ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Download File
/cvs/rxvt-unicode/README.FAQ
(Generate patch)

Comparing rxvt-unicode/README.FAQ (file contents):
Revision 1.54 by root, Fri Jan 25 18:42:22 2008 UTC vs.
Revision 1.55 by root, Sun Jun 15 13:54:15 2008 UTC

823 cases. You can also create a termcap entry by using terminfo's infocmp 823 cases. You can also create a termcap entry by using terminfo's infocmp
824 program like this: 824 program like this:
825 825
826 infocmp -C rxvt-unicode 826 infocmp -C rxvt-unicode
827 827
828 Or you could use this termcap entry, generated by the command above: 828 Or you could use the termcap entry in doc/etc/rxvt-unicode.termcap,
829 829 generated by the command above.
830 rxvt-unicode|rxvt-unicode terminal (X Window System):\
831 :am:bw:eo:km:mi:ms:xn:xo:\
832 :co#80:it#8:li#24:lm#0:\
833 :AL=\E[%dL:DC=\E[%dP:DL=\E[%dM:DO=\E[%dB:IC=\E[%d@:\
834 :K1=\EOw:K2=\EOu:K3=\EOy:K4=\EOq:K5=\EOs:LE=\E[%dD:\
835 :RI=\E[%dC:SF=\E[%dS:SR=\E[%dT:UP=\E[%dA:ae=\E(B:al=\E[L:\
836 :as=\E(0:bl=^G:cd=\E[J:ce=\E[K:cl=\E[H\E[2J:\
837 :cm=\E[%i%d;%dH:cr=^M:cs=\E[%i%d;%dr:ct=\E[3g:dc=\E[P:\
838 :dl=\E[M:do=^J:ec=\E[%dX:ei=\E[4l:ho=\E[H:\
839 :i1=\E[?47l\E=\E[?1l:ic=\E[@:im=\E[4h:\
840 :is=\E[r\E[m\E[2J\E[H\E[?7h\E[?1;3;4;6l\E[4l:\
841 :k1=\E[11~:k2=\E[12~:k3=\E[13~:k4=\E[14~:k5=\E[15~:\
842 :k6=\E[17~:k7=\E[18~:k8=\E[19~:k9=\E[20~:kD=\E[3~:\
843 :kI=\E[2~:kN=\E[6~:kP=\E[5~:kb=\177:kd=\EOB:ke=\E[?1l\E>:\
844 :kh=\E[7~:kl=\EOD:kr=\EOC:ks=\E[?1h\E=:ku=\EOA:le=^H:\
845 :mb=\E[5m:md=\E[1m:me=\E[m\017:mr=\E[7m:nd=\E[C:rc=\E8:\
846 :sc=\E7:se=\E[27m:sf=^J:so=\E[7m:sr=\EM:st=\EH:ta=^I:\
847 :te=\E[r\E[?1049l:ti=\E[?1049h:ue=\E[24m:up=\E[A:\
848 :us=\E[4m:vb=\E[?5h\E[?5l:ve=\E[?25h:vi=\E[?25l:\
849 :vs=\E[?25h:
850 830
851 Why does "ls" no longer have coloured output? 831 Why does "ls" no longer have coloured output?
852 The "ls" in the GNU coreutils unfortunately doesn't use terminfo to 832 The "ls" in the GNU coreutils unfortunately doesn't use terminfo to
853 decide whether a terminal has colour, but uses its own configuration 833 decide whether a terminal has colour, but uses its own configuration
854 file. Needless to say, "rxvt-unicode" is not in its default file (among 834 file. Needless to say, "rxvt-unicode" is not in its default file (among
1076 As you might have guessed, FreeBSD does neither define this symbol nor 1056 As you might have guessed, FreeBSD does neither define this symbol nor
1077 does it support it. Instead, it uses its own internal representation of 1057 does it support it. Instead, it uses its own internal representation of
1078 wchar_t. This is, of course, completely fine with respect to standards. 1058 wchar_t. This is, of course, completely fine with respect to standards.
1079 1059
1080 However, that means rxvt-unicode only works in "POSIX", "ISO-8859-1" and 1060 However, that means rxvt-unicode only works in "POSIX", "ISO-8859-1" and
1081 "UTF-8" locales under FreeBSD (which all use Unicode as wchar_t. 1061 "UTF-8" locales under FreeBSD (which all use Unicode as wchar_t).
1082 1062
1083 "__STDC_ISO_10646__" is the only sane way to support multi-language apps 1063 "__STDC_ISO_10646__" is the only sane way to support multi-language apps
1084 in an OS, as using a locale-dependent (and non-standardized) 1064 in an OS, as using a locale-dependent (and non-standardized)
1085 representation of wchar_t makes it impossible to convert between wchar_t 1065 representation of wchar_t makes it impossible to convert between wchar_t
1086 (as used by X11 and your applications) and any other encoding without 1066 (as used by X11 and your applications) and any other encoding without

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines