[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/libev/ev.pod

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.190 by root, Tue Sep 30 19:34:14 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 1.194 by root, Mon Oct 20 16:08:36 2008 UTC

 C<EVUNLOOP_ONE>, which will make the innermost C<ev_loop> call return, or
 C<EVUNLOOP_ALL>, which will make all nested C<ev_loop> calls return.
 This "unloop state" will be cleared when entering C<ev_loop> again.
+It is safe to call C<ev_unloop> from otuside any C<ev_loop> calls.
 =item ev_ref (loop)
 =item ev_unref (loop)
 Ref/unref can be used to add or remove a reference count on the event
 =over 4
 =item queueing from a signal handler context
 To implement race-free queueing, you simply add to the queue in the signal
-handler but you block the signal handler in the watcher callback. Here is an example that does that for
+handler but you block the signal handler in the watcher callback. Here is
-some fictitious SIGUSR1 handler:
+an example that does that for some fictitious SIGUSR1 handler:
    static ev_async mysig;
    static void
    sigusr1_handler (void)
 =over 4
 =item ev_once (loop, int fd, int events, ev_tstamp timeout, callback)
 This function combines a simple timer and an I/O watcher, calls your
-callback on whichever event happens first and automatically stop both
+callback on whichever event happens first and automatically stops both
 watchers. This is useful if you want to wait for a single event on an fd
 or timeout without having to allocate/configure/start/stop/free one or
 more watchers yourself.
-If C<fd> is less than 0, then no I/O watcher will be started and events
+If C<fd> is less than 0, then no I/O watcher will be started and the
-is being ignored. Otherwise, an C<ev_io> watcher for the given C<fd> and
+C<events> argument is being ignored. Otherwise, an C<ev_io> watcher for
-C<events> set will be created and started.
+the given C<fd> and C<events> set will be created and started.
 If C<timeout> is less than 0, then no timeout watcher will be
 started. Otherwise an C<ev_timer> watcher with after = C<timeout> (and
-repeat = 0) will be started. While C<0> is a valid timeout, it is of
+repeat = 0) will be started. C<0> is a valid timeout.
-dubious value.
 The callback has the type C<void (*cb)(int revents, void *arg)> and gets
 passed an C<revents> set like normal event callbacks (a combination of
 C<EV_ERROR>, C<EV_READ>, C<EV_WRITE> or C<EV_TIMEOUT>) and the C<arg>
-value passed to C<ev_once>:
+value passed to C<ev_once>. Note that it is possible to receive I<both>
+a timeout and an io event at the same time - you probably should give io
+events precedence.
+Example: wait up to ten seconds for data to appear on STDIN_FILENO.
    static void stdin_ready (int revents, void *arg)
    {
+     if (revents & EV_READ)
+       /* stdin might have data for us, joy! */;
-     if (revents & EV_TIMEOUT)
+     else if (revents & EV_TIMEOUT)
        /* doh, nothing entered */;
-     else if (revents & EV_READ)
-       /* stdin might have data for us, joy! */;
    }
    ev_once (STDIN_FILENO, EV_READ, 10., stdin_ready, 0);
 =item ev_feed_event (ev_loop *, watcher *, int revents)
 =head2 THREADS AND COROUTINES
 =head3 THREADS
 All libev functions are reentrant and thread-safe unless explicitly
-documented otherwise, but it uses no locking itself. This means that you
+documented otherwise, but libev implements no locking itself. This means
-can use as many loops as you want in parallel, as long as there are no
+that you can use as many loops as you want in parallel, as long as there
-concurrent calls into any libev function with the same loop parameter
+are no concurrent calls into any libev function with the same loop
-(C<ev_default_*> calls have an implicit default loop parameter, of
+parameter (C<ev_default_*> calls have an implicit default loop parameter,
-course): libev guarantees that different event loops share no data
+of course): libev guarantees that different event loops share no data
 structures that need any locking.
 Or to put it differently: calls with different loop parameters can be done
 concurrently from multiple threads, calls with the same loop parameter
 must be done serially (but can be done from different threads, as long as
 =back
 =head3 COROUTINES
-Libev is much more accommodating to coroutines ("cooperative threads"):
+Libev is very accommodating to coroutines ("cooperative threads"):
-libev fully supports nesting calls to it's functions from different
+libev fully supports nesting calls to its functions from different
 coroutines (e.g. you can call C<ev_loop> on the same loop from two
-different coroutines and switch freely between both coroutines running the
+different coroutines, and switch freely between both coroutines running the
 loop, as long as you don't confuse yourself). The only exception is that
 you must not do this from C<ev_periodic> reschedule callbacks.
 Care has been taken to ensure that libev does not keep local state inside
-C<ev_loop>, and other calls do not usually allow coroutine switches.
+C<ev_loop>, and other calls do not usually allow for coroutine switches as
+they do not clal any callbacks.
 =head2 COMPILER WARNINGS
 Depending on your compiler and compiler settings, you might get no or a
 lot of warnings when compiling libev code. Some people are apparently
 annoyed when you get a brisk "this is no bug" answer and take the chance
 of learning how to interpret valgrind properly.
 If you need, for some reason, empty reports from valgrind for your project
 I suggest using suppression lists.
-=head1 COMPLEXITIES
-In this section the complexities of (many of) the algorithms used inside
-libev will be explained. For complexity discussions about backends see the
-documentation for C<ev_default_init>.
-All of the following are about amortised time: If an array needs to be
-extended, libev needs to realloc and move the whole array, but this
-happens asymptotically never with higher number of elements, so O(1) might
-mean it might do a lengthy realloc operation in rare cases, but on average
-it is much faster and asymptotically approaches constant time.
-=over 4
-=item Starting and stopping timer/periodic watchers: O(log skipped_other_timers)
-This means that, when you have a watcher that triggers in one hour and
-there are 100 watchers that would trigger before that then inserting will
-have to skip roughly seven (C<ld 100>) of these watchers.
-=item Changing timer/periodic watchers (by autorepeat or calling again): O(log skipped_other_timers)
-That means that changing a timer costs less than removing/adding them
-as only the relative motion in the event queue has to be paid for.
-=item Starting io/check/prepare/idle/signal/child/fork/async watchers: O(1)
-These just add the watcher into an array or at the head of a list.
-=item Stopping check/prepare/idle/fork/async watchers: O(1)
-=item Stopping an io/signal/child watcher: O(number_of_watchers_for_this_(fd/signal/pid % EV_PID_HASHSIZE))
-These watchers are stored in lists then need to be walked to find the
-correct watcher to remove. The lists are usually short (you don't usually
-have many watchers waiting for the same fd or signal).
-=item Finding the next timer in each loop iteration: O(1)
-By virtue of using a binary or 4-heap, the next timer is always found at a
-fixed position in the storage array.
-=item Each change on a file descriptor per loop iteration: O(number_of_watchers_for_this_fd)
-A change means an I/O watcher gets started or stopped, which requires
-libev to recalculate its status (and possibly tell the kernel, depending
-on backend and whether C<ev_io_set> was used).
-=item Activating one watcher (putting it into the pending state): O(1)
-=item Priority handling: O(number_of_priorities)
-Priorities are implemented by allocating some space for each
-priority. When doing priority-based operations, libev usually has to
-linearly search all the priorities, but starting/stopping and activating
-watchers becomes O(1) with respect to priority handling.
-=item Sending an ev_async: O(1)
-=item Processing ev_async_send: O(number_of_async_watchers)
-=item Processing signals: O(max_signal_number)
-Sending involves a system call I<iff> there were no other C<ev_async_send>
-calls in the current loop iteration. Checking for async and signal events
-involves iterating over all running async watchers or all signal numbers.
-=back
 =head1 PORTABILITY NOTES
 =head2 WIN32 PLATFORM LIMITATIONS AND WORKAROUNDS
 =back
 If you know of other additional requirements drop me a note.
+=head1 ALGORITHMIC COMPLEXITIES
+In this section the complexities of (many of) the algorithms used inside
+libev will be documented. For complexity discussions about backends see
+the documentation for C<ev_default_init>.
+All of the following are about amortised time: If an array needs to be
+extended, libev needs to realloc and move the whole array, but this
+happens asymptotically rarer with higher number of elements, so O(1) might
+mean that libev does a lengthy realloc operation in rare cases, but on
+average it is much faster and asymptotically approaches constant time.
+=over 4
+=item Starting and stopping timer/periodic watchers: O(log skipped_other_timers)
+This means that, when you have a watcher that triggers in one hour and
+there are 100 watchers that would trigger before that, then inserting will
+have to skip roughly seven (C<ld 100>) of these watchers.
+=item Changing timer/periodic watchers (by autorepeat or calling again): O(log skipped_other_timers)
+That means that changing a timer costs less than removing/adding them,
+as only the relative motion in the event queue has to be paid for.
+=item Starting io/check/prepare/idle/signal/child/fork/async watchers: O(1)
+These just add the watcher into an array or at the head of a list.
+=item Stopping check/prepare/idle/fork/async watchers: O(1)
+=item Stopping an io/signal/child watcher: O(number_of_watchers_for_this_(fd/signal/pid % EV_PID_HASHSIZE))
+These watchers are stored in lists, so they need to be walked to find the
+correct watcher to remove. The lists are usually short (you don't usually
+have many watchers waiting for the same fd or signal: one is typical, two
+is rare).
+=item Finding the next timer in each loop iteration: O(1)
+By virtue of using a binary or 4-heap, the next timer is always found at a
+fixed position in the storage array.
+=item Each change on a file descriptor per loop iteration: O(number_of_watchers_for_this_fd)
+A change means an I/O watcher gets started or stopped, which requires
+libev to recalculate its status (and possibly tell the kernel, depending
+on backend and whether C<ev_io_set> was used).
+=item Activating one watcher (putting it into the pending state): O(1)
+=item Priority handling: O(number_of_priorities)
+Priorities are implemented by allocating some space for each
+priority. When doing priority-based operations, libev usually has to
+linearly search all the priorities, but starting/stopping and activating
+watchers becomes O(1) with respect to priority handling.
+=item Sending an ev_async: O(1)
+=item Processing ev_async_send: O(number_of_async_watchers)
+=item Processing signals: O(max_signal_number)
+Sending involves a system call I<iff> there were no other C<ev_async_send>
+calls in the current loop iteration. Checking for async and signal events
+involves iterating over all running async watchers or all signal numbers.
+=back
 =head1 AUTHOR
 Marc Lehmann <libev@schmorp.de>.

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents): Revision 1.190 by root, Tue Sep 30 19:34:14 2008 UTC vs. Revision 1.194 by root, Mon Oct 20 16:08:36 2008 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.190 by root, Tue Sep 30 19:34:14 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 1.194 by root, Mon Oct 20 16:08:36 2008 UTC