| 1 |
Network Working Group J. Oikarinen |
| 2 |
Request for Comments: 1459 D. Reed |
| 3 |
May 1993 |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Internet Relay Chat Protocol |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Status of This Memo |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet |
| 11 |
community. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested. |
| 12 |
Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol |
| 13 |
Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol. |
| 14 |
Distribution of this memo is unlimited. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Abstract |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The IRC protocol was developed over the last 4 years since it was |
| 19 |
first implemented as a means for users on a BBS to chat amongst |
| 20 |
themselves. Now it supports a world-wide network of servers and |
| 21 |
clients, and is stringing to cope with growth. Over the past 2 years, |
| 22 |
the average number of users connected to the main IRC network has |
| 23 |
grown by a factor of 10. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
The IRC protocol is a text-based protocol, with the simplest client |
| 26 |
being any socket program capable of connecting to the server. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Table of Contents |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................... 4 |
| 31 |
1.1 Servers ................................................ 4 |
| 32 |
1.2 Clients ................................................ 5 |
| 33 |
1.2.1 Operators .......................................... 5 |
| 34 |
1.3 Channels ................................................ 5 |
| 35 |
1.3.1 Channel Operators .................................... 6 |
| 36 |
2. THE IRC SPECIFICATION ....................................... 7 |
| 37 |
2.1 Overview ................................................ 7 |
| 38 |
2.2 Character codes ......................................... 7 |
| 39 |
2.3 Messages ................................................ 7 |
| 40 |
2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF .................... 8 |
| 41 |
2.4 Numeric replies ......................................... 10 |
| 42 |
3. IRC Concepts ................................................ 10 |
| 43 |
3.1 One-to-one communication ................................ 10 |
| 44 |
3.2 One-to-many ............................................. 11 |
| 45 |
3.2.1 To a list .......................................... 11 |
| 46 |
3.2.2 To a group (channel) ............................... 11 |
| 47 |
3.2.3 To a host/server mask .............................. 12 |
| 48 |
3.3 One to all .............................................. 12 |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 1] |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
3.3.1 Client to Client ................................... 12 |
| 58 |
3.3.2 Clients to Server .................................. 12 |
| 59 |
3.3.3 Server to Server ................................... 12 |
| 60 |
4. MESSAGE DETAILS ............................................. 13 |
| 61 |
4.1 Connection Registration ................................. 13 |
| 62 |
4.1.1 Password message ................................... 14 |
| 63 |
4.1.2 Nickname message ................................... 14 |
| 64 |
4.1.3 User message ....................................... 15 |
| 65 |
4.1.4 Server message ..................................... 16 |
| 66 |
4.1.5 Operator message ................................... 17 |
| 67 |
4.1.6 Quit message ....................................... 17 |
| 68 |
4.1.7 Server Quit message ................................ 18 |
| 69 |
4.2 Channel operations ...................................... 19 |
| 70 |
4.2.1 Join message ....................................... 19 |
| 71 |
4.2.2 Part message ....................................... 20 |
| 72 |
4.2.3 Mode message ....................................... 21 |
| 73 |
4.2.3.1 Channel modes ................................. 21 |
| 74 |
4.2.3.2 User modes .................................... 22 |
| 75 |
4.2.4 Topic message ...................................... 23 |
| 76 |
4.2.5 Names message ...................................... 24 |
| 77 |
4.2.6 List message ....................................... 24 |
| 78 |
4.2.7 Invite message ..................................... 25 |
| 79 |
4.2.8 Kick message ....................................... 25 |
| 80 |
4.3 Server queries and commands ............................. 26 |
| 81 |
4.3.1 Version message .................................... 26 |
| 82 |
4.3.2 Stats message ...................................... 27 |
| 83 |
4.3.3 Links message ...................................... 28 |
| 84 |
4.3.4 Time message ....................................... 29 |
| 85 |
4.3.5 Connect message .................................... 29 |
| 86 |
4.3.6 Trace message ...................................... 30 |
| 87 |
4.3.7 Admin message ...................................... 31 |
| 88 |
4.3.8 Info message ....................................... 31 |
| 89 |
4.4 Sending messages ........................................ 32 |
| 90 |
4.4.1 Private messages ................................... 32 |
| 91 |
4.4.2 Notice messages .................................... 33 |
| 92 |
4.5 User-based queries ...................................... 33 |
| 93 |
4.5.1 Who query .......................................... 33 |
| 94 |
4.5.2 Whois query ........................................ 34 |
| 95 |
4.5.3 Whowas message ..................................... 35 |
| 96 |
4.6 Miscellaneous messages .................................. 35 |
| 97 |
4.6.1 Kill message ....................................... 36 |
| 98 |
4.6.2 Ping message ....................................... 37 |
| 99 |
4.6.3 Pong message ....................................... 37 |
| 100 |
4.6.4 Error message ...................................... 38 |
| 101 |
5. OPTIONAL MESSAGES ........................................... 38 |
| 102 |
5.1 Away message ............................................ 38 |
| 103 |
5.2 Rehash command .......................................... 39 |
| 104 |
5.3 Restart command ......................................... 39 |
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 2] |
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
5.4 Summon message .......................................... 40 |
| 114 |
5.5 Users message ........................................... 40 |
| 115 |
5.6 Operwall command ........................................ 41 |
| 116 |
5.7 Userhost message ........................................ 42 |
| 117 |
5.8 Ison message ............................................ 42 |
| 118 |
6. REPLIES ..................................................... 43 |
| 119 |
6.1 Error Replies ........................................... 43 |
| 120 |
6.2 Command responses ....................................... 48 |
| 121 |
6.3 Reserved numerics ....................................... 56 |
| 122 |
7. Client and server authentication ............................ 56 |
| 123 |
8. Current Implementations Details ............................. 56 |
| 124 |
8.1 Network protocol: TCP ................................... 57 |
| 125 |
8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets ............................ 57 |
| 126 |
8.2 Command Parsing ......................................... 57 |
| 127 |
8.3 Message delivery ........................................ 57 |
| 128 |
8.4 Connection 'Liveness' ................................... 58 |
| 129 |
8.5 Establishing a server-client connection ................. 58 |
| 130 |
8.6 Establishing a server-server connection ................. 58 |
| 131 |
8.6.1 State information exchange when connecting ......... 59 |
| 132 |
8.7 Terminating server-client connections ................... 59 |
| 133 |
8.8 Terminating server-server connections ................... 59 |
| 134 |
8.9 Tracking nickname changes ............................... 60 |
| 135 |
8.10 Flood control of clients ............................... 60 |
| 136 |
8.11 Non-blocking lookups ................................... 61 |
| 137 |
8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups ............................ 61 |
| 138 |
8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups .......................... 61 |
| 139 |
8.12 Configuration file ..................................... 61 |
| 140 |
8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect ....................... 62 |
| 141 |
8.12.2 Operators ......................................... 62 |
| 142 |
8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect ....................... 62 |
| 143 |
8.12.4 Administrivia ..................................... 63 |
| 144 |
8.13 Channel membership ..................................... 63 |
| 145 |
9. Current problems ............................................ 63 |
| 146 |
9.1 Scalability ............................................. 63 |
| 147 |
9.2 Labels .................................................. 63 |
| 148 |
9.2.1 Nicknames .......................................... 63 |
| 149 |
9.2.2 Channels ........................................... 64 |
| 150 |
9.2.3 Servers ............................................ 64 |
| 151 |
9.3 Algorithms .............................................. 64 |
| 152 |
10. Support and availability ................................... 64 |
| 153 |
11. Security Considerations .................................... 65 |
| 154 |
12. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 65 |
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 3] |
| 165 |
|
| 166 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 167 |
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
1. INTRODUCTION |
| 170 |
|
| 171 |
The IRC (Internet Relay Chat) protocol has been designed over a |
| 172 |
number of years for use with text based conferencing. This document |
| 173 |
describes the current IRC protocol. |
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
The IRC protocol has been developed on systems using the TCP/IP |
| 176 |
network protocol, although there is no requirement that this remain |
| 177 |
the only sphere in which it operates. |
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
IRC itself is a teleconferencing system, which (through the use of |
| 180 |
the client-server model) is well-suited to running on many machines |
| 181 |
in a distributed fashion. A typical setup involves a single process |
| 182 |
(the server) forming a central point for clients (or other servers) |
| 183 |
to connect to, performing the required message delivery/multiplexing |
| 184 |
and other functions. |
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
1.1 Servers |
| 187 |
|
| 188 |
The server forms the backbone of IRC, providing a point to which |
| 189 |
clients may connect to to talk to each other, and a point for other |
| 190 |
servers to connect to, forming an IRC network. The only network |
| 191 |
configuration allowed for IRC servers is that of a spanning tree [see |
| 192 |
Fig. 1] where each server acts as a central node for the rest of the |
| 193 |
net it sees. |
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
[ Server 15 ] [ Server 13 ] [ Server 14] |
| 197 |
/ \ / |
| 198 |
/ \ / |
| 199 |
[ Server 11 ] ------ [ Server 1 ] [ Server 12] |
| 200 |
/ \ / |
| 201 |
/ \ / |
| 202 |
[ Server 2 ] [ Server 3 ] |
| 203 |
/ \ \ |
| 204 |
/ \ \ |
| 205 |
[ Server 4 ] [ Server 5 ] [ Server 6 ] |
| 206 |
/ | \ / |
| 207 |
/ | \ / |
| 208 |
/ | \____ / |
| 209 |
/ | \ / |
| 210 |
[ Server 7 ] [ Server 8 ] [ Server 9 ] [ Server 10 ] |
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
: |
| 213 |
[ etc. ] |
| 214 |
: |
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
[ Fig. 1. Format of IRC server network ] |
| 217 |
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 4] |
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
1.2 Clients |
| 226 |
|
| 227 |
A client is anything connecting to a server that is not another |
| 228 |
server. Each client is distinguished from other clients by a unique |
| 229 |
nickname having a maximum length of nine (9) characters. See the |
| 230 |
protocol grammar rules for what may and may not be used in a |
| 231 |
nickname. In addition to the nickname, all servers must have the |
| 232 |
following information about all clients: the real name of the host |
| 233 |
that the client is running on, the username of the client on that |
| 234 |
host, and the server to which the client is connected. |
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
1.2.1 Operators |
| 237 |
|
| 238 |
To allow a reasonable amount of order to be kept within the IRC |
| 239 |
network, a special class of clients (operators) is allowed to perform |
| 240 |
general maintenance functions on the network. Although the powers |
| 241 |
granted to an operator can be considered as 'dangerous', they are |
| 242 |
nonetheless required. Operators should be able to perform basic |
| 243 |
network tasks such as disconnecting and reconnecting servers as |
| 244 |
needed to prevent long-term use of bad network routing. In |
| 245 |
recognition of this need, the protocol discussed herein provides for |
| 246 |
operators only to be able to perform such functions. See sections |
| 247 |
4.1.7 (SQUIT) and 4.3.5 (CONNECT). |
| 248 |
|
| 249 |
A more controversial power of operators is the ability to remove a |
| 250 |
user from the connected network by 'force', i.e. operators are able |
| 251 |
to close the connection between any client and server. The |
| 252 |
justification for this is delicate since its abuse is both |
| 253 |
destructive and annoying. For further details on this type of |
| 254 |
action, see section 4.6.1 (KILL). |
| 255 |
|
| 256 |
1.3 Channels |
| 257 |
|
| 258 |
A channel is a named group of one or more clients which will all |
| 259 |
receive messages addressed to that channel. The channel is created |
| 260 |
implicitly when the first client joins it, and the channel ceases to |
| 261 |
exist when the last client leaves it. While channel exists, any |
| 262 |
client can reference the channel using the name of the channel. |
| 263 |
|
| 264 |
Channels names are strings (beginning with a '&' or '#' character) of |
| 265 |
length up to 200 characters. Apart from the the requirement that the |
| 266 |
first character being either '&' or '#'; the only restriction on a |
| 267 |
channel name is that it may not contain any spaces (' '), a control G |
| 268 |
(^G or ASCII 7), or a comma (',' which is used as a list item |
| 269 |
separator by the protocol). |
| 270 |
|
| 271 |
There are two types of channels allowed by this protocol. One is a |
| 272 |
distributed channel which is known to all the servers that are |
| 273 |
|
| 274 |
|
| 275 |
|
| 276 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 5] |
| 277 |
|
| 278 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
|
| 281 |
connected to the network. These channels are marked by the first |
| 282 |
character being a only clients on the server where it exists may join |
| 283 |
it. These are distinguished by a leading '&' character. On top of |
| 284 |
these two types, there are the various channel modes available to |
| 285 |
alter the characteristics of individual channels. See section 4.2.3 |
| 286 |
(MODE command) for more details on this. |
| 287 |
|
| 288 |
To create a new channel or become part of an existing channel, a user |
| 289 |
is required to JOIN the channel. If the channel doesn't exist prior |
| 290 |
to joining, the channel is created and the creating user becomes a |
| 291 |
channel operator. If the channel already exists, whether or not your |
| 292 |
request to JOIN that channel is honoured depends on the current modes |
| 293 |
of the channel. For example, if the channel is invite-only, (+i), |
| 294 |
then you may only join if invited. As part of the protocol, a user |
| 295 |
may be a part of several channels at once, but a limit of ten (10) |
| 296 |
channels is recommended as being ample for both experienced and |
| 297 |
novice users. See section 8.13 for more information on this. |
| 298 |
|
| 299 |
If the IRC network becomes disjoint because of a split between two |
| 300 |
servers, the channel on each side is only composed of those clients |
| 301 |
which are connected to servers on the respective sides of the split, |
| 302 |
possibly ceasing to exist on one side of the split. When the split |
| 303 |
is healed, the connecting servers announce to each other who they |
| 304 |
think is in each channel and the mode of that channel. If the |
| 305 |
channel exists on both sides, the JOINs and MODEs are interpreted in |
| 306 |
an inclusive manner so that both sides of the new connection will |
| 307 |
agree about which clients are in the channel and what modes the |
| 308 |
channel has. |
| 309 |
|
| 310 |
1.3.1 Channel Operators |
| 311 |
|
| 312 |
The channel operator (also referred to as a "chop" or "chanop") on a |
| 313 |
given channel is considered to 'own' that channel. In recognition of |
| 314 |
this status, channel operators are endowed with certain powers which |
| 315 |
enable them to keep control and some sort of sanity in their channel. |
| 316 |
As an owner of a channel, a channel operator is not required to have |
| 317 |
reasons for their actions, although if their actions are generally |
| 318 |
antisocial or otherwise abusive, it might be reasonable to ask an IRC |
| 319 |
operator to intervene, or for the usersjust leave and go elsewhere |
| 320 |
and form their own channel. |
| 321 |
|
| 322 |
The commands which may only be used by channel operators are: |
| 323 |
|
| 324 |
KICK - Eject a client from the channel |
| 325 |
MODE - Change the channel's mode |
| 326 |
INVITE - Invite a client to an invite-only channel (mode +i) |
| 327 |
TOPIC - Change the channel topic in a mode +t channel |
| 328 |
|
| 329 |
|
| 330 |
|
| 331 |
|
| 332 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 6] |
| 333 |
|
| 334 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 335 |
|
| 336 |
|
| 337 |
A channel operator is identified by the '@' symbol next to their |
| 338 |
nickname whenever it is associated with a channel (ie replies to the |
| 339 |
NAMES, WHO and WHOIS commands). |
| 340 |
|
| 341 |
2. The IRC Specification |
| 342 |
|
| 343 |
2.1 Overview |
| 344 |
|
| 345 |
The protocol as described herein is for use both with server to |
| 346 |
server and client to server connections. There are, however, more |
| 347 |
restrictions on client connections (which are considered to be |
| 348 |
untrustworthy) than on server connections. |
| 349 |
|
| 350 |
2.2 Character codes |
| 351 |
|
| 352 |
No specific character set is specified. The protocol is based on a a |
| 353 |
set of codes which are composed of eight (8) bits, making up an |
| 354 |
octet. Each message may be composed of any number of these octets; |
| 355 |
however, some octet values are used for control codes which act as |
| 356 |
message delimiters. |
| 357 |
|
| 358 |
