[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/libev/ev.html

Comparing libev/ev.html (file contents):
Revision 1.60 by root, Wed Nov 28 18:29:29 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.72 by root, Sat Dec 8 15:30:29 2007 UTC

 <head>
 	<title>libev</title>
 	<meta name="description" content="Pod documentation for libev" />
 	<meta name="inputfile" content="&lt;standard input&gt;" />
 	<meta name="outputfile" content="&lt;standard output&gt;" />
-	<meta name="created" content="Wed Nov 28 19:29:25 2007" />
+	<meta name="created" content="Sat Dec  8 16:30:24 2007" />
 	<meta name="generator" content="Pod::Xhtml 1.57" />
 <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://res.tst.eu/pod.css"/></head>
 <body>
 <div class="pod">
 <!-- INDEX START -->
 </pre>
 </div>
 <h1 id="DESCRIPTION">DESCRIPTION</h1>
 <div id="DESCRIPTION_CONTENT">
+<p>The newest version of this document is also available as a html-formatted
+web page you might find easier to navigate when reading it for the first
+time: <a href="http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.html">http://cvs.schmorp.de/libev/ev.html</a>.</p>
 <p>Libev is an event loop: you register interest in certain events (such as a
 file descriptor being readable or a timeout occuring), and it will manage
 these event sources and provide your program with events.</p>
 <p>To do this, it must take more or less complete control over your process
 (or thread) by executing the <i>event loop</i> handler, and will then
 <code>LIBEV_FLAGS</code>. Otherwise (the default), this environment variable will
 override the flags completely if it is found in the environment. This is
 useful to try out specific backends to test their performance, or to work
 around bugs.</p>
 				</dd>
+				<dt><code>EVFLAG_FORKCHECK</code></dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>Instead of calling <code>ev_default_fork</code> or <code>ev_loop_fork</code> manually after
+a fork, you can also make libev check for a fork in each iteration by
+enabling this flag.</p>
+					<p>This works by calling <code>getpid ()</code> on every iteration of the loop,
+and thus this might slow down your event loop if you do a lot of loop
+iterations and little real work, but is usually not noticeable (on my
+Linux system for example, <code>getpid</code> is actually a simple 5-insn sequence
+without a syscall and thus <i>very</i> fast, but my Linux system also has
+<code>pthread_atfork</code> which is even faster).</p>
+					<p>The big advantage of this flag is that you can forget about fork (and
+forget about forgetting to tell libev about forking) when you use this
+flag.</p>
+					<p>This flag setting cannot be overriden or specified in the <code>LIBEV_FLAGS</code>
+environment variable.</p>
+				</dd>
 				<dt><code>EVBACKEND_SELECT</code>  (value 1, portable select backend)</dt>
 				<dd>
 					<p>This is your standard select(2) backend. Not <i>completely</i> standard, as
 libev tries to roll its own fd_set with no limits on the number of fds,
 but if that fails, expect a fairly low limit on the number of fds when
 	<dt>ev_loop_fork (loop)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Like <code>ev_default_fork</code>, but acts on an event loop created by
 <code>ev_loop_new</code>. Yes, you have to call this on every allocated event loop
 after fork, and how you do this is entirely your own problem.</p>
+	</dd>
+	<dt>unsigned int ev_loop_count (loop)</dt>
+	<dd>
+		<p>Returns the count of loop iterations for the loop, which is identical to
+the number of times libev did poll for new events. It starts at <code>0</code> and
+happily wraps around with enough iterations.</p>
+		<p>This value can sometimes be useful as a generation counter of sorts (it
+&quot;ticks&quot; the number of loop iterations), as it roughly corresponds with
+<code>ev_prepare</code> and <code>ev_check</code> calls.</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>unsigned int ev_backend (loop)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Returns one of the <code>EVBACKEND_*</code> flags indicating the event backend in
 use.</p>
 	<dt>bool ev_is_pending (ev_TYPE *watcher)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Returns a true value iff the watcher is pending, (i.e. it has outstanding
 events but its callback has not yet been invoked). As long as a watcher
 is pending (but not active) you must not call an init function on it (but
-<code>ev_TYPE_set</code> is safe) and you must make sure the watcher is available to
+<code>ev_TYPE_set</code> is safe), you must not change its priority, and you must
-libev (e.g. you cnanot <code>free ()</code> it).</p>
+make sure the watcher is available to libev (e.g. you cannot <code>free ()</code>
+it).</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>callback ev_cb (ev_TYPE *watcher)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Returns the callback currently set on the watcher.</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>ev_cb_set (ev_TYPE *watcher, callback)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Change the callback. You can change the callback at virtually any time
 (modulo threads).</p>
+	</dd>
+	<dt>ev_set_priority (ev_TYPE *watcher, priority)</dt>
+	<dt>int ev_priority (ev_TYPE *watcher)</dt>
+	<dd>
+		<p>Set and query the priority of the watcher. The priority is a small
+integer between <code>EV_MAXPRI</code> (default: <code>2</code>) and <code>EV_MINPRI</code>
+(default: <code>-2</code>). Pending watchers with higher priority will be invoked
+before watchers with lower priority, but priority will not keep watchers
+from being executed (except for <code>ev_idle</code> watchers).</p>
+		<p>This means that priorities are <i>only</i> used for ordering callback
+invocation after new events have been received. This is useful, for
+example, to reduce latency after idling, or more often, to bind two
+watchers on the same event and make sure one is called first.</p>
+		<p>If you need to suppress invocation when higher priority events are pending
+you need to look at <code>ev_idle</code> watchers, which provide this functionality.</p>
+		<p>You <i>must not</i> change the priority of a watcher as long as it is active or
+pending.</p>
+		<p>The default priority used by watchers when no priority has been set is
+always <code>0</code>, which is supposed to not be too high and not be too low :).</p>
+		<p>Setting a priority outside the range of <code>EV_MINPRI</code> to <code>EV_MAXPRI</code> is
+fine, as long as you do not mind that the priority value you query might
+or might not have been adjusted to be within valid range.</p>
+	</dd>
+	<dt>ev_invoke (loop, ev_TYPE *watcher, int revents)</dt>
+	<dd>
+		<p>Invoke the <code>watcher</code> with the given <code>loop</code> and <code>revents</code>. Neither
+<code>loop</code> nor <code>revents</code> need to be valid as long as the watcher callback
+can deal with that fact.</p>
+	</dd>
+	<dt>int ev_clear_pending (loop, ev_TYPE *watcher)</dt>
+	<dd>
+		<p>If the watcher is pending, this function returns clears its pending status
+and returns its <code>revents</code> bitset (as if its callback was invoked). If the
+watcher isn't pending it does nothing and returns <code>0</code>.</p>
 	</dd>
 </dl>
 this situation even with a relatively standard program structure. Thus
 it is best to always use non-blocking I/O: An extra <code>read</code>(2) returning
 <code>EAGAIN</code> is far preferable to a program hanging until some data arrives.</p>
 <p>If you cannot run the fd in non-blocking mode (for example you should not
 play around with an Xlib connection), then you have to seperately re-test
-wether a file descriptor is really ready with a known-to-be good interface
+whether a file descriptor is really ready with a known-to-be good interface
