| 1 |
root |
1.14 |
=head1 LIBECB - e-C-Builtins |
| 2 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 3 |
root |
1.14 |
=head2 ABOUT LIBECB |
| 4 |
|
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
Libecb is currently a simple header file that doesn't require any |
| 6 |
|
|
configuration to use or include in your project. |
| 7 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
sf-exg |
1.16 |
It's part of the e-suite of libraries, other members of which include |
| 9 |
root |
1.14 |
libev and libeio. |
| 10 |
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
Its homepage can be found here: |
| 12 |
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/libecb |
| 14 |
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
It mainly provides a number of wrappers around GCC built-ins, together |
| 16 |
|
|
with replacement functions for other compilers. In addition to this, |
| 17 |
sf-exg |
1.16 |
it provides a number of other lowlevel C utilities, such as endianness |
| 18 |
root |
1.14 |
detection, byte swapping or bit rotations. |
| 19 |
|
|
|
| 20 |
root |
1.24 |
Or in other words, things that should be built into any standard C system, |
| 21 |
|
|
but aren't, implemented as efficient as possible with GCC, and still |
| 22 |
|
|
correct with other compilers. |
| 23 |
root |
1.17 |
|
| 24 |
root |
1.14 |
More might come. |
| 25 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 26 |
|
|
=head2 ABOUT THE HEADER |
| 27 |
|
|
|
| 28 |
root |
1.14 |
At the moment, all you have to do is copy F<ecb.h> somewhere where your |
| 29 |
|
|
compiler can find it and include it: |
| 30 |
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
|
#include <ecb.h> |
| 32 |
|
|
|
| 33 |
|
|
The header should work fine for both C and C++ compilation, and gives you |
| 34 |
|
|
all of F<inttypes.h> in addition to the ECB symbols. |
| 35 |
|
|
|
| 36 |
sf-exg |
1.16 |
There are currently no object files to link to - future versions might |
| 37 |
root |
1.14 |
come with an (optional) object code library to link against, to reduce |
| 38 |
|
|
code size or gain access to additional features. |
| 39 |
|
|
|
| 40 |
|
|
It also currently includes everything from F<inttypes.h>. |
| 41 |
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
|
=head2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL / CONVENTIONS |
| 43 |
|
|
|
| 44 |
|
|
This manual mainly describes each (public) function available after |
| 45 |
|
|
including the F<ecb.h> header. The header might define other symbols than |
| 46 |
|
|
these, but these are not part of the public API, and not supported in any |
| 47 |
|
|
way. |
| 48 |
|
|
|
| 49 |
|
|
When the manual mentions a "function" then this could be defined either as |
| 50 |
|
|
as inline function, a macro, or an external symbol. |
| 51 |
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
|
When functions use a concrete standard type, such as C<int> or |
| 53 |
|
|
C<uint32_t>, then the corresponding function works only with that type. If |
| 54 |
|
|
only a generic name is used (C<expr>, C<cond>, C<value> and so on), then |
| 55 |
|
|
the corresponding function relies on C to implement the correct types, and |
| 56 |
|
|
is usually implemented as a macro. Specifically, a "bool" in this manual |
| 57 |
|
|
refers to any kind of boolean value, not a specific type. |
| 58 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 59 |
root |
1.40 |
=head2 TYPES / TYPE SUPPORT |
| 60 |
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
|
ecb.h makes sure that the following types are defined (in the expected way): |
| 62 |
|
|
|
| 63 |
root |
1.42 |
int8_t uint8_t int16_t uint16_t |
| 64 |
|
|
int32_t uint32_t int64_t uint64_t |
| 65 |
root |
1.49 |
intptr_t uintptr_t |
| 66 |
root |
1.40 |
|
| 67 |
|
|
The macro C<ECB_PTRSIZE> is defined to the size of a pointer on this |
| 68 |
root |
1.45 |
platform (currently C<4> or C<8>) and can be used in preprocessor |
| 69 |
|
|
expressions. |
| 70 |
root |
1.40 |
|
| 71 |
root |
1.49 |
For C<ptrdiff_t> and C<size_t> use C<stddef.h>. |
| 72 |
|
|
|
| 73 |
root |
1.43 |
=head2 LANGUAGE/COMPILER VERSIONS |
| 74 |
|
|
|
| 75 |
sf-exg |
1.46 |
All the following symbols expand to an expression that can be tested in |
| 76 |
root |
1.44 |
preprocessor instructions as well as treated as a boolean (use C<!!> to |
| 77 |
|
|
ensure it's either C<0> or C<1> if you need that). |
| 78 |
|
|
|
| 79 |
root |
1.43 |
=over 4 |
| 80 |
|
|
|
| 81 |
root |
1.44 |
=item ECB_C |
| 82 |
|
|
|
| 83 |
|
|
True if the implementation defines the C<__STDC__> macro to a true value, |
| 84 |
root |
1.55 |
while not claiming to be C++. |
| 85 |
root |
1.44 |
|
| 86 |
root |
1.43 |
=item ECB_C99 |
| 87 |
|
|
|
| 88 |
root |
1.47 |
True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C99 (ISO/IEC |
| 89 |
root |
1.55 |
9899:1999) or any later version, while not claiming to be C++. |
| 90 |
root |
1.47 |
|
| 91 |
|
|
Note that later versions (ECB_C11) remove core features again (for |