Regardless of being an 8-bit protocol, the delimiters and keywords |
| 359 |
are such that protocol is mostly usable from USASCII terminal and a |
| 360 |
telnet connection. |
| 361 |
|
| 362 |
Because of IRC's scandanavian origin, the characters {}| are |
| 363 |
considered to be the lower case equivalents of the characters []\, |
| 364 |
respectively. This is a critical issue when determining the |
| 365 |
equivalence of two nicknames. |
| 366 |
|
| 367 |
2.3 Messages |
| 368 |
|
| 369 |
Servers and clients send eachother messages which may or may not |
| 370 |
generate a reply. If the message contains a valid command, as |
| 371 |
described in later sections, the client should expect a reply as |
| 372 |
specified but it is not advised to wait forever for the reply; client |
| 373 |
to server and server to server communication is essentially |
| 374 |
asynchronous in nature. |
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
Each IRC message may consist of up to three main parts: the prefix |
| 377 |
(optional), the command, and the command parameters (of which there |
| 378 |
may be up to 15). The prefix, command, and all parameters are |
| 379 |
separated by one (or more) ASCII space character(s) (0x20). |
| 380 |
|
| 381 |
The presence of a prefix is indicated with a single leading ASCII |
| 382 |
colon character (':', 0x3b), which must be the first character of the |
| 383 |
message itself. There must be no gap (whitespace) between the colon |
| 384 |
and the prefix. The prefix is used by servers to indicate the true |
| 385 |
|
| 386 |
|
| 387 |
|
| 388 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 7] |
| 389 |
|
| 390 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 391 |
|
| 392 |
|
| 393 |
origin of the message. If the prefix is missing from the message, it |
| 394 |
is assumed to have originated from the connection from which it was |
| 395 |
received. Clients should not use prefix when sending a message from |
| 396 |
themselves; if they use a prefix, the only valid prefix is the |
| 397 |
registered nickname associated with the client. If the source |
| 398 |
identified by the prefix cannot be found from the server's internal |
| 399 |
database, or if the source is registered from a different link than |
| 400 |
from which the message arrived, the server must ignore the message |
| 401 |
silently. |
| 402 |
|
| 403 |
The command must either be a valid IRC command or a three (3) digit |
| 404 |
number represented in ASCII text. |
| 405 |
|
| 406 |
IRC messages are always lines of characters terminated with a CR-LF |
| 407 |
(Carriage Return - Line Feed) pair, and these messages shall not |
| 408 |
exceed 512 characters in length, counting all characters including |
| 409 |
the trailing CR-LF. Thus, there are 510 characters maximum allowed |
| 410 |
for the command and its parameters. There is no provision for |
| 411 |
continuation message lines. See section 7 for more details about |
| 412 |
current implementations. |
| 413 |
|
| 414 |
2.3.1 Message format in 'pseudo' BNF |
| 415 |
|
| 416 |
The protocol messages must be extracted from the contiguous stream of |
| 417 |
octets. The current solution is to designate two characters, CR and |
| 418 |
LF, as message separators. Empty messages are silently ignored, |
| 419 |
which permits use of the sequence CR-LF between messages |
| 420 |
without extra problems. |
| 421 |
|
| 422 |
The extracted message is parsed into the components <prefix>, |
| 423 |
<command> and list of parameters matched either by <middle> or |
| 424 |
<trailing> components. |
| 425 |
|
| 426 |
The BNF representation for this is: |
| 427 |
|
| 428 |
|
| 429 |
<message> ::= [':' <prefix> <SPACE> ] <command> <params> <crlf> |
| 430 |
<prefix> ::= <servername> | <nick> [ '!' <user> ] [ '@' <host> ] |
| 431 |
<command> ::= <letter> { <letter> } | <number> <number> <number> |
| 432 |
<SPACE> ::= ' ' { ' ' } |
| 433 |
<params> ::= <SPACE> [ ':' <trailing> | <middle> <params> ] |
| 434 |
|
| 435 |
<middle> ::= <Any *non-empty* sequence of octets not including SPACE |
| 436 |
or NUL or CR or LF, the first of which may not be ':'> |
| 437 |
<trailing> ::= <Any, possibly *empty*, sequence of octets not including |
| 438 |
NUL or CR or LF> |
| 439 |
|
| 440 |
<crlf> ::= CR LF |
| 441 |
|
| 442 |
|
| 443 |
|
| 444 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 8] |
| 445 |
|
| 446 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 447 |
|
| 448 |
|
| 449 |
NOTES: |
| 450 |
|
| 451 |
1) <SPACE> is consists only of SPACE character(s) (0x20). |
| 452 |
Specially notice that TABULATION, and all other control |
| 453 |
characters are considered NON-WHITE-SPACE. |
| 454 |
|
| 455 |
2) After extracting the parameter list, all parameters are equal, |
| 456 |
whether matched by <middle> or <trailing>. <Trailing> is just |
| 457 |
a syntactic trick to allow SPACE within parameter. |
| 458 |
|
| 459 |
3) The fact that CR and LF cannot appear in parameter strings is |
| 460 |
just artifact of the message framing. This might change later. |
| 461 |
|
| 462 |
4) The NUL character is not special in message framing, and |
| 463 |
basically could end up inside a parameter, but as it would |
| 464 |
cause extra complexities in normal C string handling. Therefore |
| 465 |
NUL is not allowed within messages. |
| 466 |
|
| 467 |
5) The last parameter may be an empty string. |
| 468 |
|
| 469 |
6) Use of the extended prefix (['!' <user> ] ['@' <host> ]) must |
| 470 |
not be used in server to server communications and is only |
| 471 |
intended for server to client messages in order to provide |
| 472 |
clients with more useful information about who a message is |
| 473 |
from without the need for additional queries. |
| 474 |
|
| 475 |
Most protocol messages specify additional semantics and syntax for |
| 476 |
the extracted parameter strings dictated by their position in the |
| 477 |
list. For example, many server commands will assume that the first |
| 478 |
parameter after the command is the list of targets, which can be |
| 479 |
described with: |
| 480 |
|
| 481 |
<target> ::= <to> [ "," <target> ] |
| 482 |
<to> ::= <channel> | <user> '@' <servername> | <nick> | <mask> |
| 483 |
<channel> ::= ('#' | '&') <chstring> |
| 484 |
<servername> ::= <host> |
| 485 |
<host> ::= see RFC 952 [DNS:4] for details on allowed hostnames |
| 486 |
<nick> ::= <letter> { <letter> | <number> | <special> } |
| 487 |
<mask> ::= ('#' | '$') <chstring> |
| 488 |
<chstring> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE, BELL, NUL, CR, LF and |
| 489 |
comma (',')> |
| 490 |
|
| 491 |
Other parameter syntaxes are: |
| 492 |
|
| 493 |
<user> ::= <nonwhite> { <nonwhite> } |
| 494 |
<letter> ::= 'a' ... 'z' | 'A' ... 'Z' |
| 495 |
<number> ::= '0' ... '9' |
| 496 |
<special> ::= '-' | '[' | ']' | '\' | '`' | '^' | '{' | '}' |
| 497 |
|
| 498 |
|
| 499 |
|
| 500 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 9] |
| 501 |
|
| 502 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 503 |
|
| 504 |
|
| 505 |
<nonwhite> ::= <any 8bit code except SPACE (0x20), NUL (0x0), CR |
| 506 |
(0xd), and LF (0xa)> |
| 507 |
|
| 508 |
2.4 Numeric replies |
| 509 |
|
| 510 |
Most of the messages sent to the server generate a reply of some |
| 511 |
sort. The most common reply is the numeric reply, used for both |
| 512 |
errors and normal replies. The numeric reply must be sent as one |
| 513 |
message consisting of the sender prefix, the three digit numeric, and |
| 514 |
the target of the reply. A numeric reply is not allowed to originate |
| 515 |
from a client; any such messages received by a server are silently |
| 516 |
dropped. In all other respects, a numeric reply is just like a normal |
| 517 |
message, except that the keyword is made up of 3 numeric digits |
| 518 |
rather than a string of letters. A list of different replies is |
| 519 |
supplied in section 6. |
| 520 |
|
| 521 |
3. IRC Concepts. |
| 522 |
|
| 523 |
This section is devoted to describing the actual concepts behind the |
| 524 |
organization of the IRC protocol and how the current |
| 525 |
implementations deliver different classes of messages. |
| 526 |
|
| 527 |
|
| 528 |
|
| 529 |
1--\ |
| 530 |
A D---4 |
| 531 |
2--/ \ / |
| 532 |
B----C |
| 533 |
/ \ |
| 534 |
3 E |
| 535 |
|
| 536 |
Servers: A, B, C, D, E Clients: 1, 2, 3, 4 |
| 537 |
|
| 538 |
[ Fig. 2. Sample small IRC network ] |
| 539 |
|
| 540 |
3.1 One-to-one communication |
| 541 |
|
| 542 |
Communication on a one-to-one basis is usually only performed by |
| 543 |
clients, since most server-server traffic is not a result of servers |
| 544 |
talking only to each other. To provide a secure means for clients to |
| 545 |
talk to each other, it is required that all servers be able to send a |
| 546 |
message in exactly one direction along the spanning tree in order to |
| 547 |
reach any client. The path of a message being delivered is the |
| 548 |
shortest path between any two points on the spanning tree. |
| 549 |
|
| 550 |
The following examples all refer to Figure 2 above. |
| 551 |
|
| 552 |
|
| 553 |
|
| 554 |
|
| 555 |
|
| 556 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 10] |
| 557 |
|
| 558 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 559 |
|
| 560 |
|
| 561 |
Example 1: |
| 562 |
A message between clients 1 and 2 is only seen by server A, which |
| 563 |
sends it straight to client 2. |
| 564 |
|
| 565 |
Example 2: |
| 566 |
A message between clients 1 and 3 is seen by servers A & B, and |
| 567 |
client 3. No other clients or servers are allowed see the message. |
| 568 |
|
| 569 |
Example 3: |
| 570 |
A message between clients 2 and 4 is seen by servers A, B, C & D |
| 571 |
and client 4 only. |
| 572 |
|
| 573 |
3.2 One-to-many |
| 574 |
|
| 575 |
The main goal of IRC is to provide a forum which allows easy and |
| 576 |
efficient conferencing (one to many conversations). IRC offers |
| 577 |
several means to achieve this, each serving its own purpose. |
| 578 |
|
| 579 |
3.2.1 To a list |
| 580 |
|
| 581 |
The least efficient style of one-to-many conversation is through |
| 582 |
clients talking to a 'list' of users. How this is done is almost |
| 583 |
self explanatory: the client gives a list of destinations to which |
| 584 |
the message is to be delivered and the server breaks it up and |
| 585 |
dispatches a separate copy of the message to each given destination. |
| 586 |
This isn't as efficient as using a group since the destination list |
| 587 |
is broken up and the dispatch sent without checking to make sure |
| 588 |
duplicates aren't sent down each path. |
| 589 |
|
| 590 |
3.2.2 To a group (channel) |
| 591 |
|
| 592 |
In IRC the channel has a role equivalent to that of the multicast |
| 593 |
group; their existence is dynamic (coming and going as people join |
| 594 |
and leave channels) and the actual conversation carried out on a |
| 595 |
channel is only sent to servers which are supporting users on a given |
| 596 |
channel. If there are multiple users on a server in the same |
| 597 |
channel, the message text is sent only once to that server and then |
| 598 |
sent to each client on the channel. This action is then repeated for |
| 599 |
each client-server combination until the original message has fanned |
| 600 |
out and reached each member of the channel. |
| 601 |
|
| 602 |
The following examples all refer to Figure 2. |
| 603 |
|
| 604 |
Example 4: |
| 605 |
Any channel with 1 client in it. Messages to the channel go to the |
| 606 |
server and then nowhere else. |
| 607 |
|
| 608 |
|
| 609 |
|
| 610 |
|
| 611 |
|
| 612 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 11] |
| 613 |
|
| 614 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 615 |
|
| 616 |
|
| 617 |
Example 5: |
| 618 |
2 clients in a channel. All messages traverse a path as if they |
| 619 |
were private messages between the two clients outside a channel. |
| 620 |
|
| 621 |
Example 6: |
| 622 |
Clients 1, 2 and 3 in a channel. All messages to the channel are |
| 623 |
sent to all clients and only those servers which must be traversed |
| 624 |
by the message if it were a private message to a single client. If |
| 625 |
client 1 sends a message, it goes back to client 2 and then via |
| 626 |
server B to client 3. |
| 627 |
|
| 628 |
3.2.3 To a host/server mask |
| 629 |
|
| 630 |
To provide IRC operators with some mechanism to send messages to a |
| 631 |
large body of related users, host and server mask messages are |
| 632 |
provided. These messages are sent to users whose host or server |
| 633 |
information match that of the mask. The messages are only sent to |
| 634 |
locations where users are, in a fashion similar to that of channels. |
| 635 |
|
| 636 |
3.3 One-to-all |
| 637 |
|
| 638 |
The one-to-all type of message is better described as a broadcast |
| 639 |
message, sent to all clients or servers or both. On a large network |
| 640 |
of users and servers, a single message can result in a lot of traffic |
| 641 |
being sent over the network in an effort to reach all of the desired |
| 642 |
destinations. |
| 643 |
|
| 644 |
For some messages, there is no option but to broadcast it to all |
| 645 |
servers so that the state information held by each server is |
| 646 |
reasonably consistent between servers. |
| 647 |
|
| 648 |
3.3.1 Client-to-Client |
| 649 |
|
| 650 |
There is no class of message which, from a single message, results in |
| 651 |
a message being sent to every other client. |
| 652 |
|
| 653 |
3.3.2 Client-to-Server |
| 654 |
|
| 655 |
Most of the commands which result in a change of state information |
| 656 |
(such as channel membership, channel mode, user status, etc) must be |
| 657 |
sent to all servers by default, and this distribution may not be |
| 658 |
changed by the client. |
| 659 |
|
| 660 |
3.3.3 Server-to-Server. |
| 661 |
|
| 662 |
While most messages between servers are distributed to all 'other' |
| 663 |
servers, this is only required for any message that affects either a |
| 664 |
user, channel or server. Since these are the basic items found in |
| 665 |
|
| 666 |
|
| 667 |
|
| 668 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 12] |
| 669 |
|
| 670 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 671 |
|
| 672 |
|
| 673 |
IRC, nearly all messages originating from a server are broadcast to |
| 674 |
all other connected servers. |
| 675 |
|
| 676 |
4. Message details |
| 677 |
|
| 678 |
On the following pages are descriptions of each message recognized by |
| 679 |
the IRC server and client. All commands described in this section |
| 680 |
must be implemented by any server for this protocol. |
| 681 |
|
| 682 |
Where the reply ERR_NOSUCHSERVER is listed, it means that the |
| 683 |
<server> parameter could not be found. The server must not send any |
| 684 |
other replies after this for that command. |
| 685 |
|
| 686 |
The server to which a client is connected is required to parse the |
| 687 |
complete message, returning any appropriate errors. If the server |
| 688 |
encounters a fatal error while parsing a message, an error must be |
| 689 |
sent back to the client and the parsing terminated. A fatal error |
| 690 |
may be considered to be incorrect command, a destination which is |
| 691 |
otherwise unknown to the server (server, nick or channel names fit |
| 692 |
this category), not enough parameters or incorrect privileges. |
| 693 |
|
| 694 |
If a full set of parameters is presented, then each must be checked |
| 695 |
for validity and appropriate responses sent back to the client. In |
| 696 |
the case of messages which use parameter lists using the comma as an |
| 697 |
item separator, a reply must be sent for each item. |
| 698 |
|
| 699 |
In the examples below, some messages appear using the full format: |
| 700 |
|
| 701 |
:Name COMMAND parameter list |
| 702 |
|
| 703 |
Such examples represent a message from "Name" in transit between |
| 704 |
servers, where it is essential to include the name of the original |
| 705 |
sender of the message so remote servers may send back a reply along |
| 706 |
the correct path. |
| 707 |
|
| 708 |
4.1 Connection Registration |
| 709 |
|
| 710 |
The commands described here are used to register a connection with an |
| 711 |
IRC server as either a user or a server as well as correctly |
| 712 |
disconnect. |
| 713 |
|
| 714 |
A "PASS" command is not required for either client or server |
| 715 |
connection to be registered, but it must precede the server message |
| 716 |
or the latter of the NICK/USER combination. It is strongly |
| 717 |
recommended that all server connections have a password in order to |
| 718 |
give some level of security to the actual connections. The |
| 719 |
recommended order for a client to register is as follows: |
| 720 |
|
| 721 |
|
| 722 |
|
| 723 |
|
| 724 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 13] |
| 725 |
|
| 726 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 727 |
|
| 728 |
|
| 729 |
1. Pass message |
| 730 |
2. Nick message |
| 731 |
3. User message |
| 732 |
|
| 733 |
4.1.1 Password message |
| 734 |
|
| 735 |
|
| 736 |
Command: PASS |
| 737 |
Parameters: <password> |
| 738 |
|
| 739 |
The PASS command is used to set a 'connection password'. The |
| 740 |
password can and must be set before any attempt to register the |
| 741 |
connection is made. Currently this requires that clients send a PASS |
| 742 |
command before sending the NICK/USER combination and servers *must* |
| 743 |
send a PASS command before any SERVER command. The password supplied |
| 744 |
must match the one contained in the C/N lines (for servers) or I |
| 745 |
lines (for clients). It is possible to send multiple PASS commands |
| 746 |
before registering but only the last one sent is used for |
| 747 |
verification and it may not be changed once registered. Numeric |
| 748 |
Replies: |
| 749 |
|
| 750 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 751 |
|
| 752 |
Example: |
| 753 |
|
| 754 |
PASS secretpasswordhere |
| 755 |
|
| 756 |
4.1.2 Nick message |
| 757 |
|
| 758 |
Command: NICK |
| 759 |
Parameters: <nickname> [ <hopcount> ] |
| 760 |
|
| 761 |
NICK message is used to give user a nickname or change the previous |
| 762 |
one. The <hopcount> parameter is only used by servers to indicate |
| 763 |
how far away a nick is from its home server. A local connection has |
| 764 |
a hopcount of 0. If supplied by a client, it must be ignored. |
| 765 |
|
| 766 |
If a NICK message arrives at a server which already knows about an |
| 767 |
identical nickname for another client, a nickname collision occurs. |
| 768 |
As a result of a nickname collision, all instances of the nickname |
| 769 |
are removed from the server's database, and a KILL command is issued |
| 770 |
to remove the nickname from all other server's database. If the NICK |
| 771 |
message causing the collision was a nickname change, then the |
| 772 |
original (old) nick must be removed as well. |
| 773 |
|
| 774 |
If the server recieves an identical NICK from a client which is |
| 775 |
directly connected, it may issue an ERR_NICKCOLLISION to the local |
| 776 |