 such as poll (fortunately in our Xlib example, Xlib already does this on
 its own, so its quite safe to use).</p>
 <dl>
 	<dt>ev_io_init (ev_io *, callback, int fd, int events)</dt>
 	<dt>ev_io_set (ev_io *, int fd, int events)</dt>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>ev_timer_again (loop)</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>This will act as if the timer timed out and restart it again if it is
 repeating. The exact semantics are:</p>
+		<p>If the timer is pending, its pending status is cleared.</p>
-		<p>If the timer is started but nonrepeating, stop it.</p>
+		<p>If the timer is started but nonrepeating, stop it (as if it timed out).</p>
-		<p>If the timer is repeating, either start it if necessary (with the repeat
+		<p>If the timer is repeating, either start it if necessary (with the
-value), or reset the running timer to the repeat value.</p>
+<code>repeat</code> value), or reset the running timer to the <code>repeat</code> value.</p>
 		<p>This sounds a bit complicated, but here is a useful and typical
-example: Imagine you have a tcp connection and you want a so-called
+example: Imagine you have a tcp connection and you want a so-called idle
-idle timeout, that is, you want to be called when there have been,
+timeout, that is, you want to be called when there have been, say, 60
-say, 60 seconds of inactivity on the socket. The easiest way to do
+seconds of inactivity on the socket. The easiest way to do this is to
-this is to configure an <code>ev_timer</code> with <code>after</code>=<code>repeat</code>=<code>60</code> and calling
+configure an <code>ev_timer</code> with a <code>repeat</code> value of <code>60</code> and then call
 <code>ev_timer_again</code> each time you successfully read or write some data. If
 you go into an idle state where you do not expect data to travel on the
-socket, you can stop the timer, and again will automatically restart it if
+socket, you can <code>ev_timer_stop</code> the timer, and <code>ev_timer_again</code> will
-need be.</p>
+automatically restart it if need be.</p>
-		<p>You can also ignore the <code>after</code> value and <code>ev_timer_start</code> altogether
+		<p>That means you can ignore the <code>after</code> value and <code>ev_timer_start</code>
-and only ever use the <code>repeat</code> value:</p>
+altogether and only ever use the <code>repeat</code> value and <code>ev_timer_again</code>:</p>
 <pre>   ev_timer_init (timer, callback, 0., 5.);
    ev_timer_again (loop, timer);
    ...
    timer-&gt;again = 17.;
    ev_timer_again (loop, timer);
    ...
    timer-&gt;again = 10.;
    ev_timer_again (loop, timer);
 </pre>
-		<p>This is more efficient then stopping/starting the timer eahc time you want
+		<p>This is more slightly efficient then stopping/starting the timer each time
-to modify its timeout value.</p>
+you want to modify its timeout value.</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>ev_tstamp repeat [read-write]</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>The current <code>repeat</code> value. Will be used each time the watcher times out
 or <code>ev_timer_again</code> is called and determines the next timeout (if any),
 </pre>
 </div>
 <h2 id="code_ev_idle_code_when_you_ve_got_no"><code>ev_idle</code> - when you've got nothing better to do...</h2>
 <div id="code_ev_idle_code_when_you_ve_got_no-2">
-<p>Idle watchers trigger events when there are no other events are pending
+<p>Idle watchers trigger events when no other events of the same or higher
-(prepare, check and other idle watchers do not count). That is, as long
+priority are pending (prepare, check and other idle watchers do not
-as your process is busy handling sockets or timeouts (or even signals,
+count).</p>
-imagine) it will not be triggered. But when your process is idle all idle
+<p>That is, as long as your process is busy handling sockets or timeouts
