--- libecb/ecb.pod 2011/08/24 23:28:47 1.37 +++ libecb/ecb.pod 2015/11/21 16:53:50 1.71 @@ -56,35 +56,169 @@ is usually implemented as a macro. Specifically, a "bool" in this manual refers to any kind of boolean value, not a specific type. -=head2 GCC ATTRIBUTES +=head2 TYPES / TYPE SUPPORT -A major part of libecb deals with GCC attributes. These are additional -attributes that you can assign to functions, variables and sometimes even -types - much like C or C in C. - -While GCC allows declarations to show up in many surprising places, -but not in many expected places, the safest way is to put attribute -declarations before the whole declaration: +ecb.h makes sure that the following types are defined (in the expected way): - ecb_const int mysqrt (int a); - ecb_unused int i; + int8_t uint8_t int16_t uint16_t + int32_t uint32_t int64_t uint64_t + intptr_t uintptr_t + +The macro C is defined to the size of a pointer on this +platform (currently C<4> or C<8>) and can be used in preprocessor +expressions. -For variables, it is often nicer to put the attribute after the name, and -avoid multiple declarations using commas: +For C and C use C. - int i ecb_unused; +=head2 LANGUAGE/ENVIRONMENT/COMPILER VERSIONS + +All the following symbols expand to an expression that can be tested in +preprocessor instructions as well as treated as a boolean (use C to +ensure it's either C<0> or C<1> if you need that). =over 4 -=item ecb_attribute ((attrs...)) +=item ECB_C + +True if the implementation defines the C<__STDC__> macro to a true value, +while not claiming to be C++. + +=item ECB_C99 + +True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C99 (ISO/IEC +9899:1999) or any later version, while not claiming to be C++. + +Note that later versions (ECB_C11) remove core features again (for +example, variable length arrays). + +=item ECB_C11 + +True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C11 (ISO/IEC +9899:2011) or any later version, while not claiming to be C++. + +=item ECB_CPP + +True if the implementation defines the C<__cplusplus__> macro to a true +value, which is typically true for C++ compilers. + +=item ECB_CPP11 + +True if the implementation claims to be compliant to ISO/IEC 14882:2011 +(C++11) or any later version. + +=item ECB_GCC_VERSION (major, minor) + +Expands to a true value (suitable for testing in by the preprocessor) +if the compiler used is GNU C and the version is the given version, or +higher. + +This macro tries to return false on compilers that claim to be GCC +compatible but aren't. -A simple wrapper that expands to C<__attribute__((attrs))> on GCC, and to -nothing on other compilers, so the effect is that only GCC sees these. +=item ECB_EXTERN_C -Example: use the C attribute on a function. +Expands to C in C++, and a simple C in C. - ecb_attribute((__deprecated__)) void - do_not_use_me_anymore (void); +This can be used to declare a single external C function: + + ECB_EXTERN_C int printf (const char *format, ...); + +=item ECB_EXTERN_C_BEG / ECB_EXTERN_C_END + +These two macros can be used to wrap multiple C definitions - +they expand to nothing in C. + +They are most useful in header files: + + ECB_EXTERN_C_BEG + + int mycfun1 (int x); + int mycfun2 (int x); + + ECB_EXTERN_C_END + +=item ECB_STDFP + +If this evaluates to a true value (suitable for testing in by the +preprocessor), then C and C use IEEE 754 single/binary32 +and double/binary64 representations internally I the endianness of +both types match the endianness of C and C. + +This means you can just copy the bits of a C (or C) to an +C (or C) and get the raw IEEE 754 bit representation +without having to think about format or endianness. + +This is true for basically all modern platforms, although F might +not be able to deduce this correctly everywhere and might err on the safe +side. + +=item ECB_AMD64, ECB_AMD64_X32 + +These two macros are defined to C<1> on the x86_64/amd64 ABI and the X32 +ABI, respectively, and undefined elsewhere. + +The designers of the new X32 ABI for some inexplicable reason decided to +make it look exactly like amd64, even though it's completely incompatible +to that ABI, breaking about every piece of software that assumed that +C<__x86_64> stands for, well, the x86-64 ABI, making these macros +necessary. + +=back + +=head2 MACRO TRICKERY + +=over 4 + +=item ECB_CONCAT (a, b) + +Expands any macros in C and C, then concatenates the result to form +a single token. This is mainly useful to form identifiers from components, +e.g.: + + #define S1 str + #define S2 cpy + + ECB_CONCAT (S1, S2)(dst, src); // == strcpy (dst, src); + +=item ECB_STRINGIFY (arg) + +Expands any macros in C and returns the stringified version of +it. This is mainly useful to get the contents of a macro in string form, +e.g.: + + #define SQL_LIMIT 100 + sql_exec ("select * from table limit " ECB_STRINGIFY (SQL_LIMIT)); + +=item ECB_STRINGIFY_EXPR (expr) + +Like C, but additionally evaluates C to make sure it +is a valid expression. This is useful to catch typos or cases where the +macro isn't available: + + #include + + ECB_STRINGIFY (EDOM); // "33" (on my system at least) + ECB_STRINGIFY_EXPR (EDOM); // "33" + + // now imagine we had a typo: + + ECB_STRINGIFY (EDAM); // "EDAM" + ECB_STRINGIFY_EXPR (EDAM); // error: EDAM undefined + +=back + +=head2 ATTRIBUTES + +A major part of libecb deals with additional attributes that can be +assigned to functions, variables and sometimes even types - much like +C or C in C. They are implemented using either GCC +attributes or other compiler/language specific features. Attributes +declarations must be put before the whole declaration: + + ecb_const int mysqrt (int a); + ecb_unused int i; + +=over 4 =item ecb_unused @@ -93,7 +227,7 @@ declare a variable but do not always use it: { - int var ecb_unused; + ecb_unused int var; #ifdef SOMECONDITION var = ...; @@ -103,12 +237,22 @@ #endif } +=item ecb_deprecated + +Similar to C, but marks a function, variable or type as +deprecated. This makes some compilers warn when the type is used. + +=item ecb_deprecated_message (message) + +Same as C, but if possible, the specified diagnostic is +used instead of a generic depreciation message when the object is being +used. + =item ecb_inline -This is not actually an attribute, but you use it like one. It expands -either to C or to just C, if inline isn't -supported. It should be used to declare functions that should be inlined, -for code size or speed reasons. +Expands either to C or to just C, if inline +isn't supported. It should be used to declare functions that should be +inlined, for code size or speed reasons. Example: inline this function, it surely will reduce codesize. @@ -120,7 +264,7 @@ =item ecb_noinline -Prevent a function from being inlined - it might be optimised away, but +Prevents a function from being inlined - it might be optimised away, but not inlined into other functions. This is useful if you know your function is rarely called and large enough for inlining not to be helpful. @@ -140,6 +284,27 @@ In this case, the compiler would probably be smart enough to deduce it on its own, so this is mainly useful for declarations. +=item ecb_restrict + +Expands to the C keyword or equivalent on compilers that support +them, and to nothing on others. Must be specified on a pointer type or +an array index to indicate that the memory doesn't alias with any other +restricted pointer in the same scope. + +Example: multiply a vector, and allow the compiler to parallelise the +loop, because it knows it doesn't overwrite input values. + + void + multiply (ecb_restrict float *src, + ecb_restrict float *dst, + int len, float factor) + { + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) + dst [i] = src [i] * factor; + } + =item ecb_const Declares that the function only depends on the values of its arguments, @@ -209,7 +374,7 @@ =item ecb_artificial Declares the function as "artificial", in this case meaning that this -function is not really mean to be a function, but more like an accessor +function is not really meant to be a function, but more like an accessor - many methods in C++ classes are mere accessor functions, and having a crash reported in such a method, or single-stepping through them, is not usually so helpful, especially when it's inlined to just a few instructions. @@ -239,7 +404,7 @@ =over 4 -=item bool ecb_is_constant(expr) +=item bool ecb_is_constant (expr) Returns true iff the expression can be deduced to be a compile-time constant, and false otherwise. @@ -267,7 +432,7 @@ : (n * (uint32_t)rndm16 ()) >> 16; } -=item bool ecb_expect (expr, value) +=item ecb_expect (expr, value) Evaluates C and returns it. In addition, it tells the compiler that the C evaluates to C a lot, which can be used for static @@ -324,10 +489,11 @@ real_reserve_method (size); /* presumably noinline */ } -=item bool ecb_assume (cond) +=item ecb_assume (cond) -Try to tell the compiler that some condition is true, even if it's not -obvious. +Tries to tell the compiler that some condition is true, even if it's not +obvious. This is not a function, but a statement: it cannot be used in +another expression. This can be used to teach the compiler about invariants or other conditions that might improve code generation, but which are impossible to @@ -354,13 +520,13 @@ completely, as it knows that C<< current + 1 > end >> is false and the call will never be executed. -=item bool ecb_unreachable () +=item ecb_unreachable () This function does nothing itself, except tell the compiler that it will never be executed. Apart from suppressing a warning in some cases, this -function can be used to implement C or similar functions. +function can be used to implement C or similar functionality. -=item bool ecb_prefetch (addr, rw, locality) +=item ecb_prefetch (addr, rw, locality) Tells the compiler to try to prefetch memory at the given Cess for either reading (C = 0) or writing (C = 1). A C of @@ -370,6 +536,9 @@ need to be accessible (it could be a null pointer for example), but C and C must be compile-time constants. +This is a statement, not a function: you cannot use it as part of an +expression. + An obvious way to use this is to prefetch some data far away, in a big array you loop over. This prefetches memory some 128 array elements later, in the hope that it will be ready when the CPU arrives at that location. @@ -427,6 +596,14 @@ ecb_ctz32 (3) = 0 ecb_ctz32 (6) = 1 +=item bool ecb_is_pot32 (uint32_t x) + +=item bool ecb_is_pot64 (uint32_t x) + +Returns true iff C is a power of two or C. + +For smaller types than C you can safely use C. + =item int ecb_ld32 (uint32_t x) =item int ecb_ld64 (uint64_t x) @@ -457,6 +634,20 @@ ecb_popcount32 (7) = 3 ecb_popcount32 (255) = 8 +=item uint8_t ecb_bitrev8 (uint8_t x) + +=item uint16_t ecb_bitrev16 (uint16_t x) + +=item uint32_t ecb_bitrev32 (uint32_t x) + +Reverses the bits in x, i.e. the MSB becomes the LSB, MSB-1 becomes LSB+1 +and so on. + +Example: + + ecb_bitrev8 (0xa7) = 0xea + ecb_bitrev32 (0xffcc4411) = 0x882233ff + =item uint32_t ecb_bswap16 (uint32_t x) =item uint32_t ecb_bswap32 (uint32_t x) @@ -493,6 +684,94 @@ =back +=head2 FLOATING POINT FIDDLING + +=over 4 + +=item ECB_INFINITY [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +Evaluates to positive infinity if supported by the platform, otherwise to +a truly huge number. + +=item ECB_NAN [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +Evaluates to a quiet NAN if supported by the platform, otherwise to +C. + +=item float ecb_ldexpf (float x, int exp) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +Same as C, but always available. + +=item uint32_t ecb_float_to_binary16 (float x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +=item uint32_t ecb_float_to_binary32 (float x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +=item uint64_t ecb_double_to_binary64 (double x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +These functions each take an argument in the native C or C +type and return the IEEE 754 bit representation of it (binary16/half, +binary32/single or binary64/double precision). + +The bit representation is just as IEEE 754 defines it, i.e. the sign bit +will be the most significant bit, followed by exponent and mantissa. + +This function should work even when the native floating point format isn't +IEEE compliant, of course at a speed and code size penalty, and of course +also within reasonable limits (it tries to convert NaNs, infinities and +denormals, but will likely convert negative zero to positive zero). + +On all modern platforms (where C is true), the compiler should +be able to optimise away this function completely. + +These functions can be helpful when serialising floats to the network - you +can serialise the return value like a normal uint16_t/uint32_t/uint64_t. + +Another use for these functions is to manipulate floating point values +directly. + +Silly example: toggle the sign bit of a float. + + /* On gcc-4.7 on amd64, */ + /* this results in a single add instruction to toggle the bit, and 4 extra */ + /* instructions to move the float value to an integer register and back. */ + + x = ecb_binary32_to_float (ecb_float_to_binary32 (x) ^ 0x80000000U) + +=item float ecb_binary16_to_float (uint16_t x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +=item float ecb_binary32_to_float (uint32_t x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +=item double ecb_binary64_to_double (uint64_t x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] + +The reverse operation of the previous function - takes the bit +representation of an IEEE binary16, binary32 or binary64 number (half, +single or double precision) and converts it to the native C or +C format. + +This function should work even when the native floating point format isn't +IEEE compliant, of course at a speed and code size penalty, and of course +also within reasonable limits (it tries to convert normals and denormals, +and might be lucky for infinities, and with extraordinary luck, also for +negative zero). + +On all modern platforms (where C is true), the compiler should +be able to optimise away this function completely. + +=item uint16_t ecb_binary32_to_binary16 (uint32_t x) + +=item uint32_t ecb_binary16_to_binary32 (uint16_t x) + +Convert a IEEE binary32/single precision to binary16/half format, and vice +versa, handling all details (round-to-even, subnormals, infinity and NaNs) +correctly. + +These are functions are available under C<-DECB_NO_LIBM>, since +they do not rely on the platform floating point format. The +C and C functions are +usually what you want. + +=back + =head2 ARITHMETIC =over 4 @@ -529,7 +808,8 @@ Returns C divided by C
rounded down or up, respectively. C and C
must have integer types and C
must be strictly -positive. +positive. Note that these functions are implemented with macros in C +and with function templates in C++. =back @@ -549,4 +829,53 @@ =back +=head2 SYMBOLS GOVERNING COMPILATION OF ECB.H ITSELF + +These symbols need to be defined before including F the first time. + +=over 4 + +=item ECB_NO_THREADS + +If F is never used from multiple threads, then this symbol can +be defined, in which case memory fences (and similar constructs) are +completely removed, leading to more efficient code and fewer dependencies. + +Setting this symbol to a true value implies C. + +=item ECB_NO_SMP + +The weaker version of C - if F is used from +multiple threads, but never concurrently (e.g. if the system the program +runs on has only a single CPU with a single core, no hyperthreading and so +on), then this symbol can be defined, leading to more efficient code and +fewer dependencies. + +=item ECB_NO_LIBM + +When defined to C<1>, do not export any functions that might introduce +dependencies on the math library (usually called F<-lm>) - these are +marked with [-UECB_NO_LIBM]. + +=back + +=head1 UNDOCUMENTED FUNCTIONALITY + +F is full of undocumented functionality as well, some of which is +intended to be internal-use only, some of which we forgot to document, and +some of which we hide because we are not sure we will keep the interface +stable. + +While you are welcome to rummage around and use whatever you find useful +(we can't stop you), keep in mind that we will change undocumented +functionality in incompatible ways without thinking twice, while we are +considerably more conservative with documented things. + +=head1 AUTHORS + +C is designed and maintained by: + + Emanuele Giaquinta + Marc Alexander Lehmann +