| 92 |
|
|
example, variable length arrays). |
| 93 |
root |
1.43 |
|
| 94 |
|
|
=item ECB_C11 |
| 95 |
|
|
|
| 96 |
root |
1.47 |
True if the implementation claims to be compliant to C11 (ISO/IEC |
| 97 |
root |
1.55 |
9899:2011) or any later version, while not claiming to be C++. |
| 98 |
root |
1.44 |
|
| 99 |
|
|
=item ECB_CPP |
| 100 |
|
|
|
| 101 |
|
|
True if the implementation defines the C<__cplusplus__> macro to a true |
| 102 |
|
|
value, which is typically true for C++ compilers. |
| 103 |
|
|
|
| 104 |
|
|
=item ECB_CPP11 |
| 105 |
|
|
|
| 106 |
|
|
True if the implementation claims to be compliant to ISO/IEC 14882:2011 |
| 107 |
sf-exg |
1.46 |
(C++11) or any later version. |
| 108 |
root |
1.43 |
|
| 109 |
|
|
=item ECB_GCC_VERSION(major,minor) |
| 110 |
|
|
|
| 111 |
|
|
Expands to a true value (suitable for testing in by the preprocessor) |
| 112 |
sf-exg |
1.46 |
if the compiler used is GNU C and the version is the given version, or |
| 113 |
root |
1.43 |
higher. |
| 114 |
|
|
|
| 115 |
|
|
This macro tries to return false on compilers that claim to be GCC |
| 116 |
|
|
compatible but aren't. |
| 117 |
|
|
|
| 118 |
root |
1.50 |
=item ECB_EXTERN_C |
| 119 |
|
|
|
| 120 |
|
|
Expands to C<extern "C"> in C++, and a simple C<extern> in C. |
| 121 |
|
|
|
| 122 |
|
|
This can be used to declare a single external C function: |
| 123 |
|
|
|
| 124 |
|
|
ECB_EXTERN_C int printf (const char *format, ...); |
| 125 |
|
|
|
| 126 |
|
|
=item ECB_EXTERN_C_BEG / ECB_EXTERN_C_END |
| 127 |
|
|
|
| 128 |
|
|
These two macros can be used to wrap multiple C<extern "C"> definitions - |
| 129 |
|
|
they expand to nothing in C. |
| 130 |
|
|
|
| 131 |
|
|
They are most useful in header files: |
| 132 |
|
|
|
| 133 |
|
|
ECB_EXTERN_C_BEG |
| 134 |
|
|
|
| 135 |
|
|
int mycfun1 (int x); |
| 136 |
|
|
int mycfun2 (int x); |
| 137 |
|
|
|
| 138 |
|
|
ECB_EXTERN_C_END |
| 139 |
|
|
|
| 140 |
|
|
=item ECB_STDFP |
| 141 |
|
|
|
| 142 |
|
|
If this evaluates to a true value (suitable for testing in by the |
| 143 |
|
|
preprocessor), then C<float> and C<double> use IEEE 754 single/binary32 |
| 144 |
|
|
and double/binary64 representations internally I<and> the endianness of |
| 145 |
|
|
both types match the endianness of C<uint32_t> and C<uint64_t>. |
| 146 |
|
|
|
| 147 |
|
|
This means you can just copy the bits of a C<float> (or C<double>) to an |
| 148 |
|
|
C<uint32_t> (or C<uint64_t>) and get the raw IEEE 754 bit representation |
| 149 |
|
|
without having to think about format or endianness. |
| 150 |
|
|
|
| 151 |
|
|
This is true for basically all modern platforms, although F<ecb.h> might |
| 152 |
|
|
not be able to deduce this correctly everywhere and might err on the safe |
| 153 |
|
|
side. |
| 154 |
|
|
|
| 155 |
root |
1.54 |
=item ECB_AMD64, ECB_AMD64_X32 |
| 156 |
|
|
|
| 157 |
|
|
These two macros are defined to C<1> on the x86_64/amd64 ABI and the X32 |
| 158 |
|
|
ABI, respectively, and undefined elsewhere. |
| 159 |
|
|
|
| 160 |
|
|
The designers of the new X32 ABI for some inexplicable reason decided to |
| 161 |
|
|
make it look exactly like amd64, even though it's completely incompatible |
| 162 |
|
|
to that ABI, breaking about every piece of software that assumed that |
| 163 |
|
|
C<__x86_64> stands for, well, the x86-64 ABI, making these macros |
| 164 |
|
|
necessary. |
| 165 |
|
|
|
| 166 |
root |
1.43 |
=back |
| 167 |
|
|
|
| 168 |
root |
1.1 |
=head2 GCC ATTRIBUTES |
| 169 |
|
|
|
| 170 |
root |
1.20 |
A major part of libecb deals with GCC attributes. These are additional |
| 171 |
sf-exg |
1.26 |
attributes that you can assign to functions, variables and sometimes even |
| 172 |
root |
1.20 |
types - much like C<const> or C<volatile> in C. |
| 173 |
|
|
|
| 174 |
|
|
While GCC allows declarations to show up in many surprising places, |
| 175 |
sf-exg |
1.26 |
but not in many expected places, the safest way is to put attribute |
| 176 |
root |
1.20 |
declarations before the whole declaration: |
| 177 |
|
|
|
| 178 |
|
|
ecb_const int mysqrt (int a); |
| 179 |
|
|
ecb_unused int i; |
| 180 |
|
|
|
| 181 |
|
|
For variables, it is often nicer to put the attribute after the name, and |
| 182 |
|
|
avoid multiple declarations using commas: |
| 183 |
|
|
|
| 184 |
|
|
int i ecb_unused; |
| 185 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 186 |
root |
1.1 |
=over 4 |
| 187 |
|
|
|
| 188 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_attribute ((attrs...)) |
| 189 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 190 |
root |
1.15 |
A simple wrapper that expands to C<__attribute__((attrs))> on GCC, and to |
| 191 |
|
|
nothing on other compilers, so the effect is that only GCC sees these. |
| 192 |
|
|
|
| 193 |
|
|
Example: use the C<deprecated> attribute on a function. |
| 194 |
|
|
|
| 195 |
|
|
ecb_attribute((__deprecated__)) void |
| 196 |
|
|
do_not_use_me_anymore (void); |
| 197 |
root |
1.2 |
|
| 198 |
root |