-watchers are being called again and again, once per event loop iteration -
+(or even signals, imagine) of the same or higher priority it will not be
+triggered. But when your process is idle (or only lower-priority watchers
+are pending), the idle watchers are being called once per event loop
-until stopped, that is, or your process receives more events and becomes
+iteration - until stopped, that is, or your process receives more events
-busy.</p>
+and becomes busy again with higher priority stuff.</p>
 <p>The most noteworthy effect is that as long as any idle watchers are
 active, the process will not block when waiting for new events.</p>
 <p>Apart from keeping your process non-blocking (which is a useful
 effect on its own sometimes), idle watchers are a good place to do
 &quot;pseudo-background processing&quot;, or delay processing stuff to after the
 		<p>Initialises and configures the prepare or check watcher - they have no
 parameters of any kind. There are <code>ev_prepare_set</code> and <code>ev_check_set</code>
 macros, but using them is utterly, utterly and completely pointless.</p>
 	</dd>
 </dl>
-<p>Example: To include a library such as adns, you would add IO watchers
+<p>There are a number of principal ways to embed other event loops or modules
-and a timeout watcher in a prepare handler, as required by libadns, and
+into libev. Here are some ideas on how to include libadns into libev
+(there is a Perl module named <code>EV::ADNS</code> that does this, which you could
+use for an actually working example. Another Perl module named <code>EV::Glib</code>
+embeds a Glib main context into libev, and finally, <code>Glib::EV</code> embeds EV
+into the Glib event loop).</p>
+<p>Method 1: Add IO watchers and a timeout watcher in a prepare handler,
-in a check watcher, destroy them and call into libadns. What follows is
+and in a check watcher, destroy them and call into libadns. What follows
-pseudo-code only of course:</p>
+is pseudo-code only of course. This requires you to either use a low
+priority for the check watcher or use <code>ev_clear_pending</code> explicitly, as
+the callbacks for the IO/timeout watchers might not have been called yet.</p>
 <pre>  static ev_io iow [nfd];
   static ev_timer tw;
   static void
   io_cb (ev_loop *loop, ev_io *w, int revents)
   {
-    // set the relevant poll flags
-    // could also call adns_processreadable etc. here
-    struct pollfd *fd = (struct pollfd *)w-&gt;data;
-    if (revents &amp; EV_READ ) fd-&gt;revents |= fd-&gt;events &amp; POLLIN;
-    if (revents &amp; EV_WRITE) fd-&gt;revents |= fd-&gt;events &amp; POLLOUT;
   }
   // create io watchers for each fd and a timer before blocking
   static void
   adns_prepare_cb (ev_loop *loop, ev_prepare *w, int revents)
   {
-    int timeout = 3600000;truct pollfd fds [nfd];
+    int timeout = 3600000;
+    struct pollfd fds [nfd];
     // actual code will need to loop here and realloc etc.
     adns_beforepoll (ads, fds, &amp;nfd, &amp;timeout, timeval_from (ev_time ()));
     /* the callback is illegal, but won't be called as we stop during check */
     ev_timer_init (&amp;tw, 0, timeout * 1e-3);
     ev_timer_start (loop, &amp;tw);
-    // create on ev_io per pollfd
+    // create one ev_io per pollfd
     for (int i = 0; i &lt; nfd; ++i)
       {
         ev_io_init (iow + i, io_cb, fds [i].fd,
           ((fds [i].events &amp; POLLIN ? EV_READ : 0)
            | (fds [i].events &amp; POLLOUT ? EV_WRITE : 0)));
         fds [i].revents = 0;
-        iow [i].data = fds + i;
         ev_io_start (loop, iow + i);
       }
   }
   // stop all watchers after blocking
   adns_check_cb (ev_loop *loop, ev_check *w, int revents)
   {
     ev_timer_stop (loop, &amp;tw);
     for (int i = 0; i &lt; nfd; ++i)
+      {
+        // set the relevant poll flags
+        // could also call adns_processreadable etc. here
+        struct pollfd *fd = fds + i;
+        int revents = ev_clear_pending (iow + i);
+        if (revents &amp; EV_READ ) fd-&gt;revents |= fd-&gt;events &amp; POLLIN;
+        if (revents &amp; EV_WRITE) fd-&gt;revents |= fd-&gt;events &amp; POLLOUT;
+        // now stop the watcher
-      ev_io_stop (loop, iow + i);
+        ev_io_stop (loop, iow + i);
+      }
     adns_afterpoll (adns, fds, nfd, timeval_from (ev_now (loop));
+  }
+</pre>
+<p>Method 2: This would be just like method 1, but you run <code>adns_afterpoll</code>
+in the prepare watcher and would dispose of the check watcher.</p>
+<p>Method 3: If the module to be embedded supports explicit event
+notification (adns does), you can also make use of the actual watcher
+callbacks, and only destroy/create the watchers in the prepare watcher.</p>
+<pre>  static void
+  timer_cb (EV_P_ ev_timer *w, int revents)
+  {
+    adns_state ads = (adns_state)w-&gt;data;
+    update_now (EV_A);
+    adns_processtimeouts (ads, &amp;tv_now);
+  }
+  static void
+  io_cb (EV_P_ ev_io *w, int revents)
+  {
+    adns_state ads = (adns_state)w-&gt;data;
+    update_now (EV_A);
+    if (revents &amp; EV_READ ) adns_processreadable  (ads, w-&gt;fd, &amp;tv_now);
+    if (revents &amp; EV_WRITE) adns_processwriteable (ads, w-&gt;fd, &amp;tv_now);
+  }
+  // do not ever call adns_afterpoll
+</pre>
+<p>Method 4: Do not use a prepare or check watcher because the module you
+want to embed is too inflexible to support it. Instead, youc na override
+their poll function.  The drawback with this solution is that the main
+loop is now no longer controllable by EV. The <code>Glib::EV</code> module does
+this.</p>
+<pre>  static gint
+  event_poll_func (GPollFD *fds, guint nfds, gint timeout)
+  {
+    int got_events = 0;
+    for (n = 0; n &lt; nfds; ++n)
+      // create/start io watcher that sets the relevant bits in fds[n] and increment got_events
+    if (timeout &gt;= 0)
+      // create/start timer
+    // poll
+    ev_loop (EV_A_ 0);
+    // stop timer again
+    if (timeout &gt;= 0)
+      ev_timer_stop (EV_A_ &amp;to);
+    // stop io watchers again - their callbacks should have set
+    for (n = 0; n &lt; nfds; ++n)
+      ev_io_stop (EV_A_ iow [n]);
+    return got_events;
   }
 the callback model to a model using method callbacks on objects.</p>
 <p>To use it,</p>
 <pre>  #include &lt;ev++.h&gt;
 </pre>
-<p>(it is not installed by default). This automatically includes <cite>ev.h</cite>
+<p>This automatically includes <cite>ev.h</cite> and puts all of its definitions (many
-and puts all of its definitions (many of them macros) into the global
+of them macros) into the global namespace. All C++ specific things are
-namespace. All C++ specific things are put into the <code>ev</code> namespace.</p>
+put into the <code>ev</code> namespace. It should support all the same embedding
-<p>It should support all the same embedding options as <cite>ev.h</cite>, most notably
+options as <cite>ev.h</cite>, most notably <code>EV_MULTIPLICITY</code>.</p>
-<code>EV_MULTIPLICITY</code>.</p>
+<p>Care has been taken to keep the overhead low. The only data member the C++
+classes add (compared to plain C-style watchers) is the event loop pointer
+that the watcher is associated with (or no additional members at all if
+you disable <code>EV_MULTIPLICITY</code> when embedding libev).</p>
+<p>Currently, functions, and static and non-static member functions can be
+used as callbacks. Other types should be easy to add as long as they only
+need one additional pointer for context. If you need support for other
+types of functors please contact the author (preferably after implementing
+it).</p>
 <p>Here is a list of things available in the <code>ev</code> namespace:</p>
 <dl>
 	<dt><code>ev::READ</code>, <code>ev::WRITE</code> etc.</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>These are just enum values with the same values as the <code>EV_READ</code> etc.