client, drop the NICK command, and not generate any kills. |
| 777 |
|
| 778 |
|
| 779 |
|
| 780 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 14] |
| 781 |
|
| 782 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 783 |
|
| 784 |
|
| 785 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 786 |
|
| 787 |
ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME |
| 788 |
ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE ERR_NICKCOLLISION |
| 789 |
|
| 790 |
Example: |
| 791 |
|
| 792 |
NICK Wiz ; Introducing new nick "Wiz". |
| 793 |
|
| 794 |
:WiZ NICK Kilroy ; WiZ changed his nickname to Kilroy. |
| 795 |
|
| 796 |
4.1.3 User message |
| 797 |
|
| 798 |
Command: USER |
| 799 |
Parameters: <username> <hostname> <servername> <realname> |
| 800 |
|
| 801 |
The USER message is used at the beginning of connection to specify |
| 802 |
the username, hostname, servername and realname of s new user. It is |
| 803 |
also used in communication between servers to indicate new user |
| 804 |
arriving on IRC, since only after both USER and NICK have been |
| 805 |
received from a client does a user become registered. |
| 806 |
|
| 807 |
Between servers USER must to be prefixed with client's NICKname. |
| 808 |
Note that hostname and servername are normally ignored by the IRC |
| 809 |
server when the USER command comes from a directly connected client |
| 810 |
(for security reasons), but they are used in server to server |
| 811 |
communication. This means that a NICK must always be sent to a |
| 812 |
remote server when a new user is being introduced to the rest of the |
| 813 |
network before the accompanying USER is sent. |
| 814 |
|
| 815 |
It must be noted that realname parameter must be the last parameter, |
| 816 |
because it may contain space characters and must be prefixed with a |
| 817 |
colon (':') to make sure this is recognised as such. |
| 818 |
|
| 819 |
Since it is easy for a client to lie about its username by relying |
| 820 |
solely on the USER message, the use of an "Identity Server" is |
| 821 |
recommended. If the host which a user connects from has such a |
| 822 |
server enabled the username is set to that as in the reply from the |
| 823 |
"Identity Server". |
| 824 |
|
| 825 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 826 |
|
| 827 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 828 |
|
| 829 |
Examples: |
| 830 |
|
| 831 |
|
| 832 |
USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan |
| 833 |
|
| 834 |
|
| 835 |
|
| 836 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 15] |
| 837 |
|
| 838 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 839 |
|
| 840 |
|
| 841 |
; User registering themselves with a |
| 842 |
username of "guest" and real name |
| 843 |
"Ronnie Reagan". |
| 844 |
|
| 845 |
|
| 846 |
:testnick USER guest tolmoon tolsun :Ronnie Reagan |
| 847 |
; message between servers with the |
| 848 |
nickname for which the USER command |
| 849 |
belongs to |
| 850 |
|
| 851 |
4.1.4 Server message |
| 852 |
|
| 853 |
Command: SERVER |
| 854 |
Parameters: <servername> <hopcount> <info> |
| 855 |
|
| 856 |
The server message is used to tell a server that the other end of a |
| 857 |
new connection is a server. This message is also used to pass server |
| 858 |
data over whole net. When a new server is connected to net, |
| 859 |
information about it be broadcast to the whole network. <hopcount> |
| 860 |
is used to give all servers some internal information on how far away |
| 861 |
all servers are. With a full server list, it would be possible to |
| 862 |
construct a map of the entire server tree, but hostmasks prevent this |
| 863 |
from being done. |
| 864 |
|
| 865 |
The SERVER message must only be accepted from either (a) a connection |
| 866 |
which is yet to be registered and is attempting to register as a |
| 867 |
server, or (b) an existing connection to another server, in which |
| 868 |
case the SERVER message is introducing a new server behind that |
| 869 |
server. |
| 870 |
|
| 871 |
Most errors that occur with the receipt of a SERVER command result in |
| 872 |
the connection being terminated by the destination host (target |
| 873 |
SERVER). Error replies are usually sent using the "ERROR" command |
| 874 |
rather than the numeric since the ERROR command has several useful |
| 875 |
properties which make it useful here. |
| 876 |
|
| 877 |
If a SERVER message is parsed and attempts to introduce a server |
| 878 |
which is already known to the receiving server, the connection from |
| 879 |
which that message must be closed (following the correct procedures), |
| 880 |
since a duplicate route to a server has formed and the acyclic nature |
| 881 |
of the IRC tree broken. |
| 882 |
|
| 883 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 884 |
|
| 885 |
ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 886 |
|
| 887 |
Example: |
| 888 |
|
| 889 |
|
| 890 |
|
| 891 |
|
| 892 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 16] |
| 893 |
|
| 894 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 895 |
|
| 896 |
|
| 897 |
SERVER test.oulu.fi 1 :[tolsun.oulu.fi] Experimental server |
| 898 |
; New server test.oulu.fi introducing |
| 899 |
itself and attempting to register. The |
| 900 |
name in []'s is the hostname for the |
| 901 |
host running test.oulu.fi. |
| 902 |
|
| 903 |
|
| 904 |
:tolsun.oulu.fi SERVER csd.bu.edu 5 :BU Central Server |
| 905 |
; Server tolsun.oulu.fi is our uplink |
| 906 |
for csd.bu.edu which is 5 hops away. |
| 907 |
|
| 908 |
4.1.5 Oper |
| 909 |
|
| 910 |
Command: OPER |
| 911 |
Parameters: <user> <password> |
| 912 |
|
| 913 |
OPER message is used by a normal user to obtain operator privileges. |
| 914 |
The combination of <user> and <password> are required to gain |
| 915 |
Operator privileges. |
| 916 |
|
| 917 |
If the client sending the OPER command supplies the correct password |
| 918 |
for the given user, the server then informs the rest of the network |
| 919 |
of the new operator by issuing a "MODE +o" for the clients nickname. |
| 920 |
|
| 921 |
The OPER message is client-server only. |
| 922 |
|
| 923 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 924 |
|
| 925 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_YOUREOPER |
| 926 |
ERR_NOOPERHOST ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH |
| 927 |
|
| 928 |
Example: |
| 929 |
|
| 930 |
OPER foo bar ; Attempt to register as an operator |
| 931 |
using a username of "foo" and "bar" as |
| 932 |
the password. |
| 933 |
|
| 934 |
4.1.6 Quit |
| 935 |
|
| 936 |
Command: QUIT |
| 937 |
Parameters: [<Quit message>] |
| 938 |
|
| 939 |
A client session is ended with a quit message. The server must close |
| 940 |
the connection to a client which sends a QUIT message. If a "Quit |
| 941 |
Message" is given, this will be sent instead of the default message, |
| 942 |
the nickname. |
| 943 |
|
| 944 |
When netsplits (disconnecting of two servers) occur, the quit message |
| 945 |
|
| 946 |
|
| 947 |
|
| 948 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 17] |
| 949 |
|
| 950 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 951 |
|
| 952 |
|
| 953 |
is composed of the names of two servers involved, separated by a |
| 954 |
space. The first name is that of the server which is still connected |
| 955 |
and the second name is that of the server that has become |
| 956 |
disconnected. |
| 957 |
|
| 958 |
If, for some other reason, a client connection is closed without the |
| 959 |
client issuing a QUIT command (e.g. client dies and EOF occurs |
| 960 |
on socket), the server is required to fill in the quit message with |
| 961 |
some sort of message reflecting the nature of the event which |
| 962 |
caused it to happen. |
| 963 |
|
| 964 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 965 |
|
| 966 |
None. |
| 967 |
|
| 968 |
Examples: |
| 969 |
|
| 970 |
QUIT :Gone to have lunch ; Preferred message format. |
| 971 |
|
| 972 |
4.1.7 Server quit message |
| 973 |
|
| 974 |
Command: SQUIT |
| 975 |
Parameters: <server> <comment> |
| 976 |
|
| 977 |
The SQUIT message is needed to tell about quitting or dead servers. |
| 978 |
If a server wishes to break the connection to another server it must |
| 979 |
send a SQUIT message to the other server, using the the name of the |
| 980 |
other server as the server parameter, which then closes its |
| 981 |
connection to the quitting server. |
| 982 |
|
| 983 |
This command is also available operators to help keep a network of |
| 984 |
IRC servers connected in an orderly fashion. Operators may also |
| 985 |
issue an SQUIT message for a remote server connection. In this case, |
| 986 |
the SQUIT must be parsed by each server inbetween the operator and |
| 987 |
the remote server, updating the view of the network held by each |
| 988 |
server as explained below. |
| 989 |
|
| 990 |
The <comment> should be supplied by all operators who execute a SQUIT |
| 991 |
for a remote server (that is not connected to the server they are |
| 992 |
currently on) so that other operators are aware for the reason of |
| 993 |
this action. The <comment> is also filled in by servers which may |
| 994 |
place an error or similar message here. |
| 995 |
|
| 996 |
Both of the servers which are on either side of the connection being |
| 997 |
closed are required to to send out a SQUIT message (to all its other |
| 998 |
server connections) for all other servers which are considered to be |
| 999 |
behind that link. |
| 1000 |
|
| 1001 |
|
| 1002 |
|
| 1003 |
|
| 1004 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 18] |
| 1005 |
|
| 1006 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1007 |
|
| 1008 |
|
| 1009 |
Similarly, a QUIT message must be sent to the other connected servers |
| 1010 |
rest of the network on behalf of all clients behind that link. In |
| 1011 |
addition to this, all channel members of a channel which lost a |
| 1012 |
member due to the split must be sent a QUIT message. |
| 1013 |
|
| 1014 |
If a server connection is terminated prematurely (e.g. the server on |
| 1015 |
the other end of the link died), the server which detects |
| 1016 |
this disconnection is required to inform the rest of the network |
| 1017 |
that the connection has closed and fill in the comment field |
| 1018 |
with something appropriate. |
| 1019 |
|
| 1020 |
Numeric replies: |
| 1021 |
|
| 1022 |
ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1023 |
|
| 1024 |
Example: |
| 1025 |
|
| 1026 |
SQUIT tolsun.oulu.fi :Bad Link ? ; the server link tolson.oulu.fi has |
| 1027 |
been terminated because of "Bad Link". |
| 1028 |
|
| 1029 |
:Trillian SQUIT cm22.eng.umd.edu :Server out of control |
| 1030 |
; message from Trillian to disconnect |
| 1031 |
"cm22.eng.umd.edu" from the net |
| 1032 |
because "Server out of control". |
| 1033 |
|
| 1034 |
4.2 Channel operations |
| 1035 |
|
| 1036 |
This group of messages is concerned with manipulating channels, their |
| 1037 |
properties (channel modes), and their contents (typically clients). |
| 1038 |
In implementing these, a number of race conditions are inevitable |
| 1039 |
when clients at opposing ends of a network send commands which will |
| 1040 |
ultimately clash. It is also required that servers keep a nickname |
| 1041 |
history to ensure that wherever a <nick> parameter is given, the |
| 1042 |
server check its history in case it has recently been changed. |
| 1043 |
|
| 1044 |
4.2.1 Join message |
| 1045 |
|
| 1046 |
Command: JOIN |
| 1047 |
Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>} [<key>{,<key>}] |
| 1048 |
|
| 1049 |
The JOIN command is used by client to start listening a specific |
| 1050 |
channel. Whether or not a client is allowed to join a channel is |
| 1051 |
checked only by the server the client is connected to; all other |
| 1052 |
servers automatically add the user to the channel when it is received |
| 1053 |
from other servers. The conditions which affect this are as follows: |
| 1054 |
|
| 1055 |
1. the user must be invited if the channel is invite-only; |
| 1056 |
|
| 1057 |
|
| 1058 |
|
| 1059 |
|
| 1060 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 19] |
| 1061 |
|
| 1062 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1063 |
|
| 1064 |
|
| 1065 |
2. the user's nick/username/hostname must not match any |
| 1066 |
active bans; |
| 1067 |
|
| 1068 |
3. the correct key (password) must be given if it is set. |
| 1069 |
|
| 1070 |
These are discussed in more detail under the MODE command (see |
| 1071 |
section 4.2.3 for more details). |
| 1072 |
|
| 1073 |
Once a user has joined a channel, they receive notice about all |
| 1074 |
commands their server receives which affect the channel. This |
| 1075 |
includes MODE, KICK, PART, QUIT and of course PRIVMSG/NOTICE. The |
| 1076 |
JOIN command needs to be broadcast to all servers so that each server |
| 1077 |
knows where to find the users who are on the channel. This allows |
| 1078 |
optimal delivery of PRIVMSG/NOTICE messages to the channel. |
| 1079 |
|
| 1080 |
If a JOIN is successful, the user is then sent the channel's topic |
| 1081 |
(using RPL_TOPIC) and the list of users who are on the channel (using |
| 1082 |
RPL_NAMREPLY), which must include the user joining. |
| 1083 |
|
| 1084 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1085 |
|
| 1086 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN |
| 1087 |
ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN ERR_BADCHANNELKEY |
| 1088 |
ERR_CHANNELISFULL ERR_BADCHANMASK |
| 1089 |
ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS |
| 1090 |
RPL_TOPIC |
| 1091 |
|
| 1092 |
Examples: |
| 1093 |
|
| 1094 |
JOIN #foobar ; join channel #foobar. |
| 1095 |
|
| 1096 |
JOIN &foo fubar ; join channel &foo using key "fubar". |
| 1097 |
|
| 1098 |
JOIN #foo,&bar fubar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar" |
| 1099 |
and &bar using no key. |
| 1100 |
|
| 1101 |
JOIN #foo,#bar fubar,foobar ; join channel #foo using key "fubar". |
| 1102 |
and channel #bar using key "foobar". |
| 1103 |
|
| 1104 |
JOIN #foo,#bar ; join channels #foo and #bar. |
| 1105 |
|
| 1106 |
:WiZ JOIN #Twilight_zone ; JOIN message from WiZ |
| 1107 |
|
| 1108 |
4.2.2 Part message |
| 1109 |
|
| 1110 |
Command: PART |
| 1111 |
Parameters: <channel>{,<channel>} |
| 1112 |
|
| 1113 |
|
| 1114 |
|
| 1115 |
|
| 1116 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 20] |
| 1117 |
|
| 1118 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1119 |
|
| 1120 |
|
| 1121 |
The PART message causes the client sending the message to be removed |
| 1122 |
from the list of active users for all given channels listed in the |
| 1123 |
parameter string. |
| 1124 |
|
| 1125 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1126 |
|
| 1127 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL |
| 1128 |
ERR_NOTONCHANNEL |
| 1129 |
|
| 1130 |
Examples: |
| 1131 |
|
| 1132 |
PART #twilight_zone ; leave channel "#twilight_zone" |
| 1133 |
|
| 1134 |
PART #oz-ops,&group5 ; leave both channels "&group5" and |
| 1135 |
"#oz-ops". |
| 1136 |
|
| 1137 |
4.2.3 Mode message |
| 1138 |
|
| 1139 |
Command: MODE |
| 1140 |
|
| 1141 |
The MODE command is a dual-purpose command in IRC. It allows both |
| 1142 |
usernames and channels to have their mode changed. The rationale for |
| 1143 |
this choice is that one day nicknames will be obsolete and the |
| 1144 |
equivalent property will be the channel. |
| 1145 |
|
| 1146 |
When parsing MODE messages, it is recommended that the entire message |
| 1147 |
be parsed first and then the changes which resulted then passed on. |
| 1148 |
|
| 1149 |
4.2.3.1 Channel modes |
| 1150 |
|
| 1151 |
Parameters: <channel> {[+|-]|o|p|s|i|t|n|b|v} [<limit>] [<user>] |
| 1152 |
[<ban mask>] |
| 1153 |
|
| 1154 |
The MODE command is provided so that channel operators may change the |
| 1155 |
characteristics of `their' channel. It is also required that servers |
| 1156 |
be able to change channel modes so that channel operators may be |
| 1157 |
created. |
| 1158 |
|
| 1159 |
The various modes available for channels are as follows: |
| 1160 |
|
| 1161 |
o - give/take channel operator privileges; |
| 1162 |
p - private channel flag; |
| 1163 |
s - secret channel flag; |
| 1164 |
i - invite-only channel flag; |
| 1165 |
t - topic settable by channel operator only flag; |
| 1166 |
n - no messages to channel from clients on the outside; |
| 1167 |
m - moderated channel; |
| 1168 |
l - set the user limit to channel; |
| 1169 |
|
| 1170 |
|
| 1171 |
|
| 1172 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 21] |
| 1173 |
|
| 1174 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1175 |
|
| 1176 |
|
| 1177 |
b - set a ban mask to keep users out; |
| 1178 |
v - give/take the ability to speak on a moderated channel; |
| 1179 |
k - set a channel key (password). |
| 1180 |
|
| 1181 |
When using the 'o' and 'b' options, a restriction on a total of three |
| 1182 |
per mode command has been imposed. That is, any combination of 'o' |
| 1183 |
and |
| 1184 |
|
| 1185 |
4.2.3.2 User modes |
| 1186 |
|
| 1187 |
Parameters: <nickname> {[+|-]|i|w|s|o} |
| 1188 |
|
| 1189 |
The user MODEs are typically changes which affect either how the |
| 1190 |
client is seen by others or what 'extra' messages the client is sent. |
| 1191 |
A user MODE command may only be accepted if both the sender of the |
| 1192 |
message and the nickname given as a parameter are both the same. |
| 1193 |
|
| 1194 |
The available modes are as follows: |
| 1195 |
|
| 1196 |
i - marks a users as invisible; |
| 1197 |
s - marks a user for receipt of server notices; |
| 1198 |
w - user receives wallops; |
| 1199 |
o - operator flag. |
| 1200 |
|
| 1201 |
Additional modes may be available later on. |
| 1202 |
|
| 1203 |
If a user attempts to make themselves an operator using the "+o" |
| 1204 |
flag, the attempt should be ignored. There is no restriction, |
| 1205 |
however, on anyone `deopping' themselves (using "-o"). Numeric |
| 1206 |
Replies: |
| 1207 |
|
| 1208 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS RPL_CHANNELMODEIS |
| 1209 |
ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED ERR_NOSUCHNICK |
| 1210 |
ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_KEYSET |
| 1211 |
RPL_BANLIST RPL_ENDOFBANLIST |
| 1212 |
ERR_UNKNOWNMODE ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL |
| 1213 |
|
| 1214 |
ERR_USERSDONTMATCH RPL_UMODEIS |
| 1215 |
ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG |
| 1216 |
|
| 1217 |
Examples: |
| 1218 |
|
| 1219 |
Use of Channel Modes: |
| 1220 |
|
| 1221 |
MODE #Finnish +im ; Makes #Finnish channel moderated and |
| 1222 |
'invite-only'. |
| 1223 |
|
| 1224 |
MODE #Finnish +o Kilroy ; Gives 'chanop' privileges to Kilroy on |
| 1225 |
|
| 1226 |
|
| 1227 |
|
| 1228 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 22] |
| 1229 |
|
| 1230 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1231 |
|
| 1232 |
|
| 1233 |
channel #Finnish. |
| 1234 |
|
| 1235 |
MODE #Finnish +v Wiz ; Allow WiZ to speak on #Finnish. |
| 1236 |
|
| 1237 |
MODE #Fins -s ; Removes 'secret' flag from channel |
| 1238 |
#Fins. |
| 1239 |
|
| 1240 |
