[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/libev/ev.html

Comparing libev/ev.html (file contents):
Revision 1.26 by root, Mon Nov 12 19:20:05 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.29 by root, Thu Nov 22 12:28:27 2007 UTC

 <head>
 	<title>libev</title>
 	<meta name="description" content="Pod documentation for libev" />
 	<meta name="inputfile" content="&lt;standard input&gt;" />
 	<meta name="outputfile" content="&lt;standard output&gt;" />
-	<meta name="created" content="Mon Nov 12 20:19:59 2007" />
+	<meta name="created" content="Thu Nov 22 13:26:17 2007" />
 	<meta name="generator" content="Pod::Xhtml 1.57" />
 <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://res.tst.eu/pod.css"/></head>
 <body>
 <div class="pod">
 <!-- INDEX START -->
 <p>These functions can be called anytime, even before initialising the
 library in any way.</p>
 <dl>
 	<dt>ev_tstamp ev_time ()</dt>
 	<dd>
-		<p>Returns the current time as libev would use it.</p>
+		<p>Returns the current time as libev would use it. Please note that the
+<code>ev_now</code> function is usually faster and also often returns the timestamp
+you actually want to know.</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>int ev_version_major ()</dt>
 	<dt>int ev_version_minor ()</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>You can find out the major and minor version numbers of the library
 <code>LIBEV_FLAGS</code>. Otherwise (the default), this environment variable will
 override the flags completely if it is found in the environment. This is
 useful to try out specific backends to test their performance, or to work
 around bugs.</p>
 				</dd>
-				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_SELECT</code>  (portable select backend)</dt>
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_SELECT</code>  (value 1, portable select backend)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>This is your standard select(2) backend. Not <i>completely</i> standard, as
+libev tries to roll its own fd_set with no limits on the number of fds,
+but if that fails, expect a fairly low limit on the number of fds when
+using this backend. It doesn't scale too well (O(highest_fd)), but its usually
+the fastest backend for a low number of fds.</p>
+				</dd>
-				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_POLL</code>    (poll backend, available everywhere except on windows)</dt>
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_POLL</code>    (value 2, poll backend, available everywhere except on windows)</dt>
-				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_EPOLL</code>   (linux only)</dt>
+				<dd>
-				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_KQUEUE</code>  (some bsds only)</dt>
+					<p>And this is your standard poll(2) backend. It's more complicated than
-				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_DEVPOLL</code> (solaris 8 only)</dt>
+select, but handles sparse fds better and has no artificial limit on the
-				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_PORT</code>    (solaris 10 only)</dt>
+number of fds you can use (except it will slow down considerably with a
+lot of inactive fds). It scales similarly to select, i.e. O(total_fds).</p>
-				<dd>
+				</dd>
-					<p>If one or more of these are ored into the flags value, then only these
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_EPOLL</code>   (value 4, Linux)</dt>
-backends will be tried (in the reverse order as given here). If one are
+				<dd>
-specified, any backend will do.</p>
+					<p>For few fds, this backend is a bit little slower than poll and select,
+but it scales phenomenally better. While poll and select usually scale like
+O(total_fds) where n is the total number of fds (or the highest fd), epoll scales
+either O(1) or O(active_fds).</p>
+					<p>While stopping and starting an I/O watcher in the same iteration will
+result in some caching, there is still a syscall per such incident
+(because the fd could point to a different file description now), so its
+best to avoid that. Also, dup()ed file descriptors might not work very
+well if you register events for both fds.</p>
+				</dd>
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_KQUEUE</code>  (value 8, most BSD clones)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it
+was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with
+anything but sockets and pipes, except on Darwin, where of course its
+completely useless). For this reason its not being &quot;autodetected&quot; unless
+you explicitly specify the flags (i.e. you don't use EVFLAG_AUTO).</p>
+					<p>It scales in the same way as the epoll backend, but the interface to the
+kernel is more efficient (which says nothing about its actual speed, of
+course). While starting and stopping an I/O watcher does not cause an
+extra syscall as with epoll, it still adds up to four event changes per
+incident, so its best to avoid that.</p>
+				</dd>
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_DEVPOLL</code> (value 16, Solaris 8)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>This is not implemented yet (and might never be).</p>
+				</dd>
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_PORT</code>    (value 32, Solaris 10)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>This uses the Solaris 10 port mechanism. As with everything on Solaris,
+it's really slow, but it still scales very well (O(active_fds)).</p>
+				</dd>
+				<dt><code>EVMETHOD_ALL</code></dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>Try all backends (even potentially broken ones). Since this is a mask, you
+can do stuff like <code>EVMETHOD_ALL &amp; ~EVMETHOD_KQUEUE</code>.</p>