1.3 |
=item ecb_unused |
| 199 |
|
|
|
| 200 |
|
|
Marks a function or a variable as "unused", which simply suppresses a |
| 201 |
|
|
warning by GCC when it detects it as unused. This is useful when you e.g. |
| 202 |
|
|
declare a variable but do not always use it: |
| 203 |
|
|
|
| 204 |
root |
1.15 |
{ |
| 205 |
|
|
int var ecb_unused; |
| 206 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 207 |
root |
1.15 |
#ifdef SOMECONDITION |
| 208 |
|
|
var = ...; |
| 209 |
|
|
return var; |
| 210 |
|
|
#else |
| 211 |
|
|
return 0; |
| 212 |
|
|
#endif |
| 213 |
|
|
} |
| 214 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 215 |
root |
1.31 |
=item ecb_inline |
| 216 |
root |
1.29 |
|
| 217 |
|
|
This is not actually an attribute, but you use it like one. It expands |
| 218 |
|
|
either to C<static inline> or to just C<static>, if inline isn't |
| 219 |
|
|
supported. It should be used to declare functions that should be inlined, |
| 220 |
|
|
for code size or speed reasons. |
| 221 |
|
|
|
| 222 |
|
|
Example: inline this function, it surely will reduce codesize. |
| 223 |
|
|
|
| 224 |
root |
1.31 |
ecb_inline int |
| 225 |
root |
1.29 |
negmul (int a, int b) |
| 226 |
|
|
{ |
| 227 |
|
|
return - (a * b); |
| 228 |
|
|
} |
| 229 |
|
|
|
| 230 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_noinline |
| 231 |
|
|
|
| 232 |
root |
1.9 |
Prevent a function from being inlined - it might be optimised away, but |
| 233 |
root |
1.3 |
not inlined into other functions. This is useful if you know your function |
| 234 |
|
|
is rarely called and large enough for inlining not to be helpful. |
| 235 |
|
|
|
| 236 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_noreturn |
| 237 |
|
|
|
| 238 |
root |
1.17 |
Marks a function as "not returning, ever". Some typical functions that |
| 239 |
|
|
don't return are C<exit> or C<abort> (which really works hard to not |
| 240 |
|
|
return), and now you can make your own: |
| 241 |
|
|
|
| 242 |
|
|
ecb_noreturn void |
| 243 |
|
|
my_abort (const char *errline) |
| 244 |
|
|
{ |
| 245 |
|
|
puts (errline); |
| 246 |
|
|
abort (); |
| 247 |
|
|
} |
| 248 |
|
|
|
| 249 |
sf-exg |
1.19 |
In this case, the compiler would probably be smart enough to deduce it on |
| 250 |
|
|
its own, so this is mainly useful for declarations. |
| 251 |
root |
1.17 |
|
| 252 |
root |
1.53 |
=item ecb_restrict |
| 253 |
|
|
|
| 254 |
|
|
Expands to the C<restrict> keyword or equivalent on compilers that support |
| 255 |
|
|
them, and to nothing on others. Must be specified on a pointer type or |
| 256 |
|
|
an array index to indicate that the memory doesn't alias with any other |
| 257 |
|
|
restricted pointer in the same scope. |
| 258 |
|
|
|
| 259 |
|
|
Example: multiply a vector, and allow the compiler to parallelise the |
| 260 |
|
|
loop, because it knows it doesn't overwrite input values. |
| 261 |
|
|
|
| 262 |
|
|
void |
| 263 |
|
|
multiply (float *ecb_restrict src, |
| 264 |
|
|
float *ecb_restrict dst, |
| 265 |
|
|
int len, float factor) |
| 266 |
|
|
{ |
| 267 |
|
|
int i; |
| 268 |
|
|
|
| 269 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) |
| 270 |
|
|
dst [i] = src [i] * factor; |
| 271 |
|
|
} |
| 272 |
|
|
|
| 273 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_const |
| 274 |
|
|
|
| 275 |
sf-exg |
1.19 |
Declares that the function only depends on the values of its arguments, |
| 276 |
root |
1.17 |
much like a mathematical function. It specifically does not read or write |
| 277 |
|
|
any memory any arguments might point to, global variables, or call any |
| 278 |
|
|
non-const functions. It also must not have any side effects. |
| 279 |
|
|
|
| 280 |
|
|
Such a function can be optimised much more aggressively by the compiler - |
| 281 |
|
|
for example, multiple calls with the same arguments can be optimised into |
| 282 |
|
|
a single call, which wouldn't be possible if the compiler would have to |
| 283 |
|
|
expect any side effects. |
| 284 |
|
|
|
| 285 |
|
|
It is best suited for functions in the sense of mathematical functions, |
| 286 |
sf-exg |
1.19 |
such as a function returning the square root of its input argument. |
| 287 |
root |
1.17 |
|
| 288 |
|
|
Not suited would be a function that calculates the hash of some memory |
| 289 |
|
|
area you pass in, prints some messages or looks at a global variable to |
| 290 |
|
|
decide on rounding. |
| 291 |
|
|
|
| 292 |
|
|
See C<ecb_pure> for a slightly less restrictive class of functions. |
| 293 |
|
|
|
| 294 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_pure |
| 295 |
|
|
|
| 296 |
root |
1.17 |
Similar to C<ecb_const>, declares a function that has no side |
| 297 |
|
|
effects. Unlike C<ecb_const>, the function is allowed to examine global |
| 298 |
|
|
variables and any other memory areas (such as the ones passed to it via |
| 299 |
|
|
pointers). |
| 300 |
|
|
|
| 301 |
|
|
While these functions cannot be optimised as aggressively as C<ecb_const> |
| 302 |
|
|
functions, they can still be optimised away in many occasions, and the |
| 303 |
|
|
compiler has more freedom in moving calls to them around. |
| 304 |
|
|
|
| 305 |
|
|
Typical examples for such functions would be C<strlen> or C<memcmp>. A |
| 306 |
|
|
function that calculates the MD5 sum of some input and updates some MD5 |
| 307 |
|
|
state passed as argument would I<NOT> be pure, however, as it would modify |
| 308 |
|
|
some memory area that is not the return value. |
| 309 |
|
|
|
| 310 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_hot |
| 311 |
|
|
|
| 312 |
root |
1.17 |
This declares a function as "hot" with regards to the cache - the function |
| 313 |
|
|
is used so often, that it is very beneficial to keep it in the cache if |
| 314 |
|
|
possible. |
| 315 |
|
|
|
| 316 |
|
|
The compiler reacts by trying to place hot functions near to each other in |
| 317 |
|
|
memory. |
| 318 |
|
|
|
| 319 |
sf-exg |
1.19 |
Whether a function is hot or not often depends on the whole program, |
| 320 |
root |
1.17 |
and less on the function itself. C<ecb_cold> is likely more useful in |
| 321 |
|
|
practise. |
| 322 |
|
|
|
| 323 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_cold |
| 324 |
|
|
|
| 325 |
root |
1.17 |
The opposite of C<ecb_hot> - declares a function as "cold" with regards to |
| 326 |
|
|
the cache, or in other words, this function is not called often, or not at |
| 327 |
|
|
speed-critical times, and keeping it in the cache might be a waste of said |
| 328 |
|
|
cache. |
| 329 |
|
|
|
| 330 |
|
|
In addition to placing cold functions together (or at least away from hot |
| 331 |
|
|
functions), this knowledge can be used in other ways, for example, the |
| 332 |
|
|
function will be optimised for size, as opposed to speed, and codepaths |
| 333 |
|
|
leading to calls to those functions can automatically be marked as if |
| 334 |
root |
1.27 |
C<ecb_expect_false> had been used to reach them. |
| 335 |
root |
1.17 |
|
| 336 |
|
|
Good examples for such functions would be error reporting functions, or |
| 337 |
|
|
functions only called in exceptional or rare cases. |
| 338 |
|
|
|
| 339 |
root |
1.2 |
=item ecb_artificial |
| 340 |
|
|
|
| 341 |
root |
1.17 |
Declares the function as "artificial", in this case meaning that this |
| 342 |
root |
1.52 |
function is not really meant to be a function, but more like an accessor |
| 343 |
root |
1.17 |
- many methods in C++ classes are mere accessor functions, and having a |
| 344 |
|
|
crash reported in such a method, or single-stepping through them, is not |
| 345 |
|
|
usually so helpful, especially when it's inlined to just a few instructions. |
| 346 |
|
|
|
| 347 |
|
|
Marking them as artificial will instruct the debugger about just this, |
| 348 |
|
|
leading to happier debugging and thus happier lives. |
| 349 |
|
|
|
| 350 |
|
|
Example: in some kind of smart-pointer class, mark the pointer accessor as |
| 351 |
|
|
artificial, so that the whole class acts more like a pointer and less like |
| 352 |
|
|
some C++ abstraction monster. |
| 353 |
|
|
|
| 354 |
|
|
template<typename T> |
| 355 |
|
|
struct my_smart_ptr |
| 356 |
|
|
{ |
| 357 |
|
|
T *value; |
| 358 |
|
|
|
| 359 |
|
|
ecb_artificial |
| 360 |
|
|
operator T *() |
| 361 |
|
|
{ |
| 362 |
|
|
return value; |
| 363 |
|
|
} |
| 364 |
|
|
}; |
| 365 |
|
|
|
| 366 |
root |
1.2 |
=back |
| 367 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 368 |
|
|
=head2 OPTIMISATION HINTS |
| 369 |
|
|
|
| 370 |
|
|
=over 4 |
| 371 |
|
|
|
| 372 |
root |
1.14 |
=item bool ecb_is_constant(expr) |
| 373 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 374 |
root |
1.3 |
Returns true iff the expression can be deduced to be a compile-time |
| 375 |
|
|
constant, and false otherwise. |
| 376 |
|
|
|
| 377 |
|
|
For example, when you have a C<rndm16> function that returns a 16 bit |
| 378 |
|
|
random number, and you have a function that maps this to a range from |
| 379 |
root |
1.5 |
0..n-1, then you could use this inline function in a header file: |
| 380 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 381 |
|
|
ecb_inline uint32_t |
| 382 |
|
|
rndm (uint32_t n) |
| 383 |
|
|
{ |
| 384 |
root |
1.6 |
return (n * (uint32_t)rndm16 ()) >> 16; |
| 385 |
root |
1.3 |
} |
| 386 |
|
|
|
| 387 |
|
|
However, for powers of two, you could use a normal mask, but that is only |
| 388 |
|
|
worth it if, at compile time, you can detect this case. This is the case |
| 389 |
|
|
when the passed number is a constant and also a power of two (C<n & (n - |
| 390 |
|
|
1) == 0>): |
| 391 |
|
|
|
| 392 |
|
|
ecb_inline uint32_t |
| 393 |
|
|
rndm (uint32_t n) |
| 394 |
|
|
{ |
| 395 |
|
|
return is_constant (n) && !(n & (n - 1)) |
| 396 |
|
|
? rndm16 () & (num - 1) |
| 397 |
root |
1.6 |
: (n * (uint32_t)rndm16 ()) >> 16; |
| 398 |
root |
1.3 |
} |
| 399 |
|
|
|
| 400 |
root |
1.14 |
=item bool ecb_expect (expr, value) |
| 401 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 402 |