MODE #42 +k oulu ; Set the channel key to "oulu". |
| 1241 |
|
| 1242 |
MODE #eu-opers +l 10 ; Set the limit for the number of users |
| 1243 |
on channel to 10. |
| 1244 |
|
| 1245 |
MODE &oulu +b ; list ban masks set for channel. |
| 1246 |
|
| 1247 |
MODE &oulu +b *!*@* ; prevent all users from joining. |
| 1248 |
|
| 1249 |
MODE &oulu +b *!*@*.edu ; prevent any user from a hostname |
| 1250 |
matching *.edu from joining. |
| 1251 |
|
| 1252 |
Use of user Modes: |
| 1253 |
|
| 1254 |
:MODE WiZ -w ; turns reception of WALLOPS messages |
| 1255 |
off for WiZ. |
| 1256 |
|
| 1257 |
:Angel MODE Angel +i ; Message from Angel to make themselves |
| 1258 |
invisible. |
| 1259 |
|
| 1260 |
MODE WiZ -o ; WiZ 'deopping' (removing operator |
| 1261 |
status). The plain reverse of this |
| 1262 |
command ("MODE WiZ +o") must not be |
| 1263 |
allowed from users since would bypass |
| 1264 |
the OPER command. |
| 1265 |
|
| 1266 |
4.2.4 Topic message |
| 1267 |
|
| 1268 |
Command: TOPIC |
| 1269 |
Parameters: <channel> [<topic>] |
| 1270 |
|
| 1271 |
The TOPIC message is used to change or view the topic of a channel. |
| 1272 |
The topic for channel <channel> is returned if there is no <topic> |
| 1273 |
given. If the <topic> parameter is present, the topic for that |
| 1274 |
channel will be changed, if the channel modes permit this action. |
| 1275 |
|
| 1276 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1277 |
|
| 1278 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOTONCHANNEL |
| 1279 |
RPL_NOTOPIC RPL_TOPIC |
| 1280 |
ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED |
| 1281 |
|
| 1282 |
|
| 1283 |
|
| 1284 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 23] |
| 1285 |
|
| 1286 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1287 |
|
| 1288 |
|
| 1289 |
Examples: |
| 1290 |
|
| 1291 |
:Wiz TOPIC #test :New topic ;User Wiz setting the topic. |
| 1292 |
|
| 1293 |
TOPIC #test :another topic ;set the topic on #test to "another |
| 1294 |
topic". |
| 1295 |
|
| 1296 |
TOPIC #test ; check the topic for #test. |
| 1297 |
|
| 1298 |
4.2.5 Names message |
| 1299 |
|
| 1300 |
Command: NAMES |
| 1301 |
Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>}] |
| 1302 |
|
| 1303 |
By using the NAMES command, a user can list all nicknames that are |
| 1304 |
visible to them on any channel that they can see. Channel names |
| 1305 |
which they can see are those which aren't private (+p) or secret (+s) |
| 1306 |
or those which they are actually on. The <channel> parameter |
| 1307 |
specifies which channel(s) to return information about if valid. |
| 1308 |
There is no error reply for bad channel names. |
| 1309 |
|
| 1310 |
If no <channel> parameter is given, a list of all channels and their |
| 1311 |
occupants is returned. At the end of this list, a list of users who |
| 1312 |
are visible but either not on any channel or not on a visible channel |
| 1313 |
are listed as being on `channel' "*". |
| 1314 |
|
| 1315 |
Numerics: |
| 1316 |
|
| 1317 |
RPL_NAMREPLY RPL_ENDOFNAMES |
| 1318 |
|
| 1319 |
Examples: |
| 1320 |
|
| 1321 |
NAMES #twilight_zone,#42 ; list visible users on #twilight_zone |
| 1322 |
and #42 if the channels are visible to |
| 1323 |
you. |
| 1324 |
|
| 1325 |
NAMES ; list all visible channels and users |
| 1326 |
|
| 1327 |
4.2.6 List message |
| 1328 |
|
| 1329 |
Command: LIST |
| 1330 |
Parameters: [<channel>{,<channel>} [<server>]] |
| 1331 |
|
| 1332 |
The list message is used to list channels and their topics. If the |
| 1333 |
<channel> parameter is used, only the status of that channel |
| 1334 |
is displayed. Private channels are listed (without their |
| 1335 |
topics) as channel "Prv" unless the client generating the query is |
| 1336 |
actually on that channel. Likewise, secret channels are not listed |
| 1337 |
|
| 1338 |
|
| 1339 |
|
| 1340 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 24] |
| 1341 |
|
| 1342 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1343 |
|
| 1344 |
|
| 1345 |
at all unless the client is a member of the channel in question. |
| 1346 |
|
| 1347 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1348 |
|
| 1349 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_LISTSTART |
| 1350 |
RPL_LIST RPL_LISTEND |
| 1351 |
|
| 1352 |
Examples: |
| 1353 |
|
| 1354 |
LIST ; List all channels. |
| 1355 |
|
| 1356 |
LIST #twilight_zone,#42 ; List channels #twilight_zone and #42 |
| 1357 |
|
| 1358 |
4.2.7 Invite message |
| 1359 |
|
| 1360 |
Command: INVITE |
| 1361 |
Parameters: <nickname> <channel> |
| 1362 |
|
| 1363 |
The INVITE message is used to invite users to a channel. The |
| 1364 |
parameter <nickname> is the nickname of the person to be invited to |
| 1365 |
the target channel <channel>. There is no requirement that the |
| 1366 |
channel the target user is being invited to must exist or be a valid |
| 1367 |
channel. To invite a user to a channel which is invite only (MODE |
| 1368 |
+i), the client sending the invite must be recognised as being a |
| 1369 |
channel operator on the given channel. |
| 1370 |
|
| 1371 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1372 |
|
| 1373 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHNICK |
| 1374 |
ERR_NOTONCHANNEL ERR_USERONCHANNEL |
| 1375 |
ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED |
| 1376 |
RPL_INVITING RPL_AWAY |
| 1377 |
|
| 1378 |
Examples: |
| 1379 |
|
| 1380 |
:Angel INVITE Wiz #Dust ; User Angel inviting WiZ to channel |
| 1381 |
#Dust |
| 1382 |
|
| 1383 |
INVITE Wiz #Twilight_Zone ; Command to invite WiZ to |
| 1384 |
#Twilight_zone |
| 1385 |
|
| 1386 |
4.2.8 Kick command |
| 1387 |
|
| 1388 |
Command: KICK |
| 1389 |
Parameters: <channel> <user> [<comment>] |
| 1390 |
|
| 1391 |
The KICK command can be used to forcibly remove a user from a |
| 1392 |
channel. It 'kicks them out' of the channel (forced PART). |
| 1393 |
|
| 1394 |
|
| 1395 |
|
| 1396 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 25] |
| 1397 |
|
| 1398 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1399 |
|
| 1400 |
|
| 1401 |
Only a channel operator may kick another user out of a channel. |
| 1402 |
Each server that receives a KICK message checks that it is valid |
| 1403 |
(ie the sender is actually a channel operator) before removing |
| 1404 |
the victim from the channel. |
| 1405 |
|
| 1406 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1407 |
|
| 1408 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL |
| 1409 |
ERR_BADCHANMASK ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED |
| 1410 |
ERR_NOTONCHANNEL |
| 1411 |
|
| 1412 |
Examples: |
| 1413 |
|
| 1414 |
KICK &Melbourne Matthew ; Kick Matthew from &Melbourne |
| 1415 |
|
| 1416 |
KICK #Finnish John :Speaking English |
| 1417 |
; Kick John from #Finnish using |
| 1418 |
"Speaking English" as the reason |
| 1419 |
(comment). |
| 1420 |
|
| 1421 |
:WiZ KICK #Finnish John ; KICK message from WiZ to remove John |
| 1422 |
from channel #Finnish |
| 1423 |
|
| 1424 |
NOTE: |
| 1425 |
It is possible to extend the KICK command parameters to the |
| 1426 |
following: |
| 1427 |
|
| 1428 |
<channel>{,<channel>} <user>{,<user>} [<comment>] |
| 1429 |
|
| 1430 |
4.3 Server queries and commands |
| 1431 |
|
| 1432 |
The server query group of commands has been designed to return |
| 1433 |
information about any server which is connected to the network. All |
| 1434 |
servers connected must respond to these queries and respond |
| 1435 |
correctly. Any invalid response (or lack thereof) must be considered |
| 1436 |
a sign of a broken server and it must be disconnected/disabled as |
| 1437 |
soon as possible until the situation is remedied. |
| 1438 |
|
| 1439 |
In these queries, where a parameter appears as "<server>", it will |
| 1440 |
usually mean it can be a nickname or a server or a wildcard name of |
| 1441 |
some sort. For each parameter, however, only one query and set of |
| 1442 |
replies is to be generated. |
| 1443 |
|
| 1444 |
4.3.1 Version message |
| 1445 |
|
| 1446 |
Command: VERSION |
| 1447 |
Parameters: [<server>] |
| 1448 |
|
| 1449 |
|
| 1450 |
|
| 1451 |
|
| 1452 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 26] |
| 1453 |
|
| 1454 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1455 |
|
| 1456 |
|
| 1457 |
The VERSION message is used to query the version of the server |
| 1458 |
program. An optional parameter <server> is used to query the version |
| 1459 |
of the server program which a client is not directly connected to. |
| 1460 |
|
| 1461 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1462 |
|
| 1463 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_VERSION |
| 1464 |
|
| 1465 |
Examples: |
| 1466 |
|
| 1467 |
:Wiz VERSION *.se ; message from Wiz to check the version |
| 1468 |
of a server matching "*.se" |
| 1469 |
|
| 1470 |
VERSION tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the version of server |
| 1471 |
"tolsun.oulu.fi". |
| 1472 |
|
| 1473 |
4.3.2 Stats message |
| 1474 |
|
| 1475 |
Command: STATS |
| 1476 |
Parameters: [<query> [<server>]] |
| 1477 |
|
| 1478 |
The stats message is used to query statistics of certain server. If |
| 1479 |
<server> parameter is omitted, only the end of stats reply is sent |
| 1480 |
back. The implementation of this command is highly dependent on the |
| 1481 |
server which replies, although the server must be able to supply |
| 1482 |
information as described by the queries below (or similar). |
| 1483 |
|
| 1484 |
A query may be given by any single letter which is only checked by |
| 1485 |
the destination server (if given as the <server> parameter) and is |
| 1486 |
otherwise passed on by intermediate servers, ignored and unaltered. |
| 1487 |
The following queries are those found in the current IRC |
| 1488 |
implementation and provide a large portion of the setup information |
| 1489 |
for that server. Although these may not be supported in the same way |
| 1490 |
by other versions, all servers should be able to supply a valid reply |
| 1491 |
to a STATS query which is consistent with the reply formats currently |
| 1492 |
used and the purpose of the query. |
| 1493 |
|
| 1494 |
The currently supported queries are: |
| 1495 |
|
| 1496 |
c - returns a list of servers which the server may connect |
| 1497 |
to or allow connections from; |
| 1498 |
h - returns a list of servers which are either forced to be |
| 1499 |
treated as leaves or allowed to act as hubs; |
| 1500 |
i - returns a list of hosts which the server allows a client |
| 1501 |
to connect from; |
| 1502 |
k - returns a list of banned username/hostname combinations |
| 1503 |
for that server; |
| 1504 |
l - returns a list of the server's connections, showing how |
| 1505 |
|
| 1506 |
|
| 1507 |
|
| 1508 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 27] |
| 1509 |
|
| 1510 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1511 |
|
| 1512 |
|
| 1513 |
long each connection has been established and the traffic |
| 1514 |
over that connection in bytes and messages for each |
| 1515 |
direction; |
| 1516 |
m - returns a list of commands supported by the server and |
| 1517 |
the usage count for each if the usage count is non zero; |
| 1518 |
o - returns a list of hosts from which normal clients may |
| 1519 |
become operators; |
| 1520 |
y - show Y (Class) lines from server's configuration file; |
| 1521 |
u - returns a string showing how long the server has been up. |
| 1522 |
|
| 1523 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1524 |
|
| 1525 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1526 |
RPL_STATSCLINE RPL_STATSNLINE |
| 1527 |
RPL_STATSILINE RPL_STATSKLINE |
| 1528 |
RPL_STATSQLINE RPL_STATSLLINE |
| 1529 |
RPL_STATSLINKINFO RPL_STATSUPTIME |
| 1530 |
RPL_STATSCOMMANDS RPL_STATSOLINE |
| 1531 |
RPL_STATSHLINE RPL_ENDOFSTATS |
| 1532 |
|
| 1533 |
Examples: |
| 1534 |
|
| 1535 |
STATS m ; check the command usage for the server |
| 1536 |
you are connected to |
| 1537 |
|
| 1538 |
:Wiz STATS c eff.org ; request by WiZ for C/N line |
| 1539 |
information from server eff.org |
| 1540 |
|
| 1541 |
4.3.3 Links message |
| 1542 |
|
| 1543 |
Command: LINKS |
| 1544 |
Parameters: [[<remote server>] <server mask>] |
| 1545 |
|
| 1546 |
With LINKS, a user can list all servers which are known by the server |
| 1547 |
answering the query. The returned list of servers must match the |
| 1548 |
mask, or if no mask is given, the full list is returned. |
| 1549 |
|
| 1550 |
If <remote server> is given in addition to <server mask>, the LINKS |
| 1551 |
command is forwarded to the first server found that matches that name |
| 1552 |
(if any), and that server is then required to answer the query. |
| 1553 |
|
| 1554 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1555 |
|
| 1556 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1557 |
RPL_LINKS RPL_ENDOFLINKS |
| 1558 |
|
| 1559 |
Examples: |
| 1560 |
|
| 1561 |
|
| 1562 |
|
| 1563 |
|
| 1564 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 28] |
| 1565 |
|
| 1566 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1567 |
|
| 1568 |
|
| 1569 |
LINKS *.au ; list all servers which have a name |
| 1570 |
that matches *.au; |
| 1571 |
|
| 1572 |
:WiZ LINKS *.bu.edu *.edu ; LINKS message from WiZ to the first |
| 1573 |
server matching *.edu for a list of |
| 1574 |
servers matching *.bu.edu. |
| 1575 |
|
| 1576 |
4.3.4 Time message |
| 1577 |
|
| 1578 |
Command: TIME |
| 1579 |
Parameters: [<server>] |
| 1580 |
|
| 1581 |
The time message is used to query local time from the specified |
| 1582 |
server. If the server parameter is not given, the server handling the |
| 1583 |
command must reply to the query. |
| 1584 |
|
| 1585 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1586 |
|
| 1587 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER RPL_TIME |
| 1588 |
|
| 1589 |
Examples: |
| 1590 |
|
| 1591 |
TIME tolsun.oulu.fi ; check the time on the server |
| 1592 |
"tolson.oulu.fi" |
| 1593 |
|
| 1594 |
Angel TIME *.au ; user angel checking the time on a |
| 1595 |
server matching "*.au" |
| 1596 |
|
| 1597 |
4.3.5 Connect message |
| 1598 |
|
| 1599 |
Command: CONNECT |
| 1600 |
Parameters: <target server> [<port> [<remote server>]] |
| 1601 |
|
| 1602 |
The CONNECT command can be used to force a server to try to establish |
| 1603 |
a new connection to another server immediately. CONNECT is a |
| 1604 |
privileged command and is to be available only to IRC Operators. If |
| 1605 |
a remote server is given then the CONNECT attempt is made by that |
| 1606 |
server to <target server> and <port>. |
| 1607 |
|
| 1608 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1609 |
|
| 1610 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NOPRIVILEGES |
| 1611 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 1612 |
|
| 1613 |
Examples: |
| 1614 |
|
| 1615 |
CONNECT tolsun.oulu.fi ; Attempt to connect a server to |
| 1616 |
tolsun.oulu.fi |
| 1617 |
|
| 1618 |
|
| 1619 |
|
| 1620 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 29] |
| 1621 |
|
| 1622 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1623 |
|
| 1624 |
|
| 1625 |
:WiZ CONNECT eff.org 6667 csd.bu.edu |
| 1626 |
; CONNECT attempt by WiZ to get servers |
| 1627 |
eff.org and csd.bu.edu connected on port |
| 1628 |
6667. |
| 1629 |
|
| 1630 |
4.3.6 Trace message |
| 1631 |
|
| 1632 |
Command: TRACE |
| 1633 |
Parameters: [<server>] |
| 1634 |
|
| 1635 |
TRACE command is used to find the route to specific server. Each |
| 1636 |
server that processes this message must tell the sender about it by |
| 1637 |
sending a reply indicating it is a pass-through link, forming a chain |
| 1638 |
of replies similar to that gained from using "traceroute". After |
| 1639 |
sending this reply back, it must then send the TRACE message to the |
| 1640 |
next server until given server is reached. If the <server> parameter |
| 1641 |
is omitted, it is recommended that TRACE command send a message to |
| 1642 |
the sender telling which servers the current server has direct |
| 1643 |
connection to. |
| 1644 |
|
| 1645 |
If the destination given by "<server>" is an actual server, then the |
| 1646 |
destination server is required to report all servers and users which |
| 1647 |
are connected to it, although only operators are permitted to see |
| 1648 |
users present. If the destination given by <server> is a nickname, |
| 1649 |
they only a reply for that nickname is given. |
| 1650 |
|
| 1651 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1652 |
|
| 1653 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1654 |
|
| 1655 |
If the TRACE message is destined for another server, all intermediate |
| 1656 |
servers must return a RPL_TRACELINK reply to indicate that the TRACE |
| 1657 |
passed through it and where its going next. |
| 1658 |
|
| 1659 |
RPL_TRACELINK |
| 1660 |
A TRACE reply may be composed of any number of the following numeric |
| 1661 |
replies. |
| 1662 |
|
| 1663 |
RPL_TRACECONNECTING RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE |
| 1664 |
RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN RPL_TRACEOPERATOR |
| 1665 |
RPL_TRACEUSER RPL_TRACESERVER |
| 1666 |
RPL_TRACESERVICE RPL_TRACENEWTYPE |
| 1667 |
RPL_TRACECLASS |
| 1668 |
|
| 1669 |
Examples: |
| 1670 |
|
| 1671 |
TRACE *.oulu.fi ; TRACE to a server matching *.oulu.fi |
| 1672 |
|
| 1673 |
|
| 1674 |
|
| 1675 |
|
| 1676 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 30] |
| 1677 |
|
| 1678 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1679 |
|
| 1680 |
|
| 1681 |
:WiZ TRACE AngelDust ; TRACE issued by WiZ to nick AngelDust |
| 1682 |
|
| 1683 |
4.3.7 Admin command |
| 1684 |
|
| 1685 |
Command: ADMIN |
| 1686 |
Parameters: [<server>] |
| 1687 |
|
| 1688 |
The admin message is used to find the name of the administrator of |
| 1689 |
the given server, or current server if <server> parameter is omitted. |
| 1690 |
Each server must have the ability to forward ADMIN messages to other |
| 1691 |
servers. |
| 1692 |
|
| 1693 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1694 |
|
| 1695 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1696 |
RPL_ADMINME RPL_ADMINLOC1 |
| 1697 |
RPL_ADMINLOC2 RPL_ADMINEMAIL |
| 1698 |
|
| 1699 |
Examples: |
| 1700 |
|
| 1701 |
ADMIN tolsun.oulu.fi ; request an ADMIN reply from |
| 1702 |
tolsun.oulu.fi |
| 1703 |
|
| 1704 |
:WiZ ADMIN *.edu ; ADMIN request from WiZ for first |
| 1705 |
server found to match *.edu. |
| 1706 |
|
| 1707 |
4.3.8 Info command |
| 1708 |
|
| 1709 |
Command: INFO |
| 1710 |
Parameters: [<server>] |
| 1711 |
|
| 1712 |
The INFO command is required to return information which describes |
| 1713 |
the server: its version, when it was compiled, the patchlevel, when |
| 1714 |
it was started, and any other miscellaneous information which may be |
| 1715 |
considered to be relevant. |
| 1716 |
|
| 1717 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1718 |
|
| 1719 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1720 |
RPL_INFO RPL_ENDOFINFO |
| 1721 |
|
| 1722 |
Examples: |
| 1723 |
|
| 1724 |
INFO csd.bu.edu ; request an INFO reply from |
| 1725 |
csd.bu.edu |
| 1726 |
|
| 1727 |
:Avalon INFO *.fi ; INFO request from Avalon for first |
| 1728 |
server found to match *.fi. |
| 1729 |
|
| 1730 |
|
| 1731 |
|
| 1732 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 31] |
| 1733 |
|
| 1734 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1735 |
|
| 1736 |
|
| 1737 |
INFO Angel ; request info from the server that |
| 1738 |
Angel is connected to. |
| 1739 |
|
| 1740 |
4.4 Sending messages |
| 1741 |
|
| 1742 |
The main purpose of the IRC protocol is to provide a base for clients |
| 1743 |
to communicate with each other. PRIVMSG and NOTICE are the only |
| 1744 |
messages available which actually perform delivery of a text message |
| 1745 |
from one client to another - the rest just make it possible and try |
| 1746 |
to ensure it happens in a reliable and structured manner. |
| 1747 |
|
| 1748 |
4.4.1 Private messages |
| 1749 |
|
| 1750 |
Command: PRIVMSG |
| 1751 |
Parameters: <receiver>{,<receiver>} <text to be sent> |
| 1752 |
|
| 1753 |
PRIVMSG is used to send private messages between users. <receiver> |
| 1754 |
is the nickname of the receiver of the message. <receiver> can also |
| 1755 |
be a list of names or channels separated with commas. |
| 1756 |
|
| 1757 |
The <receiver> parameter may also me a host mask (#mask) or server |
| 1758 |
mask ($mask). In both cases the server will only send the PRIVMSG |
| 1759 |
to those who have a server or host matching the mask. The mask must |
| 1760 |
have at least 1 (one) "." in it and no wildcards following the |
| 1761 |
last ".". This requirement exists to prevent people sending messages |
| 1762 |
to "#*" or "$*", which would broadcast to all users; from |
| 1763 |
experience, this is abused more than used responsibly and properly. |
| 1764 |
Wildcards are the '*' and '?' characters. This extension to |
| 1765 |
the PRIVMSG command is only available to Operators. |
| 1766 |
|
| 1767 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1768 |
|
| 1769 |
ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND |
| 1770 |
ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN ERR_NOTOPLEVEL |
| 1771 |
ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS |
| 1772 |
ERR_NOSUCHNICK |
| 1773 |
RPL_AWAY |
| 1774 |
|
| 1775 |
Examples: |
| 1776 |
|
| 1777 |
:Angel PRIVMSG Wiz :Hello are you receiving this message ? |
| 1778 |
; Message from Angel to Wiz. |
| 1779 |
|
| 1780 |
PRIVMSG Angel :yes I'm receiving it !receiving it !'u>(768u+1n) .br ; |
| 1781 |
Message to Angel. |
| 1782 |
|
| 1783 |
PRIVMSG jto@tolsun.oulu.fi :Hello ! |
| 1784 |
; Message to a client on server |
| 1785 |
|
| 1786 |
|
| 1787 |
|
| 1788 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 32] |
| 1789 |
|
| 1790 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1791 |
|
| 1792 |
|
| 1793 |
tolsun.oulu.fi with username of "jto". |
| 1794 |
|
| 1795 |
PRIVMSG $*.fi :Server tolsun.oulu.fi rebooting. |
| 1796 |
; Message to everyone on a server which |
| 1797 |
has a name matching *.fi. |
| 1798 |
|
| 1799 |
PRIVMSG #*.edu :NSFNet is undergoing work, expect interruptions |
| 1800 |
; Message to all users who come from a |
| 1801 |
host which has a name matching *.edu. |
| 1802 |
|
| 1803 |
4.4.2 Notice |
| 1804 |
|
| 1805 |
Command: NOTICE |
| 1806 |
Parameters: <nickname> <text> |
| 1807 |
|
| 1808 |
The NOTICE message is used similarly to PRIVMSG. The difference |
| 1809 |
between NOTICE and PRIVMSG is that automatic replies must never be |
| 1810 |
sent in response to a NOTICE message. This rule applies to servers |
| 1811 |
too - they must not send any error reply back to the client on |
| 1812 |
receipt of a notice. The object of this rule is to avoid loops |
| 1813 |
between a client automatically sending something in response to |
| 1814 |
something it received. This is typically used by automatons (clients |
| 1815 |
with either an AI or other interactive program controlling their |
| 1816 |
actions) which are always seen to be replying lest they end up in a |
| 1817 |
loop with another automaton. |
| 1818 |
|
| 1819 |
See PRIVMSG for more details on replies and examples. |
| 1820 |
|
| 1821 |
4.5 User based queries |
| 1822 |
|
| 1823 |
User queries are a group of commands which are primarily concerned |
| 1824 |
with finding details on a particular user or group users. When using |
| 1825 |
wildcards with any of these commands, if they match, they will only |
| 1826 |
return information on users who are 'visible' to you. The visibility |
| 1827 |
of a user is determined as a combination of the user's mode and the |
| 1828 |
common set of channels you are both on. |
| 1829 |
|
| 1830 |
4.5.1 Who query |
| 1831 |
|
| 1832 |
Command: WHO |
| 1833 |
Parameters: [<name> [<o>]] |
| 1834 |
|
| 1835 |
The WHO message is used by a client to generate a query which returns |
| 1836 |
a list of information which 'matches' the <name> parameter given by |
| 1837 |
the client. In the absence of the <name> parameter, all visible |
| 1838 |
(users who aren't invisible (user mode +i) and who don't have a |
| 1839 |
common channel with the requesting client) are listed. The same |
| 1840 |
result can be achieved by using a <name> of "0" or any wildcard which |
| 1841 |
|
| 1842 |
|
| 1843 |
|
| 1844 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 33] |
| 1845 |
|
| 1846 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1847 |
|
| 1848 |
|
| 1849 |
will end up matching every entry possible. |
| 1850 |
|
| 1851 |
The <name> passed to WHO is matched against users' host, server, real |
| 1852 |
name and nickname if the channel <name> cannot be found. |
| 1853 |
|
| 1854 |
If the "o" parameter is passed only operators are returned according |
| 1855 |
to the name mask supplied. |
| 1856 |
|
| 1857 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1858 |
|
| 1859 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 1860 |
RPL_WHOREPLY RPL_ENDOFWHO |
| 1861 |
|
| 1862 |
Examples: |
| 1863 |
|
| 1864 |
WHO *.fi ; List all users who match against |
| 1865 |
"*.fi". |
| 1866 |
|
| 1867 |
WHO jto* o ; List all users with a match against |
| 1868 |
"jto*" if they are an operator. |
| 1869 |
|
| 1870 |
4.5.2 Whois query |
| 1871 |
|
| 1872 |
Command: WHOIS |
| 1873 |
Parameters: [<server>] <nickmask>[,<nickmask>[,...]] |
| 1874 |
|
| 1875 |
This message is used to query information about particular user. The |
| 1876 |
server will answer this message with several numeric messages |
| 1877 |
indicating different statuses of each user which matches the nickmask |
| 1878 |
(if you are entitled to see them). If no wildcard is present in the |
| 1879 |
<nickmask>, any information about that nick which you are allowed to |
| 1880 |
see is presented. A comma (',') separated list of nicknames may be |
| 1881 |
given. |
| 1882 |
|
| 1883 |
The latter version sends the query to a specific server. It is |
| 1884 |
useful if you want to know how long the user in question has been |
| 1885 |
idle as only local server (ie. the server the user is directly |
| 1886 |
connected to) knows that information, while everything else is |
| 1887 |
globally known. |
| 1888 |
|
| 1889 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1890 |
|
| 1891 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN |
| 1892 |
RPL_WHOISUSER RPL_WHOISCHANNELS |
| 1893 |
RPL_WHOISCHANNELS RPL_WHOISSERVER |
| 1894 |
RPL_AWAY RPL_WHOISOPERATOR |
| 1895 |
RPL_WHOISIDLE ERR_NOSUCHNICK |
| 1896 |
RPL_ENDOFWHOIS |
| 1897 |
|
| 1898 |
|
| 1899 |
|
| 1900 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 34] |
| 1901 |
|
| 1902 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1903 |
|
| 1904 |
|
| 1905 |
Examples: |
| 1906 |
|
| 1907 |
WHOIS wiz ; return available user information |
| 1908 |
about nick WiZ |
| 1909 |
|
| 1910 |
WHOIS eff.org trillian ; ask server eff.org for user |
| 1911 |
information about trillian |
| 1912 |
|
| 1913 |
4.5.3 Whowas |
| 1914 |
|
| 1915 |
Command: WHOWAS |
| 1916 |
Parameters: <nickname> [<count> [<server>]] |
| 1917 |
|
| 1918 |
Whowas asks for information about a nickname which no longer exists. |
| 1919 |
This may either be due to a nickname change or the user leaving IRC. |
| 1920 |
In response to this query, the server searches through its nickname |
| 1921 |
history, looking for any nicks which are lexically the same (no wild |
| 1922 |
card matching here). The history is searched backward, returning the |
| 1923 |
most recent entry first. If there are multiple entries, up to |
| 1924 |
<count> replies will be returned (or all of them if no <count> |
| 1925 |
parameter is given). If a non-positive number is passed as being |
| 1926 |
<count>, then a full search is done. |
| 1927 |
|
| 1928 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1929 |
|
| 1930 |
ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK |
| 1931 |
RPL_WHOWASUSER RPL_WHOISSERVER |
| 1932 |
RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS |
| 1933 |
|
| 1934 |
Examples: |
| 1935 |
|
| 1936 |
WHOWAS Wiz ; return all information in the nick |
| 1937 |
history about nick "WiZ"; |
| 1938 |
|
| 1939 |
WHOWAS Mermaid 9 ; return at most, the 9 most recent |
| 1940 |
entries in the nick history for |
| 1941 |
"Mermaid"; |
| 1942 |
|
| 1943 |
WHOWAS Trillian 1 *.edu ; return the most recent history for |
| 1944 |
"Trillian" from the first server found |
| 1945 |
to match "*.edu". |
| 1946 |
|
| 1947 |
4.6 Miscellaneous messages |
| 1948 |
|
| 1949 |
Messages in this category do not fit into any of the above categories |
| 1950 |
but are nonetheless still a part of and required by the protocol. |
| 1951 |
|
| 1952 |
|
| 1953 |
|
| 1954 |
|
| 1955 |
|
| 1956 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 35] |
| 1957 |
|
| 1958 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 1959 |
|
| 1960 |
|
| 1961 |
4.6.1 Kill message |
| 1962 |
|
| 1963 |
Command: KILL |
| 1964 |
Parameters: <nickname> <comment> |
| 1965 |
|
| 1966 |
The KILL message is used to cause a client-server connection to be |
| 1967 |
closed by the server which has the actual connection. KILL is used |
| 1968 |
by servers when they encounter a duplicate entry in the list of valid |
| 1969 |
nicknames and is used to remove both entries. It is also available |
| 1970 |
to operators. |
| 1971 |
|
| 1972 |
Clients which have automatic reconnect algorithms effectively make |
| 1973 |
this command useless since the disconnection is only brief. It does |
| 1974 |
however break the flow of data and can be used to stop large amounts |
| 1975 |
of being abused, any user may elect to receive KILL messages |
| 1976 |
generated for others to keep an 'eye' on would be trouble spots. |
| 1977 |
|
| 1978 |
In an arena where nicknames are required to be globally unique at all |
| 1979 |
times, KILL messages are sent whenever 'duplicates' are detected |
| 1980 |
(that is an attempt to register two users with the same nickname) in |
| 1981 |
the hope that both of them will disappear and only 1 reappear. |
| 1982 |
|
| 1983 |
The comment given must reflect the actual reason for the KILL. For |
| 1984 |
server-generated KILLs it usually is made up of details concerning |
| 1985 |
the origins of the two conflicting nicknames. For users it is left |
| 1986 |
up to them to provide an adequate reason to satisfy others who see |
| 1987 |
it. To prevent/discourage fake KILLs from being generated to hide |
| 1988 |
the identify of the KILLer, the comment also shows a 'kill-path' |
| 1989 |
which is updated by each server it passes through, each prepending |
| 1990 |
its name to the path. |
| 1991 |
|
| 1992 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 1993 |
|
| 1994 |
ERR_NOPRIVILEGES ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 1995 |
ERR_NOSUCHNICK ERR_CANTKILLSERVER |
| 1996 |
|
| 1997 |
|
| 1998 |
KILL David (csd.bu.edu <- tolsun.oulu.fi) |
| 1999 |
; Nickname collision between csd.bu.edu |
| 2000 |
and tolson.oulu.fi |
| 2001 |
|
| 2002 |
|
| 2003 |
NOTE: |
| 2004 |
It is recommended that only Operators be allowed to kill other users |
| 2005 |
with KILL message. In an ideal world not even operators would need |
| 2006 |
to do this and it would be left to servers to deal with. |
| 2007 |
|
| 2008 |
|
| 2009 |
|
| 2010 |
|
| 2011 |
|
| 2012 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 36] |
| 2013 |
|
| 2014 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2015 |
|
| 2016 |
|
| 2017 |
4.6.2 Ping message |
| 2018 |
|
| 2019 |
Command: PING |
| 2020 |
Parameters: <server1> [<server2>] |
| 2021 |
|
| 2022 |
The PING message is used to test the presence of an active client at |
| 2023 |
the other end of the connection. A PING message is sent at regular |
| 2024 |
intervals if no other activity detected coming from a connection. If |
| 2025 |
a connection fails to respond to a PING command within a set amount |
| 2026 |
of time, that connection is closed. |
| 2027 |
|
| 2028 |
Any client which receives a PING message must respond to <server1> |
| 2029 |
(server which sent the PING message out) as quickly as possible with |
| 2030 |
an appropriate PONG message to indicate it is still there and alive. |
| 2031 |
Servers should not respond to PING commands but rely on PINGs from |
| 2032 |
the other end of the connection to indicate the connection is alive. |
| 2033 |
If the <server2> parameter is specified, the PING message gets |
| 2034 |
forwarded there. |
| 2035 |
|
| 2036 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2037 |
|
| 2038 |
ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 2039 |
|
| 2040 |
Examples: |
| 2041 |
|
| 2042 |
PING tolsun.oulu.fi ; server sending a PING message to |
| 2043 |
another server to indicate it is still |
| 2044 |
alive. |
| 2045 |
|
| 2046 |
PING WiZ ; PING message being sent to nick WiZ |
| 2047 |
|
| 2048 |
4.6.3 Pong message |
| 2049 |
|
| 2050 |
Command: PONG |
| 2051 |
Parameters: <daemon> [<daemon2>] |
| 2052 |
|
| 2053 |
PONG message is a reply to ping message. If parameter <daemon2> is |
| 2054 |
given this message must be forwarded to given daemon. The <daemon> |
| 2055 |
parameter is the name of the daemon who has responded to PING message |
| 2056 |
and generated this message. |
| 2057 |
|
| 2058 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2059 |
|
| 2060 |
ERR_NOORIGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 2061 |
|
| 2062 |
Examples: |
| 2063 |
|
| 2064 |
PONG csd.bu.edu tolsun.oulu.fi ; PONG message from csd.bu.edu to |
| 2065 |
|
| 2066 |
|
| 2067 |
|
| 2068 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 37] |
| 2069 |
|
| 2070 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2071 |
|
| 2072 |
|
| 2073 |
tolsun.oulu.fi |
| 2074 |
|
| 2075 |
4.6.4 Error |
| 2076 |
|
| 2077 |
Command: ERROR |
| 2078 |
Parameters: <error message> |
| 2079 |
|
| 2080 |
The ERROR command is for use by servers when reporting a serious or |
| 2081 |
fatal error to its operators. It may also be sent from one server to |
| 2082 |
another but must not be accepted from any normal unknown clients. |
| 2083 |
|
| 2084 |
An ERROR message is for use for reporting errors which occur with a |
| 2085 |
server-to-server link only. An ERROR message is sent to the server |
| 2086 |
at the other end (which sends it to all of its connected operators) |
| 2087 |
and to all operators currently connected. It is not to be passed |
| 2088 |
onto any other servers by a server if it is received from a server. |
| 2089 |
|
| 2090 |
When a server sends a received ERROR message to its operators, the |
| 2091 |
message should be encapsulated inside a NOTICE message, indicating |
| 2092 |
that the client was not responsible for the error. |
| 2093 |
|
| 2094 |
Numerics: |
| 2095 |
|
| 2096 |
None. |
| 2097 |
|
| 2098 |
Examples: |
| 2099 |
|
| 2100 |
ERROR :Server *.fi already exists; ERROR message to the other server |
| 2101 |
which caused this error. |
| 2102 |
|
| 2103 |
NOTICE WiZ :ERROR from csd.bu.edu -- Server *.fi already exists |
| 2104 |
; Same ERROR message as above but sent |
| 2105 |
to user WiZ on the other server. |
| 2106 |
|
| 2107 |
5. OPTIONALS |
| 2108 |
|
| 2109 |
This section describes OPTIONAL messages. They are not required in a |
| 2110 |
working server implementation of the protocol described herein. In |
| 2111 |
the absence of the option, an error reply message must be generated |
| 2112 |
or an unknown command error. If the message is destined for another |
| 2113 |
server to answer then it must be passed on (elementary parsing |
| 2114 |
required) The allocated numerics for this are listed with the |
| 2115 |
messages below. |
| 2116 |
|
| 2117 |
5.1 Away |
| 2118 |
|
| 2119 |
Command: AWAY |
| 2120 |
Parameters: [message] |
| 2121 |
|
| 2122 |
|
| 2123 |
|
| 2124 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 38] |
| 2125 |
|
| 2126 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2127 |
|
| 2128 |
|
| 2129 |
With the AWAY message, clients can set an automatic reply string for |
| 2130 |
any PRIVMSG commands directed at them (not to a channel they are on). |
| 2131 |
The automatic reply is sent by the server to client sending the |
| 2132 |
PRIVMSG command. The only replying server is the one to which the |
| 2133 |
sending client is connected to. |
| 2134 |
|
| 2135 |
The AWAY message is used either with one parameter (to set an AWAY |
| 2136 |
message) or with no parameters (to remove the AWAY message). |
| 2137 |
|
| 2138 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2139 |
|
| 2140 |
RPL_UNAWAY RPL_NOWAWAY |
| 2141 |
|
| 2142 |
Examples: |
| 2143 |
|
| 2144 |
AWAY :Gone to lunch. Back in 5 ; set away message to "Gone to lunch. |
| 2145 |
Back in 5". |
| 2146 |
|
| 2147 |
:WiZ AWAY ; unmark WiZ as being away. |
| 2148 |
|
| 2149 |
|
| 2150 |
5.2 Rehash message |
| 2151 |
|
| 2152 |
Command: REHASH |
| 2153 |
Parameters: None |
| 2154 |
|
| 2155 |
The rehash message can be used by the operator to force the server to |
| 2156 |
re-read and process its configuration file. |
| 2157 |
|
| 2158 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2159 |
|
| 2160 |
RPL_REHASHING ERR_NOPRIVILEGES |
| 2161 |
|
| 2162 |
Examples: |
| 2163 |
|
| 2164 |
REHASH ; message from client with operator |
| 2165 |
status to server asking it to reread its |
| 2166 |
configuration file. |
| 2167 |
|
| 2168 |
5.3 Restart message |
| 2169 |
|
| 2170 |
Command: RESTART |
| 2171 |
Parameters: None |
| 2172 |
|
| 2173 |
The restart message can only be used by an operator to force a server |
| 2174 |
restart itself. This message is optional since it may be viewed as a |
| 2175 |
risk to allow arbitrary people to connect to a server as an operator |
| 2176 |
and execute this command, causing (at least) a disruption to service. |
| 2177 |
|
| 2178 |
|
| 2179 |
|
| 2180 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 39] |
| 2181 |
|
| 2182 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2183 |
|
| 2184 |
|
| 2185 |
The RESTART command must always be fully processed by the server to |
| 2186 |
which the sending client is connected and not be passed onto other |
| 2187 |
connected servers. |
| 2188 |
|
| 2189 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2190 |
|
| 2191 |
ERR_NOPRIVILEGES |
| 2192 |
|