 which is called <code>ev::sig</code> to avoid clashes with the <code>signal</code> macro
 defines by many implementations.</p>
 		<p>All of those classes have these methods:</p>
 		<p>
 			<dl>
-				<dt>ev::TYPE::TYPE (object *, object::method *)</dt>
+				<dt>ev::TYPE::TYPE ()</dt>
-				<dt>ev::TYPE::TYPE (object *, object::method *, struct ev_loop *)</dt>
+				<dt>ev::TYPE::TYPE (struct ev_loop *)</dt>
 				<dt>ev::TYPE::~TYPE</dt>
 				<dd>
-					<p>The constructor takes a pointer to an object and a method pointer to
+					<p>The constructor (optionally) takes an event loop to associate the watcher
-the event handler callback to call in this class. The constructor calls
+with. If it is omitted, it will use <code>EV_DEFAULT</code>.</p>
-<code>ev_init</code> for you, which means you have to call the <code>set</code> method
+					<p>The constructor calls <code>ev_init</code> for you, which means you have to call the
-before starting it. If you do not specify a loop then the constructor
+<code>set</code> method before starting it.</p>
-automatically associates the default loop with this watcher.</p>
+					<p>It will not set a callback, however: You have to call the templated <code>set</code>
+method to set a callback before you can start the watcher.</p>
+					<p>(The reason why you have to use a method is a limitation in C++ which does
+not allow explicit template arguments for constructors).</p>
 					<p>The destructor automatically stops the watcher if it is active.</p>
+				</dd>
+				<dt>w-&gt;set&lt;class, &amp;class::method&gt; (object *)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>This method sets the callback method to call. The method has to have a
+signature of <code>void (*)(ev_TYPE &amp;, int)</code>, it receives the watcher as
+first argument and the <code>revents</code> as second. The object must be given as
+parameter and is stored in the <code>data</code> member of the watcher.</p>
+					<p>This method synthesizes efficient thunking code to call your method from
+the C callback that libev requires. If your compiler can inline your
+callback (i.e. it is visible to it at the place of the <code>set</code> call and
+your compiler is good :), then the method will be fully inlined into the
+thunking function, making it as fast as a direct C callback.</p>
+					<p>Example: simple class declaration and watcher initialisation</p>
+<pre>  struct myclass
+  {
+    void io_cb (ev::io &amp;w, int revents) { }
+  }
+  myclass obj;
+  ev::io iow;
+  iow.set &lt;myclass, &amp;myclass::io_cb&gt; (&amp;obj);
+</pre>
+				</dd>
+				<dt>w-&gt;set&lt;function&gt; (void *data = 0)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>Also sets a callback, but uses a static method or plain function as
+callback. The optional <code>data</code> argument will be stored in the watcher's
+<code>data</code> member and is free for you to use.</p>
+					<p>The prototype of the <code>function</code> must be <code>void (*)(ev::TYPE &amp;w, int)</code>.</p>
+					<p>See the method-<code>set</code> above for more details.</p>
+					<p>Example:</p>
+<pre>  static void io_cb (ev::io &amp;w, int revents) { }
+  iow.set &lt;io_cb&gt; ();
+</pre>
 				</dd>
 				<dt>w-&gt;set (struct ev_loop *)</dt>
 				<dd>
 					<p>Associates a different <code>struct ev_loop</code> with this watcher. You can only
 do this when the watcher is inactive (and not pending either).</p>
 				</dd>
 				<dt>w-&gt;set ([args])</dt>
 				<dd>
 					<p>Basically the same as <code>ev_TYPE_set</code>, with the same args. Must be
-called at least once.  Unlike the C counterpart, an active watcher gets
+called at least once. Unlike the C counterpart, an active watcher gets
-automatically stopped and restarted.</p>
+automatically stopped and restarted when reconfiguring it with this
+method.</p>
 				</dd>
 				<dt>w-&gt;start ()</dt>
 				<dd>
-					<p>Starts the watcher. Note that there is no <code>loop</code> argument as the
+					<p>Starts the watcher. Note that there is no <code>loop</code> argument, as the
