--- rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt.7.pod	2006/01/18 17:49:46	1.88
+++ rxvt-unicode/doc/rxvt.7.pod	2006/01/18 21:00:39	1.89
@@ -161,20 +161,21 @@
 =item I am using Debian GNU/Linux and have a problem...
 
 The Debian GNU/Linux package of rxvt-unicode in sarge contains large
-patches that considerably change the behaviour of rxvt-unicode. Before
-reporting a bug to the original rxvt-unicode author please download and
-install the genuine version (L<http://software.schmorp.de#rxvt-unicode>)
-and try to reproduce the problem. If you cannot, chances are that the
-problems are specific to Debian GNU/Linux, in which case it should be
-reported via the Debian Bug Tracking System (use C<reportbug> to report
-the bug).
+patches that considerably change the behaviour of rxvt-unicode (but
+unfortunately this notice has been removed). Before reporting a bug to
+the original rxvt-unicode author please download and install the genuine
+version (L<http://software.schmorp.de#rxvt-unicode>) and try to reproduce
+the problem. If you cannot, chances are that the problems are specific to
+Debian GNU/Linux, in which case it should be reported via the Debian Bug
+Tracking System (use C<reportbug> to report the bug).
 
 For other problems that also affect the Debian package, you can and
 probably should use the Debian BTS, too, because, after all, it's also a
 bug in the Debian version and it serves as a reminder for other users that
 might encounter the same issue.
 
-=item I am maintaining rxvt-unicode for distribution/OS XXX, any recommendation?
+=item I am maintaining rxvt-unicode for distribution/OS XXX, any
+recommendation?
 
 You should build one binary with the default options. F<configure>
 now enables most useful options, and the trend goes to making them