| 2193 |
Examples: |
| 2194 |
|
| 2195 |
RESTART ; no parameters required. |
| 2196 |
|
| 2197 |
5.4 Summon message |
| 2198 |
|
| 2199 |
Command: SUMMON |
| 2200 |
Parameters: <user> [<server>] |
| 2201 |
|
| 2202 |
The SUMMON command can be used to give users who are on a host |
| 2203 |
running an IRC server a message asking them to please join IRC. This |
| 2204 |
message is only sent if the target server (a) has SUMMON enabled, (b) |
| 2205 |
the user is logged in and (c) the server process can write to the |
| 2206 |
user's tty (or similar). |
| 2207 |
|
| 2208 |
If no <server> parameter is given it tries to summon <user> from the |
| 2209 |
server the client is connected to is assumed as the target. |
| 2210 |
|
| 2211 |
If summon is not enabled in a server, it must return the |
| 2212 |
ERR_SUMMONDISABLED numeric and pass the summon message onwards. |
| 2213 |
|
| 2214 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2215 |
|
| 2216 |
ERR_NORECIPIENT ERR_FILEERROR |
| 2217 |
ERR_NOLOGIN ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 2218 |
RPL_SUMMONING |
| 2219 |
|
| 2220 |
Examples: |
| 2221 |
|
| 2222 |
SUMMON jto ; summon user jto on the server's host |
| 2223 |
|
| 2224 |
SUMMON jto tolsun.oulu.fi ; summon user jto on the host which a |
| 2225 |
server named "tolsun.oulu.fi" is |
| 2226 |
running. |
| 2227 |
|
| 2228 |
|
| 2229 |
5.5 Users |
| 2230 |
|
| 2231 |
Command: USERS |
| 2232 |
Parameters: [<server>] |
| 2233 |
|
| 2234 |
|
| 2235 |
|
| 2236 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 40] |
| 2237 |
|
| 2238 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2239 |
|
| 2240 |
|
| 2241 |
The USERS command returns a list of users logged into the server in a |
| 2242 |
similar format to who(1), rusers(1) and finger(1). Some people |
| 2243 |
may disable this command on their server for security related |
| 2244 |
reasons. If disabled, the correct numeric must be returned to |
| 2245 |
indicate this. |
| 2246 |
|
| 2247 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2248 |
|
| 2249 |
ERR_NOSUCHSERVER ERR_FILEERROR |
| 2250 |
RPL_USERSSTART RPL_USERS |
| 2251 |
RPL_NOUSERS RPL_ENDOFUSERS |
| 2252 |
ERR_USERSDISABLED |
| 2253 |
|
| 2254 |
Disabled Reply: |
| 2255 |
|
| 2256 |
ERR_USERSDISABLED |
| 2257 |
|
| 2258 |
Examples: |
| 2259 |
|
| 2260 |
USERS eff.org ; request a list of users logged in on |
| 2261 |
server eff.org |
| 2262 |
|
| 2263 |
:John USERS tolsun.oulu.fi ; request from John for a list of users |
| 2264 |
logged in on server tolsun.oulu.fi |
| 2265 |
|
| 2266 |
5.6 Operwall message |
| 2267 |
|
| 2268 |
Command: WALLOPS |
| 2269 |
Parameters: Text to be sent to all operators currently online |
| 2270 |
|
| 2271 |
Sends a message to all operators currently online. After |
| 2272 |
implementing WALLOPS as a user command it was found that it was |
| 2273 |
often and commonly abused as a means of sending a message to a lot |
| 2274 |
of people (much similar to WALL). Due to this it is recommended |
| 2275 |
that the current implementation of WALLOPS be used as an |
| 2276 |
example by allowing and recognising only servers as the senders of |
| 2277 |
WALLOPS. |
| 2278 |
|
| 2279 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2280 |
|
| 2281 |
ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 2282 |
|
| 2283 |
Examples: |
| 2284 |
|
| 2285 |
:csd.bu.edu WALLOPS :Connect '*.uiuc.edu 6667' from Joshua; WALLOPS |
| 2286 |
message from csd.bu.edu announcing a |
| 2287 |
CONNECT message it received and acted |
| 2288 |
upon from Joshua. |
| 2289 |
|
| 2290 |
|
| 2291 |
|
| 2292 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 41] |
| 2293 |
|
| 2294 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2295 |
|
| 2296 |
|
| 2297 |
5.7 Userhost message |
| 2298 |
|
| 2299 |
Command: USERHOST |
| 2300 |
Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>} |
| 2301 |
|
| 2302 |
The USERHOST command takes a list of up to 5 nicknames, each |
| 2303 |
separated by a space character and returns a list of information |
| 2304 |
about each nickname that it found. The returned list has each reply |
| 2305 |
separated by a space. |
| 2306 |
|
| 2307 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2308 |
|
| 2309 |
RPL_USERHOST ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 2310 |
|
| 2311 |
Examples: |
| 2312 |
|
| 2313 |
USERHOST Wiz Michael Marty p ;USERHOST request for information on |
| 2314 |
nicks "Wiz", "Michael", "Marty" and "p" |
| 2315 |
|
| 2316 |
5.8 Ison message |
| 2317 |
|
| 2318 |
Command: ISON |
| 2319 |
Parameters: <nickname>{<space><nickname>} |
| 2320 |
|
| 2321 |
The ISON command was implemented to provide a quick and efficient |
| 2322 |
means to get a response about whether a given nickname was currently |
| 2323 |
on IRC. ISON only takes one (1) parameter: a space-separated list of |
| 2324 |
nicks. For each nickname in the list that is present, the server |
| 2325 |
adds that to its reply string. Thus the reply string may return |
| 2326 |
empty (none of the given nicks are present), an exact copy of the |
| 2327 |
parameter string (all of them present) or as any other subset of the |
| 2328 |
set of nicks given in the parameter. The only limit on the number |
| 2329 |
of nicks that may be checked is that the combined length must not be |
| 2330 |
too large as to cause the server to chop it off so it fits in 512 |
| 2331 |
characters. |
| 2332 |
|
| 2333 |
ISON is only be processed by the server local to the client sending |
| 2334 |
the command and thus not passed onto other servers for further |
| 2335 |
processing. |
| 2336 |
|
| 2337 |
Numeric Replies: |
| 2338 |
|
| 2339 |
RPL_ISON ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 2340 |
|
| 2341 |
Examples: |
| 2342 |
|
| 2343 |
ISON phone trillian WiZ jarlek Avalon Angel Monstah |
| 2344 |
; Sample ISON request for 7 nicks. |
| 2345 |
|
| 2346 |
|
| 2347 |
|
| 2348 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 42] |
| 2349 |
|
| 2350 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2351 |
|
| 2352 |
|
| 2353 |
6. REPLIES |
| 2354 |
|
| 2355 |
The following is a list of numeric replies which are generated in |
| 2356 |
response to the commands given above. Each numeric is given with its |
| 2357 |
number, name and reply string. |
| 2358 |
|
| 2359 |
6.1 Error Replies. |
| 2360 |
|
| 2361 |
401 ERR_NOSUCHNICK |
| 2362 |
"<nickname> :No such nick/channel" |
| 2363 |
|
| 2364 |
- Used to indicate the nickname parameter supplied to a |
| 2365 |
command is currently unused. |
| 2366 |
|
| 2367 |
402 ERR_NOSUCHSERVER |
| 2368 |
"<server name> :No such server" |
| 2369 |
|
| 2370 |
- Used to indicate the server name given currently |
| 2371 |
doesn't exist. |
| 2372 |
|
| 2373 |
403 ERR_NOSUCHCHANNEL |
| 2374 |
"<channel name> :No such channel" |
| 2375 |
|
| 2376 |
- Used to indicate the given channel name is invalid. |
| 2377 |
|
| 2378 |
404 ERR_CANNOTSENDTOCHAN |
| 2379 |
"<channel name> :Cannot send to channel" |
| 2380 |
|
| 2381 |
- Sent to a user who is either (a) not on a channel |
| 2382 |
which is mode +n or (b) not a chanop (or mode +v) on |
| 2383 |
a channel which has mode +m set and is trying to send |
| 2384 |
a PRIVMSG message to that channel. |
| 2385 |
|
| 2386 |
405 ERR_TOOMANYCHANNELS |
| 2387 |
"<channel name> :You have joined too many \ |
| 2388 |
channels" |
| 2389 |
- Sent to a user when they have joined the maximum |
| 2390 |
number of allowed channels and they try to join |
| 2391 |
another channel. |
| 2392 |
|
| 2393 |
406 ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK |
| 2394 |
"<nickname> :There was no such nickname" |
| 2395 |
|
| 2396 |
- Returned by WHOWAS to indicate there is no history |
| 2397 |
information for that nickname. |
| 2398 |
|
| 2399 |
407 ERR_TOOMANYTARGETS |
| 2400 |
"<target> :Duplicate recipients. No message \ |
| 2401 |
|
| 2402 |
|
| 2403 |
|
| 2404 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 43] |
| 2405 |
|
| 2406 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2407 |
|
| 2408 |
|
| 2409 |
delivered" |
| 2410 |
|
| 2411 |
- Returned to a client which is attempting to send a |
| 2412 |
PRIVMSG/NOTICE using the user@host destination format |
| 2413 |
and for a user@host which has several occurrences. |
| 2414 |
|
| 2415 |
409 ERR_NOORIGIN |
| 2416 |
":No origin specified" |
| 2417 |
|
| 2418 |
- PING or PONG message missing the originator parameter |
| 2419 |
which is required since these commands must work |
| 2420 |
without valid prefixes. |
| 2421 |
|
| 2422 |
411 ERR_NORECIPIENT |
| 2423 |
":No recipient given (<command>)" |
| 2424 |
412 ERR_NOTEXTTOSEND |
| 2425 |
":No text to send" |
| 2426 |
413 ERR_NOTOPLEVEL |
| 2427 |
"<mask> :No toplevel domain specified" |
| 2428 |
414 ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL |
| 2429 |
"<mask> :Wildcard in toplevel domain" |
| 2430 |
|
| 2431 |
- 412 - 414 are returned by PRIVMSG to indicate that |
| 2432 |
the message wasn't delivered for some reason. |
| 2433 |
ERR_NOTOPLEVEL and ERR_WILDTOPLEVEL are errors that |
| 2434 |
are returned when an invalid use of |
| 2435 |
"PRIVMSG $<server>" or "PRIVMSG #<host>" is attempted. |
| 2436 |
|
| 2437 |
421 ERR_UNKNOWNCOMMAND |
| 2438 |
"<command> :Unknown command" |
| 2439 |
|
| 2440 |
- Returned to a registered client to indicate that the |
| 2441 |
command sent is unknown by the server. |
| 2442 |
|
| 2443 |
422 ERR_NOMOTD |
| 2444 |
":MOTD File is missing" |
| 2445 |
|
| 2446 |
- Server's MOTD file could not be opened by the server. |
| 2447 |
|
| 2448 |
423 ERR_NOADMININFO |
| 2449 |
"<server> :No administrative info available" |
| 2450 |
|
| 2451 |
- Returned by a server in response to an ADMIN message |
| 2452 |
when there is an error in finding the appropriate |
| 2453 |
information. |
| 2454 |
|
| 2455 |
424 ERR_FILEERROR |
| 2456 |
":File error doing <file op> on <file>" |
| 2457 |
|
| 2458 |
|
| 2459 |
|
| 2460 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 44] |
| 2461 |
|
| 2462 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2463 |
|
| 2464 |
|
| 2465 |
- Generic error message used to report a failed file |
| 2466 |
operation during the processing of a message. |
| 2467 |
|
| 2468 |
431 ERR_NONICKNAMEGIVEN |
| 2469 |
":No nickname given" |
| 2470 |
|
| 2471 |
- Returned when a nickname parameter expected for a |
| 2472 |
command and isn't found. |
| 2473 |
|
| 2474 |
432 ERR_ERRONEUSNICKNAME |
| 2475 |
"<nick> :Erroneus nickname" |
| 2476 |
|
| 2477 |
- Returned after receiving a NICK message which contains |
| 2478 |
characters which do not fall in the defined set. See |
| 2479 |
section x.x.x for details on valid nicknames. |
| 2480 |
|
| 2481 |
433 ERR_NICKNAMEINUSE |
| 2482 |
"<nick> :Nickname is already in use" |
| 2483 |
|
| 2484 |
- Returned when a NICK message is processed that results |
| 2485 |
in an attempt to change to a currently existing |
| 2486 |
nickname. |
| 2487 |
|
| 2488 |
436 ERR_NICKCOLLISION |
| 2489 |
"<nick> :Nickname collision KILL" |
| 2490 |
|
| 2491 |
- Returned by a server to a client when it detects a |
| 2492 |
nickname collision (registered of a NICK that |
| 2493 |
already exists by another server). |
| 2494 |
|
| 2495 |
441 ERR_USERNOTINCHANNEL |
| 2496 |
"<nick> <channel> :They aren't on that channel" |
| 2497 |
|
| 2498 |
- Returned by the server to indicate that the target |
| 2499 |
user of the command is not on the given channel. |
| 2500 |
|
| 2501 |
442 ERR_NOTONCHANNEL |
| 2502 |
"<channel> :You're not on that channel" |
| 2503 |
|
| 2504 |
- Returned by the server whenever a client tries to |
| 2505 |
perform a channel effecting command for which the |
| 2506 |
client isn't a member. |
| 2507 |
|
| 2508 |
443 ERR_USERONCHANNEL |
| 2509 |
"<user> <channel> :is already on channel" |
| 2510 |
|
| 2511 |
- Returned when a client tries to invite a user to a |
| 2512 |
channel they are already on. |
| 2513 |
|
| 2514 |
|
| 2515 |
|
| 2516 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 45] |
| 2517 |
|
| 2518 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2519 |
|
| 2520 |
|
| 2521 |
444 ERR_NOLOGIN |
| 2522 |
"<user> :User not logged in" |
| 2523 |
|
| 2524 |
- Returned by the summon after a SUMMON command for a |
| 2525 |
user was unable to be performed since they were not |
| 2526 |
logged in. |
| 2527 |
|
| 2528 |
445 ERR_SUMMONDISABLED |
| 2529 |
":SUMMON has been disabled" |
| 2530 |
|
| 2531 |
- Returned as a response to the SUMMON command. Must be |
| 2532 |
returned by any server which does not implement it. |
| 2533 |
|
| 2534 |
446 ERR_USERSDISABLED |
| 2535 |
":USERS has been disabled" |
| 2536 |
|
| 2537 |
- Returned as a response to the USERS command. Must be |
| 2538 |
returned by any server which does not implement it. |
| 2539 |
|
| 2540 |
451 ERR_NOTREGISTERED |
| 2541 |
":You have not registered" |
| 2542 |
|
| 2543 |
- Returned by the server to indicate that the client |
| 2544 |
must be registered before the server will allow it |
| 2545 |
to be parsed in detail. |
| 2546 |
|
| 2547 |
461 ERR_NEEDMOREPARAMS |
| 2548 |
"<command> :Not enough parameters" |
| 2549 |
|
| 2550 |
- Returned by the server by numerous commands to |
| 2551 |
indicate to the client that it didn't supply enough |
| 2552 |
parameters. |
| 2553 |
|
| 2554 |
462 ERR_ALREADYREGISTRED |
| 2555 |
":You may not reregister" |
| 2556 |
|
| 2557 |
- Returned by the server to any link which tries to |
| 2558 |
change part of the registered details (such as |
| 2559 |
password or user details from second USER message). |
| 2560 |
|
| 2561 |
|
| 2562 |
463 ERR_NOPERMFORHOST |
| 2563 |
":Your host isn't among the privileged" |
| 2564 |
|
| 2565 |
- Returned to a client which attempts to register with |
| 2566 |
a server which does not been setup to allow |
| 2567 |
connections from the host the attempted connection |
| 2568 |
is tried. |
| 2569 |
|
| 2570 |
|
| 2571 |
|
| 2572 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 46] |
| 2573 |
|
| 2574 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2575 |
|
| 2576 |
|
| 2577 |
464 ERR_PASSWDMISMATCH |
| 2578 |
":Password incorrect" |
| 2579 |
|
| 2580 |
- Returned to indicate a failed attempt at registering |
| 2581 |
a connection for which a password was required and |
| 2582 |
was either not given or incorrect. |
| 2583 |
|
| 2584 |
465 ERR_YOUREBANNEDCREEP |
| 2585 |
":You are banned from this server" |
| 2586 |
|
| 2587 |
- Returned after an attempt to connect and register |
| 2588 |
yourself with a server which has been setup to |
| 2589 |
explicitly deny connections to you. |
| 2590 |
|
| 2591 |
467 ERR_KEYSET |
| 2592 |
"<channel> :Channel key already set" |
| 2593 |
471 ERR_CHANNELISFULL |
| 2594 |
"<channel> :Cannot join channel (+l)" |
| 2595 |
472 ERR_UNKNOWNMODE |
| 2596 |
"<char> :is unknown mode char to me" |
| 2597 |
473 ERR_INVITEONLYCHAN |
| 2598 |
"<channel> :Cannot join channel (+i)" |
| 2599 |
474 ERR_BANNEDFROMCHAN |
| 2600 |
"<channel> :Cannot join channel (+b)" |
| 2601 |
475 ERR_BADCHANNELKEY |
| 2602 |
"<channel> :Cannot join channel (+k)" |
| 2603 |
481 ERR_NOPRIVILEGES |
| 2604 |
":Permission Denied- You're not an IRC operator" |
| 2605 |
|
| 2606 |
- Any command requiring operator privileges to operate |
| 2607 |
must return this error to indicate the attempt was |
| 2608 |
unsuccessful. |
| 2609 |
|
| 2610 |
482 ERR_CHANOPRIVSNEEDED |
| 2611 |
"<channel> :You're not channel operator" |
| 2612 |
|
| 2613 |
- Any command requiring 'chanop' privileges (such as |
| 2614 |
MODE messages) must return this error if the client |
| 2615 |
making the attempt is not a chanop on the specified |
| 2616 |
channel. |
| 2617 |
|
| 2618 |
483 ERR_CANTKILLSERVER |
| 2619 |
":You cant kill a server!" |
| 2620 |
|
| 2621 |
- Any attempts to use the KILL command on a server |
| 2622 |
are to be refused and this error returned directly |
| 2623 |
to the client. |
| 2624 |
|
| 2625 |
|
| 2626 |
|
| 2627 |
|
| 2628 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 47] |
| 2629 |
|
| 2630 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2631 |
|
| 2632 |
|
| 2633 |
491 ERR_NOOPERHOST |
| 2634 |
":No O-lines for your host" |
| 2635 |
|
| 2636 |
- If a client sends an OPER message and the server has |
| 2637 |
not been configured to allow connections from the |
| 2638 |
client's host as an operator, this error must be |
| 2639 |
returned. |
| 2640 |
|
| 2641 |
501 ERR_UMODEUNKNOWNFLAG |
| 2642 |
":Unknown MODE flag" |
| 2643 |
|
| 2644 |
- Returned by the server to indicate that a MODE |
| 2645 |
message was sent with a nickname parameter and that |
| 2646 |
the a mode flag sent was not recognized. |
| 2647 |
|
| 2648 |
502 ERR_USERSDONTMATCH |
| 2649 |
":Cant change mode for other users" |
| 2650 |
|
| 2651 |
- Error sent to any user trying to view or change the |
| 2652 |
user mode for a user other than themselves. |
| 2653 |
|
| 2654 |
6.2 Command responses. |
| 2655 |
|
| 2656 |
300 RPL_NONE |
| 2657 |
Dummy reply number. Not used. |
| 2658 |
|
| 2659 |
302 RPL_USERHOST |
| 2660 |
":[<reply>{<space><reply>}]" |
| 2661 |
|
| 2662 |
- Reply format used by USERHOST to list replies to |
| 2663 |
the query list. The reply string is composed as |
| 2664 |
follows: |
| 2665 |
|
| 2666 |
<reply> ::= <nick>['*'] '=' <'+'|'-'><hostname> |
| 2667 |
|
| 2668 |
The '*' indicates whether the client has registered |
| 2669 |
as an Operator. The '-' or '+' characters represent |
| 2670 |
whether the client has set an AWAY message or not |
| 2671 |
respectively. |
| 2672 |
|
| 2673 |
303 RPL_ISON |
| 2674 |
":[<nick> {<space><nick>}]" |
| 2675 |
|
| 2676 |
- Reply format used by ISON to list replies to the |
| 2677 |
query list. |
| 2678 |
|
| 2679 |
301 RPL_AWAY |
| 2680 |
"<nick> :<away message>" |
| 2681 |
|
| 2682 |
|
| 2683 |
|
| 2684 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 48] |
| 2685 |
|
| 2686 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2687 |
|
| 2688 |
|
| 2689 |
305 RPL_UNAWAY |
| 2690 |
":You are no longer marked as being away" |
| 2691 |
306 RPL_NOWAWAY |
| 2692 |
":You have been marked as being away" |
| 2693 |
|
| 2694 |
- These replies are used with the AWAY command (if |
| 2695 |
allowed). RPL_AWAY is sent to any client sending a |
| 2696 |
PRIVMSG to a client which is away. RPL_AWAY is only |
| 2697 |
sent by the server to which the client is connected. |
| 2698 |
Replies RPL_UNAWAY and RPL_NOWAWAY are sent when the |
| 2699 |
client removes and sets an AWAY message. |
| 2700 |
|
| 2701 |
311 RPL_WHOISUSER |
| 2702 |
"<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>" |
| 2703 |
312 RPL_WHOISSERVER |
| 2704 |
"<nick> <server> :<server info>" |
| 2705 |
313 RPL_WHOISOPERATOR |
| 2706 |
"<nick> :is an IRC operator" |
| 2707 |
317 RPL_WHOISIDLE |
| 2708 |
"<nick> <integer> :seconds idle" |
| 2709 |
318 RPL_ENDOFWHOIS |
| 2710 |
"<nick> :End of /WHOIS list" |
| 2711 |
319 RPL_WHOISCHANNELS |
| 2712 |
"<nick> :{[@|+]<channel><space>}" |
| 2713 |
|
| 2714 |
- Replies 311 - 313, 317 - 319 are all replies |
| 2715 |
generated in response to a WHOIS message. Given that |
| 2716 |
there are enough parameters present, the answering |
| 2717 |
server must either formulate a reply out of the above |
