[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/libev/ev.pod

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.232 by root, Thu Apr 16 06:17:26 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 1.233 by root, Thu Apr 16 07:32:51 2009 UTC

…		…
1083	integer between C<EV_MAXPRI> (default: C<2>) and C<EV_MINPRI>	1083	integer between C<EV_MAXPRI> (default: C<2>) and C<EV_MINPRI>
1084	(default: C<-2>). Pending watchers with higher priority will be invoked	1084	(default: C<-2>). Pending watchers with higher priority will be invoked
1085	before watchers with lower priority, but priority will not keep watchers	1085	before watchers with lower priority, but priority will not keep watchers
1086	from being executed (except for C<ev_idle> watchers).	1086	from being executed (except for C<ev_idle> watchers).
1087		1087
1088	See L<
1089
1090	This means that priorities are I<only> used for ordering callback
1091	invocation after new events have been received. This is useful, for
1092	example, to reduce latency after idling, or more often, to bind two
1093	watchers on the same event and make sure one is called first.
1094
1095	If you need to suppress invocation when higher priority events are pending	1088	If you need to suppress invocation when higher priority events are pending
1096	you need to look at C<ev_idle> watchers, which provide this functionality.	1089	you need to look at C<ev_idle> watchers, which provide this functionality.
1097		1090
1098	You I<must not> change the priority of a watcher as long as it is active or	1091	You I<must not> change the priority of a watcher as long as it is active or
1099	pending.	1092	pending.
1100
1101	The default priority used by watchers when no priority has been set is
1102	always C<0>, which is supposed to not be too high and not be too low :).
1103		1093
1104	Setting a priority outside the range of C<EV_MINPRI> to C<EV_MAXPRI> is	1094	Setting a priority outside the range of C<EV_MINPRI> to C<EV_MAXPRI> is
1105	fine, as long as you do not mind that the priority value you query might	1095	fine, as long as you do not mind that the priority value you query might
1106	or might not have been clamped to the valid range.	1096	or might not have been clamped to the valid range.
		1097
		1098	The default priority used by watchers when no priority has been set is
		1099	always C<0>, which is supposed to not be too high and not be too low :).
		1100
		1101	See L<WATCHER PRIORITIES>, below, for a more thorough treatment of
		1102	priorities.
1107		1103
1108	=item ev_invoke (loop, ev_TYPE *watcher, int revents)	1104	=item ev_invoke (loop, ev_TYPE *watcher, int revents)
1109		1105
1110	Invoke the C<watcher> with the given C<loop> and C<revents>. Neither	1106	Invoke the C<watcher> with the given C<loop> and C<revents>. Neither
1111	C<loop> nor C<revents> need to be valid as long as the watcher callback	1107	C<loop> nor C<revents> need to be valid as long as the watcher callback
…		…
1186	t2_cb (EV_P_ ev_timer *w, int revents)	1182	t2_cb (EV_P_ ev_timer *w, int revents)
1187	{	1183	{
1188	struct my_biggy big = (struct my_biggy *	1184	struct my_biggy big = (struct my_biggy *
1189	(((char *)w) - offsetof (struct my_biggy, t2));	1185	(((char *)w) - offsetof (struct my_biggy, t2));
1190	}	1186	}
		1187
		1188	=head2 WATCHER PRIORITY MODELS
		1189
		1190	Many event loops support I<watcher priorities>, which are usually small
		1191	integers that influence the ordering of event callback invocation
		1192	between watchers in some way, all else being equal.
		1193
		1194	In libev, Watcher priorities can be set using C<ev_set_priority>. See its
		1195	description for the more technical details such as the actual priority
		1196	range.
		1197
		1198	There are two common ways how these these priorities are being interpreted
		1199	by event loops:
		1200
		1201	In the more common lock-out model, higher priorities "lock out" invocation
		1202	of lower priority watchers, which means as long as higher priority
		1203	watchers receive events, lower priority watchers are not being invoked.
		1204
		1205	The less common only-for-ordering model uses priorities solely to order
		1206	callback invocation within a single event loop iteration: Higher priority
		1207	watchers are invoked before lower priority ones, but they all get invoked
		1208	before polling for new events.
		1209
		1210	Libev uses the second (only-for-ordering) model for all its watchers