-constructor already takes the loop.</p>
+constructor already stores the event loop.</p>
 				</dd>
 				<dt>w-&gt;stop ()</dt>
 				<dd>
 					<p>Stops the watcher if it is active. Again, no <code>loop</code> argument.</p>
 				</dd>
     myclass ();
   }
   myclass::myclass (int fd)
-  : io   (this, &amp;myclass::io_cb),
-    idle (this, &amp;myclass::idle_cb)
   {
+    io  .set &lt;myclass, &amp;myclass::io_cb  &gt; (this);
+    idle.set &lt;myclass, &amp;myclass::idle_cb&gt; (this);
     io.start (fd, ev::READ);
   }
 </div>
 <h1 id="MACRO_MAGIC">MACRO MAGIC</h1>
 <div id="MACRO_MAGIC_CONTENT">
 <p>Libev can be compiled with a variety of options, the most fundemantal is
-<code>EV_MULTIPLICITY</code>. This option determines wether (most) functions and
+<code>EV_MULTIPLICITY</code>. This option determines whether (most) functions and
 callbacks have an initial <code>struct ev_loop *</code> argument.</p>
 <p>To make it easier to write programs that cope with either variant, the
 following macros are defined:</p>
 <dl>
 	<dt><code>EV_A</code>, <code>EV_A_</code></dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>Similar to the other two macros, this gives you the value of the default
 loop, if multiple loops are supported (&quot;ev loop default&quot;).</p>
 	</dd>
 </dl>
-<p>Example: Declare and initialise a check watcher, working regardless of
+<p>Example: Declare and initialise a check watcher, utilising the above
-wether multiple loops are supported or not.</p>
+macros so it will work regardless of whether multiple loops are supported
+or not.</p>
 <pre>  static void
   check_cb (EV_P_ ev_timer *w, int revents)
   {
     ev_check_stop (EV_A_ w);
   }
   ev_check check;
   ev_check_init (&amp;check, check_cb);
   ev_check_start (EV_DEFAULT_ &amp;check);
   ev_loop (EV_DEFAULT_ 0);
 </pre>
 </div>
 <h1 id="EMBEDDING">EMBEDDING</h1>
   ev_vars.h
   ev_wrap.h
   ev_win32.c      required on win32 platforms only
-  ev_select.c     only when select backend is enabled (which is by default)
+  ev_select.c     only when select backend is enabled (which is enabled by default)
   ev_poll.c       only when poll backend is enabled (disabled by default)
   ev_epoll.c      only when the epoll backend is enabled (disabled by default)
   ev_kqueue.c     only when the kqueue backend is enabled (disabled by default)
   ev_port.c       only when the solaris port backend is enabled (disabled by default)
 will have the <code>struct ev_loop *</code> as first argument, and you can create
 additional independent event loops. Otherwise there will be no support
 for multiple event loops and there is no first event loop pointer
 argument. Instead, all functions act on the single default loop.</p>
 	</dd>
+	<dt>EV_MINPRI</dt>
+	<dt>EV_MAXPRI</dt>
+	<dd>
+		<p>The range of allowed priorities. <code>EV_MINPRI</code> must be smaller or equal to
+<code>EV_MAXPRI</code>, but otherwise there are no non-obvious limitations. You can
+provide for more priorities by overriding those symbols (usually defined
+to be <code>-2</code> and <code>2</code>, respectively).</p>
+		<p>When doing priority-based operations, libev usually has to linearly search
+all the priorities, so having many of them (hundreds) uses a lot of space
+and time, so using the defaults of five priorities (-2 .. +2) is usually
+fine.</p>
+		<p>If your embedding app does not need any priorities, defining these both to
+<code>0</code> will save some memory and cpu.</p>
+	</dd>
 	<dt>EV_PERIODIC_ENABLE</dt>
 	<dd>
 		<p>If undefined or defined to be <code>1</code>, then periodic timers are supported. If
+defined to be <code>0</code>, then they are not. Disabling them saves a few kB of
+code.</p>
+	</dd>
+	<dt>EV_IDLE_ENABLE</dt>
+	<dd>
+		<p>If undefined or defined to be <code>1</code>, then idle watchers are supported. If
 defined to be <code>0</code>, then they are not. Disabling them saves a few kB of
 code.</p>
 	</dd>
 	<dt>EV_EMBED_ENABLE</dt>
 	<dd>
