ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Download File
/cvs/rxvt-unicode/README.FAQ
(Generate patch)

Comparing rxvt-unicode/README.FAQ (file contents):
Revision 1.30 by root, Mon Jan 16 15:07:27 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 1.32 by root, Thu Jan 19 19:26:30 2006 UTC

128 When using the rxvtc client, the version displayed is that of the 128 When using the rxvtc client, the version displayed is that of the
129 daemon. 129 daemon.
130 130
131 I am using Debian GNU/Linux and have a problem... 131 I am using Debian GNU/Linux and have a problem...
132 The Debian GNU/Linux package of rxvt-unicode in sarge contains large 132 The Debian GNU/Linux package of rxvt-unicode in sarge contains large
133 patches that considerably change the behaviour of rxvt-unicode. 133 patches that considerably change the behaviour of rxvt-unicode (but
134 Before reporting a bug to the original rxvt-unicode author please 134 unfortunately this notice has been removed). Before reporting a bug
135 download and install the genuine version 135 to the original rxvt-unicode author please download and install the
136 (<http://software.schmorp.de#rxvt-unicode>) and try to reproduce the 136 genuine version (<http://software.schmorp.de#rxvt-unicode>) and try
137 problem. If you cannot, chances are that the problems are specific 137 to reproduce the problem. If you cannot, chances are that the
138 to Debian GNU/Linux, in which case it should be reported via the 138 problems are specific to Debian GNU/Linux, in which case it should
139 Debian Bug Tracking System (use "reportbug" to report the bug). 139 be reported via the Debian Bug Tracking System (use "reportbug" to
140 report the bug).
140 141
141 For other problems that also affect the Debian package, you can and 142 For other problems that also affect the Debian package, you can and
142 probably should use the Debian BTS, too, because, after all, it's 143 probably should use the Debian BTS, too, because, after all, it's
143 also a bug in the Debian version and it serves as a reminder for 144 also a bug in the Debian version and it serves as a reminder for
144 other users that might encounter the same issue. 145 other users that might encounter the same issue.
165 of encodings built-in that increase download times and are rarely 166 of encodings built-in that increase download times and are rarely
166 used). 167 used).
167 168
168 I need to make it setuid/setgid to support utmp/ptys on my OS, is this 169 I need to make it setuid/setgid to support utmp/ptys on my OS, is this
169 safe? 170 safe?
170 Likely not. While I honestly try to make it secure, and am probably 171 It should be, starting with release 7.1. You are encouraged to
171 not bad at it, I think it is simply unreasonable to expect all of 172 properly install urxvt with privileges necessary for your OS now.
172 freetype + fontconfig + xft + xlib + perl + ... + rxvt-unicode 173
173 itself to all be secure. Also, rxvt-unicode disables some options
174 when it detects that it runs setuid or setgid, which is not nice. 174 When rxvt-unicode detects that it runs setuid or setgid, it will
175 Besides, with the embedded perl interpreter the possibility for 175 fork into a helper process for privileged operations (pty handling
176 security problems easily multiplies. 176 on some systems, utmp/wtmp/lastlog handling on others) and drop
177 privileges immediately. This is much safer than most other terminals
178 that keep privileges while running (but is more relevant to urxvt,
179 as it contains things as perl interpreters, which might be "helpful"
180 to attackers).
177 181
178 Elevated privileges are only required for utmp and pty operations on 182 This forking is done as the very first within main(), which is very
179 some systems (for example, GNU/Linux doesn't need any extra 183 early and reduces possible bugs to initialisation code run before
180 privileges for ptys, but some need it for utmp support). It is 184 main(), or things like the dynamic loader of your system, which
181 planned to mvoe this into a forked handler process, but this is not 185 should result in very little risk.
182 yet done.
183
184 So, while setuid/setgid operation is supported and not a problem on
185 your typical single-user-no-other-logins unix desktop, always
186 remember that its an awful lot of code, most of which isn't checked
187 for security issues regularly.
188 186
189 When I log-in to another system it tells me about missing terminfo data? 187 When I log-in to another system it tells me about missing terminfo data?
190 The terminal description used by rxvt-unicode is not as widely 188 The terminal description used by rxvt-unicode is not as widely
191 available as that for xterm, or even rxvt (for which the same 189 available as that for xterm, or even rxvt (for which the same
192 problem often arises). 190 problem often arises).

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines