--- libev/ev.pod	2019/06/25 05:01:22	1.453
+++ libev/ev.pod	2023/06/03 08:53:03	1.469
@@ -161,9 +161,13 @@
 so C<NDEBUG> will disable this checking): these are programming errors in
 the libev caller and need to be fixed there.
 
-Libev also has a few internal error-checking C<assert>ions, and also has
-extensive consistency checking code. These do not trigger under normal
-circumstances, as they indicate either a bug in libev or worse.
+Via the C<EV_FREQUENT> macro you can compile in and/or enable extensive
+consistency checking code inside libev that can be used to check for
+internal inconsistencies, suually caused by application bugs.
+
+Libev also has a few internal error-checking C<assert>ions. These do not
+trigger under normal circumstances, as they indicate either a bug in libev
+or worse.
 
 
 =head1 GLOBAL FUNCTIONS
@@ -478,7 +482,16 @@
 It's also required by POSIX in a threaded program, as libev calls
 C<sigprocmask>, whose behaviour is officially unspecified.
 
-This flag's behaviour will become the default in future versions of libev.
+=item C<EVFLAG_NOTIMERFD>
+
+When this flag is specified, the libev will avoid using a C<timerfd> to
+detect time jumps. It will still be able to detect time jumps, but takes
+longer and has a lower accuracy in doing so, but saves a file descriptor
+per loop.
+
+The current implementation only tries to use a C<timerfd> when the first
+C<ev_periodic> watcher is started and falls back on other methods if it
+cannot be created, but this behaviour might change in the future.
 
 =item C<EVBACKEND_SELECT>  (value 1, portable select backend)
 
@@ -513,7 +526,7 @@
 
 =item C<EVBACKEND_EPOLL>   (value 4, Linux)
 
-Use the linux-specific epoll(7) interface (for both pre- and post-2.6.9
+Use the Linux-specific epoll(7) interface (for both pre- and post-2.6.9
 kernels).
 
 For few fds, this backend is a bit little slower than poll and select, but
@@ -576,14 +589,14 @@
 
 =item C<EVBACKEND_LINUXAIO>   (value 64, Linux)
 
-Use the linux-specific linux aio (I<not> C<< aio(7) >> but C<<
+Use the Linux-specific Linux AIO (I<not> C<< aio(7) >> but C<<
 io_submit(2) >>) event interface available in post-4.18 kernels (but libev
 only tries to use it in 4.19+).
 
-This is another linux trainwreck of an event interface.
+This is another Linux train wreck of an event interface.
 
 If this backend works for you (as of this writing, it was very
-experimental), it is the best event interface available on linux and might
+experimental), it is the best event interface available on Linux and might
 be well worth enabling it - if it isn't available in your kernel this will
 be detected and this backend will be skipped.
 
@@ -591,24 +604,24 @@
 buffer to receive events. It also doesn't suffer from most of the design
 problems of epoll (such as not being able to remove event sources from
 the epoll set), and generally sounds too good to be true. Because, this
-being the linux kernel, of course it suffers from a whole new set of
+being the Linux kernel, of course it suffers from a whole new set of
 limitations, forcing you to fall back to epoll, inheriting all its design
 issues.
 
 For one, it is not easily embeddable (but probably could be done using
 an event fd at some extra overhead). It also is subject to a system wide
-limit that can be configured in F</proc/sys/fs/aio-max-nr>. If no aio
+limit that can be configured in F</proc/sys/fs/aio-max-nr>. If no AIO
 requests are left, this backend will be skipped during initialisation, and
 will switch to epoll when the loop is active.
 
 Most problematic in practice, however, is that not all file descriptors
-work with it. For example, in linux 5.1, tcp sockets, pipes, event fds,
-files, F</dev/null> and a few others are supported, but ttys do not work
+work with it. For example, in Linux 5.1, TCP sockets, pipes, event fds,
+files, F</dev/null> and many others are supported, but ttys do not work
 properly (a known bug that the kernel developers don't care about, see
 L<https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1047453/>), so this is not
 (yet?) a generic event polling interface.
 
-Overall, it seems the linux developers just don't want it to have a
+Overall, it seems the Linux developers just don't want it to have a
 generic event handling mechanism other than C<select> or C<poll>.
 
 To work around all these problem, the current version of libev uses its
@@ -639,7 +652,7 @@
 course). While stopping, setting and starting an I/O watcher does never
 cause an extra system call as with C<EVBACKEND_EPOLL>, it still adds up to
 two event changes per incident. Support for C<fork ()> is very bad (you
-might have to leak fd's on fork, but it's more sane than epoll) and it
+might have to leak fds on fork, but it's more sane than epoll) and it
 drops fds silently in similarly hard-to-detect cases.
 
 This backend usually performs well under most conditions.
@@ -664,8 +677,8 @@
 
 =item C<EVBACKEND_PORT>    (value 32, Solaris 10)
 
-This uses the Solaris 10 event port mechanism. As with everything on Solaris,
-it's really slow, but it still scales very well (O(active_fds)).
+This uses the Solaris 10 event port mechanism. As with everything on
+Solaris, it's really slow, but it still scales very well (O(active_fds)).
 
 While this backend scales well, it requires one system call per active
 file descriptor per loop iteration. For small and medium numbers of file
@@ -948,8 +961,8 @@
    - Queue all idle watchers with priority higher than that of pending events.
    - Queue all check watchers.
    - Call all queued watchers in reverse order (i.e. check watchers first).
-     Signals and child watchers are implemented as I/O watchers, and will
-     be handled here by queueing them when their watcher gets executed.
+     Signals, async and child watchers are implemented as I/O watchers, and
+     will be handled here by queueing them when their watcher gets executed.
    - If ev_break has been called, or EVRUN_ONCE or EVRUN_NOWAIT
      were used, or there are no active watchers, goto FINISH, otherwise
      continue with step LOOP.
@@ -1207,8 +1220,9 @@
 corresponding stop function (C<< ev_TYPE_stop (loop, watcher *) >>.
 
 As long as your watcher is active (has been started but not stopped) you
-must not touch the values stored in it. Most specifically you must never
-reinitialise it or call its C<ev_TYPE_set> macro.
+must not touch the values stored in it except when explicitly documented
+otherwise. Most specifically you must never reinitialise it or call its
+C<ev_TYPE_set> macro.
 
 Each and every callback receives the event loop pointer as first, the
 registered watcher structure as second, and a bitset of received events as
@@ -1384,7 +1398,10 @@
 
 Returns a true value iff the watcher is active (i.e. it has been started
 and not yet been stopped). As long as a watcher is active you must not modify
-it.
+it unless documented otherwise.
+
+Obviously, it is safe to call this on an active watcher, or actually any
+watcher that is initialised.
 
 =item bool ev_is_pending (ev_TYPE *watcher)
 
@@ -1395,6 +1412,9 @@
 make sure the watcher is available to libev (e.g. you cannot C<free ()>
 it).
 
+It is safe to call this on any watcher in any state as long as it is
+initialised.
+
 =item callback ev_cb (ev_TYPE *watcher)
 
 Returns the callback currently set on the watcher.
@@ -1417,8 +1437,8 @@
 If you need to suppress invocation when higher priority events are pending
 you need to look at C<ev_idle> watchers, which provide this functionality.
 
-You I<must not> change the priority of a watcher as long as it is active or
-pending.
+You I<must not> change the priority of a watcher as long as it is active
+or pending. Reading the priority with C<ev_priority> is fine in any state.
 
 Setting a priority outside the range of C<EV_MINPRI> to C<EV_MAXPRI> is
 fine, as long as you do not mind that the priority value you query might
@@ -1450,8 +1470,9 @@
 
 Feeds the given event set into the event loop, as if the specified event
 had happened for the specified watcher (which must be a pointer to an
-initialised but not necessarily started event watcher). Obviously you must
-not free the watcher as long as it has pending events.
+initialised but not necessarily started event watcher, though it can be
+active). Obviously you must not free the watcher as long as it has pending
+events.
 
 Stopping the watcher, letting libev invoke it, or calling
 C<ev_clear_pending> will clear the pending event, even if the watcher was
@@ -1489,24 +1510,33 @@
 
 Once a watcher has been started with a call to C<ev_TYPE_start> it becomes
 property of the event loop, and is actively waiting for events. While in
-this state it cannot be accessed (except in a few documented ways), moved,
-freed or anything else - the only legal thing is to keep a pointer to it,
-and call libev functions on it that are documented to work on active watchers.
+this state it cannot be accessed (except in a few documented ways, such as
+stoping it), moved, freed or anything else - the only legal thing is to
+keep a pointer to it, and call libev functions on it that are documented
+to work on active watchers.
+
+As a rule of thumb, before accessing a member or calling any function on
+a watcher, it should be stopped (or freshly initialised). If that is not
+convenient, you can check the documentation for that function or member to
+see if it is safe to use on an active watcher.
 
 =item pending
 
 If a watcher is active and libev determines that an event it is interested
-in has occurred (such as a timer expiring), it will become pending. It will
-stay in this pending state until either it is stopped or its callback is
-about to be invoked, so it is not normally pending inside the watcher
-callback.
+in has occurred (such as a timer expiring), it will become pending. It
+will stay in this pending state until either it is explicitly stopped or
+its callback is about to be invoked, so it is not normally pending inside
+the watcher callback.
+
+Generally, the watcher might or might not be active while it is pending
+(for example, an expired non-repeating timer can be pending but no longer
+active). If it is pending but not active, it can be freely accessed (e.g.
+by calling C<ev_TYPE_set>), but it is still property of the event loop at
+this time, so cannot be moved, freed or reused. And if it is active the
+rules described in the previous item still apply.
 
-The watcher might or might not be active while it is pending (for example,
-an expired non-repeating timer can be pending but no longer active). If it
-is stopped, it can be freely accessed (e.g. by calling C<ev_TYPE_set>),
-but it is still property of the event loop at this time, so cannot be
-moved, freed or reused. And if it is active the rules described in the
-previous item still apply.
+Explicitly stopping a watcher will also clear the pending state
+unconditionally, so it is safe to stop a watcher and then free it.
 
 It is also possible to feed an event on a watcher that is not active (e.g.
 via C<ev_feed_event>), in which case it becomes pending without being
@@ -1533,7 +1563,7 @@
 integers that influence the ordering of event callback invocation
 between watchers in some way, all else being equal.
 
-In libev, Watcher priorities can be set using C<ev_set_priority>. See its
+In libev, watcher priorities can be set using C<ev_set_priority>. See its
 description for the more technical details such as the actual priority
 range.
 
@@ -1637,15 +1667,18 @@
 information given in the last section. Any initialisation/set macros,
 functions and members specific to the watcher type are explained.
 
-Members are additionally marked with either I<[read-only]>, meaning that,
-while the watcher is active, you can look at the member and expect some
-sensible content, but you must not modify it (you can modify it while the
-watcher is stopped to your hearts content), or I<[read-write]>, which
-means you can expect it to have some sensible content while the watcher
-is active, but you can also modify it. Modifying it may not do something
+Most members are additionally marked with either I<[read-only]>, meaning
+that, while the watcher is active, you can look at the member and expect
+some sensible content, but you must not modify it (you can modify it while
+the watcher is stopped to your hearts content), or I<[read-write]>, which
+means you can expect it to have some sensible content while the watcher is
+active, but you can also modify it (within the same thread as the event
+loop, i.e. without creating data races). Modifying it may not do something
 sensible or take immediate effect (or do anything at all), but libev will
 not crash or malfunction in any way.
 
+In any case, the documentation for each member will explain what the
+effects are, and if there are any additional access restrictions.
 
 =head2 C<ev_io> - is this file descriptor readable or writable?
 
@@ -1747,7 +1780,7 @@
 
 =head3 The special problem of fork
 
-Some backends (epoll, kqueue, probably linuxaio) do not support C<fork ()>
+Some backends (epoll, kqueue, linuxaio, iouring) do not support C<fork ()>
 at all or exhibit useless behaviour. Libev fully supports fork, but needs
 to be told about it in the child if you want to continue to use it in the
 child.
@@ -1815,16 +1848,36 @@
 =item ev_io_set (ev_io *, int fd, int events)
 
 Configures an C<ev_io> watcher. The C<fd> is the file descriptor to
-receive events for and C<events> is either C<EV_READ>, C<EV_WRITE> or
-C<EV_READ | EV_WRITE>, to express the desire to receive the given events.
+receive events for and C<events> is either C<EV_READ>, C<EV_WRITE>, both
+C<EV_READ | EV_WRITE> or C<0>, to express the desire to receive the given
+events.
+
+Note that setting the C<events> to C<0> and starting the watcher is
+supported, but not specially optimized - if your program sometimes happens
+to generate this combination this is fine, but if it is easy to avoid
+starting an io watcher watching for no events you should do so.
+
+=item ev_io_modify (ev_io *, int events)
+
+Similar to C<ev_io_set>, but only changes the requested events. Using this
+might be faster with some backends, as libev can assume that the C<fd>
+still refers to the same underlying file description, something it cannot
+do when using C<ev_io_set>.
 
-=item int fd [read-only]
+=item int fd [no-modify]
 
-The file descriptor being watched.
+The file descriptor being watched. While it can be read at any time, you
+must not modify this member even when the watcher is stopped - always use
+C<ev_io_set> for that.
 
-=item int events [read-only]
+=item int events [no-modify]
 
-The events being watched.
+The set of events the fd is being watched for, among other flags. Remember
+that this is a bit set - to test for C<EV_READ>, use C<< w->events &
+EV_READ >>, and similarly for C<EV_WRITE>.
+
+As with C<fd>, you must not modify this member even when the watcher is
+stopped, always use C<ev_io_set> or C<ev_io_modify> for that.
 