 				</dd>
 			</dl>
 		</p>
+		<p>If one or more of these are ored into the flags value, then only these
+backends will be tried (in the reverse order as given here). If none are
+specified, most compiled-in backend will be tried, usually in reverse
+order of their flag values :)</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>struct ev_loop *ev_loop_new (unsigned int flags)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Similar to <code>ev_default_loop</code>, but always creates a new event loop that is
 always distinct from the default loop. Unlike the default loop, it cannot
 your process until at least one new event arrives, and will return after
 one iteration of the loop.</p>
 		<p>This flags value could be used to implement alternative looping
 constructs, but the <code>prepare</code> and <code>check</code> watchers provide a better and
 more generic mechanism.</p>
+		<p>Here are the gory details of what ev_loop does:</p>
+<pre>   1. If there are no active watchers (reference count is zero), return.
+   2. Queue and immediately call all prepare watchers.
+   3. If we have been forked, recreate the kernel state.
+   4. Update the kernel state with all outstanding changes.
+   5. Update the &quot;event loop time&quot;.
+   6. Calculate for how long to block.
+   7. Block the process, waiting for events.
+   8. Update the &quot;event loop time&quot; and do time jump handling.
+   9. Queue all outstanding timers.
+  10. Queue all outstanding periodics.
+  11. If no events are pending now, queue all idle watchers.
+  12. Queue all check watchers.
+  13. Call all queued watchers in reverse order (i.e. check watchers first).
+  14. If ev_unloop has been called or EVLOOP_ONESHOT or EVLOOP_NONBLOCK
+      was used, return, otherwise continue with step #1.
+</pre>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>ev_unloop (loop, how)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Can be used to make a call to <code>ev_loop</code> return early (but only after it
 has processed all outstanding events). The <code>how</code> argument must be either
-<code>EVUNLOOP_ONCE</code>, which will make the innermost <code>ev_loop</code> call return, or
+<code>EVUNLOOP_ONE</code>, which will make the innermost <code>ev_loop</code> call return, or
 <code>EVUNLOOP_ALL</code>, which will make all nested <code>ev_loop</code> calls return.</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>ev_ref (loop)</dt>
 	<dt>ev_unref (loop)</dt>
 	<dd>
 <p>Timer watchers are simple relative timers that generate an event after a
 given time, and optionally repeating in regular intervals after that.</p>
 <p>The timers are based on real time, that is, if you register an event that
 times out after an hour and you reset your system clock to last years
 time, it will still time out after (roughly) and hour. &quot;Roughly&quot; because
-detecting time jumps is hard, and soem inaccuracies are unavoidable (the
+detecting time jumps is hard, and some inaccuracies are unavoidable (the
 monotonic clock option helps a lot here).</p>
 <p>The relative timeouts are calculated relative to the <code>ev_now ()</code>
 time. This is usually the right thing as this timestamp refers to the time
-of the event triggering whatever timeout you are modifying/starting.  If
+of the event triggering whatever timeout you are modifying/starting. If
-you suspect event processing to be delayed and you *need* to base the timeout
+you suspect event processing to be delayed and you <i>need</i> to base the timeout
 on the current time, use something like this to adjust for this:</p>
 <pre>   ev_timer_set (&amp;timer, after + ev_now () - ev_time (), 0.);
 </pre>
+<p>The callback is guarenteed to be invoked only when its timeout has passed,
+but if multiple timers become ready during the same loop iteration then
+order of execution is undefined.</p>
 <dl>
 	<dt>ev_timer_init (ev_timer *, callback, ev_tstamp after, ev_tstamp repeat)</dt>
 	<dt>ev_timer_set (ev_timer *, ev_tstamp after, ev_tstamp repeat)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Configure the timer to trigger after <code>after</code> seconds. If <code>repeat</code> is
 take a year to trigger the event (unlike an <code>ev_timer</code>, which would trigger
 roughly 10 seconds later and of course not if you reset your system time
 again).</p>
 <p>They can also be used to implement vastly more complex timers, such as
 triggering an event on eahc midnight, local time.</p>
+<p>As with timers, the callback is guarenteed to be invoked only when the
+time (<code>at</code>) has been passed, but if multiple periodic timers become ready
+during the same loop iteration then order of execution is undefined.</p>
 <dl>
 	<dt>ev_periodic_init (ev_periodic *, callback, ev_tstamp at, ev_tstamp interval, reschedule_cb)</dt>
 	<dt>ev_periodic_set (ev_periodic *, ev_tstamp after, ev_tstamp repeat, reschedule_cb)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Lots of arguments, lets sort it out... There are basically three modes of
 operation, and we will explain them from simplest to complex:</p>
 		<p>
 			<dl>
 				<dt>* absolute timer (interval = reschedule_cb = 0)</dt>
 				<dd>
 					<p>In this configuration the watcher triggers an event at the wallclock time

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing libev/ev.html (file contents): Revision 1.26 by root, Mon Nov 12 19:20:05 2007 UTC vs. Revision 1.29 by root, Thu Nov 22 12:28:27 2007 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing libev/ev.html (file contents):
Revision 1.26 by root, Mon Nov 12 19:20:05 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.29 by root, Thu Nov 22 12:28:27 2007 UTC