 the <cite>libev/</cite> subdirectory and includes them in the <cite>EV/EVAPI.h</cite> (public
 interface) and <cite>EV.xs</cite> (implementation) files. Only the <cite>EV.xs</cite> file
 will be compiled. It is pretty complex because it provides its own header
 file.</p>
 		<p>The usage in rxvt-unicode is simpler. It has a <cite>ev_cpp.h</cite> header file
-that everybody includes and which overrides some autoconf choices:</p>
+that everybody includes and which overrides some configure choices:</p>
+<pre>  #define EV_MINIMAL 1
-<pre>  #define EV_USE_POLL 0
+  #define EV_USE_POLL 0
   #define EV_MULTIPLICITY 0
-  #define EV_PERIODICS 0
+  #define EV_PERIODIC_ENABLE 0
+  #define EV_STAT_ENABLE 0
+  #define EV_FORK_ENABLE 0
   #define EV_CONFIG_H &lt;config.h&gt;
+  #define EV_MINPRI 0
+  #define EV_MAXPRI 0
   #include &quot;ev++.h&quot;
 </pre>
 		<p>And a <cite>ev_cpp.C</cite> implementation file that contains libev proper and is compiled:</p>
 <h1 id="COMPLEXITIES">COMPLEXITIES</h1>
 <div id="COMPLEXITIES_CONTENT">
 		<p>In this section the complexities of (many of) the algorithms used inside
 libev will be explained. For complexity discussions about backends see the
 documentation for <code>ev_default_init</code>.</p>
+		<p>All of the following are about amortised time: If an array needs to be
+extended, libev needs to realloc and move the whole array, but this
+happens asymptotically never with higher number of elements, so O(1) might
+mean it might do a lengthy realloc operation in rare cases, but on average
+it is much faster and asymptotically approaches constant time.</p>
 		<p>
 			<dl>
 				<dt>Starting and stopping timer/periodic watchers: O(log skipped_other_timers)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>This means that, when you have a watcher that triggers in one hour and
+there are 100 watchers that would trigger before that then inserting will
+have to skip those 100 watchers.</p>
+				</dd>
 				<dt>Changing timer/periodic watchers (by autorepeat, again): O(log skipped_other_timers)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>That means that for changing a timer costs less than removing/adding them
+as only the relative motion in the event queue has to be paid for.</p>
+				</dd>
 				<dt>Starting io/check/prepare/idle/signal/child watchers: O(1)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>These just add the watcher into an array or at the head of a list.
-				<dt>Stopping check/prepare/idle watchers: O(1)</dt>
+=item Stopping check/prepare/idle watchers: O(1)</p>
+				</dd>
 				<dt>Stopping an io/signal/child watcher: O(number_of_watchers_for_this_(fd/signal/pid % EV_PID_HASHSIZE))</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>These watchers are stored in lists then need to be walked to find the
+correct watcher to remove. The lists are usually short (you don't usually
+have many watchers waiting for the same fd or signal).</p>
+				</dd>
 				<dt>Finding the next timer per loop iteration: O(1)</dt>
 				<dt>Each change on a file descriptor per loop iteration: O(number_of_watchers_for_this_fd)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>A change means an I/O watcher gets started or stopped, which requires
+libev to recalculate its status (and possibly tell the kernel).</p>
+				</dd>
 				<dt>Activating one watcher: O(1)</dt>
+				<dt>Priority handling: O(number_of_priorities)</dt>
+				<dd>
+					<p>Priorities are implemented by allocating some space for each
+priority. When doing priority-based operations, libev usually has to
+linearly search all the priorities.</p>
+				</dd>
 			</dl>
 		</p>

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing libev/ev.html (file contents): Revision 1.60 by root, Wed Nov 28 18:29:29 2007 UTC vs. Revision 1.72 by root, Sat Dec 8 15:30:29 2007 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing libev/ev.html (file contents):
Revision 1.60 by root, Wed Nov 28 18:29:29 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.72 by root, Sat Dec 8 15:30:29 2007 UTC