| 2718 |
numerics (if the query nick is found) or return an |
| 2719 |
error reply. The '*' in RPL_WHOISUSER is there as |
| 2720 |
the literal character and not as a wild card. For |
| 2721 |
each reply set, only RPL_WHOISCHANNELS may appear |
| 2722 |
more than once (for long lists of channel names). |
| 2723 |
The '@' and '+' characters next to the channel name |
| 2724 |
indicate whether a client is a channel operator or |
| 2725 |
has been granted permission to speak on a moderated |
| 2726 |
channel. The RPL_ENDOFWHOIS reply is used to mark |
| 2727 |
the end of processing a WHOIS message. |
| 2728 |
|
| 2729 |
314 RPL_WHOWASUSER |
| 2730 |
"<nick> <user> <host> * :<real name>" |
| 2731 |
369 RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS |
| 2732 |
"<nick> :End of WHOWAS" |
| 2733 |
|
| 2734 |
- When replying to a WHOWAS message, a server must use |
| 2735 |
the replies RPL_WHOWASUSER, RPL_WHOISSERVER or |
| 2736 |
ERR_WASNOSUCHNICK for each nickname in the presented |
| 2737 |
|
| 2738 |
|
| 2739 |
|
| 2740 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 49] |
| 2741 |
|
| 2742 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2743 |
|
| 2744 |
|
| 2745 |
list. At the end of all reply batches, there must |
| 2746 |
be RPL_ENDOFWHOWAS (even if there was only one reply |
| 2747 |
and it was an error). |
| 2748 |
|
| 2749 |
321 RPL_LISTSTART |
| 2750 |
"Channel :Users Name" |
| 2751 |
322 RPL_LIST |
| 2752 |
"<channel> <# visible> :<topic>" |
| 2753 |
323 RPL_LISTEND |
| 2754 |
":End of /LIST" |
| 2755 |
|
| 2756 |
- Replies RPL_LISTSTART, RPL_LIST, RPL_LISTEND mark |
| 2757 |
the start, actual replies with data and end of the |
| 2758 |
server's response to a LIST command. If there are |
| 2759 |
no channels available to return, only the start |
| 2760 |
and end reply must be sent. |
| 2761 |
|
| 2762 |
324 RPL_CHANNELMODEIS |
| 2763 |
"<channel> <mode> <mode params>" |
| 2764 |
|
| 2765 |
331 RPL_NOTOPIC |
| 2766 |
"<channel> :No topic is set" |
| 2767 |
332 RPL_TOPIC |
| 2768 |
"<channel> :<topic>" |
| 2769 |
|
| 2770 |
- When sending a TOPIC message to determine the |
| 2771 |
channel topic, one of two replies is sent. If |
| 2772 |
the topic is set, RPL_TOPIC is sent back else |
| 2773 |
RPL_NOTOPIC. |
| 2774 |
|
| 2775 |
341 RPL_INVITING |
| 2776 |
"<channel> <nick>" |
| 2777 |
|
| 2778 |
- Returned by the server to indicate that the |
| 2779 |
attempted INVITE message was successful and is |
| 2780 |
being passed onto the end client. |
| 2781 |
|
| 2782 |
342 RPL_SUMMONING |
| 2783 |
"<user> :Summoning user to IRC" |
| 2784 |
|
| 2785 |
- Returned by a server answering a SUMMON message to |
| 2786 |
indicate that it is summoning that user. |
| 2787 |
|
| 2788 |
351 RPL_VERSION |
| 2789 |
"<version>.<debuglevel> <server> :<comments>" |
| 2790 |
|
| 2791 |
- Reply by the server showing its version details. |
| 2792 |
The <version> is the version of the software being |
| 2793 |
|
| 2794 |
|
| 2795 |
|
| 2796 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 50] |
| 2797 |
|
| 2798 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2799 |
|
| 2800 |
|
| 2801 |
used (including any patchlevel revisions) and the |
| 2802 |
<debuglevel> is used to indicate if the server is |
| 2803 |
running in "debug mode". |
| 2804 |
|
| 2805 |
The "comments" field may contain any comments about |
| 2806 |
the version or further version details. |
| 2807 |
|
| 2808 |
352 RPL_WHOREPLY |
| 2809 |
"<channel> <user> <host> <server> <nick> \ |
| 2810 |
<H|G>[*][@|+] :<hopcount> <real name>" |
| 2811 |
315 RPL_ENDOFWHO |
| 2812 |
"<name> :End of /WHO list" |
| 2813 |
|
| 2814 |
- The RPL_WHOREPLY and RPL_ENDOFWHO pair are used |
| 2815 |
to answer a WHO message. The RPL_WHOREPLY is only |
| 2816 |
sent if there is an appropriate match to the WHO |
| 2817 |
query. If there is a list of parameters supplied |
| 2818 |
with a WHO message, a RPL_ENDOFWHO must be sent |
| 2819 |
after processing each list item with <name> being |
| 2820 |
the item. |
| 2821 |
|
| 2822 |
353 RPL_NAMREPLY |
| 2823 |
"<channel> :[[@|+]<nick> [[@|+]<nick> [...]]]" |
| 2824 |
366 RPL_ENDOFNAMES |
| 2825 |
"<channel> :End of /NAMES list" |
| 2826 |
|
| 2827 |
- To reply to a NAMES message, a reply pair consisting |
| 2828 |
of RPL_NAMREPLY and RPL_ENDOFNAMES is sent by the |
| 2829 |
server back to the client. If there is no channel |
| 2830 |
found as in the query, then only RPL_ENDOFNAMES is |
| 2831 |
returned. The exception to this is when a NAMES |
| 2832 |
message is sent with no parameters and all visible |
| 2833 |
channels and contents are sent back in a series of |
| 2834 |
RPL_NAMEREPLY messages with a RPL_ENDOFNAMES to mark |
| 2835 |
the end. |
| 2836 |
|
| 2837 |
364 RPL_LINKS |
| 2838 |
"<mask> <server> :<hopcount> <server info>" |
| 2839 |
365 RPL_ENDOFLINKS |
| 2840 |
"<mask> :End of /LINKS list" |
| 2841 |
|
| 2842 |
- In replying to the LINKS message, a server must send |
| 2843 |
replies back using the RPL_LINKS numeric and mark the |
| 2844 |
end of the list using an RPL_ENDOFLINKS reply. |
| 2845 |
|
| 2846 |
367 RPL_BANLIST |
| 2847 |
"<channel> <banid>" |
| 2848 |
368 RPL_ENDOFBANLIST |
| 2849 |
|
| 2850 |
|
| 2851 |
|
| 2852 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 51] |
| 2853 |
|
| 2854 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2855 |
|
| 2856 |
|
| 2857 |
"<channel> :End of channel ban list" |
| 2858 |
|
| 2859 |
- When listing the active 'bans' for a given channel, |
| 2860 |
a server is required to send the list back using the |
| 2861 |
RPL_BANLIST and RPL_ENDOFBANLIST messages. A separate |
| 2862 |
RPL_BANLIST is sent for each active banid. After the |
| 2863 |
banids have been listed (or if none present) a |
| 2864 |
RPL_ENDOFBANLIST must be sent. |
| 2865 |
|
| 2866 |
371 RPL_INFO |
| 2867 |
":<string>" |
| 2868 |
374 RPL_ENDOFINFO |
| 2869 |
":End of /INFO list" |
| 2870 |
|
| 2871 |
- A server responding to an INFO message is required to |
| 2872 |
send all its 'info' in a series of RPL_INFO messages |
| 2873 |
with a RPL_ENDOFINFO reply to indicate the end of the |
| 2874 |
replies. |
| 2875 |
|
| 2876 |
375 RPL_MOTDSTART |
| 2877 |
":- <server> Message of the day - " |
| 2878 |
372 RPL_MOTD |
| 2879 |
":- <text>" |
| 2880 |
376 RPL_ENDOFMOTD |
| 2881 |
":End of /MOTD command" |
| 2882 |
|
| 2883 |
- When responding to the MOTD message and the MOTD file |
| 2884 |
is found, the file is displayed line by line, with |
| 2885 |
each line no longer than 80 characters, using |
| 2886 |
RPL_MOTD format replies. These should be surrounded |
| 2887 |
by a RPL_MOTDSTART (before the RPL_MOTDs) and an |
| 2888 |
RPL_ENDOFMOTD (after). |
| 2889 |
|
| 2890 |
381 RPL_YOUREOPER |
| 2891 |
":You are now an IRC operator" |
| 2892 |
|
| 2893 |
- RPL_YOUREOPER is sent back to a client which has |
| 2894 |
just successfully issued an OPER message and gained |
| 2895 |
operator status. |
| 2896 |
|
| 2897 |
382 RPL_REHASHING |
| 2898 |
"<config file> :Rehashing" |
| 2899 |
|
| 2900 |
- If the REHASH option is used and an operator sends |
| 2901 |
a REHASH message, an RPL_REHASHING is sent back to |
| 2902 |
the operator. |
| 2903 |
|
| 2904 |
391 RPL_TIME |
| 2905 |
|
| 2906 |
|
| 2907 |
|
| 2908 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 52] |
| 2909 |
|
| 2910 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2911 |
|
| 2912 |
|
| 2913 |
"<server> :<string showing server's local time>" |
| 2914 |
|
| 2915 |
- When replying to the TIME message, a server must send |
| 2916 |
the reply using the RPL_TIME format above. The string |
| 2917 |
showing the time need only contain the correct day and |
| 2918 |
time there. There is no further requirement for the |
| 2919 |
time string. |
| 2920 |
|
| 2921 |
392 RPL_USERSSTART |
| 2922 |
":UserID Terminal Host" |
| 2923 |
393 RPL_USERS |
| 2924 |
":%-8s %-9s %-8s" |
| 2925 |
394 RPL_ENDOFUSERS |
| 2926 |
":End of users" |
| 2927 |
395 RPL_NOUSERS |
| 2928 |
":Nobody logged in" |
| 2929 |
|
| 2930 |
- If the USERS message is handled by a server, the |
| 2931 |
replies RPL_USERSTART, RPL_USERS, RPL_ENDOFUSERS and |
| 2932 |
RPL_NOUSERS are used. RPL_USERSSTART must be sent |
| 2933 |
first, following by either a sequence of RPL_USERS |
| 2934 |
or a single RPL_NOUSER. Following this is |
| 2935 |
RPL_ENDOFUSERS. |
| 2936 |
|
| 2937 |
200 RPL_TRACELINK |
| 2938 |
"Link <version & debug level> <destination> \ |
| 2939 |
<next server>" |
| 2940 |
201 RPL_TRACECONNECTING |
| 2941 |
"Try. <class> <server>" |
| 2942 |
202 RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE |
| 2943 |
"H.S. <class> <server>" |
| 2944 |
203 RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN |
| 2945 |
"???? <class> [<client IP address in dot form>]" |
| 2946 |
204 RPL_TRACEOPERATOR |
| 2947 |
"Oper <class> <nick>" |
| 2948 |
205 RPL_TRACEUSER |
| 2949 |
"User <class> <nick>" |
| 2950 |
206 RPL_TRACESERVER |
| 2951 |
"Serv <class> <int>S <int>C <server> \ |
| 2952 |
<nick!user|*!*>@<host|server>" |
| 2953 |
208 RPL_TRACENEWTYPE |
| 2954 |
"<newtype> 0 <client name>" |
| 2955 |
261 RPL_TRACELOG |
| 2956 |
"File <logfile> <debug level>" |
| 2957 |
|
| 2958 |
- The RPL_TRACE* are all returned by the server in |
| 2959 |
response to the TRACE message. How many are |
| 2960 |
returned is dependent on the the TRACE message and |
| 2961 |
|
| 2962 |
|
| 2963 |
|
| 2964 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 53] |
| 2965 |
|
| 2966 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 2967 |
|
| 2968 |
|
| 2969 |
whether it was sent by an operator or not. There |
| 2970 |
is no predefined order for which occurs first. |
| 2971 |
Replies RPL_TRACEUNKNOWN, RPL_TRACECONNECTING and |
| 2972 |
RPL_TRACEHANDSHAKE are all used for connections |
| 2973 |
which have not been fully established and are either |
| 2974 |
unknown, still attempting to connect or in the |
| 2975 |
process of completing the 'server handshake'. |
| 2976 |
RPL_TRACELINK is sent by any server which handles |
| 2977 |
a TRACE message and has to pass it on to another |
| 2978 |
server. The list of RPL_TRACELINKs sent in |
| 2979 |
response to a TRACE command traversing the IRC |
| 2980 |
network should reflect the actual connectivity of |
| 2981 |
the servers themselves along that path. |
| 2982 |
RPL_TRACENEWTYPE is to be used for any connection |
| 2983 |
which does not fit in the other categories but is |
| 2984 |
being displayed anyway. |
| 2985 |
|
| 2986 |
211 RPL_STATSLINKINFO |
| 2987 |
"<linkname> <sendq> <sent messages> \ |
| 2988 |
<sent bytes> <received messages> \ |
| 2989 |
<received bytes> <time open>" |
| 2990 |
212 RPL_STATSCOMMANDS |
| 2991 |
"<command> <count>" |
| 2992 |
213 RPL_STATSCLINE |
| 2993 |
"C <host> * <name> <port> <class>" |
| 2994 |
214 RPL_STATSNLINE |
| 2995 |
"N <host> * <name> <port> <class>" |
| 2996 |
215 RPL_STATSILINE |
| 2997 |
"I <host> * <host> <port> <class>" |
| 2998 |
216 RPL_STATSKLINE |
| 2999 |
"K <host> * <username> <port> <class>" |
| 3000 |
218 RPL_STATSYLINE |
| 3001 |
"Y <class> <ping frequency> <connect \ |
| 3002 |
frequency> <max sendq>" |
| 3003 |
219 RPL_ENDOFSTATS |
| 3004 |
"<stats letter> :End of /STATS report" |
| 3005 |
241 RPL_STATSLLINE |
| 3006 |
"L <hostmask> * <servername> <maxdepth>" |
| 3007 |
242 RPL_STATSUPTIME |
| 3008 |
":Server Up %d days %d:%02d:%02d" |
| 3009 |
243 RPL_STATSOLINE |
| 3010 |
"O <hostmask> * <name>" |
| 3011 |
244 RPL_STATSHLINE |
| 3012 |
"H <hostmask> * <servername>" |
| 3013 |
|
| 3014 |
221 RPL_UMODEIS |
| 3015 |
"<user mode string>" |
| 3016 |
|
| 3017 |
|
| 3018 |
|
| 3019 |
|
| 3020 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 54] |
| 3021 |
|
| 3022 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3023 |
|
| 3024 |
|
| 3025 |
- To answer a query about a client's own mode, |
| 3026 |
RPL_UMODEIS is sent back. |
| 3027 |
|
| 3028 |
251 RPL_LUSERCLIENT |
| 3029 |
":There are <integer> users and <integer> \ |
| 3030 |
invisible on <integer> servers" |
| 3031 |
252 RPL_LUSEROP |
| 3032 |
"<integer> :operator(s) online" |
| 3033 |
253 RPL_LUSERUNKNOWN |
| 3034 |
"<integer> :unknown connection(s)" |
| 3035 |
254 RPL_LUSERCHANNELS |
| 3036 |
"<integer> :channels formed" |
| 3037 |
255 RPL_LUSERME |
| 3038 |
":I have <integer> clients and <integer> \ |
| 3039 |
servers" |
| 3040 |
|
| 3041 |
- In processing an LUSERS message, the server |
| 3042 |
sends a set of replies from RPL_LUSERCLIENT, |
| 3043 |
RPL_LUSEROP, RPL_USERUNKNOWN, |
| 3044 |
RPL_LUSERCHANNELS and RPL_LUSERME. When |
| 3045 |
replying, a server must send back |
| 3046 |
RPL_LUSERCLIENT and RPL_LUSERME. The other |
| 3047 |
replies are only sent back if a non-zero count |
| 3048 |
is found for them. |
| 3049 |
|
| 3050 |
256 RPL_ADMINME |
| 3051 |
"<server> :Administrative info" |
| 3052 |
257 RPL_ADMINLOC1 |
| 3053 |
":<admin info>" |
| 3054 |
258 RPL_ADMINLOC2 |
| 3055 |
":<admin info>" |
| 3056 |
259 RPL_ADMINEMAIL |
| 3057 |
":<admin info>" |
| 3058 |
|
| 3059 |
- When replying to an ADMIN message, a server |
| 3060 |
is expected to use replies RLP_ADMINME |
| 3061 |
through to RPL_ADMINEMAIL and provide a text |
| 3062 |
message with each. For RPL_ADMINLOC1 a |
| 3063 |
description of what city, state and country |
| 3064 |
the server is in is expected, followed by |
| 3065 |
details of the university and department |
| 3066 |
(RPL_ADMINLOC2) and finally the administrative |
| 3067 |
contact for the server (an email address here |
| 3068 |
is required) in RPL_ADMINEMAIL. |
| 3069 |
|
| 3070 |
|
| 3071 |
|
| 3072 |
|
| 3073 |
|
| 3074 |
|
| 3075 |
|
| 3076 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 55] |
| 3077 |
|
| 3078 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3079 |
|
| 3080 |
|
| 3081 |
6.3 Reserved numerics. |
| 3082 |
|
| 3083 |
These numerics are not described above since they fall into one of |
| 3084 |
the following categories: |
| 3085 |
|
| 3086 |
1. no longer in use; |
| 3087 |
|
| 3088 |
2. reserved for future planned use; |
| 3089 |
|
| 3090 |
3. in current use but are part of a non-generic 'feature' of |
| 3091 |
the current IRC server. |
| 3092 |
|
| 3093 |
209 RPL_TRACECLASS 217 RPL_STATSQLINE |
| 3094 |
231 RPL_SERVICEINFO 232 RPL_ENDOFSERVICES |
| 3095 |
233 RPL_SERVICE 234 RPL_SERVLIST |
| 3096 |
235 RPL_SERVLISTEND |
| 3097 |
316 RPL_WHOISCHANOP 361 RPL_KILLDONE |
| 3098 |
362 RPL_CLOSING 363 RPL_CLOSEEND |
| 3099 |
373 RPL_INFOSTART 384 RPL_MYPORTIS |
| 3100 |
466 ERR_YOUWILLBEBANNED 476 ERR_BADCHANMASK |
| 3101 |
492 ERR_NOSERVICEHOST |
| 3102 |
|
| 3103 |
7. Client and server authentication |
| 3104 |
|
| 3105 |
Clients and servers are both subject to the same level of |
| 3106 |
authentication. For both, an IP number to hostname lookup (and |
| 3107 |
reverse check on this) is performed for all connections made to the |
| 3108 |
server. Both connections are then subject to a password check (if |
| 3109 |
there is a password set for that connection). These checks are |
| 3110 |
possible on all connections although the password check is only |
| 3111 |
commonly used with servers. |
| 3112 |
|
| 3113 |
An additional check that is becoming of more and more common is that |
| 3114 |
of the username responsible for making the connection. Finding the |
| 3115 |
username of the other end of the connection typically involves |
| 3116 |
connecting to an authentication server such as IDENT as described in |
| 3117 |
RFC 1413. |
| 3118 |
|
| 3119 |
Given that without passwords it is not easy to reliably determine who |
| 3120 |
is on the other end of a network connection, use of passwords is |
| 3121 |
strongly recommended on inter-server connections in addition to any |
| 3122 |
other measures such as using an ident server. |
| 3123 |
|
| 3124 |
8. Current implementations |
| 3125 |
|
| 3126 |
The only current implementation of this protocol is the IRC server, |
| 3127 |
version 2.8. Earlier versions may implement some or all of the |
| 3128 |
commands described by this document with NOTICE messages replacing |
| 3129 |
|
| 3130 |
|
| 3131 |
|
| 3132 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 56] |
| 3133 |
|
| 3134 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3135 |
|
| 3136 |
|
| 3137 |
many of the numeric replies. Unfortunately, due to backward |
| 3138 |
compatibility requirements, the implementation of some parts of this |
| 3139 |
document varies with what is laid out. On notable difference is: |
| 3140 |
|
| 3141 |
* recognition that any LF or CR anywhere in a message marks the |
| 3142 |
end of that message (instead of requiring CR-LF); |
| 3143 |
|
| 3144 |
The rest of this section deals with issues that are mostly of |
| 3145 |
importance to those who wish to implement a server but some parts |
| 3146 |
also apply directly to clients as well. |
| 3147 |
|
| 3148 |
8.1 Network protocol: TCP - why it is best used here. |
| 3149 |
|
| 3150 |
IRC has been implemented on top of TCP since TCP supplies a reliable |
| 3151 |
network protocol which is well suited to this scale of conferencing. |
| 3152 |
The use of multicast IP is an alternative, but it is not widely |
| 3153 |
available or supported at the present time. |
| 3154 |
|
| 3155 |
8.1.1 Support of Unix sockets |
| 3156 |
|
| 3157 |
Given that Unix domain sockets allow listen/connect operations, the |
| 3158 |
current implementation can be configured to listen and accept both |
| 3159 |
client and server connections on a Unix domain socket. These are |
| 3160 |
recognized as sockets where the hostname starts with a '/'. |
| 3161 |
|
| 3162 |
When providing any information about the connections on a Unix domain |
| 3163 |
socket, the server is required to supplant the actual hostname in |
| 3164 |
place of the pathname unless the actual socket name is being asked |
| 3165 |
for. |
| 3166 |
|
| 3167 |
8.2 Command Parsing |
| 3168 |
|
| 3169 |
To provide useful 'non-buffered' network IO for clients and servers, |
| 3170 |
each connection is given its own private 'input buffer' in which the |
| 3171 |
results of the most recent read and parsing are kept. A buffer size |
| 3172 |
of 512 bytes is used so as to hold 1 full message, although, this |
| 3173 |
will usually hold several commands. The private buffer is parsed |
| 3174 |
after every read operation for valid messages. When dealing with |
| 3175 |
multiple messages from one client in the buffer, care should be taken |
| 3176 |
in case one happens to cause the client to be 'removed'. |
| 3177 |
|
| 3178 |
8.3 Message delivery |
| 3179 |
|
| 3180 |
It is common to find network links saturated or hosts to which you |
| 3181 |
are sending data unable to send data. Although Unix typically |
| 3182 |
handles this through the TCP window and internal buffers, the server |
| 3183 |
often has large amounts of data to send (especially when a new |
| 3184 |
server-server link forms) and the small buffers provided in the |
| 3185 |
|
| 3186 |
|
| 3187 |
|
| 3188 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 57] |
| 3189 |
|
| 3190 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3191 |
|
| 3192 |
|
| 3193 |
kernel are not enough for the outgoing queue. To alleviate this |
