[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/libecb/ecb.pod

Comparing libecb/ecb.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.54 by root, Wed Dec 19 23:33:47 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 1.55 by root, Thu Jan 9 05:16:12 2014 UTC

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

…		…
79	=over 4	79	=over 4
80		80
81	=item ECB_C	81	=item ECB_C
82		82
83	True if the implementation defines the C<__STDC__> macro to a true value,	83	True if the implementation defines the C<__STDC__> macro to a true value,
84	which is typically true for both C and C++ compilers.	84	while not claiming to be C++.
85		85
86	=item ECB_C99	86	=item ECB_C99
87		87
88	True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C99 (ISO/IEC	88	True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C99 (ISO/IEC
89	9899:1999) or any later version.	89	9899:1999) or any later version, while not claiming to be C++.
90		90
91	Note that later versions (ECB_C11) remove core features again (for	91	Note that later versions (ECB_C11) remove core features again (for
92	example, variable length arrays).	92	example, variable length arrays).
93		93
94	=item ECB_C11	94	=item ECB_C11
95		95
96	True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C11 (ISO/IEC	96	True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C11 (ISO/IEC
97	9899:2011) or any later version.	97	9899:2011) or any later version, while not claiming to be C++.
98		98
99	=item ECB_CPP	99	=item ECB_CPP
100		100
101	True if the implementation defines the C<__cplusplus__> macro to a true	101	True if the implementation defines the C<__cplusplus__> macro to a true
102	value, which is typically true for C++ compilers.	102	value, which is typically true for C++ compilers.