ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Download File
/cvs/rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt.7.pod
(Generate patch)

Comparing rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt.7.pod (file contents):
Revision 1.58 by root, Wed Jul 13 02:24:02 2005 UTC vs.
Revision 1.60 by root, Fri Jul 29 03:12:10 2005 UTC

487 487
488=item Can I speed up Xft rendering somehow? 488=item Can I speed up Xft rendering somehow?
489 489
490Yes, the most obvious way to speed it up is to avoid Xft entirely, as 490Yes, the most obvious way to speed it up is to avoid Xft entirely, as
491it is simply slow. If you still want Xft fonts you might try to disable 491it is simply slow. If you still want Xft fonts you might try to disable
492antialiasing (by appending C<:antialiasing=false>), which saves lots of 492antialiasing (by appending C<:antialias=false>), which saves lots of
493memory and also speeds up rendering considerably. 493memory and also speeds up rendering considerably.
494 494
495=item Rxvt-unicode doesn't seem to anti-alias its fonts, what is wrong? 495=item Rxvt-unicode doesn't seem to anti-alias its fonts, what is wrong?
496 496
497Rxvt-unicode will use whatever you specify as a font. If it needs to 497Rxvt-unicode will use whatever you specify as a font. If it needs to
575 URxvt.color7: #e1dddd 575 URxvt.color7: #e1dddd
576 URxvt.color15: #e1dddd 576 URxvt.color15: #e1dddd
577 577
578=item How can I start @@RXVT_NAME@@d in a race-free way? 578=item How can I start @@RXVT_NAME@@d in a race-free way?
579 579
580Despite it's name, @@RXVT_NAME@@d is not a real daemon, but more like a 580Try C<@@RXVT_NAME@@d -f -o>, which tells @@RXVT_NAME@@d to open the
581server that answers @@RXVT_NAME@@c's requests, so it doesn't background 581display, create the listening socket and then fork.
582itself.
583
584To ensure @@RXVT_NAME@@d is listening on it's socket, you can use the
585following method to wait for the startup message before continuing:
586
587 { @@RXVT_NAME@@d & } | read
588 582
589=item What's with the strange Backspace/Delete key behaviour? 583=item What's with the strange Backspace/Delete key behaviour?
590 584
591Assuming that the physical Backspace key corresponds to the 585Assuming that the physical Backspace key corresponds to the
592BackSpace keysym (not likely for Linux ... see the following 586BackSpace keysym (not likely for Linux ... see the following

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines