@@ -1015,9 +1029,10 @@

Prepare and check watchers are usually (but not always) used in tandem: prepare watchers get invoked before the process blocks and check watchers afterwards.

Their main purpose is to integrate other event mechanisms into libev. This -could be used, for example, to track variable changes, implement your own -watchers, integrate net-snmp or a coroutine library and lots more.

Their main purpose is to integrate other event mechanisms into libev and +their use is somewhat advanced. This could be used, for example, to track +variable changes, implement your own watchers, integrate net-snmp or a +coroutine library and lots more.

This is done by examining in each prepare call which file descriptors need to be watched by the other library, registering ev_io watchers for them and starting an ev_timer watcher for any timeouts (many libraries @@ -1047,6 +1062,72 @@ + + +

This is a rather advanced watcher type that lets you embed one event loop +into another.

There are primarily two reasons you would want that: work around bugs and +prioritise I/O.

As an example for a bug workaround, the kqueue backend might only support +sockets on some platform, so it is unusable as generic backend, but you +still want to make use of it because you have many sockets and it scales +so nicely. In this case, you would create a kqueue-based loop and embed it +into your default loop (which might use e.g. poll). Overall operation will +be a bit slower because first libev has to poll and then call kevent, but +at least you can use both at what they are best.

As for prioritising I/O: rarely you have the case where some fds have +to be watched and handled very quickly (with low latency), and even +priorities and idle watchers might have too much overhead. In this case +you would put all the high priority stuff in one loop and all the rest in +a second one, and embed the second one in the first.

As long as the watcher is started it will automatically handle events. The +callback will be invoked whenever some events have been handled. You can +set the callback to 0 to avoid having to specify one if you are not +interested in that.

Also, there have not currently been made special provisions for forking: +when you fork, you not only have to call ev_loop_fork on both loops, +but you will also have to stop and restart any ev_embed watchers +yourself.

Unfortunately, not all backends are embeddable, only the ones returned by +ev_embeddable_backends are, which, unfortunately, does not include any +portable one.

So when you want to use this feature you will always have to be prepared +that you cannot get an embeddable loop. The recommended way to get around +this is to have a separate variables for your embeddable loop, try to +create it, and if that fails, use the normal loop for everything:

  struct ev_loop *loop_hi = ev_default_init (0);
+  struct ev_loop *loop_lo = 0;
+  struct ev_embed embed;
+
+  // see if there is a chance of getting one that works
+  // (remember that a flags value of 0 means autodetection)
+  loop_lo = ev_embeddable_backends () & ev_recommended_backends ()
+    ? ev_loop_new (ev_embeddable_backends () & ev_recommended_backends ())
+    : 0;
+
+  // if we got one, then embed it, otherwise default to loop_hi
+  if (loop_lo)
+    {
+      ev_embed_init (&embed, 0, loop_lo);
+      ev_embed_start (loop_hi, &embed);
+    }
+  else
+    loop_lo = loop_hi;
+
+

ev_embed_init (ev_embed *, callback, struct ev_loop *loop)
ev_embed_set (ev_embed *, callback, struct ev_loop *loop): +
Configures the watcher to embed the given loop, which must be embeddable.
+

+ + +

`ev_child` - wait for pid status changes

`ev_embed` - when one backend isn't enough

ev_child - wait for pid status changes

ev_embed - when one backend isn't enough

`ev_child` - wait for pid status changes

`ev_embed` - when one backend isn't enough