[ViewVC] Diff of: cvs/libev/ev.pod

Comparing libev/ev.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.98 by root, Sat Dec 22 06:10:25 2007 UTC vs.
Revision 1.99 by root, Sat Dec 22 06:16:36 2007 UTC

 overhead for the actual polling but can deliver many events at once.
 By setting a higher I<io collect interval> you allow libev to spend more
 time collecting I/O events, so you can handle more events per iteration,
 at the cost of increasing latency. Timeouts (both C<ev_periodic> and
-C<ev_timer>) will be not affected.
+C<ev_timer>) will be not affected. Setting this to a non-null bvalue will
+introduce an additional C<ev_sleep ()> call into most loop iterations.
 Likewise, by setting a higher I<timeout collect interval> you allow libev
 to spend more time collecting timeouts, at the expense of increased
 latency (the watcher callback will be called later). C<ev_io> watchers
-will not be affected.
+will not be affected. Setting this to a non-null value will not introduce
+any overhead in libev.
 Many (busy) programs can usually benefit by setting the io collect
 interval to a value near C<0.1> or so, which is often enough for
 interactive servers (of course not for games), likewise for timeouts. It
 usually doesn't make much sense to set it to a lower value than C<0.01>,

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines