb_is_constant_struct *)0 : (void *)((expr) - (expr)), ecb_is_constant_struct *: 0, default: 1)) */ + #define ecb_is_constant(expr) 0 #define ecb_expect(expr,value) (expr) #define ecb_prefetch(addr,rw,locality)