		1211	except for idle watchers (which use the lock-out model).
		1212
		1213	The rationale behind this is that implementing the lock-out model for
		1214	watchers is not well supported by most kernel interfaces, and most event
		1215	libraries will just poll for the same events again and again as long as
		1216	their callbacks have not been executed, which is very inefficient in the
		1217	common case of one high-priority watcher locking out a mass of lower
		1218	priority ones.
		1219
		1220	Static (ordering) priorities are most useful when you have two or more
		1221	watchers handling the same resource: a typical usage example is having an
		1222	C<ev_io> watcher to receive data, and an associated C<ev_timer> to handle
		1223	timeouts. Under load, data might be received while the program handles
		1224	other jobs, but since timers normally get invoked first, the timeout
		1225	handler will be executed before checking for data. In that case, giving
		1226	the timer a lower priority than the I/O watcher ensures that I/O will be
		1227	handled first even under adverse conditions (which is usually, but not
		1228	always, what you want).
		1229
		1230	Since idle watchers use the "lock-out" model, meaning that idle watchers
		1231	will only be executed when no same or higher priority watchers have
		1232	received events, they can be used to implement the "lock-out" model when
		1233	required.
		1234
		1235	For example, to emulate how many other event libraries handle priorities,
		1236	you can associate an C<ev_idle> watcher to each such watcher, and in
		1237	the normal watcher callback, you just start the idle watcher. The real
		1238	processing is done in the idle watcher callback. This causes libev to
		1239	continously poll and process kernel event data for the watcher, but when
		1240	the lock-out case is known to be rare (which in turn is rare :), this is
		1241	workable.
		1242
		1243	Usually, however, the lock-out model implemented that way will perform
		1244	miserably under the type of load it was designed to handle. In that case,
		1245	it might be preferable to stop the real watcher before starting the
		1246	idle watcher, so the kernel will not have to process the event in case
		1247	the actual processing will be delayed for considerable time.
		1248
		1249	Here is an example of an I/O watcher that should run at a strictly lower
		1250	priority than the default, and which should only process data when no
		1251	other events are pending:
		1252
		1253	ev_idle idle; // actual processing watcher
		1254	ev_io io; // actual event watcher
		1255
		1256	static void
		1257	io_cb (EV_P_ ev_io *w, int revents)
		1258	{
		1259	// stop the I/O watcher, we received the event, but
		1260	// are not yet ready to handle it.
		1261	ev_io_stop (EV_A_ w);
		1262
		1263	// start the idle watcher to ahndle the actual event.
		1264	// it will not be executed as long as other watchers
		1265	// with the default priority are receiving events.
		1266	ev_idle_start (EV_A_ &idle);
		1267	}
		1268
		1269	static void
		1270	idle-cb (EV_P_ ev_idle *w, int revents)
		1271	{
		1272	// actual processing
		1273	read (STDIN_FILENO, ...);
		1274
		1275	// have to start the I/O watcher again, as
		1276	// we have handled the event
		1277	ev_io_start (EV_P_ &io);
		1278	}
		1279
		1280	// initialisation
		1281	ev_idle_init (&idle, idle_cb);
		1282	ev_io_init (&io, io_cb, STDIN_FILENO, EV_READ);
		1283	ev_io_start (EV_DEFAULT_ &io);
		1284
		1285	In the "real" world, it might also be beneficial to start a timer, so that
		1286	low-priority connections can not be locked out forever under load. This
		1287	enables your program to keep a lower latency for important connections
		1288	during short periods of high load, while not completely locking out less
		1289	important ones.
1191		1290
1192		1291
1193	=head1 WATCHER TYPES	1292	=head1 WATCHER TYPES
1194		1293
1195	This section describes each watcher in detail, but will not repeat	1294	This section describes each watcher in detail, but will not repeat

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents): Revision 1.232 by root, Thu Apr 16 06:17:26 2009 UTC vs. Revision 1.233 by root, Thu Apr 16 07:32:51 2009 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.232 by root, Thu Apr 16 06:17:26 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 1.233 by root, Thu Apr 16 07:32:51 2009 UTC