| 3194 |
problem, a "send queue" is used as a FIFO queue for data to be sent. |
| 3195 |
A typical "send queue" may grow to 200 Kbytes on a large IRC network |
| 3196 |
with a slow network connection when a new server connects. |
| 3197 |
|
| 3198 |
When polling its connections, a server will first read and parse all |
| 3199 |
incoming data, queuing any data to be sent out. When all available |
| 3200 |
input is processed, the queued data is sent. This reduces the number |
| 3201 |
of write() system calls and helps TCP make bigger packets. |
| 3202 |
|
| 3203 |
8.4 Connection 'Liveness' |
| 3204 |
|
| 3205 |
To detect when a connection has died or become unresponsive, the |
| 3206 |
server must ping each of its connections that it doesn't get a |
| 3207 |
response from in a given amount of time. |
| 3208 |
|
| 3209 |
If a connection doesn't respond in time, its connection is closed |
| 3210 |
using the appropriate procedures. A connection is also dropped if |
| 3211 |
its sendq grows beyond the maximum allowed, because it is better to |
| 3212 |
close a slow connection than have a server process block. |
| 3213 |
|
| 3214 |
8.5 Establishing a server to client connection |
| 3215 |
|
| 3216 |
Upon connecting to an IRC server, a client is sent the MOTD (if |
| 3217 |
present) as well as the current user/server count (as per the LUSER |
| 3218 |
command). The server is also required to give an unambiguous message |
| 3219 |
to the client which states its name and version as well as any other |
| 3220 |
introductory messages which may be deemed appropriate. |
| 3221 |
|
| 3222 |
After dealing with this, the server must then send out the new user's |
| 3223 |
nickname and other information as supplied by itself (USER command) |
| 3224 |
and as the server could discover (from DNS/authentication servers). |
| 3225 |
The server must send this information out with NICK first followed by |
| 3226 |
USER. |
| 3227 |
|
| 3228 |
8.6 Establishing a server-server connection. |
| 3229 |
|
| 3230 |
The process of establishing of a server-to-server connection is |
| 3231 |
fraught with danger since there are many possible areas where |
| 3232 |
problems can occur - the least of which are race conditions. |
| 3233 |
|
| 3234 |
After a server has received a connection following by a PASS/SERVER |
| 3235 |
pair which were recognised as being valid, the server should then |
| 3236 |
reply with its own PASS/SERVER information for that connection as |
| 3237 |
well as all of the other state information it knows about as |
| 3238 |
described below. |
| 3239 |
|
| 3240 |
When the initiating server receives a PASS/SERVER pair, it too then |
| 3241 |
|
| 3242 |
|
| 3243 |
|
| 3244 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 58] |
| 3245 |
|
| 3246 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3247 |
|
| 3248 |
|
| 3249 |
checks that the server responding is authenticated properly before |
| 3250 |
accepting the connection to be that server. |
| 3251 |
|
| 3252 |
8.6.1 Server exchange of state information when connecting |
| 3253 |
|
| 3254 |
The order of state information being exchanged between servers is |
| 3255 |
essential. The required order is as follows: |
| 3256 |
|
| 3257 |
* all known other servers; |
| 3258 |
|
| 3259 |
* all known user information; |
| 3260 |
|
| 3261 |
* all known channel information. |
| 3262 |
|
| 3263 |
Information regarding servers is sent via extra SERVER messages, user |
| 3264 |
information with NICK/USER/MODE/JOIN messages and channels with MODE |
| 3265 |
messages. |
| 3266 |
|
| 3267 |
NOTE: channel topics are *NOT* exchanged here because the TOPIC |
| 3268 |
command overwrites any old topic information, so at best, the two |
| 3269 |
sides of the connection would exchange topics. |
| 3270 |
|
| 3271 |
By passing the state information about servers first, any collisions |
| 3272 |
with servers that already exist occur before nickname collisions due |
| 3273 |
to a second server introducing a particular nickname. Due to the IRC |
| 3274 |
network only being able to exist as an acyclic graph, it may be |
| 3275 |
possible that the network has already reconnected in another |
| 3276 |
location, the place where the collision occurs indicating where the |
| 3277 |
net needs to split. |
| 3278 |
|
| 3279 |
8.7 Terminating server-client connections |
| 3280 |
|
| 3281 |
When a client connection closes, a QUIT message is generated on |
| 3282 |
behalf of the client by the server to which the client connected. No |
| 3283 |
other message is to be generated or used. |
| 3284 |
|
| 3285 |
8.8 Terminating server-server connections |
| 3286 |
|
| 3287 |
If a server-server connection is closed, either via a remotely |
| 3288 |
generated SQUIT or 'natural' causes, the rest of the connected IRC |
| 3289 |
network must have its information updated with by the server which |
| 3290 |
detected the closure. The server then sends a list of SQUITs (one |
| 3291 |
for each server behind that connection) and a list of QUITs (again, |
| 3292 |
one for each client behind that connection). |
| 3293 |
|
| 3294 |
|
| 3295 |
|
| 3296 |
|
| 3297 |
|
| 3298 |
|
| 3299 |
|
| 3300 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 59] |
| 3301 |
|
| 3302 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3303 |
|
| 3304 |
|
| 3305 |
8.9 Tracking nickname changes |
| 3306 |
|
| 3307 |
All IRC servers are required to keep a history of recent nickname |
| 3308 |
changes. This is required to allow the server to have a chance of |
| 3309 |
keeping in touch of things when nick-change race conditions occur |
| 3310 |
with commands which manipulate them. Commands which must trace nick |
| 3311 |
changes are: |
| 3312 |
|
| 3313 |
* KILL (the nick being killed) |
| 3314 |
|
| 3315 |
* MODE (+/- o,v) |
| 3316 |
|
| 3317 |
* KICK (the nick being kicked) |
| 3318 |
|
| 3319 |
No other commands are to have nick changes checked for. |
| 3320 |
|
| 3321 |
In the above cases, the server is required to first check for the |
| 3322 |
existence of the nickname, then check its history to see who that |
| 3323 |
nick currently belongs to (if anyone!). This reduces the chances of |
| 3324 |
race conditions but they can still occur with the server ending up |
| 3325 |
affecting the wrong client. When performing a change trace for an |
| 3326 |
above command it is recommended that a time range be given and |
| 3327 |
entries which are too old ignored. |
| 3328 |
|
| 3329 |
For a reasonable history, a server should be able to keep previous |
| 3330 |
nickname for every client it knows about if they all decided to |
| 3331 |
change. This size is limited by other factors (such as memory, etc). |
| 3332 |
|
| 3333 |
8.10 Flood control of clients |
| 3334 |
|
| 3335 |
With a large network of interconnected IRC servers, it is quite easy |
| 3336 |
for any single client attached to the network to supply a continuous |
| 3337 |
stream of messages that result in not only flooding the network, but |
| 3338 |
also degrading the level of service provided to others. Rather than |
| 3339 |
require every 'victim' to be provide their own protection, flood |
| 3340 |
protection was written into the server and is applied to all clients |
| 3341 |
except services. The current algorithm is as follows: |
| 3342 |
|
| 3343 |
* check to see if client's `message timer' is less than |
| 3344 |
current time (set to be equal if it is); |
| 3345 |
|
| 3346 |
* read any data present from the client; |
| 3347 |
|
| 3348 |
* while the timer is less than ten seconds ahead of the current |
| 3349 |
time, parse any present messages and penalize the client by |
| 3350 |
2 seconds for each message; |
| 3351 |
|
| 3352 |
which in essence means that the client may send 1 message every 2 |
| 3353 |
|
| 3354 |
|
| 3355 |
|
| 3356 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 60] |
| 3357 |
|
| 3358 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3359 |
|
| 3360 |
|
| 3361 |
seconds without being adversely affected. |
| 3362 |
|
| 3363 |
8.11 Non-blocking lookups |
| 3364 |
|
| 3365 |
In a real-time environment, it is essential that a server process do |
| 3366 |
as little waiting as possible so that all the clients are serviced |
| 3367 |
fairly. Obviously this requires non-blocking IO on all network |
| 3368 |
read/write operations. For normal server connections, this was not |
| 3369 |
difficult, but there are other support operations that may cause the |
| 3370 |
server to block (such as disk reads). Where possible, such activity |
| 3371 |
should be performed with a short timeout. |
| 3372 |
|
| 3373 |
8.11.1 Hostname (DNS) lookups |
| 3374 |
|
| 3375 |
Using the standard resolver libraries from Berkeley and others has |
| 3376 |
meant large delays in some cases where replies have timed out. To |
| 3377 |
avoid this, a separate set of DNS routines were written which were |
| 3378 |
setup for non-blocking IO operations and then polled from within the |
| 3379 |
main server IO loop. |
| 3380 |
|
| 3381 |
8.11.2 Username (Ident) lookups |
| 3382 |
|
| 3383 |
Although there are numerous ident libraries for use and inclusion |
| 3384 |
into other programs, these caused problems since they operated in a |
| 3385 |
synchronous manner and resulted in frequent delays. Again the |
| 3386 |
solution was to write a set of routines which would cooperate with |
| 3387 |
the rest of the server and work using non-blocking IO. |
| 3388 |
|
| 3389 |
8.12 Configuration File |
| 3390 |
|
| 3391 |
To provide a flexible way of setting up and running the server, it is |
| 3392 |
recommended that a configuration file be used which contains |
| 3393 |
instructions to the server on the following: |
| 3394 |
|
| 3395 |
* which hosts to accept client connections from; |
| 3396 |
|
| 3397 |
* which hosts to allow to connect as servers; |
| 3398 |
|
| 3399 |
* which hosts to connect to (both actively and |
| 3400 |
passively); |
| 3401 |
|
| 3402 |
* information about where the server is (university, |
| 3403 |
city/state, company are examples of this); |
| 3404 |
|
| 3405 |
* who is responsible for the server and an email address |
| 3406 |
at which they can be contacted; |
| 3407 |
|
| 3408 |
* hostnames and passwords for clients which wish to be given |
| 3409 |
|
| 3410 |
|
| 3411 |
|
| 3412 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 61] |
| 3413 |
|
| 3414 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3415 |
|
| 3416 |
|
| 3417 |
access to restricted operator commands. |
| 3418 |
|
| 3419 |
In specifying hostnames, both domain names and use of the 'dot' |
| 3420 |
notation (127.0.0.1) should both be accepted. It must be possible to |
| 3421 |
specify the password to be used/accepted for all outgoing and |
| 3422 |
incoming connections (although the only outgoing connections are |
| 3423 |
those to other servers). |
| 3424 |
|
| 3425 |
The above list is the minimum requirement for any server which wishes |
| 3426 |
to make a connection with another server. Other items which may be |
| 3427 |
of use are: |
| 3428 |
|
| 3429 |
* specifying which servers other server may introduce; |
| 3430 |
|
| 3431 |
* how deep a server branch is allowed to become; |
| 3432 |
|
| 3433 |
* hours during which clients may connect. |
| 3434 |
|
| 3435 |
8.12.1 Allowing clients to connect |
| 3436 |
|
| 3437 |
A server should use some sort of 'access control list' (either in the |
| 3438 |
configuration file or elsewhere) that is read at startup and used to |
| 3439 |
decide what hosts clients may use to connect to it. |
| 3440 |
|
| 3441 |
Both 'deny' and 'allow' should be implemented to provide the required |
| 3442 |
flexibility for host access control. |
| 3443 |
|
| 3444 |
8.12.2 Operators |
| 3445 |
|
| 3446 |
The granting of operator privileges to a disruptive person can have |
| 3447 |
dire consequences for the well-being of the IRC net in general due to |
| 3448 |
the powers given to them. Thus, the acquisition of such powers |
| 3449 |
should not be very easy. The current setup requires two 'passwords' |
| 3450 |
to be used although one of them is usually easy guessed. Storage of |
| 3451 |
oper passwords in configuration files is preferable to hard coding |
| 3452 |
them in and should be stored in a crypted format (ie using crypt(3) |
| 3453 |
from Unix) to prevent easy theft. |
| 3454 |
|
| 3455 |
8.12.3 Allowing servers to connect |
| 3456 |
|
| 3457 |
The interconnection of server is not a trivial matter: a bad |
| 3458 |
connection can have a large impact on the usefulness of IRC. Thus, |
| 3459 |
each server should have a list of servers to which it may connect and |
| 3460 |
which servers may connect to it. Under no circumstances should a |
| 3461 |
server allow an arbitrary host to connect as a server. In addition |
| 3462 |
to which servers may and may not connect, the configuration file |
| 3463 |
should also store the password and other characteristics of that |
| 3464 |
link. |
| 3465 |
|
| 3466 |
|
| 3467 |
|
| 3468 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 62] |
| 3469 |
|
| 3470 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3471 |
|
| 3472 |
|
| 3473 |
8.12.4 Administrivia |
| 3474 |
|
| 3475 |
To provide accurate and valid replies to the ADMIN command (see |
| 3476 |
section 4.3.7), the server should find the relevant details in the |
| 3477 |
configuration. |
| 3478 |
|
| 3479 |
8.13 Channel membership |
| 3480 |
|
| 3481 |
The current server allows any registered local user to join upto 10 |
| 3482 |
different channels. There is no limit imposed on non-local users so |
| 3483 |
that the server remains (reasonably) consistant with all others on a |
| 3484 |
channel membership basis |
| 3485 |
|
| 3486 |
9. Current problems |
| 3487 |
|
| 3488 |
There are a number of recognized problems with this protocol, all of |
| 3489 |
which hope to be solved sometime in the near future during its |
| 3490 |
rewrite. Currently, work is underway to find working solutions to |
| 3491 |
these problems. |
| 3492 |
|
| 3493 |
9.1 Scalability |
| 3494 |
|
| 3495 |
It is widely recognized that this protocol does not scale |
| 3496 |
sufficiently well when used in a large arena. The main problem comes |
| 3497 |
from the requirement that all servers know about all other servers |
| 3498 |
and users and that information regarding them be updated as soon as |
| 3499 |
it changes. It is also desirable to keep the number of servers low |
| 3500 |
so that the path length between any two points is kept minimal and |
| 3501 |
the spanning tree as strongly branched as possible. |
| 3502 |
|
| 3503 |
9.2 Labels |
| 3504 |
|
| 3505 |
The current IRC protocol has 3 types of labels: the nickname, the |
| 3506 |
channel name and the server name. Each of the three types has its |
| 3507 |
own domain and no duplicates are allowed inside that domain. |
| 3508 |
Currently, it is possible for users to pick the label for any of the |
| 3509 |
three, resulting in collisions. It is widely recognized that this |
| 3510 |
needs reworking, with a plan for unique names for channels and nicks |
| 3511 |
that don't collide being desirable as well as a solution allowing a |
| 3512 |
cyclic tree. |
| 3513 |
|
| 3514 |
9.2.1 Nicknames |
| 3515 |
|
| 3516 |
The idea of the nickname on IRC is very convenient for users to use |
| 3517 |
when talking to each other outside of a channel, but there is only a |
| 3518 |
finite nickname space and being what they are, its not uncommon for |
| 3519 |
several people to want to use the same nick. If a nickname is chosen |
| 3520 |
by two people using this protocol, either one will not succeed or |
| 3521 |
|
| 3522 |
|
| 3523 |
|
| 3524 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 63] |
| 3525 |
|
| 3526 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3527 |
|
| 3528 |
|
| 3529 |
both will removed by use of KILL (4.6.1). |
| 3530 |
|
| 3531 |
9.2.2 Channels |
| 3532 |
|
| 3533 |
The current channel layout requires that all servers know about all |
| 3534 |
channels, their inhabitants and properties. Besides not scaling |
| 3535 |
well, the issue of privacy is also a concern. A collision of |
| 3536 |
channels is treated as an inclusive event (both people who create the |
| 3537 |
new channel are considered to be members of it) rather than an |
| 3538 |
exclusive one such as used to solve nickname collisions. |
| 3539 |
|
| 3540 |
9.2.3 Servers |
| 3541 |
|
| 3542 |
Although the number of servers is usually small relative to the |
| 3543 |
number of users and channels, they two currently required to be known |
| 3544 |
globally, either each one separately or hidden behind a mask. |
| 3545 |
|
| 3546 |
9.3 Algorithms |
| 3547 |
|
| 3548 |
In some places within the server code, it has not been possible to |
| 3549 |
avoid N^2 algorithms such as checking the channel list of a set |
| 3550 |
of clients. |
| 3551 |
|
| 3552 |
In current server versions, there are no database consistency checks, |
| 3553 |
each server assumes that a neighbouring server is correct. This |
| 3554 |
opens the door to large problems if a connecting server is buggy or |
| 3555 |
otherwise tries to introduce contradictions to the existing net. |
| 3556 |
|
| 3557 |
Currently, because of the lack of unique internal and global labels, |
| 3558 |
there are a multitude of race conditions that exist. These race |
| 3559 |
conditions generally arise from the problem of it taking time for |
| 3560 |
messages to traverse and effect the IRC network. Even by changing to |
| 3561 |
unique labels, there are problems with channel-related commands being |
| 3562 |
disrupted. |
| 3563 |
|
| 3564 |
10. Current support and availability |
| 3565 |
|
| 3566 |
Mailing lists for IRC related discussion: |
| 3567 |
Future protocol: ircd-three-request@eff.org |
| 3568 |
General discussion: operlist-request@eff.org |
| 3569 |
|
| 3570 |
Software implemenations |
| 3571 |
cs.bu.edu:/irc |
| 3572 |
nic.funet.fi:/pub/irc |
| 3573 |
coombs.anu.edu.au:/pub/irc |
| 3574 |
|
| 3575 |
Newsgroup: alt.irc |
| 3576 |
|
| 3577 |
|
| 3578 |
|
| 3579 |
|
| 3580 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 64] |
| 3581 |
|
| 3582 |
RFC 1459 Internet Relay Chat Protocol May 1993 |
| 3583 |
|
| 3584 |
|
| 3585 |
Security Considerations |
| 3586 |
|
| 3587 |
Security issues are discussed in sections 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.3, 5.5, and |
| 3588 |
7. |
| 3589 |
|
| 3590 |
12. Authors' Addresses |
| 3591 |
|
| 3592 |
Jarkko Oikarinen |
| 3593 |
Tuirantie 17 as 9 |
| 3594 |
90500 OULU |
| 3595 |
FINLAND |
| 3596 |
|
| 3597 |
Email: jto@tolsun.oulu.fi |
| 3598 |
|
| 3599 |
|
| 3600 |
Darren Reed |
| 3601 |
4 Pateman Street |
| 3602 |
Watsonia, Victoria 3087 |
| 3603 |
Australia |
| 3604 |
|
| 3605 |
Email: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au |
| 3606 |
|
| 3607 |
|
| 3608 |
|
| 3609 |
|
| 3610 |
|
| 3611 |
|
| 3612 |
|
| 3613 |
|
| 3614 |
|
| 3615 |
|
| 3616 |
|
| 3617 |
|
| 3618 |
|
| 3619 |
|
| 3620 |
|
| 3621 |
|
| 3622 |
|
| 3623 |
|
| 3624 |
|
| 3625 |
|
| 3626 |
|
| 3627 |
|
| 3628 |
|
| 3629 |
|
| 3630 |
|
| 3631 |
|
| 3632 |
|
| 3633 |
|
| 3634 |
|
| 3635 |
|
| 3636 |
Oikarinen & Reed [Page 65] |
| 3637 |
|