 =back
 
@@ -3827,10 +3880,10 @@
 First, you need to associate some data with the event loop:
 
    typedef struct {
-     mutex_t lock; /* global loop lock */
+     pthread_mutex_t lock; /* global loop lock */
+     pthread_t tid;
+     pthread_cond_t invoke_cv;
      ev_async async_w;
-     thread_t tid;
-     cond_t invoke_cv;
    } userdata;
 
    void prepare_loop (EV_P)
@@ -3838,19 +3891,19 @@
       // for simplicity, we use a static userdata struct.
       static userdata u;
 
-      ev_async_init (&u->async_w, async_cb);
-      ev_async_start (EV_A_ &u->async_w);
+      ev_async_init (&u.async_w, async_cb);
+      ev_async_start (EV_A_ &u.async_w);
 
-      pthread_mutex_init (&u->lock, 0);
-      pthread_cond_init (&u->invoke_cv, 0);
+      pthread_mutex_init (&u.lock, 0);
+      pthread_cond_init (&u.invoke_cv, 0);
 
       // now associate this with the loop
-      ev_set_userdata (EV_A_ u);
+      ev_set_userdata (EV_A_ &u);
       ev_set_invoke_pending_cb (EV_A_ l_invoke);
       ev_set_loop_release_cb (EV_A_ l_release, l_acquire);
 
       // then create the thread running ev_run
-      pthread_create (&u->tid, 0, l_run, EV_A);
+      pthread_create (&u.tid, 0, l_run, EV_A);
    }
 
 The callback for the C<ev_async> watcher does nothing: the watcher is used
@@ -4232,6 +4285,9 @@
 For C<ev::embed> watchers this method is called C<set_embed>, to avoid
 clashing with the C<set (loop)> method.
 
+For C<ev::io> watchers there is an additional C<set> method that acepts a
+new event mask only, and internally calls C<ev_io_modify>.
+
 =item w->start ()
 
 Starts the watcher. Note that there is no C<loop> argument, as the
@@ -4482,6 +4538,7 @@
    ev_poll.c       only when poll backend is enabled
    ev_epoll.c      only when the epoll backend is enabled
    ev_linuxaio.c   only when the linux aio backend is enabled
+   ev_iouring.c    only when the linux io_uring backend is enabled
    ev_kqueue.c     only when the kqueue backend is enabled
    ev_port.c       only when the solaris port backend is enabled
 
@@ -4612,6 +4669,30 @@
 If undefined, it will be enabled if the headers indicate GNU/Linux + Glibc
 2.7 or newer, otherwise disabled.
 
+=item EV_USE_SIGNALFD
+
+If defined to be C<1>, then libev will assume that C<signalfd ()> is
+available and will probe for kernel support at runtime. This enables
+the use of EVFLAG_SIGNALFD for faster and simpler signal handling. If
+undefined, it will be enabled if the headers indicate GNU/Linux + Glibc
+2.7 or newer, otherwise disabled.
+
+=item EV_USE_TIMERFD
+
+If defined to be C<1>, then libev will assume that C<timerfd ()> is
+available and will probe for kernel support at runtime. This allows
+libev to detect time jumps accurately. If undefined, it will be enabled
+if the headers indicate GNU/Linux + Glibc 2.8 or newer and define
+C<TFD_TIMER_CANCEL_ON_SET>, otherwise disabled.
+
+=item EV_USE_EVENTFD
+
+If defined to be C<1>, then libev will assume that C<eventfd ()> is
+available and will probe for kernel support at runtime. This will improve
+C<ev_signal> and C<ev_async> performance and reduce resource consumption.
+If undefined, it will be enabled if the headers indicate GNU/Linux + Glibc
+2.7 or newer, otherwise disabled.
+
 =item EV_USE_SELECT
 
 If undefined or defined to be C<1>, libev will compile in support for the
@@ -4684,10 +4765,16 @@
 
 =item EV_USE_LINUXAIO
 
+If defined to be C<1>, libev will compile in support for the Linux aio
+backend (C<EV_USE_EPOLL> must also be enabled). If undefined, it will be
+enabled on linux, otherwise disabled.
+
+=item EV_USE_IOURING
+
 If defined to be C<1>, libev will compile in support for the Linux
-aio backend. Due to it's currenbt limitations it has to be requested
-explicitly.  If undefined, it will be enabled on linux, otherwise
-disabled.
+io_uring backend (C<EV_USE_EPOLL> must also be enabled). Due to it's
+current limitations it has to be requested explicitly. If undefined, it
+will be enabled on linux, otherwise disabled.
 
 =item EV_USE_KQUEUE
 
@@ -4975,6 +5062,9 @@
 verification code will be called very frequently, which will slow down
 libev considerably.
 
+Verification errors are reported via C's C<assert> mechanism, so if you
+disable that (e.g. by defining C<NDEBUG>) then no errors will be reported.
+
 The default is C<1>, unless C<EV_FEATURES> overrides it, in which case it
 will be C<0>.