root |
1.7 |
Evaluates C<expr> and returns it. In addition, it tells the compiler that |
| 403 |
|
|
the C<expr> evaluates to C<value> a lot, which can be used for static |
| 404 |
|
|
branch optimisations. |
| 405 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 406 |
root |
1.27 |
Usually, you want to use the more intuitive C<ecb_expect_true> and |
| 407 |
|
|
C<ecb_expect_false> functions instead. |
| 408 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 409 |
root |
1.27 |
=item bool ecb_expect_true (cond) |
| 410 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 411 |
root |
1.27 |
=item bool ecb_expect_false (cond) |
| 412 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 413 |
root |
1.7 |
These two functions expect a expression that is true or false and return |
| 414 |
|
|
C<1> or C<0>, respectively, so when used in the condition of an C<if> or |
| 415 |
|
|
other conditional statement, it will not change the program: |
| 416 |
|
|
|
| 417 |
|
|
/* these two do the same thing */ |
| 418 |
|
|
if (some_condition) ...; |
| 419 |
root |
1.27 |
if (ecb_expect_true (some_condition)) ...; |
| 420 |
root |
1.7 |
|
| 421 |
root |
1.27 |
However, by using C<ecb_expect_true>, you tell the compiler that the |
| 422 |
|
|
condition is likely to be true (and for C<ecb_expect_false>, that it is |
| 423 |
|
|
unlikely to be true). |
| 424 |
root |
1.7 |
|
| 425 |
root |
1.9 |
For example, when you check for a null pointer and expect this to be a |
| 426 |
root |
1.27 |
rare, exceptional, case, then use C<ecb_expect_false>: |
| 427 |
root |
1.7 |
|
| 428 |
|
|
void my_free (void *ptr) |
| 429 |
|
|
{ |
| 430 |
root |
1.27 |
if (ecb_expect_false (ptr == 0)) |
| 431 |
root |
1.7 |
return; |
| 432 |
|
|
} |
| 433 |
|
|
|
| 434 |
|
|
Consequent use of these functions to mark away exceptional cases or to |
| 435 |
|
|
tell the compiler what the hot path through a function is can increase |
| 436 |
|
|
performance considerably. |
| 437 |
|
|
|
| 438 |
root |
1.27 |
You might know these functions under the name C<likely> and C<unlikely> |
| 439 |
|
|
- while these are common aliases, we find that the expect name is easier |
| 440 |
|
|
to understand when quickly skimming code. If you wish, you can use |
| 441 |
|
|
C<ecb_likely> instead of C<ecb_expect_true> and C<ecb_unlikely> instead of |
| 442 |
|
|
C<ecb_expect_false> - these are simply aliases. |
| 443 |
|
|
|
| 444 |
root |
1.7 |
A very good example is in a function that reserves more space for some |
| 445 |
|
|
memory block (for example, inside an implementation of a string stream) - |
| 446 |
root |
1.9 |
each time something is added, you have to check for a buffer overrun, but |
| 447 |
root |
1.7 |
you expect that most checks will turn out to be false: |
| 448 |
|
|
|
| 449 |
|
|
/* make sure we have "size" extra room in our buffer */ |
| 450 |
|
|
ecb_inline void |
| 451 |
|
|
reserve (int size) |
| 452 |
|
|
{ |
| 453 |
root |
1.27 |
if (ecb_expect_false (current + size > end)) |
| 454 |
root |
1.7 |
real_reserve_method (size); /* presumably noinline */ |
| 455 |
|
|
} |
| 456 |
|
|
|
| 457 |
root |
1.14 |
=item bool ecb_assume (cond) |
| 458 |
root |
1.7 |
|
| 459 |
|
|
Try to tell the compiler that some condition is true, even if it's not |
| 460 |
|
|
obvious. |
| 461 |
|
|
|
| 462 |
|
|
This can be used to teach the compiler about invariants or other |
| 463 |
|
|
conditions that might improve code generation, but which are impossible to |
| 464 |
|
|
deduce form the code itself. |
| 465 |
|
|
|
| 466 |
root |
1.27 |
For example, the example reservation function from the C<ecb_expect_false> |
| 467 |
root |
1.7 |
description could be written thus (only C<ecb_assume> was added): |
| 468 |
|
|
|
| 469 |
|
|
ecb_inline void |
| 470 |
|
|
reserve (int size) |
| 471 |
|
|
{ |
| 472 |
root |
1.27 |
if (ecb_expect_false (current + size > end)) |
| 473 |
root |
1.7 |
real_reserve_method (size); /* presumably noinline */ |
| 474 |
|
|
|
| 475 |
|
|
ecb_assume (current + size <= end); |
| 476 |
|
|
} |
| 477 |
|
|
|
| 478 |
|
|
If you then call this function twice, like this: |
| 479 |
|
|
|
| 480 |
|
|
reserve (10); |
| 481 |
|
|
reserve (1); |
| 482 |
|
|
|
| 483 |
|
|
Then the compiler I<might> be able to optimise out the second call |
| 484 |
|
|
completely, as it knows that C<< current + 1 > end >> is false and the |
| 485 |
|
|
call will never be executed. |
| 486 |
|
|
|
| 487 |
|
|
=item bool ecb_unreachable () |
| 488 |
|
|
|
| 489 |
|
|
This function does nothing itself, except tell the compiler that it will |
| 490 |
root |
1.9 |
never be executed. Apart from suppressing a warning in some cases, this |
| 491 |
root |
1.7 |
function can be used to implement C<ecb_assume> or similar functions. |
| 492 |
|
|
|
| 493 |
root |
1.14 |
=item bool ecb_prefetch (addr, rw, locality) |
| 494 |
root |
1.7 |
|
| 495 |
|
|
Tells the compiler to try to prefetch memory at the given C<addr>ess |
| 496 |
root |
1.10 |
