--- rxvt-unicode/README.FAQ	2006/01/28 22:16:58	1.33
+++ rxvt-unicode/README.FAQ	2006/01/31 00:53:49	1.36
@@ -39,6 +39,90 @@
 
            URxvt.searchable-scrollback: CM-s
 
+    The cursor moves when selecting text in the current input line, how do I
+    switch this off?
+    During rlogin/ssh/telnet/etc. sessions, clicking near the cursor outputs
+    strange escape sequences, how do I fix this?
+        These are caused by the "readline" perl extension. Under normal
+        circumstances, it will move your cursor around when you click into
+        the line that contains it. It tries hard not to do this at the wrong
+        moment, but when running a program that doesn't parse cursor
+        movements or in some cases during rlogin sessions, it fails to
+        detect this properly.
+
+        You can permamently switch this feature off by disabling the
+        "readline" extension:
+
+           URxvt.perl-ext-common: default,-readline
+
+    Why doesn't rxvt-unicode read my resources?
+        Well, why, indeed? It does, in a way very similar to other X
+        applications. Most importantly, this means that if you or your OS
+        loads resources into the X display (the right way to do it),
+        rxvt-unicode will ignore any resource files in your home directory.
+        It will only read $HOME/.Xdefaults when no resources are attached to
+        the display.
+
+        If you have or use an $HOME/.Xresources file, chances are that
+        resources are loaded into your X-server. In this case, you have to
+        re-login after every change (or run xrdb -merge $HOME/.Xresources).
+
+        Also consider the form resources have to use:
+
+          URxvt.resource: value
+
+        If you want to use another form (there are lots of different ways of
+        specifying resources), make sure you understand wether and why it
+        works. If unsure, use the form above.
+
+    I can't get transparency working, what am I doing wrong?
+        First of all, transparency isn't officially supported in
+        rxvt-unicode, so you are mostly on your own. Do not bug the author
+        about it (but you may bug everybody else). Also, if you can't get it
+        working consider it a rite of passage: ... and you failed.
+
+        Here are four ways to get transparency. Do read the manpage and
+        option descriptions for the programs mentioned and rxvt-unicode.
+        Really, do it!
+
+        1. Use inheritPixmap:
+
+           Esetroot wallpaper.jpg
+           rxvt -ip -tint red -sh 40
+
+        That works. If you think it doesn't, you lack transparency and
+        tinting support, or you are unable to read.
+
+        2. Use a simple pixmap and emulate pseudo-transparency. This enables
+        you to use effects other than tinting and shading: Just
+        shade/tint/whatever your picture with gimp:
+
+           convert wallpaper.jpg -blur 20x20 -modulate 30 background.xpm
+           rxvt -pixmap background.xpm -pe automove-background
+
+        That works. If you think it doesn't, you lack XPM and Perl support,
+        or you are unable to read.
+
+        3. Use an ARGB visual:
+
+           rxvt -depth 32 -fg grey90 -bg rgba:0000/0000/4444/cccc
+
+        This requires XFT support, and the support of your X-server. If that
+        doesn't work for you, blame Xorg and Keith Packard. ARGB visuals
+        aren't there yet, no matter what they claim. Rxvt-Unicode contains
+        the neccessary bugfixes and workarounds for Xft and Xlib to make it
+        work, but that doesn't mean that your WM has the required kludges in
+        place.
+
+        4. Use xcompmgr and let it do the job:
+
+          xprop -frame -f _NET_WM_WINDOW_OPACITY 32c \
+                -set _NET_WM_WINDOW_OPACITY 0xc0000000
+
+        Then click on a window you want to make transparent. Replace
+        0xc0000000 by other values to change the degree of opacity. If it
+        doesn't work and your server crashes, you got to keep the pieces.
+
     Isn't rxvt supposed to be small? Don't all those features bloat?
         I often get asked about this, and I think, no, they didn't cause
         extra bloat. If you compare a minimal rxvt and a minimal urxvt, you