for either reading (C<rw> = 0) or writing (C<rw> = 1). A C<locality> of |
| 497 |
root |
1.7 |
C<0> means that there will only be one access later, C<3> means that |
| 498 |
|
|
the data will likely be accessed very often, and values in between mean |
| 499 |
|
|
something... in between. The memory pointed to by the address does not |
| 500 |
|
|
need to be accessible (it could be a null pointer for example), but C<rw> |
| 501 |
|
|
and C<locality> must be compile-time constants. |
| 502 |
|
|
|
| 503 |
|
|
An obvious way to use this is to prefetch some data far away, in a big |
| 504 |
root |
1.9 |
array you loop over. This prefetches memory some 128 array elements later, |
| 505 |
root |
1.7 |
in the hope that it will be ready when the CPU arrives at that location. |
| 506 |
|
|
|
| 507 |
|
|
int sum = 0; |
| 508 |
|
|
|
| 509 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) |
| 510 |
|
|
{ |
| 511 |
|
|
sum += arr [i] |
| 512 |
|
|
ecb_prefetch (arr + i + 128, 0, 0); |
| 513 |
|
|
} |
| 514 |
|
|
|
| 515 |
|
|
It's hard to predict how far to prefetch, and most CPUs that can prefetch |
| 516 |
|
|
are often good enough to predict this kind of behaviour themselves. It |
| 517 |
|
|
gets more interesting with linked lists, especially when you do some fair |
| 518 |
|
|
processing on each list element: |
| 519 |
|
|
|
| 520 |
|
|
for (node *n = start; n; n = n->next) |
| 521 |
|
|
{ |
| 522 |
|
|
ecb_prefetch (n->next, 0, 0); |
| 523 |
|
|
... do medium amount of work with *n |
| 524 |
|
|
} |
| 525 |
|
|
|
| 526 |
|
|
After processing the node, (part of) the next node might already be in |
| 527 |
|
|
cache. |
| 528 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 529 |
root |
1.2 |
=back |
| 530 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 531 |
root |
1.36 |
=head2 BIT FIDDLING / BIT WIZARDRY |
| 532 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 533 |
root |
1.4 |
=over 4 |
| 534 |
|
|
|
| 535 |
root |
1.3 |
=item bool ecb_big_endian () |
| 536 |
|
|
|
| 537 |
|
|
=item bool ecb_little_endian () |
| 538 |
|
|
|
| 539 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
These two functions return true if the byte order is big endian |
| 540 |
|
|
(most-significant byte first) or little endian (least-significant byte |
| 541 |
|
|
first) respectively. |
| 542 |
|
|
|
| 543 |
root |
1.24 |
On systems that are neither, their return values are unspecified. |
| 544 |
|
|
|
| 545 |
root |
1.3 |
=item int ecb_ctz32 (uint32_t x) |
| 546 |
|
|
|
| 547 |
root |
1.35 |
=item int ecb_ctz64 (uint64_t x) |
| 548 |
|
|
|
| 549 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
Returns the index of the least significant bit set in C<x> (or |
| 550 |
root |
1.24 |
equivalently the number of bits set to 0 before the least significant bit |
| 551 |
root |
1.35 |
set), starting from 0. If C<x> is 0 the result is undefined. |
| 552 |
|
|
|
| 553 |
root |
1.36 |
For smaller types than C<uint32_t> you can safely use C<ecb_ctz32>. |
| 554 |
|
|
|
| 555 |
root |
1.35 |
For example: |
| 556 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
|
| 557 |
root |
1.15 |
ecb_ctz32 (3) = 0 |
| 558 |
|
|
ecb_ctz32 (6) = 1 |
| 559 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
|
| 560 |
root |
1.41 |
=item bool ecb_is_pot32 (uint32_t x) |
| 561 |
|
|
|
| 562 |
|
|
=item bool ecb_is_pot64 (uint32_t x) |
| 563 |
|
|
|
| 564 |
|
|
Return true iff C<x> is a power of two or C<x == 0>. |
| 565 |
|
|
|
| 566 |
|
|
For smaller types then C<uint32_t> you can safely use C<ecb_is_pot32>. |
| 567 |
|
|
|
| 568 |
root |
1.35 |
=item int ecb_ld32 (uint32_t x) |
| 569 |
|
|
|
| 570 |
|
|
=item int ecb_ld64 (uint64_t x) |
| 571 |
|
|
|
| 572 |
|
|
Returns the index of the most significant bit set in C<x>, or the number |
| 573 |
|
|
of digits the number requires in binary (so that C<< 2**ld <= x < |
| 574 |
|
|
2**(ld+1) >>). If C<x> is 0 the result is undefined. A common use case is |
| 575 |
|
|
to compute the integer binary logarithm, i.e. C<floor (log2 (n))>, for |
| 576 |
|
|
example to see how many bits a certain number requires to be encoded. |
| 577 |
|
|
|
| 578 |
|
|
This function is similar to the "count leading zero bits" function, except |
| 579 |
|
|
that that one returns how many zero bits are "in front" of the number (in |
| 580 |
|
|
the given data type), while C<ecb_ld> returns how many bits the number |
| 581 |
|
|
itself requires. |
| 582 |
|
|
|
| 583 |
root |
1.36 |
For smaller types than C<uint32_t> you can safely use C<ecb_ld32>. |
| 584 |
|
|
|
| 585 |
root |
1.3 |
=item int ecb_popcount32 (uint32_t x) |
| 586 |
|
|
|
| 587 |
root |
1.35 |
=item int ecb_popcount64 (uint64_t x) |
| 588 |
|
|
|
| 589 |
root |
1.36 |
Returns the number of bits set to 1 in C<x>. |
| 590 |
|
|
|
| 591 |
|
|
For smaller types than C<uint32_t> you can safely use C<ecb_popcount32>. |
| 592 |
|
|
|
| 593 |
|
|
For example: |
| 594 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
|
| 595 |
root |
1.15 |
ecb_popcount32 (7) = 3 |
| 596 |
|
|
ecb_popcount32 (255) = 8 |
| 597 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
|
| 598 |
root |
1.39 |
=item uint8_t ecb_bitrev8 (uint8_t x) |
| 599 |
|
|
|
| 600 |
|
|
=item uint16_t ecb_bitrev16 (uint16_t x) |
| 601 |
|
|
|
| 602 |
|
|
=item uint32_t ecb_bitrev32 (uint32_t x) |
| 603 |
|
|
|
| 604 |
|
|
Reverses the bits in x, i.e. the MSB becomes the LSB, MSB-1 becomes LSB+1 |
| 605 |
|
|
and so on. |
| 606 |
|
|
|
| 607 |
|
|
Example: |
| 608 |
|
|
|
| 609 |
|
|
ecb_bitrev8 (0xa7) = 0xea |
| 610 |
|
|
ecb_bitrev32 (0xffcc4411) = 0x882233ff |
| 611 |
|
|
|
| 612 |
root |
1.8 |
=item uint32_t ecb_bswap16 (uint32_t x) |
| 613 |
|
|
|
| 614 |
root |
1.3 |
=item uint32_t ecb_bswap32 (uint32_t x) |
| 615 |
|
|
|
| 616 |
root |
1.34 |
=item uint64_t ecb_bswap64 (uint64_t x) |
| 617 |
sf-exg |
1.13 |
|
| 618 |
root |
1.34 |
These functions return the value of the 16-bit (32-bit, 64-bit) value |
| 619 |
|
|
C<x> after reversing the order of bytes (0x11223344 becomes 0x44332211 in |
| 620 |
|
|
C<ecb_bswap32>). |
| 621 |
|
|
|
| 622 |
|
|
=item uint8_t ecb_rotl8 (uint8_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 623 |
|
|
|
| 624 |
|
|
=item uint16_t ecb_rotl16 (uint16_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 625 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 626 |
|
|
=item uint32_t ecb_rotl32 (uint32_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 627 |
|
|
|
| 628 |
root |
1.34 |
=item uint64_t ecb_rotl64 (uint64_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 629 |
|
|
|
| 630 |
|
|
=item uint8_t ecb_rotr8 (uint8_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 631 |
|
|
|
| 632 |
|
|
=item uint16_t ecb_rotr16 (uint16_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 633 |
|
|
|
| 634 |
|
|
=item uint32_t ecb_rotr32 (uint32_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 635 |
|
|
|
| 636 |
root |
1.33 |
=item uint64_t ecb_rotr64 (uint64_t x, unsigned int count) |
| 637 |
|
|
|
| 638 |
root |
1.34 |
These two families of functions return the value of C<x> after rotating |
| 639 |
|
|
all the bits by C<count> positions to the right (C<ecb_rotr>) or left |
| 640 |
|
|
(C<ecb_rotl>). |
| 641 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
|
| 642 |
root |
1.20 |
Current GCC versions understand these functions and usually compile them |
| 643 |
root |
1.34 |
to "optimal" code (e.g. a single C<rol> or a combination of C<shld> on |
| 644 |
|
|
x86). |
| 645 |
root |
1.20 |
|
| 646 |
root |
1.3 |
=back |
| 647 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 648 |
root |
1.50 |
=head2 FLOATING POINT FIDDLING |
| 649 |
|
|
|
| 650 |
|
|
=over 4 |
| 651 |
|
|
|
| 652 |
|
|
=item uint32_t ecb_float_to_binary32 (float x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] |
| 653 |
|
|
|
| 654 |
|
|
=item uint64_t ecb_double_to_binary64 (double x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] |
| 655 |
|
|
|
| 656 |
|
|
These functions each take an argument in the native C<float> or C<double> |
| 657 |
|
|
type and return the IEEE 754 bit representation of it. |
| 658 |
|
|
|
| 659 |
|
|
The bit representation is just as IEEE 754 defines it, i.e. the sign bit |
| 660 |
|
|
will be the most significant bit, followed by exponent and mantissa. |
| 661 |
|
|
|
| 662 |
|
|
This function should work even when the native floating point format isn't |
| 663 |
|
|
IEEE compliant, of course at a speed and code size penalty, and of course |
| 664 |
|
|
also within reasonable limits (it tries to convert NaNs, infinities and |
| 665 |
|
|
denormals, but will likely convert negative zero to positive zero). |
| 666 |
|
|
|
| 667 |
|
|
On all modern platforms (where C<ECB_STDFP> is true), the compiler should |
| 668 |
|
|
be able to optimise away this function completely. |
| 669 |
|
|
|
| 670 |
|
|
These functions can be helpful when serialising floats to the network - you |
| 671 |
|
|
can serialise the return value like a normal uint32_t/uint64_t. |
| 672 |
|
|
|
| 673 |
|
|
Another use for these functions is to manipulate floating point values |
| 674 |
|
|
directly. |
| 675 |
|
|
|
| 676 |
|
|
Silly example: toggle the sign bit of a float. |
| 677 |
|
|
|
| 678 |
|
|
/* On gcc-4.7 on amd64, */ |
| 679 |
|
|
/* this results in a single add instruction to toggle the bit, and 4 extra */ |
| 680 |
|
|
/* instructions to move the float value to an integer register and back. */ |
| 681 |
|
|
|
| 682 |
|
|
x = ecb_binary32_to_float (ecb_float_to_binary32 (x) ^ 0x80000000U) |
| 683 |
|
|
|
| 684 |
|
|
=item float ecb_binary32_to_float (uint32_t x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] |
| 685 |
|
|
|
| 686 |
|
|
=item double ecb_binary32_to_double (uint64_t x) [-UECB_NO_LIBM] |
| 687 |
|
|
|
| 688 |
|
|
The reverse operation of the previos function - takes the bit representation |
| 689 |
|
|
of an IEEE binary32 or binary64 number and converts it to the native C<float> |
| 690 |
|
|
or C<double> format. |
| 691 |
|
|
|
| 692 |
|
|
This function should work even when the native floating point format isn't |
| 693 |
|
|
IEEE compliant, of course at a speed and code size penalty, and of course |
| 694 |
|
|
also within reasonable limits (it tries to convert normals and denormals, |
| 695 |
|
|
and might be lucky for infinities, and with extraordinary luck, also for |
| 696 |
|
|
negative zero). |
| 697 |
|
|
|
| 698 |
|
|
On all modern platforms (where C<ECB_STDFP> is true), the compiler should |
| 699 |
|
|
be able to optimise away this function completely. |
| 700 |
|
|
|
| 701 |
|
|
=back |
| 702 |
|
|
|
| 703 |
root |
1.1 |
=head2 ARITHMETIC |
| 704 |
|
|
|
| 705 |
root |
1.3 |
=over 4 |
| 706 |
|
|
|
| 707 |
root |
1.14 |
=item x = ecb_mod (m, n) |
| 708 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 709 |
root |
1.25 |
Returns C<m> modulo C<n>, which is the same as the positive remainder |
| 710 |
|
|
of the division operation between C<m> and C<n>, using floored |
| 711 |
|
|
division. Unlike the C remainder operator C<%>, this function ensures that |
| 712 |
|
|
the return value is always positive and that the two numbers I<m> and |
| 713 |
|
|
I<m' = m + i * n> result in the same value modulo I<n> - in other words, |
| 714 |
|
|
C<ecb_mod> implements the mathematical modulo operation, which is missing |
| 715 |
|
|
in the language. |
| 716 |
root |
1.14 |
|
| 717 |
sf-exg |
1.23 |
C<n> must be strictly positive (i.e. C<< >= 1 >>), while C<m> must be |
| 718 |
root |
1.14 |
negatable, that is, both C<m> and C<-m> must be representable in its |
| 719 |
root |
1.30 |
type (this typically excludes the minimum signed integer value, the same |
| 720 |
root |
1.25 |
limitation as for C</> and C<%> in C). |
| 721 |
sf-exg |
1.11 |
|
| 722 |
root |
1.24 |
Current GCC versions compile this into an efficient branchless sequence on |
| 723 |
root |
1.28 |
almost all CPUs. |
| 724 |
root |
1.24 |
|
| 725 |
|
|
For example, when you want to rotate forward through the members of an |
| 726 |
|
|
array for increasing C<m> (which might be negative), then you should use |
| 727 |
|
|
C<ecb_mod>, as the C<%> operator might give either negative results, or |
| 728 |
|
|
change direction for negative values: |
| 729 |
|
|
|
| 730 |
|
|
for (m = -100; m <= 100; ++m) |
| 731 |
|
|
int elem = myarray [ecb_mod (m, ecb_array_length (myarray))]; |
| 732 |
|
|
|
| 733 |
sf-exg |
1.37 |
=item x = ecb_div_rd (val, div) |
| 734 |
|
|
|
| 735 |
|
|
=item x = ecb_div_ru (val, div) |
| 736 |
|
|
|
| 737 |
|
|
Returns C<val> divided by C<div> rounded down or up, respectively. |
| 738 |
|
|
C<val> and C<div> must have integer types and C<div> must be strictly |
| 739 |
sf-exg |
1.38 |
positive. Note that these functions are implemented with macros in C |
| 740 |
|
|
and with function templates in C++. |
| 741 |
sf-exg |
1.37 |
|
| 742 |
root |
1.3 |
=back |
| 743 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 744 |
|
|
=head2 UTILITY |
| 745 |
|
|
|
| 746 |
root |
1.3 |
=over 4 |
| 747 |
|
|
|
| 748 |
sf-exg |
1.23 |
=item element_count = ecb_array_length (name) |
| 749 |
root |
1.3 |
|
| 750 |
sf-exg |
1.13 |
Returns the number of elements in the array C<name>. For example: |
| 751 |
|
|
|
| 752 |
|
|
int primes[] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11 }; |
| 753 |
|
|
int sum = 0; |
| 754 |
|
|
|
| 755 |
|
|
for (i = 0; i < ecb_array_length (primes); i++) |
| 756 |
|
|
sum += primes [i]; |
| 757 |
|
|
|
| 758 |
root |
1.3 |
=back |
| 759 |
root |
1.1 |
|
| 760 |
root |
1.43 |
=head2 SYMBOLS GOVERNING COMPILATION OF ECB.H ITSELF |
| 761 |
|
|
|
| 762 |
|
|
These symbols need to be defined before including F<ecb.h> the first time. |
| 763 |
|
|
|
| 764 |
|
|
=over 4 |
| 765 |
|
|
|
| 766 |
root |
1.51 |
=item ECB_NO_THREADS |
| 767 |
root |
1.43 |
|
| 768 |
|
|
If F<ecb.h> is never used from multiple threads, then this symbol can |
| 769 |
|
|
be defined, in which case memory fences (and similar constructs) are |
| 770 |
|
|
completely removed, leading to more efficient code and fewer dependencies. |
| 771 |
|
|
|
| 772 |
|
|
Setting this symbol to a true value implies C<ECB_NO_SMP>. |
| 773 |
|
|
|
| 774 |
|
|
=item ECB_NO_SMP |
| 775 |
|
|
|
| 776 |
|
|
The weaker version of C<ECB_NO_THREADS> - if F<ecb.h> is used from |
| 777 |
|
|
multiple threads, but never concurrently (e.g. if the system the program |
| 778 |
|
|
runs on has only a single CPU with a single core, no hyperthreading and so |
| 779 |
|
|
on), then this symbol can be defined, leading to more efficient code and |
| 780 |
|
|
fewer dependencies. |
| 781 |
|
|
|
| 782 |
root |
1.50 |
=item ECB_NO_LIBM |
| 783 |
|
|
|
| 784 |
|
|
When defined to C<1>, do not export any functions that might introduce |
| 785 |
|
|
dependencies on the math library (usually called F<-lm>) - these are |
| 786 |
|
|
marked with [-UECB_NO_LIBM]. |
| 787 |
|
|
|
| 788 |
root |
1.43 |
=back |
| 789 |
|
|
|
| 790 |
root |
1.1 |
|